• 沒有找到結果。

Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation modeling approach

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation modeling approach"

Copied!
16
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E

Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual

reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation

modeling approach

Li-Keng Cheng• Ming-Hua Chieng• Wei-Hua Chieng

Received: 3 February 2013 / Accepted: 15 January 2014 / Published online: 23 January 2014 Ó Springer-Verlag London 2014

Abstract With the rapid development of the VR market, virtual experience has increasingly been the object of study in recent years. A growing number of studies have reported the positive effect that virtual experience can have on a user’s mood and loyalty. However, few studies have investigated the influence of the mechanism of virtual experience on users’ mood and loyalty. To compensate for this research gap, this study aims to evaluate consumers’ virtual experience by examining the flow state in a virtual environment. A total of 368 valid questionnaires were collected, and a structural equation modeling approach was employed in the data analysis. The study reveals that forming flow involves many factors: the intrinsic charac-teristics of the mediated environment, the consumer’s assumptions and perceptions prior to entering the flow state, the stage at which the customer enters the flow state, and the consequences of the flow experience.

Keywords Flow Telepresence  Interactivity  Vividness Virtual experience

1 Introduction

Virtual reality (VR) technology has been widely adopted in many fields (Macredie et al. 1996; McConville and Virk

2012; Gervasi and Ranon 2010; Riva 1998), including education training, medical teaching, virtual experiments, and game development. Because of the rapid growth of the VR industry, there has been a dramatic proliferation of research concerned with the virtual experience (VE), which refers to user interaction with a 3D computer-simulated interactive environment that requires an engaging and emotional psychological state (Li et al.2001).

Because the mood, loyalty, and brand attitude of users are solid predictors of purchase behavior or continued use (Lutz 1980; Beatty and Elizabeth Ferrell 1998), an increasing number of recent publications and empirical studies have focused on the positive influence of virtual experience on users’ mood, loyalty, and brand attitude. Lee et al. (2012) proposed a framework for demonstrating that a 3D product interface tends to foster the formation of positive brand attitudes. Furthermore, Lee (2012) validated the link from 3D interface and imagery vividness to brand attitudes. In addition, a number of studies have demon-strated that a user’s mood and loyalty can be enhanced through the virtual environment (Schuemie et al. 2001; Reid 2002). Jung (2011) noted that the experience of pre-sence affects users’ continued use of social virtual worlds. Moreover, Plante et al. (2003) investigated how virtual reality technology may promote users’ mood of exercise.

To date, however, there has been relatively little research conducted to account for the mechanism by which virtual experience affects the strength of users’ mood and loyalty. Perugini and Bagozzi (2001) proposed that theo-retical mechanisms can be better comprehended by intro-ducing a new construct that mediates the influence of

L.-K. Cheng (&)

Department of Business Administration, National Chengchi University, No. 64, Sec. 2, ZhiNan Road, Taipei 11605, Taiwan, ROC

e-mail: zerowa@msn.com; 100355503@nccu.edu.tw M.-H. Chieng

Institute of Business and Management, National Chiao Tung University, No.118, Sec. 1, Jhongsiao W. Road,

Taipei 100, Taiwan, ROC e-mail: herrowa@yahoo.com.tw W.-H. Chieng

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, 1001, Ta Hsueh Road, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, ROC DOI 10.1007/s10055-014-0244-2

(2)

existing variables, and this progress may be referred to as theory deepening. Thus, the purpose of this article is to introduce and test the flow model to explain how existing antecedents influence user mood and loyalty in 3D VR environments.

Our study differs from previous studies in the following respects. First, with respect to the literature on virtual experience focusing on the predictors of virtual environ-ment, we examine how such predictors affect users in 3D virtual environments. Second, previous studies of tele-presence have focused primarily on interactivity (Choi et al.2007; Skadberg and Kimmel2004; Novak et al.2000) and did not consider the relationship between interactivity and vividness (Coyle and Thorson2001). By contrast, we consider the causal relationship between interactivity and vividness. Third, the previous literature on virtual experi-ence primarily focused on Western countries, whereas we include Asian countries in our study.

2 Theoretical background and hypotheses

2.1 Flow

Csikszentmihalyi (1975) proposed flow theory, which was primarily intended to examine the psychological state in which humans are completely immersed in particular behaviors and activities. In examining the concept of flow, Csikszentmihalyi (1975) explored the psychological state of total absorption that a human experiences when engag-ing in certain behaviors or activities. Flow is an enjoyable experience in which a participant feels a high level of behavioral control, happiness, and enjoyment (Csikszentmihalyi 1990). Csikszentmihalyi (1993) identi-fied nine elements of flow. These nine elements were theorized to fall into three categories or stages: equilibrium between skills and challenges, focused attention for opti-mal controllability, and loss of self-consciousness with even time distortion. Hoffman and Novak (1996) proposed a flow model for computer-mediated environments (CME). The researchers stated that the content characteristics, control characteristics, and process characteristics of a mediated environment could all affect the flow. Content characteristics include interactivity and vividness, control characteristics pertain to skills and challenges, and process characteristics are associated with goal-directed and experiential behavior.

Some previous studies have examined the relationship between flow element and attitude toward Web sites (No-vak et al.2000; Huang2003; Skadberg and Kimmel2004; O’Cass and Carlson 2010; Sa´nchez-Franco2006; Stavro-poulos et al. 2013). Furthermore, some studies have focused on the influence of flow on attitudes toward

purchasing online (Guo and Poole 2009; Korzaan 2003). Other researchers have validated the link between flow and learners’ attitudes toward e-learning (Choi et al.2007) and online communication (Zaman et al. 2010; Huang et al.

2011). In recent years, many subsequent researchers have claimed that flow can sufficiently explain man–machine interactivity in computer-mediated virtual environments (Animesh et al.2011; Hoffman and Novak2009). Hoffman and Novak (2009) suggested that flow in a virtual reality environment is qualitatively different from that in Web browser-based environments. These authors also claimed that flow would be a typical aspect of the user experience in virtual environments. Figure1 depicts a proposed frame-work for our research.

2.2 Relation to interactivity and vividness

Steuer (1992) suggested that interactivity refers to the level and type of content that a user encounters in real-time adjustments to the virtual environment. According to McMillan and Jang-Sun (2002), studies of interactivity have identified three primary means of conceptualizing interactivity: the telepresence view, the process view, and the perceptual view. In this study, we employed the tele-presence view because this view is more suitable than other perspectives, given our aim of examining person–computer interactivity in virtual reality (Steuer 1992). According to Steuer (1992), interactivity depends on the level and type of content that a user encounters in his or her real-time adjustments to the virtual environment. Furthermore, many studies have adopted the telepresence view in analyzing virtual experience; for instance, Animesh et al. (2011) studied the relationship between person and computer

Interactivity Vividness Involvement H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H10 H11 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H20 H19 H12 Skill Challenge Focused Attention Flow Positive Affect Loyalty Telepresence

(3)

interactivity and the purchase of virtual goods in online games, and Suntornpithug and Khamalah (2010) studied the relationship between person and computer interactivity and online purchasing.

Steuer (1992) defined vividness in relation to the breadth and depth of the message, in which the breadth is the number of senses that can be measured at a given time: For example, video has greater breadth than audio does. Per-ceptive depth refers to the quantity and quality of the information received: For example, high-definition movies exhibit greater depth than do ordinary movies.

Ghun (1999) stated that interactivity requires a certain vividness threshold. Moreover, Shih (1998) asserted that as the vividness of a medium increases, interactions acceler-ate because vividness can stimulacceler-ate the sensory perceptions of users and improve interactivity. The following hypoth-esis is then derived:

H1 Greater vividness corresponds to greater interactivity.

