• 沒有找到結果。

Taxonomic Studies on the Genus Apophylia from Taiwan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Taxonomic Studies on the Genus Apophylia from Taiwan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae)"

Copied!
16
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)台灣農業研究 (J. Taiwan Agric. Res.) 63(1):1–16 (2014) DOI: 10.6156/JTAR/2014.06301.01. Taxonomic Studies on the Genus Apophylia from Taiwan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) Chi-Feng Lee1,* and Jan Bezděk2. Abstract Lee, C. F. and J. Bezděk. 2014. Taxonomic Studies on the Genus Apophylia from Taiwan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). J. Taiwan Agric. Res. 63(1):1–16.. The Taiwanese species of Apophylia Thomson are reviewed. Four species are redescribed: A. asahinai Chûjô, 1962; A. beeneni Bezděk, 2003; A. miyamotoi Kimoto, 1969; and A. velai Bezděk, 2003. Two new synonyms are proposed: A. taiwanica Bezděk, 2003 as a junior synonym of A. asahinai Chûjô, 1962; and A. kaoi Bezděk and Lee, 2009 as a junior synonym of A. velai Bezděk, 2003. Diagnostic characters of both sexes are illustrated. Occurrence of sibling species of chrysomelids in Taiwan is briefly discussed. Key words: Leaf beetles, Taxonomy, Endophallic sclerites.. INTRODUCTION Chrysomelidae is one of the most diverse family belonging to Coleoptera. The genus Apophylia Thomson, 1858 is a large genus of the subfamily Galerucinae, which comparised 144 species distributed in Asia and Africa (Wilcox 1971; Beenen 2010; Bezděk unpublished data). The biology is little known, only adults were collected on Poaceae, Ehretiaceae, Lamiaceae, Convolulaceae, and Acanthaceae (Jolivet & Hawkeswood 1995). Recently Bezděk (2007) reported that two species of this genus were collected by sweeping of Cynoglossum sp. (Boraginaceae). No articles reported that adults of Apophylia caused damage to crops. The taxonomic history of Apophylia in Taiwan is scattered and complex. A. flavovirens Fairmaire, 1878 and A. nigriceps Laboissière, 1927 were first recorded by Chûjô. (1935). Later, Chûjô (1962) reported again on A. nigriceps and described the new species A. asahinai. A. flavovirens was recorded again from Taiwan by Kimoto (1965), and a new species, A. miyamotoi Kimoto, was described. However, after examining types Bezděk (2003a) found that A. flavovirens and A. nigriceps identified by Kimoto and Chûjô, respectively, were misidentified and described them as new species, A. beeneni and A. velai. Bezděk (2003b) also illustrated the male aedeagus of A. asahinai and described a new species, A. taiwanica. This species and A. asahinai are morphologically indistinguishable. Bezděk and Lee (2009) described the sixth new species although it and A. velai were also morphologically indistinguishable. The Taiwan Chrysomelid Research Team (TCRT) was founded in 2005 and composed of 10 members. All of them are amateurs who are interested in inventorying all species of Chryso-. Received: October 24, 2013; Accepted: November 22, 2013. * Corresponding author, e-mail: chifeng@tari.gov.tw 1 Associate Research Fellow, Applied Zoology Division, Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. 2 Professor, Department of Zoology, Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic..

(2) 2. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. melidae in Taiwan. Specimens of the genus have been extensively collected and studied, and plants that adults feed on recorded. The diagnostic characters were assessed and the status of all species was evaluated based on a large series of specimens, and the results are reported here. In addition, the possibility of sibling species of Apophylia in Taiwan is discussed based on their distributions and biology.. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nearly 500 specimens have been examined. About half were collected by TCRT and deposited at the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute (TARI). The others are conserved in the historical collection compartments at TARI. To prepare drawings of the adult reproductive systems, the abdomens of adults were separated and boiled in a 10% KOH solution, cleared in distilled water, and then covered by a cover glass on slide glass with glycerin for observation. Specimens were examined and drawings were made using a Leica M165 stereomicroscope. Microscopic slides were examined and illustrated using a Nikon ECLIPSE 50i microscope. Body parts were then stored in glycerin tubes with the dry mounted specimens. Host plants are recorded by observing adult feeding behavior in the field. These plants were identified by Chih-Kai Yang. The type specimens examined are deposited in the following collections: JBCB (Jan Bezděk collection, Brno, Czech Republic), KUEC (Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan), and TARI (Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan). Exact label data are cited for all type specimens; a double slash (//) divides the data on different labels and a single slash (/) divides the data in different rows. Other comments and remarks are indicated as follow: (p) - preceding data are printed, (h)- preceding data are handwritten, (w)- white label, (y)yellow label, and (r)- red label.. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Genus Apophylia Thomson, 1858 Apophylia Thomson, 1858: 221. Type species: Apophylia chloroptera Thomson, 1858. Bequaertinia Laboissière, 1922: 263. Type species: Bequaertinia nodicornis Laboissière, 1922. Galerucesthis Weise, 1896: 296. Type species: Auchenia thalassina Faldermann, 1835. Glyptolus Jacoby, 1884: 62. Type species: Glyptolus viridis Jacoby, 1884. Malaxia Fairmaire, 1878: 139. Type species: Malaxia flavovirens Fairmaire, 1878. Malaxoides Fairmaire, 1888: 155. Type species: Malaxoides grandicornis Fairmaire, 1888. Daignosis. Body small to medium size, elongate. Color variable but elytra metallic green. Body covered with dense pubescence. H ead hypo-prognathous , oval, convex from lateral view. Frons without frontal ridge. Annal calli smooth or raised, separated from each other, not delineated from vertex. Interantennal space narrower than transverse diameter of eye. Clypeus short, labrum typical. Antenna 11-segmented, filiform. Pronotum wide, widest near apex, with lateral impressions. All borders unmargined. Procoxal cavity open behind. Primary setigerous pore on anterior part of lateral margin of pronotum. Elytra elongate, with lateral sides parallel. Humeral callus well developed, without shallow transverse impression posteriorly. Elytral punctures, small but distinct, extremely dense. Epipleuron wide, almost reaching elytral apex. Apices of tibiae unspined. First segment of posterior tarsus as long as remainder combined. Tarsal claws simple, with angular bases. Apophylia asahinai Chûjô, 1962 Apophylia flavovirens: Chûjô, 1935: 174 (Taihorin and Taihorinsho = Talin, in Chiyi; Sokutsu, near Chiasien, in Kaohsiung;.

