and leukocyte recruitment: Role of VEGF-receptor 2 and host VEGF-A. Cancer Res 2001;/61:/24048.
[3] Yuan F, Chen Y, Dellian M, Safabakhsh N, Ferrara N, Jain RK. Time-dependent vascular regression and permeability changes in established human tumor xenografts induced by an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular perme-ability factor antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;/93:/
1476570.
[4] Tsuzuki Y, Fukumura D, Oosthuyse B, Koike C, Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) modulation by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-- hypoxia response element-- VEGF cascade differentially regulates vascular response and growth rate in tumors. Cancer Res 2000;/60:/624852.
[5] Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Stoll BR, Padera TP, Dolmans DE, Hicklin DJ, Fukumura D, et al. Tumor oxygenation in hormone-dependent tumors during vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 blockade, hormone ablation, and chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2000;/60:/455660.
[6] Lee CG, Heijn M, di TE, Griffon-Etienne G, Ancukiewicz M, Koike C, et al. Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor treatment augments tumor radiation response under nor-moxic or hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res 2000;/60:/556570.
[7] Drevs J, Siegert P, Medinger M, Mross K, Strecker R, Zirrgiebel U, et al. Phase I clinical study of AZD2171, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibitor, in
patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2007;/25:/
304554.
[8] Ananthnarayan S, Bahng J, Roring J, Nghiemphu P, Lai A, Cloughesy T, et al. Time course of imaging changes of GBM during extended bevacizumab treatment. J Neurooncol 2008;/88:/33947.
[9] Abrams TJ, Murray LJ, Pesenti E, Holway VW, Colombo T, Lee LB, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 as a single agent and in combination with ‘‘standard of care’’ therapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2003;/2:/101121.
[10] Ebos JM, Lee CR, Christensen JG, Mutsaers AJ, Kerbel RS. Multiple circulating proangiogenic factors induced by suni-tinib malate are tumor-independent and correlate with antitumor efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;/104:/
1706974.
[11] Mancuso MR, Davis R, Norberg SM, O’Brien S, Sennino B, Nakahara T, et al. Rapid vascular regrowth in tumors after reversal of VEGF inhibition. J Clin Invest 2006;/116:/
261021.
[12] Fiedler W, Serve H, Dohner H, Schwittay M, Ottmann OG, O’Farrell AM, et al. A phase 1 study of SU11248 in the treatment of patients with refractory or resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or not amenable to conventional therapy for the disease. Blood 2005;/105:/98693.
Salvage therapy with sorafenib plus vinblastine and fluorouracil
for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
CHENG-JENG TAI
Section of Hematology-Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital and Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical
University, Taipei, Taiwan
To the Editor,
Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor and is effective
in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma
(RCC) [1,2]. However, the median treatment
dura-tion for RCC in published articles is around
24 weeks [2]. But for responsive patients, no
pub-lished reports have discussed when sorafenib should
be discontinued. We report a patient with metastatic
RCC who responded to treatment with sorafenib
plus chemotherapy, and the treatment was
discon-tinued at his own insistence. Thirty months after the
first dose of sorafenib plus chemotherapy and
15 months after discontinuing treatment, he was
still alive without disease progression.
An 81-year-old man presented with severe pain in
his right hip joint and underwent hip joint
replace-ment in October 2006. A specimen from the resected
hip joint was sent for pathologic studies and was
diagnosed as metastatic renal cell carcinoma with
bony metastasis. A computed tomographic (CT) scan
(Figure 1) revealed a right kidney tumor and enlarged
calyx, so he was referred to our medical oncology
department for treatment. Because of the patient’s
age, sorafenib was administered at a reduced dosage
of 400 mg/day to avoid toxicity. One month later,
vinblastine (8 mg/m
2) plus fluorouracil (500
mg/cy-cle) were given as conjunct medication and repeated
every two weeks. Bisphosphonate (pamidronate) was
also given with 90 mg/month. The patient tolerated
the treatment well and the disease remained stable
without further metastasis for 15 months, when he
Correspondence: Cheng-Jeng Tai, 252 Wu-Hsing St, Taipei 110, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886 2 27372181 ext 3903. Fax: 886 2 2736 3051. E-mail:
Sorafenib plus chemotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
931
(Received 25 April 2009; accepted 26 May 2009)
ISSN 0284-186X print/ISSN 1651-226X online # 2009 Informa UK Ltd. (Informa Healthcare, Taylor & Francis AS) DOI: 10.1080/02841860903071351
Acta Oncol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Taipei Medical University on 05/30/11
insisted on stopping the medication. Fifteen months
later, we contacted him and he was healthy with an
ECOG performance status of 01.
One of the main problems of using targeted
therapy in metastatic cancer is whether the
medica-tion should be discontinued when the clinical status
is stable or the patient is in remission. In most cases,
patients are treated until disease progresses [3].
Therefore, it’s difficult to determine when and
whether to stop the medication. We also assumed
that the addition of chemotherapy to these targeted
medications might lead to better disease control
and longer progression free intervals [4]. The cost
of treatment is another problem. In metastatic RCC,
the costs for sorafenib are around US$30 000
40 000. This usually prevents a patient from taking
these medications without limit. Based on this case,
we are particularly interested in the cost-effectiveness
of treatment, an aspect which interests insurance
authorities the most.
Presently, the eradication of metastatic RCC by
available medications is still a long way off. Lower
costs and longer survivals with better control remain
the main goals of treatment.
References
[1] Ratain MJ, Eisen T, Stadler WM, Flaherty KT, Kaye SB, Rosner GL, et al. Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;/24:/250512.
[2] Kane RC, Farrell AT, Saber H, Tang S, Williams G, Jee JM, et al. Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006;/12:/72718.
[3] Bracarda S, Caserta C, Sordini L, Rossi M, Hamzay A, Crino L. Protein kinase inhibitors in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Sorafenib. Ann Oncol 2007;/18(Suppl 6):/225.
[4] Gollob JA. Sorafenib: Scientific rationales for single-agent and combination therapy in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2005;/4:/16774.
Persistent hiccups as an adverse event to FLAG-IDA regimen for
leukemia
FABIO FORGHIERI
1, MONICA MACCAFERRI
1, MONICA MORSELLI
1, LEONARDO
POTENZA
1, FRANCESCO VOLZONE
1, ELENA BANDIERI
2, GIUSEPPE TORELLI
1&
MARIO LUPPI
11
Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda
Ospedaliera Policlinico, Modena, Italy and
2Centro Valutazione Efficacia Assistenza Sanitaria, AUSL Modena, Italy.
Correspondence: Mario Luppi, Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda
Ospedaliera Policlinico, Via del Pozzo 71, 41100 Modena, Italy. Tel:39 059 4225570. Fax: 39 059 4224549. E-mail: [email protected]
932
F. Forghieri et al.
(Received 8 January 2009; accepted 11 January 2009)
ISSN 0284-186X print/ISSN 1651-226X online # 2009 Informa UK Ltd. (Informa Healthcare, Taylor & Francis AS) DOI: 10.1080/02841860902740931
Acta Oncol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Taipei Medical University on 05/30/11