The Factors Related to Abstinence from Drug Use and Seeking Help from Medical Services in Taiwanese Heroin and Methamphetamine Users 

63 Heroin and methamphetamine (MAMP) use is a major

public health issue in Asia [1,2]. Heroin use is associ-ated with a wide range of serious harmful effects, including overdose, disease, trauma, psychopathology,

suicide and crime [3–6]. Previous research has also demonstrated that amphetamine use is associated with psychologic morbidity, dependence and health prob-lems [7–11]. Although substance use results in severe complications, it is not easy for abusers to make the decision to abstain from substance use, unless they are aware of the adverse effects of substance use on their health, social relationships, occupational function and family life [12].

For example, a previous study found that concerns about health and relationships were the main reasons Received: May 31, 2007 Accepted: Oct 19, 2007

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Cheng-Fang Yen, Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Tzyou 1st

Road, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan. E-mail: chfaye@cc.kmu.edu.tw

F

ACTORS

R

ELATED TO

A

BSTINENCE FROM

D

RUG

U

SE AND

S

EEKING

H

ELP FROM

M

EDICAL

S

ERVICES IN

T

AIWANESE

H

EROIN AND

M

ETHAMPHETAMINE

U

SERS

Chia-Nan Yen,1,2_{Tze-Chun Tang,}3_{Shu-Chun Liu,}4_{By-Yu Liu,}3_{Hsiu-Tao Chang,}3_and

Cheng-Fang Yen2,3,4

1_{Tainan Hospital Department of Health, Executive Yuan,} 2_{Graduate Institute of Behavioral}

Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, 3_{Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical}

University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, and 4_{Department of}

Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

The aim of this study was to examine the factors related to abstinence from heroin and metham-phetamine (MAMP) use and to seeking help from medical services in Taiwanese drug users. A total of 196 heroin users and 226 MAMP users were recruited in this study. Their experience of previous abstinence from drug use and the routes taken to seek help for abstinence were determined at interview. Demographic data, characteristics of drug use and reasons to abstain from drug use were compared between subjects who had and those who had never tried to abstain from drug use before, as well as between the subjects who had previously sought help from medical services and those who had tried to abstain from drug use by themselves. Those who had previously tried to abstain from heroin use had longer durations of heroin use, spent more money on getting heroin, were more likely to have a criminal record of illicit drug use and had longer durations of being detained due to illicit drug use compared with those who had never tried to abstain from heroin use. Those who had sought help from medical services for abstinence were more likely to be heroin users and to spend more money on getting illicit drugs, and tried to abstain due to concerns about relationships with family. Demographic data, characteristics of drug use and reasons to abstain from drug use were different between drug users who had different experiences of abstinence.

Key Words:abstinence, heroin, methamphetamine, seek help (Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:63–71)

for wanting to stop MAMP use [13]. However, the factors related to the will to abstain from heroin and MAMP use have seldom been examined in Asian societies. Further studies on this can serve as a basis for developing strategies to promote drug user moti-vation to try abstinence.

Previous studies found that only a small portion of drug users seek help from medical services for their drug-related problems. Klee and Morris reported that about half of amphetamine users wanted to reduce their use of amphetamines, but only one in five had sought help from medical services [11]. Hall and Hando found that 41% of amphetamine users felt that they needed help for amphetamine-related problems, but only 27% had actually sought help from medical services [14]. An Australian study on young offenders revealed that only 10% reported willing-ness to access treatment for their drug problems, and 18% reported accessing some form of treatment in the past, despite high rates of problems caused by substance abuse [15]. The most common form of help-seeking was approaching their family [15]. It is important to identify the factors associated with treatment entry, which may help treatment providers develop effective intervention systems to encourage drug users to seek help from medical services.

Previous studies in Western societies have shown that substance abusers who were female [16–19], older [14,20,21], classified as substance-dependent [14], had lengthy durations of drug use [18,22], histories of prior treatment [18,23,24], histories of being arrested or booked [18,22,25], better social support [26,27], con-current psychiatric comorbidity [20,22,25,28–31], per-ceived the adverse effects of drug use [32], perper-ceived the loss of control over substance use [33] and per-ceived the need for treatment [25], were more likely to seek help from medical units to abstain from substance use. However, to our knowledge, no study has exam-ined the factors related to the will to seek help from medical units when attempting to abstain from heroin and MAMP use in non-Western populations.