2.3 Relation to telepresence

Nowak and Biocca (2003) classified the presence into three types: telepresence, copresence, and social presence. Telepresence has been frequently described as the sense of being in the virtual or mediated environment (Klein2003; Kim and Biocca1997; Schubert et al. 1996; Steuer 1992; Sheridan 1992; Minsky 1980; Nowak and Biocca 2003). Furthermore, telepresence has always been used to com-prehend the attitudes or behavior of users in virtual envi-ronment (Jung2011; Animesh et al. 2011). Copresence is often defined as the sense that refers to a psychological link to and with another person (Nowak and Biocca 2003; Nowak2001). Social presence refers to the degree of sense of interaction with others in the virtual environment (No-wak and Biocca 2003; Jung 2011). Specifically, telepres-ence is more relevant to our study than the other two types of presence because this article is primarily concerned with the experience of users in virtual environment rather than interactions between users.

Researchers have agreed that two key variables affecting telepresence are interactivity and vividness (Klein 2003; Coyle and Thorson 2001; Draper et al. 1998; Kim and Biocca1997; Steuer1992; Sheridan1992; Rheingold1991; Huang et al. 2011). In addition, other researchers have begun observing the level of vividness; for instance, Welch et al. (1996) experimented on driver simulators and con-cluded that more vivid virtual environments are associated with higher levels of telepresence. Subsequent work indi-cated that the media richness of a medium—its vividness— affects the level of telepresence (Li et al.2001; Fortin and Dholakia 2005). Meanwhile, researchers were also observing the phenomenon from the interactivity

perspective; for instance, Shih (1998) proposed that a user’s perception of telepresence depends on the user’s interaction with the environment and the feedback derived from the environment. Hoffman and Novak (1996) asserted that interactivity is closely correlated to telepresence and that a user enters a flow state through constant feedback and response. Amant (2002) and Animesh et al. (2011) noted that a person’s online presence is created by the ability to respond quickly. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have indicated that the interactivity of the game and virtual world can enhance the sense of tele-presence (Von Der Pu¨Tten et al.2012; Shahid et al.2012; Chanel et al.2012; Nelson et al.2006; Siriaraya and Siang Ang 2012; Haans and IJsselsteijn 2012). Hence, we pro-pose the following hypotheses:

H2 Greater vividness corresponds to greater telepresence. H3 Greater interactivity corresponds to greater telepresence. Rich media tools, such as video, audio, and animation, may be considered tools that increase vividness by enhancing the richness of the experience. Animation is a device that can attract attention when used effectively (Zeff and Aronson 1999; Rothschild1987). Hence, we propose the following hypothesis:

H4 Greater vividness corresponds to greater focused attention.

Csikszentmihalyi and Csikszentmihalyi (1988) proposed that a user’s perception of skills and challenges is relative to other activities in which the user engages rather than on an absolute value. Novak et al. (2000) regarded skill and control as a combined construct in conducting their examination. As noted by Li et al. (2001), interactive media can improve user perceptions of control skills. Consequently, we proposed that as user perceptions of increased interactivity are associated with greater percep-tions of user skill. Kettanurak et al. (2001) also suggested that interactivity positively influences user control skill and performance.

H5 Greater interactivity corresponds to greater skills. The flow model proposed by Novak et al. (2000) asserted that higher rates of interaction increase the like-lihood of user challenges. Furthermore, Friedl (2002) suggested that high interactivity in game design can increase the perceived challenge for even the most expe-rienced game players. Thus, we considered the following hypotheses:

H6 Greater interactivity corresponds to greater challenge. Novak et al. (2000) found that mediated environments with higher interaction rates are associated with higher

(4)

levels of user concentration. Huang et al. (2011) suggested that users increase their concentration on the current activity through rapid interactivity resulting from seamless sequences of action. Thus, we developed the following hypotheses:

H7 Greater interactivity corresponds to focused attention. Novak et al. (2000) revealed that a higher level of importance (involvement) yields higher levels of user skill. If the role of a user becomes more important, then the user will spend more time in the game and develop stronger skills. Additionally, Novak, Hoffman, and Yung have shown that a higher level of importance (involvement) creates greater user challenge. Hence, we propose the fol-lowing hypotheses:

H8 Greater involvement corresponds to greater skill. H9 Greater involvement corresponds to greater challenge.

Webster et al. (1993) found that intrinsic interest and focused attention are positively correlated and that a lasting involvement affects the level of focused attention (Celsi and Olson 1988). The flow framework of Hoffman and Novak (1996) also proposed that higher levels of impor-tance (involvement) are associated with greater likelihood of forming focused attention. Faber and Lee (2007) also agreed that involvement increases the demand for primary attention. In addition, Koufaris (2002) and Huang et al. (2011) noted that user involvement is positively related to focused attention. Hence, higher levels of user involvement are associated with increases in the focused attention of users.

H10 Greater involvement corresponds to greater focused attention.

Nelson et al. (2006) claimed that there is a positive relationship between involvement and telepresence. Held and Durlach (1992) concluded that user familiarity inten-sifies telepresence. Experts and novices vary in their capacity and requirements, and this variation leads to dif-fering levels of telepresence experience (Dix et al.1993). Thus, an expert/novice distinction would be a vital indi-cator for measuring involvement. Witmer and Singer (1998) suggested that higher levels of user involvement increase the likelihood of forming positive telepresence, which leads to the following hypothesis:

H11 Greater involvement corresponds to greater telepresence.

The conclusions by Novak et al. (2000) and Koufaris (2002) showed that a more challenging mediated environ-ment is more likely to draw a user’s focused attention. Thus, we developed the following hypothesis:

H12 Greater challenge corresponds to greater focused attention.

As a user interacts with a mediated environment, the user’s perception that the entire media environment is within his grip causes the user to enter a flow state (Ani-mesh et al.2011; Choi et al.2007; Skadberg and Kimmel

2004; Huang 2003; Webster et al. 1993; Trevino and Webster 1992). This finding allows us to propose the fol-lowing hypothesis:

H13 Greater interactivity corresponds to greater flow. Hoffman and Novak (1996) suggested that both skill and challenge affected flow. When skill-level fails to meet the specified challenge, the user is likely to feel anxiety, whereas when the level of challenge decreased, the user is likely to feel bored. Hence, the user can enter flow when there is equilibrium between skill and challenge, and it is only when high states of skill and challenge are present that the user can be inspired with the potential to acquire new skill. Subsequent research has also indicated the point at which a user’s skill and challenge must be perceived as congruent to form a flow state (Ellis et al. 1994; Guo and Poole 2009; Skadberg and Kimmel2004), thus leading to the following hypotheses:

H14 Greater skill corresponds to greater flow. H15 Greater challenge corresponds to greater flow.

Hoffman and Novak (1996) proposed that two primary antecedent factors are necessary for the flow state to be experienced: (1) skill and challenge and (2) focused attention. A user’s focused attention, especially on a lim-ited stimulus field, together with the filtration of other unrelated information, leads to a flow state. Huang (2006) noted that if consumers do not focus on current activities, then they become either bored or anxious and are likely to halt their current task. Thus, we develop the following hypothesis:

H16 Greater focused attention corresponds to greater flow.

When the information in an environment is technically manipulated or depressed and a medium shifts focused attention toward this information from the virtual envi-ronment, a user is likely to form a telepresence (Kim and Biocca 1997; Gerrig 1993). Witmer and Singer (1998) concluded that a user who is focused on stimulants in a virtual environment and becomes absorbed by the envi-ronment is more inclined to perceive a high level of tele-presence. Draper et al. (1998) asserted that focused attention plays an important role in determining telepres-ence (Schubert et al. 2001; Sheridan 1992). Mollen and Wilson (2010) also claimed that telepresence is augmented

(5)

by focused attention. Hence, reviewing the findings above, we propose the following hypothesis:

H17 Greater focused attention corresponds to greater telepresence.

The flow framework proposed by Hoffman and Novak (1996) indicates that telepresence serves as an antecedent of flow but not a requisite one. Recent publications regarding online learning indicated that a significant cor-relation exists between telepresence and flow (Guo et al.