(3) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. Fuhosho, a unidentified locality of Chishan, in Kaohsiung; Shis = Shishitou, in Nantou); Chûjô, 1938: 135. Apophylia asahinai Chûjô, 1962: 23 (Musya = Wushe, in Nantou); Chûjô, 1963: 387 ( Ta k a o = K a o h s i u n g c i t y ; K o s e m p o = Chiasien, in Kaohsiung); Kimoto, 1965: 489; Kimoto, 1966: 26 (Polisha = Puli, in Nantou; Zentai = Chietapu, in Tainan); Kimoto, 1969: 22 (Fenchihu, in Chiayi); Kimoto, 1986: 56 (Nanshanchi, in Nantou; Lushan, in Nantou); Kimoto, 1991: 9 (Hohuanshan-doubtful locality, in Nantou; Shaping, in Kaohsiung); Bezděk, 2003b: 481 (illustration of male aedeagus; Tungpu, in Nantou). Apophylia taiwanica Bezděk, 2003b: 505 (Lienhuachih, in Nantou; Alishan, in Chiayi). new synonymy Type Specimens Examined. Apophylia asahinai: Holotype (♂), labelled: “Musha (h) FORMOSA (p) 26.X.1928 (h) COL. M. CHUJO (w, p) //Holotype (r, h) //Apophylia asahinai CHÛJÔ (w, h)” (KUEC). Apophylia taiwanica: 1 paratype (♂), labelled: “Taihorin/Formosa/H. Sauter, 1911 (w, p) //7.VII. (w, p) //Chujo det. (w, h) //PARATYPUS/Apophylia/taiwanica sp. nov./J. Bezděk det. 2002 (r, p)” (JBCB); 1 paratype (♂), with same labels but collected “7.XI.” (JBCB); 1 paratype (♂), labelled: “Formosa/Taihorin. (p) VI. (h) 09/Sauter S G. (y, p) //PARATYPUS/Apophylia/taiwanica sp. nov./J. Bezděk det. 2002 (r, p)” (JBCB). Specimens Examined (n = 137). Hsinchu: 1♂, Peitelaman, 26.VI.2008, leg. H. Lee; 1♂. Wufeng, 14–16.VII.1982, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; Ilan: 1♀, Fushan botanical park, 8.V.2008, leg. S. F. Yu; Keelung: 1♀, Chingjenhu, 9.IV.2009, leg. S. Y. Wu; 1♂, same locality, 10–13.X.2012, leg. L. P. Hsu; Kaohsiung: 1♂, Chiasien, 10–13.V.1981, leg. C. C. Chen and C. C. Pan; 1♀, Chungchihkuan, 3.VII.2009, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♂, 1♀, same locality,. 3. 10–13.X.2012, leg. L. P. Hsu; 5♂♂, 1♀, Tengchih, 4.VIII.2012, leg. J. C. Chen; Nantou: 1♀, Hoshe, 22.VII.1982, L. Y. Chou and T. Lin; 1♀, Lushan, 27–31. V.1980, leg. K. S. Lin and L. Y. Chou; 1♀, Meifeng, 19.VI.2010, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♀, Sunglintsun, 9.VII.2007, leg. M. H. Tsou; 4♂♂, Tungpu, 20–22.VI.1980, leg. C. C. Chen; 3♂♂, 2♀♀, same locality, 25–29.IX.1980, leg. L. Y. Chou and T. Lin; 2♀♀, 28.IV.–2.V.1981, leg. T. Lin and C. J. Lee; 2♂♂, 3♀♀, same locality, 19–23.VII.1982, leg. L. Y. Chou and T. Lin; 1♀, same locality, 22–25.XI.1982, leg. K. C. Chou and S. P. Huang; 2♂♂, same locality, 20–24.VI.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and C. Y. Wong; 3♂♂, 1♀, same locality, 23–27.VII.1984, leg. K. C. Chou and C. H. Yang; 2♂♂, 2♀♀, same locality, 5–8.X.1981, leg. T. Lin and W. S. Tang; 1♂, Wushe, 30.VIII.–2.IX.1982, leg. L. Y. Chou and K. C. Chou; 1♂, same locality, 7–8.X.1982, leg. K. C. Chou; 4♂♂, Wu t a k e n g , 5 . V. 2 0 1 3 , l e g . J . C . C h e n ; Pingtung: 1♀, Mutan, 5.V.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♀, Nanjenshan, 7.XII.2009, leg. Y. T. Wang; 3♂♂, 4♀♀, Peihulushan, 4.XI.2009, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♀, Peitawushan, 21.VII.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♂, same locality, 25.VI.2012, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♂, Tahanshan, 1.VIII.2011, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♂, same locality, 12.IX.2011, leg. J. C. Chen; 2♂♂, 3♀♀, same locality, 6.VI.2012, leg. C. F. Lee; 4♂♂, same locality, 19.VII.2012, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♀, same locality, 20.VIII.2012, leg. J. C. C h e n ; 1 ♀ , s a m e l o c a l i t y, 1 4 . I X . 2 0 1 2 , l e g . Y T. C h u n g ; 2 ♂ ♂ , s a m e l o c a l i t y, 25.V.2013, leg. Y. T. Chung; 1♂, Wanan Trail, 31.VIII.2009, leg. J. C. Chen; Tainan: 1♂, Pichien trail, 31.III.2010, leg. U. Ong; Taipei: 1♀, Chutzuhu, 26.V.1983, leg. K.C. Chou; 4♂♂, 9♀♀, same locality, 9.VIII. 2008, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♀, Fengkueitsui, 29.VI.2007, leg. S. F. Yu; 1♀, Fulung, 20.V.2008, leg. H. Lee; 1♂,.