The aims of this study were to examine the factors related to the experiences of abstaining from heroin and MAMP use and to seeking help from medical services in Taiwanese drug users. We hypothesized that there are demographic and drug-using factors that can differentiate between the drug users who have and those who have never tried to abstain from drug use before, as well as between the drug users who have

previously sought help from medical services for abstinence from drug use and those who tried to abstain from drug use by themselves.

M

ETHODS

Subjects

Taiwan’s Justice Act requires those who are arrested for illicit drug use to undergo a 1- to 2-month detoxi-fication program at an abstinence center sponsored by the Ministry of Law. The Ministry of Justice invites psychiatrists to gather psychologic, behavioral and familial information from drug users to determine the risk of relapse and, when appropriate, to inter-vene in the management of deviant behavior. In this study, one third of the subjects who used MAMP or heroin were randomly recruited from an abstinence center in southern Taiwan. Those who refused inter-view (n= 10) or could not cooperate (for example, mentally retarded individuals; n= 3) were excluded from the study. We investigated the experiences of MAMP or heroin use if the subjects used these two drugs simultaneously. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Kaohsiung Medical University.

Assessment

We used the Questionnaire for Experiences of Drug Use (Q-EDU) to inquire about subjects’ experiences of drug use, including the variety of illicit drug use, experience of previously abstaining from drug use, the routes of abstinence from drug use (seeking help from medical services, family or friends, or trying to abstain by themselves), duration from the first drug use, money spent on drug use, criminal record of illicit drug use, and durations of previous detention due to illicit drug use [34]. The 1-week test–retest reli-ability of the Q-EDU in this study was examined by the Kappa coefficient of agreement for nominal vari-ables and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for ratio variables. The values of Kappa ranged from 0.484 (p< 0.005) to 0.621 (p < 0.001), and the values of r ranged from 0.4145 (p< 0.005) to 0.778 (p < 0.001).

We designed the questionnaire to inquire into the motivation to abstain from drug use. Initially, we conducted interviews in depth for 10 heroin users and 10 MAMP users who had once abstained from drug use. Based on the information collected and the

clinical experiences of the investigators, we designed the Questionnaire for Reasons to Abstain Drug Use (Q-RADU–Chinese version). We then invited six experts to examine the validity of the questionnaire and then revised it accordingly. The Q-RADU is a 4-point 12-item questionnaire, and a higher score indicates that the item is more concordant with an individual’s reasons for abstaining from drug use. The 1-week test–retest reliability of each item on the Q-RADU was examined by the intraclass correlation coefficient, which ranged from 0.394 (p< 0.05) to 0.742 (p< 0.001).

Procedures and statistical analyses

Subjects who refused participation, had severe men-tal illness and had obvious withdrawal symptoms were excluded. We explained the purposes and pro-cedures of the study to the subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study commencement. We inquired about subjects’ demographic data and characteristics of drug use according to the Q-EDU, including the variety of illicit drug use, experience of previously abstaining from drug use, duration from the first drug use, money spent on drug use, criminal record of illicit drug use and duration of previous detention due to illicit drug use. Those who had previously tried to abstain from drug use were further asked whether they had sought help from medical services for abstaining from drug use, sought help from family or

friends, or tried to abstain by themselves. Subjects with experience of abstinence completed the Q-RADU after the questionnaire was explained to them by the research assistants and under their direction.

Demographic data and characteristics of drug use were compared between subjects who had and those who had never tried to abstain from drug use before by using the χ2_{test, t test and Mann-Whitney U test}

in heroin and MAMP users. Meanwhile, because seeking help from medical services for abstinence from drug use and abstaining from drug use itself are two totally different routes, we compared the demo-graphic data, characteristics of drug use and reasons to abstain from drug use between subjects who had previously sought help from medical services and those who tried to abstain from drug use by them-selves using the χ2_{test, t test and Mann-Whitney U}

test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statis-tically significant. However, because there were mul-tiple comparisons in this study, we decreased the alpha level by dividing 0.05 by the numbers of comparisons made to prevent the probability of a type I error.