2012; Faiola et al.2012). Additionally, several studies have suggested that telepresence is an antecedent of flow state (Nijs et al.2012; Animesh et al.2011; Zaman et al.2010), which supports the following hypothesis:

H18 Greater telepresence corresponds to greater flow. Webster et al. (1993) asserted that flow is essentially a form of human–machine interactive experience and that through the process of interaction, an individual can per-ceive joy and involvement and thus derive emotions and satisfaction. Welch (1999) found that a strong flow is conducive to creating an emotional state in users. Fur-thermore, four studies (Hoffman and Novak1996; Hsu and Lu2004; Sa´nchez-Franco2006; Choi et al.2007) asserted that flow positively affects the attitudes of users, thus leading to the following hypothesis:

H19 Greater flow corresponds to greater positive affection. Hoffman and Novak (1996) suggested that flow would dictate a user’s positive attitude and future usage desir-ability. Moreover, conclusions by Chou and Ting (2003), Korzaan (2003), and O’Cass and Carlson (2010) showed that flow is positively related to loyalty. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:

H20 Greater flow corresponds to greater loyalty (to a 3D VR game).

3 Methodology

3.1 Stimuli

Although conventional 3D VR motion theaters can involve hundreds of people and offer a high level of immersion, they offer only a passive mode of experience, meaning that the server and the screen are operating under a fixed sce-nario. In these circumstances, the user views only the screen and perceives the motion rather than modifying the trajectory of motion. As opposed to motion theaters, interactive simulators allow users to manipulate the setting. The user is able to interact with the simulator. The most technically sophisticated 3D VR motion simulators are

equipped with a six-axis motion platform. This interactive simulation technology remains rare around the world. Representative applications include aircraft piloting and race car games by Maxflight USA and Injoy Motion Corp Taiwan. The 3D VR simulators developed in Injoy Motion Corp offer the challenge of online competition among multiple players. This feature meets the desire of the younger consumer market for challenge, stimulation, and joy. The appeal of this feature has caused 3D VR games to become mainstream and has thus drawn the focus of this study.

In this study, we used a six-axis simulator to create a 3D VR interactive environment and we measured participants’ virtual experience. A larger range of motion and a larger angle of rotation to improve the experience of virtual environment are the main characteristics of a six-axis simulator (Fig. 2). The participants sat in the booth of the simulator during game play to block external interference and to maximize their concentration.

This research used the game Panzer Elite Action, which is produced by the Injoy Motion Corp. In the beginning of the game, the participants were informed that they must shoot and kill the enemy to pass through each barrier. The participants played for approximately 10 min to complete one session. The game takes place in World War II. In this game, participants control their tank through a World War II battlefield to kill the rival tank and troop that blocked their path to the end point (Fig.3). There are many pow-erful and renowned rival tanks in this game, including a Soviet T34-76, Allied Sherman tank, and others. Partici-pants can use the joystick to control a tank’s movement and direction and manipulate the artillery of the tank to attack the enemy. Additionally, participants can use a special button to call for air support in bombing the enemy. Because of the 3D VR interactive design of the six-axis

(6)

simulator, participants would feel the vibrations of the booth when their tank was being attacked or went through the bumpy roads.

3.2 Measurement

In this study, all items were measured on a seven-point Likert scale. A seven-point Likert scale was used to relieve the burden of informants and to reduce response error resulting from the large number of items used in this study. To enhance face validity, a group of expert judges quali-tatively tested an initial pool of items.

We measured the constructs of skill, challenge, positive affect, and flow by adopting the scale used by Novak et al. (2000), and the instrument measuring flow contained a paragraph explaining the flow state. The interactivity scale by Novak et al. (2000) was adopted; this scale is based on theoretical fundamentals from the work of Steuer (1992) and consists of three-items. The three-item vividness scale was developed by Witmer and Singer (1998). We measured the constructs of involvement by adopting the three-item scale used by Laurent and Kapferer (1985). The four-item focused attention scale was developed by Ghani and Deshpande (1994). The telepresence scale employed by Novak et al. (2000) was also used; this scale is based on theoretical fundamentals from the work of Kim and Biocca (1997) and consists of six-items. We measured the con-structs of loyalty by adopting the three-item scale used by Franzen (1999) and Zeithaml et al. (1996).

3.3 Data collection

The survey was conducted for three consecutive days during the Taiwan International Amusement Machine Exposition Show. The participants were recruited from the exhibition and were given a gift as payment for their par-ticipation. The participants were then asked to read a

printed page of instructions on how to play the 3D VR game to which they were assigned. Prior to beginning the assigned game, each participant practiced moving and using the weapons. When they finished practicing, the participants were asked to play the 3D VR game for 10 min. After playing the game, the participants were asked to complete a questionnaire. During the three-day period, 485 questionnaires were dispatched. After careful review, 368 valid questionnaires were retained after the elimination of incomplete responses and aberrant respon-ses. Finally, a total of 368 fully completed responses were used for the analysis. Table1 presents the demographic information of the final samples.

4 Findings

4.1 Measurement model evaluation

Tests of the measurement model and structural model were employed with maximum likelihood estimation. The SAS 9.3 statistical software package was used in the data ana-lysis. The study’s measurement model incorporated three stages to select and evaluate the final items to be used in testing the following hypotheses. (1) In a reliability check, the study computes each construct using Cronbach’s a, as proposed by Nunnally and Bernstein (1994). Following this criterion, a score of 0.7 or higher would validate reliability. We also compute an item-to-total coefficient on each item. An item that has an item-to-total coefficient below 0.5 is then deleted for parsimony purposes. Finally, a total of ten constructs evolved into 34 items (Table 2).

(2) An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to check the unidimensionality of all constructs in our model and to ensure that the item loadings comply with the latent

Fig. 3 Tank go through the battlefield

Table 1 Sample Demographics

Gender Male 70.1 %

Female 29.9 %

Age (years) ^18 17.9 %

19–35 67.2 %

[35 14.9 %

Level of education Junior high

school 11.7 % Senior high school 21.7 % College 60.6 % Graduate school 6.0 % Hours spent on computer game per

week

0 9.8 %

1–4 57.3 %

5–12 23.9 %

(7)

constructs used in past research. The exploratory factor analysis used the principal component analysis factor method with equamax rotation. A factor-loading threshold of 0.45 was used, as recommended by Nunnally and Bernstein (1994). Table3 shows that the factor-loading values are well above the threshold value of 0.45.

(3) A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed as the measurement model specifies the pattern by which each observed measure loads on a particular factor through CFA. Garver and Mentzer (1999) suggested that there are two choices in the overall fitting indicator strategy, and our

study adheres to the following criteria: (a) the strategy is not influenced by sample size; (b) the strategy is accurate and consistent in assessing various models; and (c) the strategy is easy to interpret when employing four indicators of the Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (Marsh et al.

1988; Marsh et al. 1996). The final results from the mea-surement model indicate that the CFI is 0.93, RNI is 0.92, and TLI is 0.92. Values exceeding 0.9 indicate that the results are acceptable (Gerbing and Anderson 1992), and the RMSEA of 0.059 (90 % confidence interval: 0.054–0.063) reflects a reasonable fit level (Browne and Cudeck 1993). A chi-squared/degree of freedom at 2.32 falls within the acceptable range between 2 and 5 (Marsh and Hocevar1985). Hence, all of the previously mentioned factors confirm that the model offers an acceptable fit.

In addition, under the measurement model, we attempt to determine measurement validity. Convergent validity was confirmed by examining both the average variance extracted (AVE) and the composite reliability of the indi-cators associated with each construct. Table 4 shows that the AVE values ranged from 0.48 to 0.66, except the skill construct measures near 0.5 at 0.48, which are well above the threshold value of 0.5 (Bagozzi and Yi 1988; Fornell and Larcker1981). The composite reliability ratings ranged from 0.65 to 0.91 and are all above the threshold value of 0.6 (Fornell and Larcker 1981), thus supporting the con-vergent validity.

Discriminant validity was evaluated by two methods (Anderson and Gerbing 1988). First, the chi-squared dif-ference test is used to select constructs with a maximum correlation in the study, and we define its covariance as 1 to obtain a chi-squared difference of 66.6, which indicates an acceptable discriminant validity (Bagozzi and Phillips

1982). Next, the confidence interval of the paired correla-tions among the latent constructs was examined. If the confidence interval includes 1.0, then discriminant validity is not supported (Anderson and Gerbing1988). The result falls between 0.82 and 0.67 to exclude 1.0 in the region and thus indicates dependable discriminant validity.