(4) 4. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. 1♀, Hsiaoyukeng, 22.VI.2008, leg. S. F. Yu; 1♂, Tatunshan, 20.VI.2010, leg. M. H. Tsou; 4♂♂, Wulai, 22.X.2006, leg. S. F. Yu; 4♂♂, Yuanshan, 11.V.2012, leg. S. F. Yu; Taitung: 1♀, Chihpen, 17–18. II. 1983, leg. L.Y. Chou and K.C. Chou; 1♀, same locality, 15.XI.2007, leg. I. C. Yu; 1♀, Lichia trail, 6.IV.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♀, Motien, 23.V.2011, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♀, Tajen, 25.II.2009, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♀, Wulu, 7.VII.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; Taoyuan: 1♂, 1♀, Fuhsing, 6.V.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; 4♂♂, 2♀♀, Lalashan, 15.VII.2009, leg. H. J. Chen; 1♀, Paling, 3–5.V.1983, leg. K.C. Chou a n d C . C . P a n ; 1 ♂ , 1 ♀ , s a m e l o c a l i t y, 23.V.2009, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♂, same locality, 1.IX.2009, leg. H. Lee; 1♀, Tungyanshan, 26.IV.2007, leg. H. Lee; 12♂♂, same locality, 12.IV.2010, leg. H. Lee. Remarks. Apophylia asahinai is similar to A. beeneni with yellow mouthparts and legs but may be distinguished from the latter by the yellow pronotum with black spots (in contrast with the blackish brown pronotum with yellow anterior and posterior margins in A. beeneni). Male. Length 5.5–6.6 mm. General color (Figs. 1–2) black; head bicolorous, vertex, frontal tubercles and postgena black, anterior part of head, mouthparts and underside yellow; antenna yellowish brown but last three or five antennomeres darkened; prothorax yellow, pronotum with median black spot, sometimes with one pair of small black spots at sides, in some specimens black spots absent; elytra metallic green; legs yellow. Antennomeres (= antennal segments) VII-XI flattened and widened, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.6 : 1.3 : 1.2 : 1.2 : 1.1 : 0.9 : 0.8 : 1.0; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 3.2 : 5.2 : 4.2 : 4.0 : 3.6 : 3.1 : 2.4 : 2.4 : 3.0 (Fig. 9). Penis (Fig. 11a) slender, 5.8 times longer than wide; parallel-sided,. apex narrowly rounded, or abruptly narrowed subapically in some specimens, moderately curved near base from lateral view (Fig. 12); opening apically tapering, basal margin indistinct; endophallic sclerites composed of three visible sclerites, stick-like (elongate, parallel-sided) sclerite longest, about 0.7 times as length of penis; a small, elongate, flattened sclerite located near apex of stick-like sclerite, outer margin of apex with small teeth; a small, flattened, curved, sclerite behind base of stick-like sclerite. Female. Length 7.4–8.1 mm. Similar to male, but antennomeres VII to XI a little widened, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.3 : 1.2 : 1.1 : 1.1 : 1.0 : 1.0 : 0.8 : 1.1; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 3.4 : 4.5 : 3.9 : 3.6 : 3.1 : 3.0 : 3.0 : 2.5 : 3.5 (Fig. 10). Apex of last abdominal ventrite with a shallow median notch. Gonocoxae (Fig. 14) wide, apex of each gonocoxa with seven to nine setae, connection of gonocoxae extremely slender, base widened. Sternite VIII (Fig. 13) weakly sclerotized, apical margin convex at middle, surface with sparse short setae along apical margin, spiculum extremely long. Spermathecal receptaculum (Fig. 15) strongly swollen; pump longer, moderately curved; spermathecal duct short, stout, shallowly projecting into receptaculum. Host Plants. Boraginaceae: Ehretia resinosa Hance; E. dicksonii Hance.; E. acuminate R. Brown; E. longiflora Champ. ex Benth. Notes. Apophylia taiwanica was described based on the specimens with a narrow apex of penis (Fig. 11b) (Bezděk 2003b) in contrast to the wider apex of aedeagus in A. asahinai. After the description of Apophylia taiwanica, the second author (J. B.) had the opportunity to identify specimens with transitional forms of the aedeagus. Now, after the examination of more than 100 specimens, we can confirm that the apex of.

(5) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. 5. Figs. 1–8. Color habitus of Apophylia species. 1. A. asahinai, male, dorsal view; 2. A. asahinai, male, ventral view; 3. A. miyamotoi, male, dorsal view; 4. A. miyamotoi, male, ventral view; 5. A. miyamotoi, female, dorsal view; 6. A. miyamotoi, female, ventral view; 7. A. miyamotoi, female, dorsal view, color variation; 8. A. miyamotoi, female, ventral view, color variation.. the aedeagus varies from narrow to wide (Figs. 11a, b). Thus, A. taiwanica is proposed to be a new synonym of A. asahinai. Distribution. Taiwan. It is a common and widespread species in Taiwan (Fig. 16). Most populations inhabit lower elevation habitats (0–1,500 m). Apophylia beeneni Bezděk, 2003 Apophylia flavovirens: Kimoto, 1965: 489 (Yentempo = Yentenchi, in Kaohsiung); Kimoto, 1966: 27 (Zentai = Chietapu, in Tainan); Kimoto, 1969: 23; Kimoto, 1987: 188.. Apophylia beeneni Bezděk, 2003a: 207 (Sokutsu, near Chiasien, in Kaohsiung). Ty p e S p e c i m e n s E x a m i n e d . 2 p a r a t y p e s ( ♀ ♀ ) , l a b e l l e d : “ F O R M O S A / K E N TING/3-10.6.1995/DALIHOD leg. (w, p) // PARATYPUS/Apophylia/beeneni sp. nov./ J. Bezděk det. 2002 (r, p)” (JBCB). Specimens Examined (n = 48). Pingtung: 1♂, 2♀♀, Checheng, 5.XII.2011, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♂, 1♀, Hengchun, 7.VII.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♂, 1♀, Kenting, 2–6. III.1982, leg. K. C. Chou and C. N. Lin; 1♂, Mutan, 28.V.2010, leg. J. C. Chen;.