R

ESULTS

Interviews with 196 heroin users and 226 MAMP users were completed. The demographic data and characteristics of drug use are shown in Table 1. Of these, 124 (63.3%) heroin users and 56 (24.8%) MAMP

Table 1.Demographic data and experience of illicit drug use of all participants

Heroin users (N= 196) MAMP users (N= 226)

Mean (SD) Range n (%) Mean (SD) Range n (%)

Male gender 166 (84.7) 192 (85)

Age (yr) 32.8 (7.8) 18–67 29.9 (7.5) 18–50

Education duration (yr) 9.7 (2.1) 3–16 9.6 (2.1) 1–16

Duration from first illicit 44.7 (61.9) 0–246 48.0 (59.8) 1–232

drug use (mo)

Money spent on illicit drug 23,853.3 0–300,000 3,208.3 0–125,000

use (NTD/mo) (38,702.7) (9,332.5)

Criminal record of illicit 54 (27.6) 45 (19.9)

drug use

Duration of previous detention 18.3 (38.9) 0–186 4.5 (18.5) 0–137

due to illicit drug use (mo)

Combined with other 85 (43.4) 82 (36.3)

substance use

Have tried to abstain from 124 (63.3) 56 (24.8)

illicit drug use

users had once tried to abstain from drug use. The differences in demographic data and experiences of illicit drug use between subjects who had and those who had never tried to abstain from heroin use are shown in Table 2. Because there were eight compar-isons made, a p value of less than 0.00625 was consid-ered statistically significant. The results indicated that the subjects who had previously tried to abstain from heroin use had longer durations of heroin use, spent more money on getting heroin, were more likely to have a criminal record of illicit drug use and had longer durations of being detained due to illicit

drug use compared with those who had never tried to abstain from heroin use.

The differences in demographic data and experi-ences of illicit drug use between subjects who had and those who had never tried to abstain from MAMP use are shown in Table 3. Because there were eight comparisons made, a p value of less than 0.00625 was considered statistically significant. The results indicated no difference in the demographic and MAMP-using characteristics between subjects who had and those who had never tried to abstain from MAMP use.

Table 2.Differences in demographic data and experiences of illicit drug use between subjects who had and those who had never tried to abstain from heroin use

Tried to abstain Never tried to

(N= 124) abstain (N= 72)

Mean (SD) n (%) Mean (SD) n (%)

χ2_{or t or Z p}

Male gender 102 (82.3) 64 (88.9) 1.545 0.214

Age (yr) 32.7 (6.8) 33.0 (9.4) 0.334* 0.739

Education duration (yr) 9.6 (2.1) 9.7 (2.2) 0.276* 0.783

Duration from first heroin 54.1 (62.6) 28.6 (57.8) −4.201† _{< 0.001}

use (mo)

Money spent on heroin use 30,292.7 12,697.6 −4.533† _{< 0.001}

(NTD/mo) (13,109.9) (25,427.6)

Criminal record of illicit drug use 43 (34.7) 11 (15.3) 8.588 0.003

Duration of previous detention 23.3 (42.6) 9.7 (29.8) −2.825† _{< 0.001}

due to illicit drug use (mo)

Combined with other 52 (41.9) 33 (45.8) 0.282 0.596

substance use

*t test; †_{Mann-Whitney U test. SD = standard deviation; NTD = New Taiwan Dollars.}

Table 3.Differences in demographic data and experiences of illicit drug use between subjects who had tried to abstain and those who had never tried to abstain from methamphetamine (MAMP) use

Tried to abstain Never tried to

(N= 56) abstain (N= 170)

Mean (SD) n (%) Mean (SD) n (%)

χ2_{or t or Z p}

Male gender 44 (78.6) 148 (87.1) 5.048 0.025

Age (yr) 29.7 (7.8) 29.9 (7.3) 0.236* 0.814

Education duration (yr) 9.2 (2.3) 9.8 (2.0) 2.056* 0.062

Duration from first MAMP 59.6 (59.0) 44.1 (59.7) −2.474† _0.013

use (mo)

Money spent on MAMP use 5,419.3 2,440.3 −2.499† _0.012

(NTD/mo) (16,642.5) (4,485.5)

Criminal record of illicit 15 (26.8) 30 (17.6) 1.732 0.188

drug use

Duration of previous detention 7.5 (22.8) 3.5 (16.6) −1.225† _0.221

due to illicit drug use (mo)

Combined with other 19 (33.9) 63 (37.1) 0.419 0.517

substance use

Of the drug users who had tried to abstain from drug use, 79 (43.9%) had sought help from medical services for abstinence from drug use, 27 (15%) had approached their family or friends for abstinence from drug use and 74 (41.1%) had tried to abstain from drug use by themselves. A total of 71 (57.3%) heroin users and eight (14.3%) MAMP users had sought help from medical services for abstinence from drug use.