4.2 Evaluation of the structural model

Figure4 reveals that under the structural model, only involvement and vividness are exogenous constructs; interactivity, skill, challenge, focused attention, telepres-ence, flow, loyalty, and positive affect are endogenous constructs. The final model is constructed to encompass ten constructs represented in 27 items. Similar to the mea-surement model’s method, this study incorporates the variance/covariance matrix in data input to examine the model. With regard to the model fit, the findings in Table5

Table 2 Reliability checks of construct and item

Construct Item Item to total Cronbach’s alfa

Interactivity INT1 0.609 0.773 INT2 0.650 INT3 0.573 Vividness VIV1 0.687 0.803 VIV2 0.654 VIV3 0.615 Skill SKI1 0.664 0.777 SKI2 0.640 SKI3 0.615 Challenge CHA1 0.767 0.850 CHA2 0.759 CHA3 0.640 Involvement INV1 0.610 0.781 INV2 0.725 INV3 0.536 Focus FOC1 0.717 0.900 FOC2 0.824 FOC3 0.779 FOC4 0.797 Telepresence TEL1 0.718 0.910 TEL2 0.780 TEL3 0.781 TEL4 0.753 TEL5 0.762 TEL6 0.704 Flow FLO1 0.601 0.750 FLO2 0.601 Loyalty LOY1 0.719 0.854 LOY2 0.735 LOY3 0.732 Positive PA1 0.656 0.840 Affect PA2 0.640 PA3 0.721 PA4 0.683

Item descriptions in the table are only keywords in the questionnaire instead of entire sentences

(8)

show CFI, TLI, and RNI are all above 0.90, which indi-cates a good fit, and show an RMSEA value of 0.068 (90 % confidence interval: 0.062–0.074), which also indicates a reasonable fit (Browne and Cudeck1993); meanwhile, the chi-square/degree of freedom of 2.69 also falls within an acceptable range (Marsh and Hocevar 1985). The results for the above indicators show that the data and model fit are acceptable. In addition, the study incorporates a one-tailed t test to validate the model’s paths, with 0.05 chosen as the level of significance. Furthermore, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) of our structural model is 0.81; according

to Segars and Grover (1993), AGFI values greater than 0.8 are considered an acceptable level for goodness of fit. Finally, our cases-to-parameter ratio is 4.91.

The final modeling results shown in Table5 indicate that a majority of the hypotheses are supported. These hypotheses include the paths (H1) from interactivity to vividness; from vividness (H2), involvement (H11), and focused attention (H17) to telepresence; from interactivity (H13), skill (H14), focused attention (H16) and telepres-ence (H18) to flow; from interactivity (H5) and involve-ment (H8) to skill and then from interactivity (H6) and

Table 3 Factor analysis Result

Construct Item Factor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Focus FOC4 0.807 0.163 0.162 0.164 0.157 0.137 0.063 0.055 0.149 0.110 FOC3 0.802 0.117 0.138 0.223 0.152 0.103 0.047 0.034 0.102 0.115 FOC2 0.788 0.180 0.119 0.185 0.239 0.142 -0.019 0.060 0.104 0.166 FOC1 0.678 0.098 0.096 0.167 0.238 0.122 0.032 0.141 0.194 0.265 Telepresence TEL5 0.163 0.700 0.234 0.167 0.111 0.192 0.145 0.173 0.065 0.238 TEL2 0.155 0.687 0.237 0.012 0.279 0.017 0.061 0.139 0.320 0.150 TEL4 0.217 0.675 0.133 0.186 0.141 0.173 0.154 0.108 0.175 0.251 TEL3 0.134 0.673 0.257 0.085 0.193 0.085 0.153 0.101 0.229 0.264 TEL1 0.180 0.564 0.162 0.099 0.321 -0.039 0.106 0.077 0.469 0.169 TEL6 0.066 0.498 0.382 0.170 0.153 0.248 0.188 0.213 0.089 0.319 Challenge CHA1 0.133 0.092 0.769 0.088 0.223 0.088 -0.023 0.009 0.329 0.168 CHA2 0.112 0.203 0.762 0.085 0.177 0.061 0.070 0.063 0.225 0.193 CHA3 0.169 0.262 0.698 0.064 0.139 0.142 0.179 -0.016 0.160 0.117

Positive affect PA4 0.079 0.121 0.017 0.851 0.111 0.066 0.053 0.111 0.070 0.040

PA2 0.161 0.051 0.098 0.781 0.107 0.087 0.015 0.138 0.112 0.028 PA3 0.268 0.065 0.079 0.647 0.312 0.168 0.090 0.063 0.231 0.163 PA1 0.293 0.087 0.160 0.578 0.341 0.217 0.080 0.043 0.097 0.172 Loyalty LOY1 0.169 0.147 0.186 0.211 0.730 0.206 0.053 0.048 0.188 0.169 LOY3 0.260 0.099 0.152 0.213 0.682 0.225 0.064 0.158 0.133 0.206 LOY2 0.167 0.253 0.202 0.204 0.649 0.236 0.199 0.139 0.047 0.255 Interactivity INT2 0.148 0.065 0.051 0.098 0.126 0.793 0.022 0.121 0.133 0.093 INT1 0.078 0.105 -0.003 0.105 0.160 0.701 0.009 0.201 0.270 0.065 INT3 0.090 0.024 0.203 0.106 0.254 0.683 0.080 0.190 0.142 0.083 Involvement INV2 0.012 0.135 0.077 0.046 0.060 0.033 0.853 0.105 0.055 0.157 INV3 0.003 -0.002 -0.124 -0.030 0.168 -0.047 0.790 0.145 0.196 -0.075 INV1 0.018 0.074 0.202 0.086 -0.068 0.101 0.782 0.091 -0.122 0.222 Skill SKI2 0.091 -0.010 -0.043 0.010 -0.010 0.093 0.072 0.879 0.014 0.044 SKI1 -0.013 0.088 -0.117 0.110 0.067 0.142 0.183 0.789 0.117 0.207 SKI3 0.015 0.180 0.262 0.151 0.179 0.161 0.122 0.682 0.053 0.051 Vividness VIV3 0.127 0.139 0.174 0.093 0.118 0.240 0.051 0.079 0.758 0.041 VIV1 0.102 0.077 0.289 0.173 0.078 0.230 0.018 0.115 0.628 0.392 VIV2 0.042 0.155 0.288 0.156 0.029 0.416 0.196 0.034 0.520 0.270 Flow FLO1 0.088 0.090 0.086 -0.033 0.158 0.022 0.187 0.095 0.125 0.840 FLO2 0.222 0.294 0.168 0.142 0.207 0.115 0.084 0.213 0.165 0.670

(9)

involvement (H9) to challenge; from interactivity (H7) and challenge (H12) to focused attention; and from flow to loyalty (H20) to positive affect (H19). All sixteen paths were found to be positive and significant. However, four paths did not reach a significant level: the path from interactivity to telepresence (H3), the path from vividness (H4) and involvement (H10) to focused attention, and the path from challenge to flow (H14).

4.3 Competing models

Researchers generally agree that studies should compare rival models rather than merely testing the performance of a proposed model (Bagozzi and Yi 1988). Because our intention is to comprehend the direct and indirect effects within the complex construct of virtual experience, it is important to prove that other paths are not significant. One possibility is that the antecedents to the flow constructs may directly influence positive affect or loyalty. This issue

is important because we model flow as an important mediator of the effects of positive affect or loyalty.

According to previous research, we added three direct links. First, because Jung (2011) considered telepresence to be a critical factor in affecting users’ motivation for con-tinued use of a product, we hypothesized that there is a direct effect of telepresence on loyalty. Second, Park (1996) proposed that involvement has a direct effect on loyalty toward a product, and we thus added the direct link between involvement and loyalty. Third, Sukoco and Wu (2011) noted that interactivity would significantly enhance a consumer’s affective responses, and we therefore hypothesized a direct effect of interactivity on positive affect.