(6) 6. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. Figs. 9–15. Apophylia asahinai. 9. Antenna, male; 10. Antenna, female; 11a. Penis, dorsal view; b. Apex of penis, dorsal view, variation; 12. Penis, lateral view; 13. Sternite VIII; 14. Gonocoxae; 15. Spermatheca.. 1♀, Sheting, 4.XI.2009, leg. M. H. Tsou; 9♂♂. 4♀♀, same locality, 7.VII.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 6♂♂, Suchunghsi, 8.V.2013, leg. Y. T. Chung; 8♂♂, 1♀, Tahanshan, 24.VI.2007, leg. C. F. Lee; 2♂♂, 2♀♀, same locality, 17.VII.2007, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♂, 1♀, same locality, 8.X.2012, l e g . S . F. Yu ; 1 ♂ , 1 ♀ , s a m e l o c a l i t y, 3.VI.2013, leg. J. C. Chen; Taitung: 3♀♀, Chihpen, 15.XI.2007, leg. Y. C. Yu. Remarks. This species is similar to A. asahinai with yellow mouthparts and legs. Besides differences mentioned in the diagnosis of A. asahinai, A. beeneni has a smaller body, darkened labrum, and modified metasternum in males. Male. Length 5.1 mm. General color (Figs. 20–21) black; head bicolorous, vertex,. frontal tubercles and postgena black, anterior part of head, mouthparts yellow except labrum blackish brown; antenna yellowish brown but last three or five antennomeres darkened; prothorax yellow, pronotum blackish brown but anterior and posterior margins yellow; elytra metallic green; legs yellow. Antennomeres VII-XI filiform, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.3 : 1.3 : 1.2 : 1.1 : 0.9 : 0.9 : 0.9 : 1.1; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 4.2 : 5.5 : 6.0 : 5.6 : 5.2 : 4.3 : 3.8 : 3.6 : 5.0 (Fig. 28). Penis (Fig. 30) slender, 5.3 times longer than wide; parallel-sided, apex narrowly rounded, strongly and subapically curved and basally widened in lateral view (Fig. 31); apical margin of.

(7) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. 7. Figs. 16–19. Distribution map of Apophylia species, solid line: 1,000 m, broken line: 2,000 m. 16. A. asahinai; 17. A. beeneni; 18. A. miyamotoi; 19. A. velai.. opening indistinct; endophallic sclerites composed of two visible sclerites, sticklike sclerite short, about 0.3 times as length of penis; another sclerite as long as stick-like sclerite, but apically widened and flattened, outer margin of apex serrate. Female. Length 5.8–6.5 mm. Similar to male (Figs. 22–23), but antennomeres VII to XI shorter and wider, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.2 : 1.2 : 1.1 : 1.1 : 1.0 : 1.0 : 0.8 : 1.0; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 3.2 : 4.3 : 4.3 : 3.9 : 3.7 : 3.6 : 3.8 : 3.5 : 4.3 (Fig. 29). Apex of last abdominal ventrite rounded. Gonocoxae (Fig. 33) wide, apex of each gonocoxa with eight setae, connection of gonocoxae slender, base. slightly widened. Sternite VIII (Fig. 32) weakly sclerotized, apical margin convex at middle, surface with sparse short setae at sides and along apical margin, spiculum relatively shorter. Spermathecal receptaculum (Fig. 34) strongly swollen; pump longer, moderately curved; spermathecal duct short, stout, shallowly projecting into receptaculum. Host Plants. Boraginaceae: Trichodesma calycosum Collett & Hemsl.; Carmona retusa (Vahl) Masam.; Ehretia resinosa Hance. Distribution. Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, Hongkong, China (Beijin, Fujian, Guangxi, Hainan, Heilongjiang, Sichuan, and Zhejiang). This species is restricted to southern Taiwan (Fig. 17)..

(8) 8. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. Figs. 20–27. Color habitus of Apophylia species. 20. A. beeneni, male, dorsal view; 21. A. beeneni, male, ventral view; 22. A. beeneni, female, dorsal view; 23. A. beeneni, female, ventral view; 24. A. velai, male, dorsal view; 25. A. velai, male, ventral view; 26. A. velai, female, dorsal view; 27. A. velai, female, ventral view.. Apophylia miyamotoi Kimoto, 1969 Apophylia miyamotoi Kimoto, 1969: 23 (Fenchihu, in Chiayi; Chiaoliping, in Chiayi); Kimoto, 1986: 56 (Jiuyuehtan, in Nantou); Kimoto, 1987: 188 (Sungkang, in Nantou); Kimoto, 1989: 248 (Chunyunshan, in Kaohsiung); Kimoto, 1991: 9 (Liukui, in Kaoshiung); Bezděk, 2003a: 202 (illustration of male aedeagus). Type Specimens Examined. Holotype (♂), labelled: “(Taiwan) Fenchihu (p) 1,400 m (h) Chiayi Hsien (w, p) //10.IV. (h) 1965 S. Miyamoto (w, p) //Japan-U.S. Co-op. Sci. Programme (y, p) //HOLOTYPE (r, p) //. Apophylia miyamotoi Kimoto, n.sp. (w, h)” (KUEC). Specimens Examined (n = 36). Kaohsiung: 1♀, Tengchih, 18.IV.2013, leg. B. X. Guo; Nantou: 2♂♂, Lienhuachih, 27.III.2008, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♂, Wushe, 19–22.IV.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and P. Huang; Pingtung: 1♂, Mutan, 19.II.2007, leg. S. F. Yu; 4♀♀, Peitawushan, 10.V. 2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 2♂♂, 2♀♀, same locality, 12.IV.2013, leg. Y. T. Chung; 1♀, Tahanshan, 9.IV.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♀, same locality, 10.IV.2010, U. Ong; 1♂, 1♀, same locality, 28.IV.2012, leg..