The differences in the demographic data and experiences of illicit drug use between subjects who had previously sought help from medical services and those who had tried to abstain from drug use by them-selves are shown in Table 4. Because there were 10 comparisons made, a p value of less than 0.005 was considered statistically significant. Compared with those who had previously abstained from drug use by themselves, the drug users who had visited medical services for help were more likely to be heroin users and spend more money on obtaining illicit drugs.

The differences in the reasons to abstain from drug use between subjects who had sought help from medical services and those who had tried to abstain

from drug use by themselves are shown in Table 5. Because there were 12 comparisons made, a p value of less than 0.00417 was considered statistically sig-nificant. The subjects who had sought help from medical units for abstinence were more likely to have tried to abstain for reasons of “relationships with family” than those who had abstained from drug use by themselves.

D

ISCUSSION

More heroin users (63.3%) had tried to abstain from drug use than MAMP users (24.8%). Also, while 57.3% of heroin users had sought help from medical services for abstinence from heroin use, only 14.3% of MAMP users had sought help from medical services for abstinence from MAMP use. This difference in the experiences of abstaining from drug use might be due to the different characteristics of the drugs. Withdrawal symptoms and tolerance of heroin use are more prominent than those related to MAMP use. Table 4.Differences in demographic data and experiences of drug use between subjects who had sought help from medical units for abstinence from drug use and those who had tried to abstain by themselves

Sought help from Abstained from drug use medical units (N= 79) by themselves (N= 74)

Mean (SD) n (%) Mean (SD) n (%)

χ2_{or t or Z p}

Male gender 65 (82.3) 58 (78.4) 0.369 0.544

Age (yr) 33.1 (6.8) 30.8 (7.3) −1.997* 0.048

Education duration (yr) 9.5 (2.2) 9.5 (2.4) −0.061* 0.952

Duration from first illicit 48.6 (57.7) 62.6 (63.4) −0.898† _0.369

drug use (mo)

Money spent on illicit drug 31,442.3 16,068.9 −4.350† _{< 0.001}

use (NTD/mo) (40,008.6) (41,009.1)

Criminal record of illicit 26 (32.9) 23 (31.1) 0.059 0.808

drug use

Duration of previous detention 25.9 (47.1) 11.4 (25.9) −1.206† _0.228

due to illicit drug use (mo)

Combined with other 32 (40.5) 25 (33.8) 0.739 0.390

substance use

No. of times tried to abstain 3.0 (5.3) 1.9 (1.9) −2.508† _0.012

from illicit drug use Illicit drugs

Heroin 71 (89.9) 33 (44.6) 36.325 < 0.001

Methamphetamine 8 (10.1) 38 (51.4)

Meanwhile, heroin use may cause more severe legal problems and economic distress than MAMP use in Taiwan. These differences may cause heroin users to have a greater motivation to abstain from drug use and to seek help from medical services.

In this study, heroin users who had longer dura-tions of drug use and spent more money on getting drugs were more likely to have tried to abstain from drug use. Longer durations of drug use and spending more money on heroin indicated more severe heroin use, which increases the possibility of encountering the negative consequences of heroin use. The heroin users who had previous criminal records for illicit drug use and longer durations of being detained due to illicit drug use were more likely to have tried to abstain from heroin use. These findings were also compatible with the results of previous studies [18,22,25]. This result further supports the notion that experiencing legal problems as a result of illicit drug use may increase the motivation for abstinence. That is to say, it may be beneficial to help subjects be aware of functional and legal consequences caused by illicit drug use, which may increase their motivation to quit drug use.

Compared with subjects who abstained from drug use by themselves, subjects who had sought help from medical services for abstinence from illicit drug use had higher expenses for illicit drugs and had used heroin. Once again, spending more money on illicit drugs indicated more severe drug use, which increases the intolerance of withdrawal symptoms when abstaining

from drug use. Meanwhile, the withdrawal symptoms of heroin abstinence are more uncomfortable than those of MAMP abstinence. The worry about the intolerance of withdrawal symptoms when abstaining from drug use may increase the motivation to seek help from medical services.