The chi-squared difference between the hypothesized model and the competing model was not significant (the chi-squared difference is 6.2479, degree of freedom = 3, p[ 0.05); according to Hair et al. (2010), this result indicates that the rival model is not better than the hypo-thetical model. In addition, the average CFI of the rival model was the same as that of the hypothesized model, and the rival model’s RMSEA was slightly higher than that of the hypothesized model (0.0681 versus 0.0680, respec-tively). However, compared with the hypothesized model, the rival models demonstrated reduced parsimony. There-fore, telepresence only influences flow, and the effects of involvement on positive affect and of interactivity on loyalty are indirect. On the basis of these findings, we believe that the exercise of fitting a rival model has strengthened the support that we found for the significance and robustness of our hypothesized model.

5 Discussion

The entire flow formation model can be divided into four stages, and each stage is contingent on the successful achievement of the previous stage. Stage one considers the mediated environment’s content/form characteristics and user involvement characteristics; stage two considers the user’s premise and perception of entering a flow state; stage three considers the user’s inner experience empha-sizing the state and phenomenon of entering a flow state; and stage four considers the consequences of entering a flow state.

Firstly, the study considers internal relationships in stage one. The study examines the relationship among content variables in the mediated environment. Interactivity and vividness significantly impact the mediated environment virtual experience. Most scholars regard interactivity and vividness as independent variables without examining their interactive effect. This study attempted to establish, based on previous research, that interactivity within a mediated

Table 4 Reliability evaluation of measurement model

Factor Composite reliability Variance extracted

Interactivity 0.78 0.54 Vividness 0.77 0.53 Skill 0.65 0.48 Challenge 0.74 0.58 Involvement 0.79 0.66 Focused attention 0.78 0.64 Telepresence 0.91 0.63 Flow 0.77 0.63 Loyalty 0.83 0.63 Positive affect 0.78 0.64 Interactivity Vividness Involvement .7832 .4406 .0146 .0958 .5160 .5594 .2574 .3716 .2153 .0109 .2448 .1656 .1873 .0776 .3832 .3244 .3634 .8811 .7754 Skill Challenge Focused Attention Flow Positive Affect Loyalty Telepresence

(10)

environment is affected by vividness; a mediated envi-ronment’s interactivity relies on the presence of vividness as a threshold. A mediated environment’s vividness and interactivity do not remain independent variables. This conclusion varies from the model proposed by Novak et al. (2000).

Secondly, the study considers the relationship between stage one and stage two. In discerning the relationship of a mediated environment’s content/format variables and user involvement, the study finds that this relationship is cor-related to the premise and perception of entering a flow state. The study’s findings revealed that both interactivity and involvement affect the mediated control characteristic variables (skill and challenge)—while interactivity also affects focused attention—but involvement does not sig-nificantly affect focused attention. This conclusion does not conform to the conclusions proposed by Novak et al. (2000). This divergence may be explained by the users’ need to pay attention when driving an interactive motion simulator to avoid loss of control in a high-speed envi-ronment. High-level and low-level participants all achieved a high level of focused attention. In addition, Novak et al. (2000) primarily examined Web-browsing behavior, which differs from the high-speed interactive environment expe-rienced in a motion simulator. Varied levels of participant involvement could affect the level of focused attention.

The study also revealed that vividness does not affect focused attention, primarily because vividness or the richness of content does not necessarily affect a user’s focused attention in a mediated environment. Hoffman and Novak (1996) stated that vividness would affect a user’s focused attention because their study examined Web-browsing behavior. The vividness of product information (a rich content) online would draw the user’s browsing attention. Moreover, that study showed that challenge will positively and significantly affect focused attention, a conclusion that conforms to Novak et al. (2000). Further-more, a worthwhile reference finding shows that though vividness does not affect focused attention, it positively and significantly affects telepresence.

Thirdly, the study considers the direct relationship between stage one and stage three. In discerning the rela-tionship in a mediated environment’s content characteris-tics between involvement and the formation of a flow state, the study showed that interactivity positively and signifi-cantly affected flow. This conclusion coincides with Hoffman and Novak (1996) and Novak et al. (2000). Nevertheless, though vividness did positively and signifi-cantly impact telepresence, interactivity did not directly affect telepresence, a finding that conforms to Novak et al. (2000) while partially echoing Steuer (1992) and Sheridan (1992). They reckon interactivity and vividness as two key

Table 5 Evaluation of structural model

Hypothesis From To Path estimation t value Test result

H1 Vividness Interactivity 0.6542 10.72*** Support

H2 Vividness Telepresence 0.4390 4.54*** Support

H3 Interactivity Telepresence 0.0174 0.15 Reject

H4 Vividness Focused attention 0.1157 0.80 Reject

H5 Interactivity Skill 0.5844 6.72*** Support

H6 Interactivity Challenge 0.6537 7.69*** Support

H7 Interactivity Focused attention 0.3722 1.87* Support

H8 Involvement Skill 0.3140 5.19*** Support

H9 Involvement Challenge 0.1877 3.40*** Support

H10 Involvement Focused attention 0.0118 0.17 Reject

H11 Involvement Telepresence 0.2178 4.83*** Support

H12 Challenge Focused attention 0.4462 3.97*** Support

H13 Interactivity Flow 0.1647 2.43* Support

H14 Skill Flow 0.1644 3.17** Support

H15 Challenge Flow 0.0660 1.33 Reject

H16 Focused attention Flow 0.2635 6.15*** Support

H17 Focused attention Telepresence 0.2676 5.34*** Support

H18 Telepresence Flow 0.3089 6.50*** Support

H19 Flow Positive affect 0.9473 12.10*** Support

H20 Flow Loyalty 1.0804 14.46*** Support

Chi/dof = 2.69, RMSEA = 0.068, CFI = 0.91, TLI = 0.90, RNI = 0.91 * p \ 0.05; ** p \ 0.01; *** p \ 0.001

(11)

elements that affect telepresence. The study also suggests that interactivity affects telepresence through challenge and focused attention. In addition to interactivity, the level of involvement will directly affect telepresence, a finding that varies from those proposed by Novak et al. (2000). They indicated that a user’s level of involvement, in Web-browsing behavior, will affect focused attention and further affect telepresence through a user’s focused attention.

Fourthly, the study considers the relationship between stage one and stage three. In discerning the relationship of premise and perception of entering a flow state to the formation of a flow state, the study revealed that skill and focused attention would affect the state of flow, though challenge did not significantly impact flow. This finding does not coincide with Novak et al. (2000). When users engage with an interaction motion simulator, challenge leads to the achievement of a flow state through a user’s focused attention. In Web-browsing behavior, a high level of challenge provided by the Internet medium would suf-fice to create a flow state. As to the formation of tele-presence, focused attention did affect teletele-presence, a finding that coincides with Novak et al. (2000).

Fifthly, the study considers internal relationships in stage three. In discerning the relationship of telepresence and flow, the study revealed that telepresence did positively and significantly affect flow, a finding that echoes Hoffman and Novak (1996). Telepresence serves as an antecedent to impact flow state but is not necessary for flow. Requisites

also include other factors (i.e., skill, challenge, focused attention, interactivity, involvement).

Lastly, the study considers the relationship between stage three and stage four. In discerning the relationship between flow formation and flow state, the study showed that flow significantly affected a user’s positive affect and inclination to repeat consuming behavior in the future (loyalty). This finding not only echoes Hoffman and Novak (1996) but also indicates that flow is a crucial construct in measuring virtual experience. Figure 5 depicts the four stage of flow formation model.

6 Managerial implications

The study findings and discussion yield the following crucial managerial implications.