(9) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. M. H. Tsou; Tainan: 1♂, 1♀, Meiling, 24.IV.2013, leg. B. X. Guo; 8♂♂, 2♀♀, Pichien trail, 31.III.2010, leg. U. Ong; 2♂♂, same locality, 22.III.2011, leg. U. Ong; Taoyuan: 4♂♂, 1♀, Tungyanshan, 12.IV.2010, leg. H. Lee. Remarks. Apophylia miyamotoi is characterized by its black body. Male. Length 4.7–5.9 mm. General color (Figs. 3–4) black but tibia paler; elytra metallic green or blue. Antennomeres VII–XI flattened and widened, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.3 : 1.3 : 1.2 : 1.2 : 1.1 : 1.1 : 0.9 : 1.1; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 3.2 : 4.0 : 4.0 : 3.8 : 3.8 : 3.7 : 3.7 : 3.2 : 3.9 (Fig. 35). Penis (Fig. 37) extremely elongate, 7.3 times longer than. 9. wide; sides asymmetric, right lateral margin widened at apical 2/5; apex narrowly rounded and posteriorly curved, moderately curved near base from lateral view (Fig. 38); opening apically tapering, basal margin indistinct; endophallic sclerites composed of two visible sclerites, sticklike sclerite longest, about 0.5 times as length of penis; another with apex strongly widened and flattened, margin with large teeth, smaller, about 0.8 times length of stick-like sclerite. Female. Length 7.4–8.1 mm. Similar to male (Figs. 5–8), but abdomen brown or yellowish brown; antenna filiform, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.4 : 1.4 : 1.2 : 1.2 : 1.2 : 1.0 : 1.0 : 1.1; ratio of length to width of antennomeres. Figs. 28–34. Apophylia beeneni. 28. Antenna, male; 29. Antenna, female; 30. Penis, dorsal view; 31. Penis, lateral view; 32. Sternite VIII; 33. Gonocoxae; 34. Spermatheca..

(10) 10. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. III to XI about 3.2 : 4.5 : 4.5 : 4.0 : 3.5 : 3.5 : 2.9 : 3.2 : 3.1 (Fig. 36). Apex of last abdominal ventrite rounded. Gonocoxae (Fig. 40) wide, apex of each gonocoxa with seven to eight setae, connection of gonocoxae extremely slender, base widened. Sternite VIII (Fig. 39) weakly sclerotized, surface with dense long setae at sides and along apical margin, spiculum extremely long. Spermathecal receptaculum (Fig. 41) strongly swollen; pump longer, moderately curved; spermathecal duct long, stout, shallowly projecting into receptaculum. Host Plants. Boraginaceae: Ehretia longiflora Champ. ex Benth.; E. acuminate R. Brown. Distribution. Taiwan. Specimens are uncommon but the species is widespread in Tai-. wan (Fig. 18). Most populations inhabit low elevation habitats (0–1,500 m). Apophylia velai Bezděk, 2003 Apophylia nigripes (sic!): Chûjô, 1935: 174 [Pingtung: Henchun (= Kankau); Manchoutsun (= Teraso)]; Chûjô, 1938: 135. Apophylia nigriceps: Chûjô, 1962: 21 (Taihoku = Taipei city); Chûjô, 1963: 388 (Kosempo = Chiasien, in Kaohsiung); Kimoto, 1965: 489; Kimoto, 1966: 27; Kimoto, 1969: 23 (Nanshanchi, in Nantou; Meichi, in Nantou; Kenting, in Pingtung); Kimoto, 1986: 56 (Jiuyehtan, in Nantou); Kimoto, 1987: 188 (Sungkang, in Nantou); Kimoto, 1989: 248 (Chunyunshan, in Kaohsiung); Kimoto, 1991: 8 (Shaping and Shinanshan, in Kaohsiung).. Figs. 35–41. Apophylia miyamotoi. 35. Antenna, male; 36. Antenna, female; 37. Penis, dorsal view; 38. Penis, lateral view; 39. Sternite VIII; 40. Gonocoxae; 41. Spermatheca..

