• 沒有找到結果。

參考文獻

在文檔中 國民中學生物科教學診斷 (頁 33-36)

1.台灣省教育廳,台灣省高級中學數學評量手冊,民 73 。

2.林邦傑,我國國中及高中學生認知發展之研究。科教月刊,民 71 , 51 ' 12,"'" 22 。 3.林邦傑,圈中及高中學生具體運思、形式運思與學業成就之關係。中國測驗學會測驗

年刑,民 70 '鉤, 23... 32 。

4. 國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心,園中科學學習成就評量研究計畫,民 71 。

5.國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心,國民中學數物生化四科學習成就評量方法改進研究 計畫,民的。

6. 國科會科教處暨教育部國教司,七十二學年度國中學生數理科學習情況調查分析研究 報告,民 73

7. 同上,民 74 。

8. 黃國彥等,國民中學生物科成就測驗,國科會,民的。

9.黃寶鋼,大一學生物理科學習成就與邏輯推理能力的關係之研究。國立政治大學學報

,民 68 '39 ,的'" 68 。

10.楊榮祥,國中生物教師對教學目標與成就的認定與教學疑難問題的研究,師大科教月 刊,民 71' 鉤, 2"'11 。

1 1.楊榮祥,學生活動中心的國中自然科學課程實驗學習成就之分析。科教月刊,民的

,

27

,

23 '" 30 。

12鄭海澀,皮亞傑認知發展與生物科學習的關係。科教月刊,民 71 , 51 , 23 '" 27 。 13.鄭湧澀,國中女生生物科學習成就與認知發展的關係。科學發展月刊,民 70 , 9 (4)

一 789 一

師大學報第卅一期

,

365 '"" 375 。

14.鄭湧澀,國中學生邏輯推理能力與科學和數學學業成就的關係。科學發展月判,民73

,

11 ( 12-2 )

,

1357 '"" 1372 。

15盧欽銘、路君約、宗亮東;科學性向與科學態度的分析研究報告。科教月刊,民的

,

6

,

24 '""31

16. 盧欽銘,高中生物科成就測驗的編制。科教月刊,民的, 19 , 44'""49 。

17謝廣全,單項變異數分析後鄧肯民最新多重差距檢定法之應用,台灣教育月刊,民72

,

395 。

18.Berger

,

C.F. Attainment of Skill in Using Science Processes 1. Instru. menta tion

,

Methodology and Analysis. Journal

01

Research i n Sci e前 e

Tea-chi ng, 1982 , 凹, 249'"" 260.

19. Di llasha w

,

F.G. and Okey

,

J .R. Tes t of 1 ntegrated Process Ski 11s for Se-condary School Stu:lents, Science Education, 1980, 64, 601 '""618. Disinger, J .R. andMayer

,

V.J. Student Development in Junior High School Science.

Journal

01

Research in Science Teaching, 1974, 11, 149'"" 155.

劫l Dunc 阻, D.缸, Mu1tiple range and mu1tiple F tests, Biometrics, 1955, 11.

1 '"" 42.

21.Fraser

,

B.J. Development aI世 Validation of a Test of Inquiry Ski l1s ( TOES ). Journal

01

Research in Science Teachi1哼, 1980, 17 (1), 7'"" 16.

22.Hofs tein

,

A. and Giddin啦, G. Trends in the Assessment of Laboratory Performance High School Science Instruction. Technical Report

,

No. 20.

Science EducationCenter

,

The University of Iowa. 1980. ED 184 877.

23.Joyce, B. andWeil,

M

,Models

01

Teaching, 2nd Ed, Prentice-Hal1, Inc.,

EI草 lewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980, p.77.

24.Pance11a

,

J.R. Use of the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Hand加 ok

1: Cognitive Domain to Analyze and Describe Standardized and Conmercial Tenth Grade Biology Examinat ions. Di sser tation Abstract s Internati onal

,

1970

,

31

,

3983-A. The University of Maryland.

25.Pattus, A.M. and Haley, Jr.,C.D. Identifying Factors Realated to Sci-ence Process Ski 11 Performance Levels. School Science and Math

,

1980

,

80 (4), 213 '"" 276.

26.Ronning

,

R.R. and McCurdy

,

DSV. The Role of Instruction in the Develop-ment of Problem Solving Ski I1s in Science

,

What Research says to the Sc i ence Teacher, NSTA, 1982, Vol. 4, 31 '"" 41.

27. Ross

,

J.A. andMaynes

,

F.J. Development of aTest of Experimental Pro-blem-Solving Skills. ] ournal

01

Research in Sci ence Teaching, 1983, 20,

國民中學生物科教學診斷 73 學年度國中生物科學習情況調查研究 的...., 75.

28. Royce

,

G.K. The Development and Val ida tion of a Diagnostic

,

cr i terion-Referenced Test of Science Processes. Dissertation Abstracts

Internat-i onal

,

1980

,

40 (8)

,

4547-A. The Universi ty of Nebraska 司Li ncoln.

29.Shaw

,

Jr.

,

E.

L.,

McKenzie

,

D.L. and Padilla

,

M.J. An Examination of the Graphing Abi 1 i ties of S tudents in Grades Seven Through Twelve. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research

in Science Teaching

,

Dallas

,

Tx. 1983.

30.Tobin, K.G. and Cap峙, W. Development and Val idation of a Group Test of Integrated Science Processes. Journal 01 Research in Science Teaching

,

1982 ,凹, 133 ...., 141.

31. Torrence

,

D.R. et al. Development and Validation of a Te levised Test of Science Processes. Paper Pressented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teachi 嗯, Toronto

,

Canada

,

1979

,

ED

166 001.

32.Wi tkin

,

H

.A.,

01 tman

,

P.瓦, Raskin , R.

,

and Karp

,

S

.A.,

A Manual lor Em-bedded Figures Test. PoloAlto

,

Califomia: Consulting Psychologists Press

,

1971.

-791 一

師大學報 第卅一期

AN EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BIOLOGY -FROM THE SURVEY CO-SPONSORED BY

THE NATIONAL SCIENCE COUNCIL AND THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION 1985一

by

Jong-Hsiang Yang

Abstract

A planned achievement test for junior high school biology (Cronbach'sα= 0.84) was applied to evaluate the instruction of junior high school biology in Taiwan under the co-sponsorship of the National Science Council and the Ministry of Education. Randomly collected samples (n = 972) from randomly assigned 17,200 testees from 86 jun ~r high schools were analyzed. The results of item analysis revealed the following weaknesses in our biology instruction: (l) it only emphasized memorization of the products (results), and neglected their understanding of the processes of the experiments; (2) it only paid attention to the rote learning of specific knowledge, and neglected the intergration or synthesis of knowledge learned; (3) it was only concerned about technique of ca1culation, and neglected the understanding of related concepts or principles, etc.

In the final part of the study, the subject group on the northern part of Taiwan (n = 320) were compared with the experimental classes of instructional models (n = 392) in the same school districts. Analysis of covariate and Duncan's new multiple range test indicated that the experimental group dominated significantly (p

<

0.01) over the sample group on a11 measured dependent variables: the achievement of knowledge gain, inductive thinking and divergent thinking ski11s.

一 792 一

在文檔中 國民中學生物科教學診斷 (頁 33-36)

相關文件