First, interactivity and vividness remain the crucial factors that affect telepresence and flow, while vividness also affects interactivity. Bone and Ellen (1992) described vividness as a continuous concept, ranging from poor presentation to an enriching and amusing and near realistic experience of content presentation. The key to the vivid quality of a motion simulator rests on the VR game’s content’s ability to captivate, the quality of the images, the sound effects, and the level of visual cognition, which requires the screen be as large as possible. This factor concerns field of view of the screen with field of view for a single eye ideally set to cover 70 degrees. Many virtual reality games set the field of view at 100 degrees or larger to provide the user an all encompassing and immersive effect (Stanney et al. 1998). In design, though, it is note-worthy that larger screen size will inadvertently reduce the quality of image resolution (Biocca1992). Perhaps, then, a well-intentioned screen configuration is not practical in design implementation. Hoffman and Novak (1996) pro-posed that two types of interactive modes exist in a med-iated environment: First, the interaction of human and computer interface, which is described as machine inter-action. Second, the interaction between one player and others under a computer medium is described as person interactivity. The study’s focal product focuses on an online interactive motion simulator that covers not only machine–user interface but also online interpersonal interface, in which interactive elements behind interface include response time and continuity (Alba et al. 1997). Under an interactive motion simulator environment, the technique that determines the interaction rests on the structure of a motion platform and the real-time computing capability of computer-generated images. The interactive motion simulator’s motion platform encompasses one to six-axes with maneuverable motions ranging from single axis to six axes of pitch, roll, yaw, surge, sway, and heave.

Interactivity Vividness Involvement Challenge Skill Focused Attention Telepresence Flow Loyalty Positive Affect

: Stage I (Media contents variable)

: Stage II (Premise and perception before into a flow state) : Stage III (Flow state)

: Stage IV (Consequence of flow)

(12)

More axes create more technological difficulty. Most vehicle and navigation simulators require three axes, whereas aircraft may require up to six axes due to maneuverability concerns. More axes of motion create a more realistic interaction generated through motions. In addition to the technique of a motion platform, the feed-back function of the joystick remains a crucial factor that affects the user’s interaction and keeps the player’s atten-tion. Regarding visual computation, conventional motion theaters offer a browser-based viewing experience that presents a collaboration of machine and screen operated at a fixed setting the user cannot adjust. Hence, the user cannot voluntarily demand that the motion be changed. The human–machine interface thus remains at a user-passive mode, which leaves a lack of interpersonal interaction. However, this study’s product offers the user a voluntarily maneuverable mediated environment that also allows interaction with others through the generation of a com-puter-mediated environment. This product requires a large amount of real-time computation in light of random game screens, which in turn requires that the producers focus on enhancing the motion platform technology and building software development know-how for screen real-time computation to improve the user’s interactive perception.

The second managerial implication concerns skill and challenge. Hoffman and Novak (1996) proposed that key requisites in flow formation lie in skill, challenge, and focused attention. As to skill and challenge, Novak et al. (2000) stated that when skill fell short of tackling a lenge, a user would feel anxious, whereas when the chal-lenge was low, a user may feel bored; hence, skill and challenge must be congruent. As the system manager is less likely to manipulate the involvement degree of partici-pants, the producer nevertheless could focus on improving the interactivity that may influence a user’s skill and challenge. In addition, Hoffman and Novak (1996) emphasized that vividness and interactivity could increase a user’s focused attention, which indicates that interactivity could directly impact flow, and can affect the state of flow through focused attention backed by skill and challenge. This proposal also confirmed interactivity’s key role in flow formation. The marketer thus needs to focus on improving the vividness; this conclusion was derived from how interactivity and vividness affect the flow deriving from an aggregated yield on a standardized path factor (of direct impact ? indirect impact) and suggests that inter-activity is 2.5 times more powerful than vividness (deriving from 0.406/0.16).

The third managerial implication concerns marketer attention to telepresence and interactivity. Steuer (1992) cited the term telepresence and asserted that two crucial factors that dictate telepresence are interactivity and viv-idness; as noted previously, interaction does not directly

affect telepresence, but it does indirectly impact telepres-ence through challenge and focused attention. Observing the aggregated effect (derived from indirect effects) of the standardized path factors, the study revealed that the influential power of vividness is three times more than that of interactivity deriving from 0.4406/0.1489. The conclu-sions indicated that vividness remains the primary factor that affects telepresence. Up to now, a majority of mar-keters have merely emphasized visual and audio to allow for improvements where dextral and olfactory senses are concerned. The level of involvement also directly influ-ences telepresence and thus needs the attention of marketers.

The fourth implication concerns the connection of telepresence and flow formation. The study revealed that telepresence remains a vital antecedent to flow construct, but is not necessary for it. Vividness, however, rather significantly influences interactivity. While this conclusion subordinates the role of interactivity, it also suggests that vividness has a very crucial role in creating telepresence. In an interactive motion stimulator, vividness is essential in forming positive interactivity. To attain the ultimate goal of improving telepresence and flow state, producers need to secure a vivid design before looking to coordinate inter-active elements that help to induce focused user attention through skill and challenge.

Finally, the study concludes that vividness and interac-tivity play important roles in formulating virtual experience in 3D VR simulators, and the study proposed that game content and motion-based platform play key roles in helping to demonstrate vividness and interactivity. Thus, in practice, we should pay more attention to scenario, fine arts, animation, and background music to improve vivid-ness for players, and we should focus on control engi-neering, 3D VR technology, and communication engineering to enhance interactivity with consumers.

7 Research limitation and future research directions

Beyond this discussion of managerial implications, the study confronts certain limitations. Firstly, while the study attempts to define the effect of interaction between vivid-ness and interactivity, it has only attempted to define the significant yields following a comparison of the vividness and interactivity factors without considering that a medi-ated environment often falls under a high level of inter-action that requires interacting with the consumer in a 3D-operating environment to create the desired effects. As this consideration is not covered by prior studies, incorporating a causal effect into the model could lead to a non-recursive model. While a majority of SEM models present a one-way direction, a two-way model will also present difficulty in

(13)

analysis and explanation. Secondly, the study used as a prerequisite flow concept the concept proposed by Hoff-man and Novak (1996) and Novak et al. (2000), notwith-standing that some research has proposed the affordance concept incorporated to describe the formation character-istics of virtual experience (Durlach and Mavor1995; Li et al.2001). The study does not include this consideration in its analysis. Without the construct of affordance, the study nevertheless offers a close facsimile on flow forma-tion stages to resemble that proposed by Csikszentmihalyi (1993) to offer certain valuable contributions.

In addition to the aforementioned research limitations, we recommend the following for future studies: first, as vividness and interactivity are not intended as independent variables, future studies may want to examine the incor-poration of varying levels of telepresence and observe how they affect consumption behavior. Second, as past studies attempt to categorize telepresence into three layers—first content telepresence, second social telepresence, third individual telepresence (Ghun1999)—the study concludes that telepresence is conducive to forming a flow state and warrants that all three layers of telepresence be further examined by future studies in terms of how they affect the flow formation process.

Third, with a recent increase in the neuroscience approach to the study of virtual experience (Sjo¨lie 2012; Riva and Mantovani 2012; Bouchard et al. 2012), future research might usefully extend the present use of the neuroscience approach to examine the virtual experience of the new research issue, such as augmented reality (Villani et al.2012; Benyon2012), locative media (Karapanos et al.

2012), and 3D virtual world (Bae et al. 2012; Nah et al.

2011). Fourth, the majority of flow research has focused on the balance between skill and challenge and does not consider the interactive relationship between skill and challenge. Perhaps future research could examine the interaction between these two constructs and could provide more detailed results, which may differentiate past research from one another.

Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge the contribution to this study of President Michael, Lai and General Manager Johnson, Chiang of Injoy Motion Corp.,http://www.injoymotion.com.

Appendix

See Table6.