(11) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. Apophylia velai Bezděk, 2003a: 222 (Taihorin = Talin, in Chiayi; Chilan, in Ilan; Huisun, in Nantou; Guanyinshan, in Taipei). Apophylia kaoi Bezděk and Lee, 2009: 430 (Chuwei, in Taipei). new synonymy Type Specimens Examined. Apophylia velai: 1 paratype (♂), labelled: “Kankau (Koshun) /Formosa/H. Sauter V. 1912 (w, p) //7.IV. (w, p) //Chujo det. (w, h) // PARATYPUS/Apophylia/velai sp. nov./J. Bezděk det. 2002 (r, p)” (JBCB); 1 paratype (♂), labelled: “Teraso II. 09 (w, h) // Chujo det. (w, h) //PARATYPUS/Apophylia/velai sp. nov./J. Bezděk det. 2002 (r, p)” (JBCB). Apophylia kaoi: Holotype (♂), labelled: “Taiwan: Taipei (1181) /Fushan/05.IV.2007, leg. M.H. Tsao (w, p) //HOLOTYPUS, /Apophylia/ kaoi sp. nov., /Bezděk & Lee det. 2009 (r, p)” (TARI); 1 paratype (♂), labelled: “Taiwan: Taipei (1182) /Fushan/05.IV.2007, leg. M.-H. Tsao (w, p) //PARATYPUS, /Apophylia/kaoi sp. nov., /Bezděk & Lee det. 2009 (r, p)” (JBCB). Specimens Examined (n = 270). Hsinchu: 1♀, Peitelaman, 26.VI.2008, leg. S. F. Yu; Kaohsiung: 4♂♂, 3♀♀, Meinung, 25.IV.2012, leg. leg. J. C. Chen; Nantou: 1♀, Meifeng, 7–9.V.1981, leg. K. S. Lin and S. C. Lin; 1♂, same locality, 20.IV.2011, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♂, Tatachia, 27.IV.2010, leg. C. F. Lee; 4♀♀, Tungpu, 20–22.VI.1980, leg. C. C. Chen; 3♂♂, same locality, 28.IV.–2.V.1981, leg. T. Lin and C. J. Lee; 1♀, same locality, 5–8. X.1981, leg. T. Lin and W. S. Tang; 4♂♂, 14♀♀, same locality, 19–23.VII.1982, leg. L. Y. Chou and T. Lin; 4♂♂, 13♀♀, same locality, 20–24.VI.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and C. Y. Wang; 24♂♂, 3♀♀, same locality, 16–20.IV.1984, leg. K. C. Chou and C. H. Yang; 29♀♀, same locality, 23–27. VII.1984, leg. K. C. Chou & C. H. Yang; 1♂, Wanta Reservoir, 24.IV.2008, leg. W. T. Liu; 5♂♂, 2♀♀, Wushe, 6–11.V.1981, K. S. Lin and S. C. Lin; 1♀, same locality,. 11. 23–28.VI.1981, leg. K. S. Lin and W. S. Tang; 2♂♂, same locality, 19–22.IV.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and P. Huang; 3♀♀, same locality, 7.V.1984, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; 1♂, 1♀, Wutakeng, 5.V.2013, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♀, Yushih, 4.VIII.1981, leg. T. Lin and W. S. Tang; Pingtung: 2♀♀, Chiupeng, 6–27.II.2010, leg. M. L. Jeng; 4♀♀, Kenting, 422.III.1980, leg. K. S. Lin; 1♂, same locality, 18–23.III.1981, leg. K. S. Lin and T. Lin; 8♂♂, 16♀♀, same locality, 24–28.VI.1981, leg. T. Lin and C. C. Pan; 13♂♂, 14♀♀, same locality, 22–26.III.1982, leg. T. Lin and S. C. Lin; 1♂, 1♀, same locality, 15.III.1984, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; 5♂♂, Nanjenhu, 15.III.2010, leg. M. H. Tshou; 1♀, Neiwen, 12.IV.2013, leg. B. X. Guo; 1♀, Peitawushan, 10.V.2010, leg. J. C. Chen; 1♀, Shantimen, 24.III.1982, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; 1♀, Shouka, 16.IV.2013, l e g . Y. T. C h u n g ; 1 ♀ , Ta h a n s h a n , 20.VII.2007, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♂, same locality, 14.VIII.2011, leg. Y. T. Wang; 1♂, 1♂, same locality, 6.VI.2012, leg. C. F. Lee; 1♂, same locality, 18.VI.2012, leg. Y. T. Chung; Taipei: 3♀♀, Chuwei, V.2006, leg. H. T. Cheng; 1♀, same locality, IV.2007, leg. H. T. Cheng; 3♀♀, Fulung, 20.V.2008, leg. H. Lee; 1♂, Fushan, 10.IV.2010, leg. H. J. Chen; 1♀, Sushoushan, 2.V.2008, leg. H. J. Chen; 1♀, Wulai, 20.IV.2007, leg. H. J. Chen; 2♀♀, Yuanshan, 11.V.2012, leg. S. F. Yu; Taitung: 2♂♂, 5♀♀, Chihpen, 24.V.2013, leg. J. C. Chen; Taoyuan: 2♂♂, 1♀, Fuhsing, 6.V.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; 11♂♂, 9♀♀, Lalashan, 2.V.2009, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♀, Lofu, 11.IV.2010, leg. M. H. Tsou; 1♀, same locality, 19.VI.2010, leg. H. J. Chen; 4♀♀, Paling, 3–5.V.1983, leg. K. C. Chou and C. C. Pan; 2♂♂, Tungyanshan, 12.IV.2010, leg. H. Lee. Remarks. Apophylia velai is similar to A. miyamotoi with black head and pronotum, but differs in possessing yellow legs..

(12) 12. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. Male. Length 4.9–5.9 mm. General color (Figs. 24–25) black; antenna yellowish brown but last three or five antennomeres darkened; elytra metallic green; legs yellow but base of femur, apex of tibia, and tarsi darkened. Antennomeres III–XI flattened and widened, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.5 : 1.3 : 1.3 : 1.3 : 1.2 : 0.9 : 0.9 : 1.1; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 2.7 : 4.1 : 3.4 : 3.0 : 3.0 : 2.5 : 2.0 : 2.0 : 2.7 (Fig. 42). Penis (Fig. 45) relatively wider, 4.0 times longer than wide; subapex asymmetric, with a prominent notch at apical 1/7 of left margin and at apical 1/20 of right margin, apex pointed, moderately curved near apex and base from lateral view (Fig. 46); opening asymmetric, slender and close to right margin at. apical 1/7, then abruptly widened, basal margin indistinct; endophallic sclerites composed of three visible sclerite, sticklike sclerite longest, about 0.7 times as length of penis; a small, triangular sclerite located near apex of stick-like sclerite; a wide, flattened sclerite located from base to apical 1/3 of stick-like sclerite, basal margin oblique and irregular. Female. Length 5.5–6.3 mm. Similar to male (Figs. 26–27); antenna black but first three antennomeres paled, antenna a little shorter and narrower, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0 : 1.4 : 1.1 : 1.1 : 1.1 : 0.9 : 0.9 : 0.8 : 1.0; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 3.0 : 4.0 : 3.0 : 3.0 : 3.0 : 3.0 : 3.0 : 2.6 : 3.0 (Fig. 43); some with filiform antenna, ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI. Figs. 42–49. Apophylia velai. 42. Antenna, male; 43. Antenna, female; 44. Antenna, female, variation; 45a. Penis, dorsal view; b: apex of penis, dorsal view, `kaoi’ type; 46a. Penis, lateral view; b: apex of penis, lateral view, `kaoi’ type; 47. Sternite VIII; 48. Gonocoxae; 49. Spermatheca..

