從學科觀點探究建構教學理念於國小各科教學之應用(II)
5
0
0
全文
(2)
(3) An Exploratory Study of the Implementation of Constructivist Approach to the Teaching of Subject Matters in Elementary School: Perspectives from the Disciplines (II). .
(4) . ! "#$%&'() *+),.
(5) . !"#$%&'( )*+ ,-./0123456789. :; <=>?%&'( @ A!BC DE +FG HIJ K2LM NOPQRST.U VW# X @)YZ[\6:;]^_ $ @ `!Ja"#$ '( bc:;d @' ( !ef:g*h3i jN. @klBCmJno p<=qr`!stu bv)*wx p<=qr + yz3{i|}~ @'( C^* b !.. among science teacher’s epistemology, teaching tasks, teaching processes, and evaluation. The co-inquiry group process applied in this study was helpful in clarifying and building teachers’ constructivist pedagogical content knowledge, but its effectiveness in changing teachers’ beliefs in science teaching was not obvious. Because the promises of constructivist teaching in science education were limited by the personal epistemology and traditional conceptions of discovery learning, it is important to clarify the differences between constructivist teaching and discovery learning and to raise teachers’ consciousness of science teaching and learning.. Abstract This study, as a part of a five-year study, examined the constructivist teaching practices in elementary science classrooms. Applying a cooperative action inquiry approach, this study found that there are correlative factors. +> ! bc4 I+ .0no ` ! !}m 8+BC @ ¡¢£ : 1.
(6) ;¤¥ ¦§¨+©ª «¬I®¯°+±²:g³ q´no :;µ@U¶·¸. =m÷øùúñûü ýXÎÏþ üÑNOP1+ ß5$× =õfù ú(Î @ ÷
(7) #b ó ¶8 V ÙñUí ^îèÈiØ# a<ï`!mf`! ÙñÎÏí?`!3 6 ÑÌÛÜ' q. ¹º»¼½¾¿ÀÁ 86à . S"ÄÅ ÆÇ%&fIb v^w !$%& È bv)*+,-É%& @bv Ê. Ë$Ì 9 0Í "#XÎ Ïm' ( ÐÑ56789. :;9 "#Ò+bc )*. >ÓÔÕ »ÃÖ×>?%&'( =Ø J @'( A!. »ÃÖ× !"#$'( Ù. »ÚÃ/0 @)YZ[±)+\ 6ÛÜ%&'( @ `!. »ÝÃÞ<%&'(ß# ®+:;. »
(8) ÃÖ×%& @'( A! à£Jabc ¦ á. »âÃÖ×"# $%&'( )*+,-. »ãÃÖ× ³%&'( qJBC tu. »äÃÖ×%&'( åtu qæ§Jçè\6 ST.. (Driver & Oldham, 1986).Ì !"#$ìL%&' K(`!4±)¸bc )*+. ,>?%&'( =+ @'( A!U¶-.. ¤/01%2éh 34 m<=Õ ()>?%& @³'( A!BC DE HI + K25Ýk6g789 :k;ÌMOPQRST. ()¥[U¶>?%& @X'( A!<=BC£z+89. BC¤>?9 D E4 @A+<BC< HI4DEK2 K2. (Ú)iFG%& @:H A!9^yzM.%& @ ³^QpBCIJrp<BC<r p @ArmJpKLK2r5Ý HSTMúyz Nj. %& @ 8S OD ' ( 0mJHFGiUM A!yz.. Úéh+êë Ë"# !$' ( ì @"í^îè< ïq>+ðñ(ÎíÑ &±êëò6óÑô[=õö. (Ý)%& @'( A!+aW # FGXLNjMPi QRQRS.%& @TOA'( 2.