Table 6 Questionnaire Items

Construct Item

number

Item

Interactivity 1 When I play the game there is very little waiting time between my actions and the computers response

2 Interacting with the game is fast

3 The game I played usually load quickly

Challenge 1 Playing the game challenges me

2 Playing the game challenges me to perform to the best of my ability 3 Playing the game provides a good test of my skills

Skill 1 I am extremely skilled at playing the game

2 I know somewhat more than most users about playing the game

3 How would you rate your skill at playing the game, compared to other things you do on the computer? Telepresence 1 I forget about my immediate surroundings when I play the game

2 Playing the game often makes me forget where I am

3 After playing the game, I feel like I come back to the ‘‘real world’’ after a journey 4 When I play the game, I feel I am in a world created by the game I played

5 When I play the game, my body is in the room, but my mind is inside the world created by the game I played 6 When I play the game, the world generated by the game I play is more real for me than the ‘‘real world’’ Flow Instructions: The word ‘‘flow’’ is used to describe a state of mind sometimes experienced by people who are deeply involved

in some activity. One example of flow is the case where a professional athlete is playing exceptionally well and achieves a state of mind where nothing else matters but the game; he or she is completely and totally immersed in it. The experience is not exclusive to athletics: Many people report this state of mind when playing games, engaging in hobbies, or working. Activities that lead to flow completely captivate a person for some period of time. When one is in flow, time may seem to stand still, and nothing else seems to matter. Flow may not last for a long time on any particular occasion, but it may come and go over time. Flow has been described as an intrinsically enjoyable experience

1 Do you think you have ever experienced flow in the game? 2 Most of the time I play the game I feel that I am in flow

(14)

References

Alba J, Lynch J, Weitz B, Janiszewski C, Lutz R, Sawyer A, Wood S (1997) Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic market-places. J Mark 61(3):38–53

Amant KS (2002) When cultures and computers collide rethinking computer-mediated communication according to international and intercultural communication expectations. J Bus Tech Commun 16(2):196–214

Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411

Animesh A, Pinsonneault A, Yang S-B, Oh W (2011) An odyssey into virtual worlds: exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Q 35(3):789

Bae S, Lee H, Park H, Cho H, Park J, Kim J (2012) The effects of egocentric and allocentric representations on presence and perceived realism: tested in stereoscopic 3D games. Interact Comput 24(4):251–264

Bagozzi RP, Phillips LW (1982) Representing and testing organi-zational theories: a holistic construal. Admin Sci Q 27(3): 459–489

Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

Beatty SE, Elizabeth Ferrell M (1998) Impulse buying: modeling its precursors. J Retail 74(2):169–191

Benyon D (2012) Presence in blended spaces. Interact Comput 24(4):219–226

Biocca F (1992) Will simulation sickness slow down the diffusion of virtual environment technology? Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 1(3):334–343

Bone PF, Ellen PS (1992) The generation and consequences of communication-evoked imagery. J Consum Res 19(1):93–104 Bouchard S, Dumoulin S, Talbot J, Ledoux A–A, Phillips J,

Monthuy-Blanc J, Labonte´-Chartrand G, Robillard G, Cantamesse M,

Renaud P (2012) Manipulating subjective realism and its impact on presence: preliminary results on feasibility and neuroana-tomical correlates. Interact Comput 24(4):227–236

Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models. Sage Focus Editions, Beverly Hills

Celsi RL, Olson JC (1988) The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J Consum Res 15(2):210–224 Chanel G, Kivikangas JM, Ravaja N (2012) Physiological compliance

for social gaming analysis: cooperative versus competitive play. Interact Comput 24(4):306–316

Choi DH, Kim J, Kim SH (2007) ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: the flow theory perspective. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65(3):223–243

Chou T-J, Ting C–C (2003) The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. CyberPsychol Behav 6:663–675

Coyle JR, Thorson ER (2001) The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. J Advert 30(3):65–77

Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety. Josse-Bass, San Francisco

Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) The psychology of optimal experience. Harpers and Row, New York

Csikszentmihalyi M (1993) The evolving itself: a psychology for the third millennium. Harpers and Row, New York

Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi I (1988) Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1993) Human–computer interaction. Prentice Hall, New York

Draper JV, Kaber DB, Usher JM (1998) Telepresence. Hum Factors 40(3):354

Durlach NI, Mavor AS (1995) Virtual reality: scientific and techno-logical challenges. National Academies Press, New York Ellis GD, Voelkl JE, Morris C (1994) Measurement and analysis

issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model. J Leis Res 26(4):337

Table 6continued

Construct Item

number

Item

Involvement 1 I give myself pleasure by playing the game

2 I can say that I particularly like this game 3 I have a strong interest in this game

Loyalty 1 Recommend the games I played to others

2 Consider this game your first choice to play

3 Repeat playing this game

Positive affect 1 Unhappy/happy

2 Annoyed/pleased

3 Unsatisfied/satisfied

4 Melancholic/contented

Focused Attention

1 Not deeply engrossed/deeply engrossed

2 Not absorbed intensely in activity/absorbed intensely in activity 3 My attention is not focused/my attention is focused

4 I do not concentrate fully/I concentrate fully

Vividness 1 How inconsistent or disconnected was the information coming from your various senses?

2 How much did your experiences in the virtual environment seem consistent with your real-world experiences? 3 How completely were you able to actively survey or search the virtual environment using vision?

(15)

Faber RJ, Lee M (2007) Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory: a perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. J Advert 36(4):75–90

Faiola A, Newlon C, Pfaff M, Smyslova O (2012) Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Comput Hum Behav 29(3):1113–1121

Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

Fortin DR, Dholakia RR (2005) Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertise-ment. J Bus Res 58(3):387–396

Franzen G (1999) Brands & advertising: how advertising effective-ness influences brand equity. NTC Publications, UK

Friedl M (2002) Online game interactivity theory with cdrom. Charles River Media, Hingham

Garver MS, Mentzer JT (1999) Logistics research methods: employ-ing structural equation modelemploy-ing to test for construct validity. J Bus Logist 20(1):33–58

Gerbing DW, Anderson JC (1992) Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Soc Methods Res 21(2):132–160

Gerrig RJ (1993) Experiencing narrative worlds. Yale University Press, New Haven

Gervasi O, Ranon R (2010) Guest editors’ foreword to the second issue on virtual reality in scientific application. Virtual Real 14(2):153

Ghani JA, Deshpande SP (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human–computer interaction. J Psychol 128(4):381–391

Ghun CR (1999) A study of the effect WWW interactive advertising. National Cheng-Chi University, Taiwan

Guo YM, Poole MS (2009) Antecedents of flow in online shopping: a test of alternative models. Inf Syst J 19(4):369–390

Guo Z, Xiao L, Chanyoung S, Lai Y (2012) Flow experience and continuance intention toward online learning: an integrated framework

Haans A, IJsselsteijn WA (2012) Embodiment and telepresence: toward a comprehensive theoretical framework. Interact Comput 24(4):211–218

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson Education, New Jersey Held R, Durlach N (1992) Telepresence. Presence Teleoper Virtual

Environ 1:102–112

Hoffman DL, Novak TP (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. J Mark 60(3):50 Hoffman DL, Novak TP (2009) Flow online: lessons learned and

future prospects. J Interact Mark 23(1):23–34

Hsu C-L, Lu H-P (2004) Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf Manag 41(7):853–868

Huang M-H (2003) Designing website attributes to induce experien-tial encounters. Comput Hum Behav 19(4):425–442

Huang M-H (2006) Flow, enduring, and situational involvement in the Web environment: a tripartite second-order examination. Psychol Mark 23(5):383–411

Huang LT, Chiu CA, Sung K, Farn CK (2011) A comparative study on the flow experience in web-based and text-based interaction environments. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 14(1–2):3–11 Jung Y (2011) Understanding the role of sense of presence and

perceived autonomy in users’ continued use of social virtual worlds. J Comput Med Commun 16(4):492–510

Karapanos E, Barreto M, Nisi V, Niforatos E (2012) Does locality make a difference? Assessing the effectiveness of location-aware narratives. Interact Comput 24(4):273–279

Kettanurak VN, Ramamurthy K, Haseman WD (2001) User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. Int J Hum Comput Stud 54(4):541–583

Kim T, Biocca F (1997) Telepresence via television: two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J Comput Med Commun 3(2). http://www.ascusc. org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/kim.html

Klein LR (2003) Creating virtual product experiences: the role of telepresence. J Interact Mark 17(1):41–55

Korzaan ML (2003) Going with the flow: predicting online purchase intentions. J Comput Inf Syst 43(4):25–31

