一、中文部份
江雪齡(民 78)。由美國良師制度探討實習教師的問題與輔導途徑。國教研究雙月刊,7,
49-52。
李雅婷(民 88)。美國德克薩斯州實習輔導教師培訓方案分析。教育實習輔導季刊,5(1),
31-36。
黃淑玲(民 86)。英國實習輔導制度之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未 出版,臺北市。
張芬芬(民 90)。英國進階教師制度及其啟示。初等教育學刊,9,55-74。
張德銳(民 87)。美國良師制度對我國實習輔導教師制度之啟示。師資培育與教育革新研 究。臺北市:五南。
張德銳(民 93 年 9 月)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師制度九十二學年度試辦成效問卷調查 研究。張玉成(主持人),2004 教學輔導教師在臺北。臺北市九十三年度市立高級中 等以下學校教學輔導教師試辦方案實施經驗暨學術論文發表會,臺北市立師範學院。
張德銳、丁一顧、陳育吟(民 92)。初任教師導入方案:一個亟待推動與研究的教改方案。
初等教育學刊,14,83-108。
張德銳、張芬芬、鄭玉卿、萬家春、楊益風、高永遠、張清楚、彭天建(民 89)。臺北市 中小學教學導師制度規劃研究。臺北市:臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所,未出版。
張德銳、張芬芬、邱錦昌、張明輝、熊曣、萬家春、鄭玉卿、葉興華、張嘉育、高紅瑛、
李俊達(民 91)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教師九十學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市:
臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系,未出版。
張德銳、張芬芬、邱錦昌、張明輝、熊曣、萬家春、鄭玉卿、葉興華、張嘉育、王淑俐、
丁一顧、許雅惠、高紅瑛、李俊達(民 92)。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師九十一學 年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市:臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系,未出版。
張德銳、丁一顧、許雅惠、陳信夫、李俊達、高紅瑛(民 93)。臺北市中小學教學輔導教 師制度九十一學年度試辦實施成效評鑑研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,35,101-126。
楊思偉(民 87)。日本實習輔導教師制度之研究。教育研究集刊,41,119-153。
二、英文部份
American Federation of Teachers (1998). Mentor teacher programs in the states. Educational Issues Policy Brief, 5, 1-13. Retrieved October 31, 2002, from
http://www.aft.org/edissues/downloads/Policy5.pdf
Certo, J. L. (2002). The support and challenge offered in mentoring to influence beginning teachers’ thinking and professional development: A case study of beginning elementary teachers and their mentors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia. (UMI Dissertation Services Number: AAT 3042804)
Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (1993). Beginning teacher support and assessment program descriptions: Year one. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
Department of Education and Skill. (2003). Induction of newly qualified teachers. Retrieved February 16, 2003, from
http://www.dfes.gov/a-z/induction_of_newly_qualified_teachers_ba.html.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1992). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an experienced support teacher (Report No. 91-6). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
Ganser, T. (1996). What do mentors say about mentoring? Journal of Staff Development. 17(3), 36-39.
Huffman, G., & Leak, S. (1986). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of mentors. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 22-25.
Huling-Austin, L. (1998). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W. R. Houston ,. M.
Haberman & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Huling-Austin, L., & Murphy, S. C. (1987). Assessing the impact of teacher induction programs:
Implications for program development. Washington, DC: the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED 283779)
Jorissen, K. T. (2002). Retaining alternate route teachers: The power of professional integration in teacher preparation and induction. The High School Journal, 86(1), 45-56.
Lowney, R. G. (1986). Mentor teacher: The California model. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 275646)
Mei, L. (1994). Mentor teacher internship program, 1993-94. OERA report. Brooklyn, NY:
New York City Board of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED387481)
Moskowitz, J., & Kennedy, S. (2003). Teacher induction in an era of educational reform: The case of New Zealand. Retrieved January 16, 2003, from
http://www.ed.gov/pubs/APEC/ch5.html.
Odell, S. J. (1990). Mentor teacher programs. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon Library.
Odell, S. J., & Ferraro, D. P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 200-204.
Stanford, R. L. et al. (1994). Empowering cooperating teachers: The University of Alabama clinical master teacher (CMT) program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED 378157
Stansbury, K., & Zimmerman J. (2002). Smart induction programs become lifelines for the beginning teacher. Journal of Staff Development, 23(4), 10-17.
Stevens, N. H. (1995). R and r for mentors: Renewal and reaffirmation for mentors as benefits from the mentoring experience. Educational Horizons, 73, 130-137.
Yosha, P. (1991). The benefits of an induction program: What do mentors and novices say?
Chicago, IL: the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332994)