(9) Ë`!¸IUi£ '( T¤BC nV
(10) 3xWX`!mJ 4KLK2 @T<=¯°W #mBC FGñO³ TOABC qY89. éhZ^[³i£\ '( T¤>?9. ÷
(11) 8<B4 @ A+]^DEK2 @ÏT<= ¯°W#m FG._ ,ÛÜ%& @ ! Ö×%& @'( A!¢£ Jbc ¦á `a /0 @)YZ[:; @ ³ !+bc56êë+ bc'd.eÚfgâf êë8ûhi³ !Ä$'( bv:; +OQjklm>?^Vnoêë !ep,+ @bq bcl 7%&êë.rs @·8Þt%&'ujk )*+vwxyzDbÐ ýN'u à£+ "U{êbc'u bc ;Ìü |àX}+8 ~f:ú._ ÔM+lÍö. 8¸4e @·N qR =.+ )¡ ¢\$lÍ £»6 ÃD͵@ $¤V¥¶ 3{x·ðÞt åí N ¦ å7 §¨t6 'Sêë©1.[U¶ ª«è¬ITT ! @)¡®¯® °3±²³._ Ëð´µ @· B¶)YZ[\6:; q è:;^*· )YZ[¸4> ?êëJl %& "¹b1 º_.(Uil FGµ@ +)YZ[^i»3 @¼ B¶ @)YZ[^_$ !½¾+'DÍ @B¶Ñ l 8ma¿ @ :úU/0êëP8Ài @³' B°S ^îè +a¿ @%&kl xD£ x Áikl 'Aûx^ @»s·ÂÃÄ @ÃB¶ ÅÆZ[P8^_$}~ @ ÇÈÉ{ @Ê BCmJ'kl 0I ¸ËÌÍ_4±Î BC._ ¬$ ³qtu mJtu åbv æ§ STM '(bv 3Ï÷øÐDѬ+1S ' (Ò,^zDb ¨¤9. +<=q`!(UxW S Ì^i£ @m %±ób 5$ m¬$ 0I¸ÓÔÕb I <=VÖWX×Ø3ÏÙ%. =» 16 lf¬ 9 lÃ^ @)¸ 3 $klVmè^v= õ.U¶ @Þx $<¶$^ @ è1*hÎ ^ @ 8( úi×a`!^ @ xìö= `1. 3.
(12) "¹îè9ÚÈ8S Ûd`!7BC4± ó ._ ÑN @)YZ[êë%& mJbq¦ å§ bk aÜ«éh ¼<=tu'( )*QÝ$ @ Ê®BCmJ÷
(13) dÊc|Í_ `! . DÍ @·®'(ÞßÐà @ʳ'(®BC·iÐ Ö×ËÌ @kl8M^ Ûd`!U^*÷
(14) 7 9Úá) '( ¹º xâãDÍ @· äå @æ ç7 eèëè³'(é 7bcóÖA ¦§÷
(15) ¨b I7BC i._ ¬$q:gDÍ @·9 X^_$ 8dÊ3{<B ê ë01 xXizD.( Ux^ @³ì),J íîï £U¶ )*ð¸^,.ñ!q q´òYó5+]ô @V õ K2:;5STx ·³bv )*^Vtu._ SÌö8bv ! ìhi÷ @'( ®BC}~Àø࣠7ù l¡ @JòY³súm JK2!:É࣠qq´b'(bv ùûϸ @ Q; ࣳ'(BCqmJ 9 ÛÜüb1_±._ _. Ý )h'K_ Ë$ X<=ýþö8 !^w @)YZ[ ê83{ê ë8¦eDE ¶Þ+ qÑm @BCË+ @³ !·Bº_ @ !.. l ef @ !+ '( bc^zDw .
(16) STÓÔÑ 7ù l¡JòY]^ ࣠qK2:;3{\ ôS 5._ ÞX qS 4 f}+ @ ^Q)YZ[8m4 + @^Vv« 8. i0e´µ+ @ü·ð Þt åí Y§+¨t3 ³a 7bc'â8 .(U x^
(17) l +ì L,-³È åtu çè\6ST:gÏ®¦ ×SÌK'( )*Ï¸Ï 8 m :=._ _
(18) Ê _ ¼½¾¿ÀÁ»Â Ã Õ !øJa"#. 3,179-208. Driver, R. & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Eduction, 13, 105-122. And, other references. 4.
(19) 5.
(20)
相關文件
• Enhancing Assessment Literacy in the English Language Curriculum at the Secondary Level: (I) Reading and Listening Skills. • Enhancing Assessment Literacy in the English
•providing different modes of support in learning tasks (e.g.. You are a summer intern in the publicity team of Go Green, a non- governmental organisation committed to
• To enhance teachers’ understanding of the major updates of the English Language Education Key Learning Area under the ongoing renewal of the school curriculum;.. • To
Literacy Development Using Storytelling to Develop Students' Interest in Reading - A Resource Package for English Teachers 2015 Teaching Phonics at Primary Level 2017
• e‐Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across
help students develop the reading skills and strategies necessary for understanding and analysing language use in English texts (e.g. text structures and
• e‐Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across
- Informants: Principal, Vice-principals, curriculum leaders, English teachers, content subject teachers, students, parents.. - 12 cases could be categorised into 3 types, based