Koufaris M (2002) Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf Syst Res 13:205–223

Laurent G, Kapferer JN (1985) Measuring consumer involvement profiles. J Mark Res 22(1):41–53

Lee K-Y (2012) Consumer processing of virtual experience in e-commerce: a test of an integrated framework. Comput Hum Behav 28(6):2134–2142

Lee K-Y, Li H, Edwards SM (2012) The effect of 3-D product visualisation on the strength of brand attitude. Int J Advertis 31(2):377–396

Li H, Daugherty T, Biocca F (2001) Characteristics of virtual experience in electronic commerce: a protocol analysis. J Interact Mark 15(3):13–30

Lutz RJ (1980) The role of attitude theory in marketing. Center for Marketing Studies, University of California, Los Angeles Macredie R, Taylor SJE, Yu X, Keeble R (1996) Virtual reality and

simulation: an overview. In: Proceedings of the 28th conference on winter simulation, 1996. IEEE Computer Society, pp 669–674

Marsh HW, Hocevar D (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 97(3):562

Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 103(3):391

Marsh HW, Balla JR, Hau K (1996) An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In: Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (eds) Advanced structural equation modeling: issue and techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ, pp 315–353

McConville KMV, Virk S (2012) Evaluation of an electronic video game for improvement of balance. Virtual Real 16(4): 315–323

McMillan SJ, Jang-Sun H (2002) Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. J Advert 31(3):29–42

Minsky M (1980) Telepresence. Omni Mag 2:45–51

Mollen A, Wilson H (2010) Engagement, telepresence and interac-tivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. J Bus Res 63(9–10):919–925 Nah FFH, Eschenbrenner B, DeWester D (2011) Enhancing brand

equity through flow and telepresence: a comparison of 2D and 3D virtual worlds. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst 35(3):731

Nelson M, Yaros R, Keum H (2006) Examining the influence of telepresence on spectator and player processing of real and fictitious brands in a computer game. J Advert 35(4):87–99 Nijs L, Coussement P, Moens B, Amelinck D, Lesaffre M, Leman M

(2012) Interacting with the music paint machine: relating the constructs of flow experience and presence. Interact Comput 24(4):237–250

(16)

Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yiu-Fai Y (2000) Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach. Market Sci 19(1):22–42

Nowak K (2001) Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation. In: Presence 2001 conference, Philadelphia, PA, 2001. Citeseer

Nowak KL, Biocca F (2003) The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 12(5):481–494

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw, New York

O’Cass A, Carlson J (2010) Examining the effects of website-induced flow in professional sporting team websites. Internet Res 20(2):115–134

Park S (1996) Relationships between involvement and attitudinal loyalty constructs in adult fitness programmes. J Leis Res 28(4):233–250

Perugini M, Bagozzi RP (2001) The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol 40(1):79–98 Plante TG, Aldridge A, Bogden R, Hanelin C (2003) Might virtual reality promote the mood benefits of exercise? Comput Hum Behav 19(4):495–509

Reid D (2002) Virtual reality and the person-environment experience. CyberPsychol Behav 5(6):559–564

Rheingold HR (1991) Virtual reality. Summit Books, New York Riva G (1998) From toys to brain: virtual reality applications in

neuroscience. Virtual Real 3(4):259–266

Riva G, Mantovani F (2012) From the body to the tools and back: a general framework for presence in mediated interactions. Interact Comput 24(4):203–210

Rothschild ML (1987) Marketing communication. D.C. Health and Company, Lexington, MA

Sa´nchez-Franco MJ (2006) Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behav Inf Technol 25(1):19–36

Schubert T, Freidman F, Regenbrech H (1996) Visual Representa-tions and InterpretaRepresenta-tions. Embodied Presence in Virtual Envi-ronments, Springer-Verlag, London

Schubert T, Freidman F, Regenbrech H (2001) The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence Teleoper and Virtual Environ 10(3):266–281

Schuemie MJ, Van Der Straaten P, Krijn M, Van Der Mast CA (2001) Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. CyberPsychol Behav 4(2):183–201

Segars AH, Grover V (1993) Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness. MIS Q 17(4):517–525

Shahid S, Krahmer E, Swerts M (2012) Video-mediated and co-present gameplay: effects of mutual gaze on game experience, expressiveness and perceived social presence. Interact Comput 24(4):292–305

Sheridan TB (1992) Musing on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 1:120–126

Shih C-F (1998) Conceptualizing consumer experience in cyberspace. Eur J Mark 32:655–663

Siriaraya P, Siang Ang C (2012) Age differences in the perception of social presence in the use of 3D virtual world for social interaction. Interact Comput 24(4):280–291

Sjo¨lie D (2012) Presence and general principles of brain function. Interact Comput 24(4):193–202

Skadberg YX, Kimmel JR (2004) Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a Web site: its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Comput Hum Behav 20(3):403–422

Stanney KM, Mourant RR, Kennedy RS (1998) Human factors issues in virtual environments: a review of the literature. Presence 7(4):327–351

Stavropoulos V, Alexandraki K, Motti-Stefanidi F (2013) Flow and telepresence contributing to internet abuse: differences accord-ing to gender and age. Comput Hum Behav 29(5):1941–1948 Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining

telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93

Sukoco BM, Wu W-Y (2011) The effects of advergames on consumer telepresence and attitudes: a comparison of products with search and experience attributes. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):7396–7406 Suntornpithug N, Khamalah J (2010) Machine and person

interactiv-ity: the driving forces behind influences on consumers’ willing-ness to purchase online. J Electron Commer Res 11(4):299–325 Trevino LK, Webster J (1992) Flow in computer-mediated commu-nication: electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Commun Res 19(5):539

Villani D, Repetto C, Cipresso P, Riva G (2012) May I experience more presence in doing the same thing in virtual reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview. Interact Comput 24(4):265–272

Von Der Pu¨Tten AM, Klatt J, Ten Broeke S, McCall R, Kra¨mer NC, Wetzel R, Blum L, Oppermann L, Klatt J (2012) Subjective and behavioral presence measurement and interactivity in the collaborative augmented reality game TimeWarp. Interact Comput 24(4):317–325

Webster J, Trevino LK, Ryan L (1993) The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human–computer interactions. Comput Hum Behav 9(4):411–426

Welch RB (1999) How can we determine if the sense of presence affects task performance? Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 8(5):574–577

Welch R, Blackmon TT, Liu A, Mellers BA, Stark LW (1996) The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subject sense of presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 5(3):263–273

Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 7:225–240

Zaman M, Anandarajan M, Dai Q (2010) Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors. Comput Hum Behav 26(5):1009–1018

Zeff RL, Aronson B (1999) Advertising on the internet. Wiley, New York

Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Mark 60(2):31–46

數據

Fig. 1 Concept model
Fig. 2 Configuration of six-axis simulator
Fig. 3 Tank go through the battlefield
Figure 4 reveals that under the structural model, only involvement and vividness are exogenous constructs; interactivity, skill, challenge, focused attention,  telepres-ence, flow, loyalty, and positive affect are endogenous constructs
+7

參考文獻

相關文件

By correcting for the speed of individual test takers, it is possible to reveal systematic differences between the items in a test, which were modeled by item discrimination and

We can therefore hope that the exact solution of a lower-dimensional string will provide ideas which could be used to make an exact definition of critical string theory and give

a) Visitor arrivals is growing at a compound annual growth rate. The number of visitors fluctuates from 2012 to 2018 and does not increase in compound growth rate in reality.

However, the SRAS curve is upward sloping, which indicates that an increase in the overall price level tends to raise the quantity of goods and services supplied and a decrease in

However, the SRAS curve is upward sloping, which indicates that an increase in the overall price level tends to raise the quantity of goods and services supplied and a decrease in

We showed that the BCDM is a unifying model in that conceptual instances could be mapped into instances of five existing bitemporal representational data models: a first normal

– Each listener may respond to a different kind of  event or multiple listeners might may respond to event, or multiple listeners might may respond to 

Immersive display: Head Mounted Display, BOOM, Stereo shutter glasses.. Force Feedback Devices (Joystick, PHANToM