(13) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. about 1.0 : 1.3 : 1.1 : 1.1 : 1.0 : 1.0 : 0.9 : 0.8 : 1.1; ratio of length to width of antennomeres III to XI about 4.1 : 5.3 : 4.6 : 4.5 : 4.5 : 4.5 : 4.5 : 4.2 : 4.7 (Fig. 44). Gonocoxae (Fig. 48) wide, apex of each gonocoxa with seven to ten setae, base extremely slender. Sternite VIII (Fig. 47) well sclerotized, with dense short setae at sides, denser along apical margin, spiculum extremely long. Spermathecal receptaculum (Fig. 49) strongly swollen; pump short, moderately curved; spermathecal duct short, stout, shallowly projecting into receptaculum. Host Plants. Boraginaceae: Ehretia longiflora Champ. ex Benth.; E. dicksonii Hance; E. acuminate R. Brown.; E. resinosa Hance. Notes. The shape of the aedeagus apex is variable. The specimens with the short, sharp apex were described as A. velai, while specimens with longer, flattened apex were described as A. kaoi (compare Bezděk 2003a and Bezděk et Lee 2009). Because of the similarity in shapes of the opening and endophallic sclerites, we have concluded that A. velai and A. kaoi belong to the same species. Thus, A. kaoi is proposed to be a new synonym of A. velai. Distribution. Taiwan. Specimens are common and widespread, making it the most common species in Taiwan. Most populations inhabit low elevation habitats (0–1,500 m).. Key to Apophylia species in Taiwan 1. Head black but mouthparts yellow; pronotum yellow with three black spots or dark brown with yellow margins ...................... 2 - Head and pronotum completely black ....... 3 2. Pronotum dark brown with yellow anterior a n d p o s t e r i o r m a rg i n s ; l a b r u m b l a c k i s h brown; male metasternum modified, bearing large symmetrical protuberance .................. .................................................. A. beeneni - Pronotum yellow with three black spots (median and two lateral); labrum yellow as same color as other parts of mouth; male. 13. metasternum not modified ......... A. asahinai 3. Legs black but tibiae paler ...... A. miyamotoi -Legs yellow but apices of tibiae darker ..... ....................................................... A. velai. CONCLUSIONS Most of Apophylia species in Taiwan are widespread and common in lowland habitats (Figs. 16, 18–19). They are associated with certain species of Boraginaceae, including Ehretia longiflora (Figs. 50–51), E. acuminate (Fig. 52), and E. dicksonii (Fig. 53). The exception is A. beeneni, found only in south Taiwan (Fig. 17), possibly because of its association with tropical host plants, including Carmona retusa (Fig. 54), E. resinosa (Figs. 55–56), and Trichodesma calycosum (Fig. 57). Obviously Apophylia species in Taiwan are sympatric since they share the same hosts and distributions. Even A. beeneni shares the same host, E. resinosa with A. asahinai, they tend to “look different” from each other. A. beeneni have yellow mouthparts, pronotum, and legs, characters shared with A. asahinai. But Taiwanese populations of A. beeneni have darker pronota that are different from the yellow pronota of A. asahinai. The absence of apparently identical allopatric species suggests that sibling species are not present in Taiwanese Apophylia. A possible model of sibling species in chrysomelids in Taiwan occurs in the genus Agetocera. Sibling species of the A. taiwana species group may result from allopatric speciation (Lee et al. 2010). To confirm the occurrence of sibling species of chrysomelids in Taiwan researchers should work on their taxonomic problems based on sufficient material and fully explore their biology.. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the Taiwan Chrysomelid Research Team for assisting in collecting materials, including Hou-Jay Chen, Jung-Chang Chen, Yi-Ting Chung, Bo-Xin Guo, Hsueh.

(14) 14. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. Figs. 50–57. Field observations. 50. Leaves of Ehretia longiflora with feeding marks; 51. One adult of Apophylia asahinai feeding on leaves of E. longiflora; 52. Leaves of E. acuminata with feeding damage; 53. Leaves of E. dicksonii with feeding damage; 54. Adults of A. beeneni feeding on leaves of Carmona retusa; 55. One adult of A. beeneni feeding on leaves of E. resinosa; 56. Adults of A. beeneni feeding on leaves of E. resinosa; 57. Leaves of Trichodesma calycosum with feeding marks.. Lee, Wei-Ting Liu, Mei-Hua Tsou, and SuF a n g Yu . We s p e c i a l l y t h a n k H s u e h L e e , Hsing-Tzung Cheng, Mei-Hua Tsou, Ren-Jye Chen, and Jung-Chang Chen for taking photographs in the field or on specimens. We thank Chris Carlton for reading the draft and editing for English style.. REFERENCES Beenen, R. 2010. Galerucinae. p.443–491. in: Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 6. Chrysomeloi-. dea (Löbl, I. and A. Smetana, eds.) Apollo Books. Vester Skerninge, Denmark. 924 pp. Bezděk, J. 2003a. Studies on asiatic Apophylia. Part 3: Revisional study of type materials and descriptions of eight species new to science (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Genus 14:191–230. Bezděk, J. 2003b. Studies on asiatic Apophylia. Part 5: Revisional study of type materials and descriptions of five species new to science (Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Genus 14:479–510. Bezděk, J. 2007. Two new Apophylia species from Maharashtra state, India (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Genus 18: 271–277..

(15) Studies on Apophylia from Taiwan. Bezděk, J. and C. F. Lee. 2009. Apophylia kaoi sp. nov. from Taiwan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Genus 20:429–434. Chûjô, M. 1935. H. Sauter’s Formosa-Ausbeute: Subfamily Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Arb. Morph. Taxon. Entomol. 2:160–174. Chûjô, M. 1938. H. Sauter’s Formosa-Collection: Subfamily Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Arb. Morph. Taxon. Entomol. 5:135–152. Chûjô, M. 1962. A taxonomic study on the Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Formosa Part XI. Subfamily Galerucinae. Philipp. J. Sci. 91:1–239. Chûjô, M. 1963. Chrysomelid-beetles from Formosa, preserved in the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. 55:379–402. Fairmaire, L. 1878. In: Deyrolle H. & Fairmaire L.: Descriptions de coléoptères recueillis par M. abbé David dans la Chine central. Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 8:87–140. Fairmaire, L. 1888. Notes sur les coléoptères des environs de Pekin (2e partie). Rev. Entomol. 7:111–160. Jacoby, M. 1884. Descriptions of new genera and species of phytophagous Coleoptera from Sumatra. Notes Leyden Mus. 6:9–70. Jolivet, P. and T. J. Hawkeswood. 1995. Host-plants of Chrysomelidae of the World. Backhuys Publishers. Leiden, Netherlands. 281 pp. Kimoto, S. 1965. A list of specimens of Chrysomelidae from Taiwan preserved in the Naturhistorisches Museum/Wien (Insecta: Coleoptera). Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 68:485–490. Kimoto, S. 1966. A list of Chrysomelid specimens of Taiwan preserved in the Zoological Museum, Berlin. Esakia 5:21–38. Kimoto, S. 1969. Notes on the Chrysomelidae from Taiwan II. Esakia 7:1–68.. 15. Kimoto, S. 1986. The Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) collected by the Nagoya University Scientific Expedition to Taiwan in 1984. Kurume Univ. J. 35:53–60. Kimoto, S. 1987. The Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) collected by the Nagoya University Scientific Expedition to Taiwan in 1986. Kurume Univ. J. 36:183–194. Kimoto, S. 1989. The Taiwanese Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) collected by Dr. Kintaro Baba, on the occasion of his entomological survey in 1983 and 1986. Kurume Univ. J. 38:237–272. Kimoto, S. 1991. The Taiwanese Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) collected by Dr. Kintaro Baba, on the occasion of his entomological survey in 1987, 1988 and 1989. Kurume Univ. J. 40:1–27. Laboissière, V. 1922. Étude des Galerucini de la collection du Musée du Congo Belge. Première partie (suite). Rev. Zool. Afr. 10:219–271. Laboissière, V. 1927. Contribution a l’étude des Galerucini de l’indochine et du Yunnan avec descriptions de nouveaux genres et espèces (Col. Chrysomelidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 96:37–62. Lee, C. F., J. Bezděk, and C. L. Staines. 2010. A review of the genus Agetocera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) in Taiwan—are there only two species? Zootaxa 2441:1–19. Thomson, J. 1858. Deuxième Partie. Insects. I. Arch. Entomol. 2:30–343. Weise, J. 1896. Synonymische Bemerkunge über europäische Chrysomelinen. Dtsch. Entomol. Z. 1896:293–296. Wilcox, J. A. 1971. Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae (Oidini, Galerucini, Metacyclini, Sermylini). in: Coleopterorum Catalogus Supplementa. Pars 78(1), 2nd ed. (Wilcox, J. A., ed.) W. Junk. S-Gravenhage, Kluwer Academic Pub. Dordrecht, Netherlands. 220 pp..

(16) 16. 台灣農業研究 第 63 卷 第 1 期. 台灣產翠螢金花蟲屬的分類回顧 (鞘翅目:金花蟲科:瑩金花蟲亞科) 李奇峰 1,* Jan Bezděk2 摘要 李奇峰、J. Bezděk。2014。台灣產翠螢金花蟲屬的分類回顧 (鞘翅目:金花蟲科:瑩金花 蟲亞科)。台灣農業研究 63(1):1–16。 本文針對台灣產翠螢金花蟲屬 Apophylia 的種類做分類回顧,四個種類被視為有效種:斑胸翠螢金花 蟲 Apophylia asahinai Chûjô, 1962、黃緣翠螢金花蟲 Apophylia beeneni Bezděk, 2003、黑翠螢金花蟲 Apophylia miyamotoi Kimoto, 1969 及黃腳翠螢金花蟲 Apophylia velai Bezděk, 2003;此外,兩個新的同物異名被提出: Apophylia taiwanica Bezděk, 2003 為 A. asahinai Chûjô, 1962 的 新 同 物 異 名,Apophylia kaoi Bezděk and Lee, 2009 為 A. velai Bezděk, 2003 的新同物異名。不同性別的診斷特徵以線圖描繪;在台灣,金花蟲同胞種 (sibling species) 的發生是否可能發生的議題也在此討論。 關鍵詞:金花蟲、分類學、內囊骨片。. * 1 2. 投稿日期:2013 年 10 月 24 日;接受日期:2013 年 11 月 22 日。 通訊作者:chifeng@tari.gov.tw 農委會農業試驗所應用動物組副研究員。台灣 台中市。 孟德爾大學動物學系教授。捷克 布爾諾。.

(17)

參考文獻

相關文件

margin over left posterior maxilla, extending from the distal side of tooth 24 to the mesial side of tooth 26 , and from the border of left maxillary sinus to the left

A diagnosis of OSF at a moderately advanced stage was made based on the characteristic oral features: gener- alized blanching of mucosa, extensive fibrosis and limited

1. An immature permanent mandibular central incisor with periapical involvement in a 7-year-old boy was treated to promote revascularization. The tooth suffered from acute

3D CT scan revealed depressed fracture involving the frontal bone on the right side, right parietal bone, and right superior orbital margin, right lamina papyracea.. The frontal

- In another study, when PDLSCs combined with stem cells from the dental apical papilla, (SCAPs), isolated from the 3rd molar, were seeded in a scaffold and

Axial (A), sagittal (B) and coronal (C) CBCT sections demonstrating a well defined radiolucency, with the attenuation of air, at the inferior margin of the C2 vertebral body,

Case Presentation: In this clinical case report, it is described a case of a 16-year-old male patient with an asymptomatic osteolytic lesion at first upper left molar apical level,

The case presented here is of a geriatric patient who presented to us with a fracture at the right parasymphysis and left dentoalveolar region of the mandible and was su ffering