In addition, drug users who were aware of the fact that continuing illicit drug use would damage relation-ships with family would have had motivation to seek help from medical units for drug abstinence. Social sup-port and social networks are imsup-portant factors to help individuals enter treatment programs [26,27], and families are generally the major source of support for individual drug users. Clinicians may use moti-vational interviewing to guide drug users to be aware of the adverse effect on family relationships caused by continuing drug use. This may change drug users’ deci-sional balance and encourage drug users to seek help from medical units for abstinence [35]. However, a pre-vious study found that although the drug users with the most severe drug-related problems may be the most likely to enter treatment initially, they were also the most likely to relapse during subsequent treatment [24]. These findings will help treatment providers develop strategies to provide insight into barriers to treatment. Several studies have shown the efficacy of metha-done maintenance therapy (MMT) in reducing illicit substance use and crime rate, improving the rehabili-tation of intravenous opiate-addicted patients and low-ering the prevalence of HIV infection [36,37]. Previous Table 5.Differences in the reasons for abstaining from drug use between subjects who had sought help from medical services and those who had abstained from drug use by themselves

Sought help Abstained from

Z† _p

from medical drug use by

units* themselves*

Illicit drug use will damage our health 2.7 (0.8) 2.6 (0.8) −1.220 0.223

Illicit drug use will damage our mental health 2.1 (1.1) 2.3 (1.0) −1.148 0.251

Illicit drug use will damage family relationships 2.9 (0.5) 2.5 (1.1) −2.982 0.003

Illicit drug users will be sentenced 2.5 (1.0) 2.3 (1.1) −1.183 0.237

Illicit drug use will damage our vocational and 2.3 (1.1) 2.4 (0.9) −0.038 0.970

academic functioning

Illicit drug use will damage relationships with friends 2.4 (1.1) 2.2 (1.1) −1.768 0.077

Illicit drug use will ruin our economic status 2.5 (0.9) 2.2 (1.2) −2.289 0.022

Illicit drug use will ruin our reputation 2.6 (0.8) 2.4 (1.0) −1.865 0.062

Illicit drug use will ruin our future 2.7 (0.7) 2.5 (0.9) −2.092 0.036

Difficult to obtain the drugs 0.6 (1.0) 0.9 (1.2) −1.064 0.287

Tired of illicit drug use 1.4 (1.4) 1.1 (1.4) −1.633 0.102

Others 0.3 (1.0) 0.2 (0.8) −0.991 0.322

studies also indicate that psychosocial services increase methadone treatment efficacy [38,39]. Further inter-vention programs will be designed based on the results of our study to increase the motivation for drug abstinence and to remove this barrier to treatment.

In Taiwan, those who are arrested for heroin or MAMP use are mandatorily incarcerated in an absti-nence center for detoxification. It is relevant to con-sider these subjects as community samples, for they are drawn from the community at large by a natural selective process carried out by law enforcement offi-cers [36]. Since MMT has been implemented in Taiwan, our further studies will be performed in the very near future. Data will be collected on people receiving MMT and these will be compared with the results of the current study.

Some potential limitations of this study should be considered. First, we did not investigate the role of psychiatric comorbidity on the motivation to abstain from drug use and to seek help from medical services. As previous research has indicated [20,22,25,28–31], dual psychiatric diagnoses influence help-seeking behaviors and the utilization of mental services. Sec-ond, the characteristics of drug use and experiences of abstaining from drug use were determined accord-ing to the information provided by the subjects in this study. Contextual information, such as observa-tions of family, was not obtained.

A

CKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from the Bureau of Controlled Drugs, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (DOH94-NNB-1033).

R

EFERENCES

1. Reid G, Devaney ML, Baldwin S. Drug production, trafficking and trade in Asia and Pacific Island countries.

Drug Alcohol Rev 2006;25:647–50.

2. Kulsudjarit K. Drug problem in southeast and south-west Asia. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004;1025:446–57.

3. Darke S, Ross J. Suicide among heroin users: rates, risk factors and methods. Addiction 2002;97:1383–94. 4. Flynn PM, Joe GW, Broome KM, et al. Recovery from

opioid addiction in DATOS. J Subst Abuse Treat 2003;25: 177–86.

5. Hser Y, Hoffman V, Grella C, et al. A 33-year follow-up of narcotic addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:503–8.

6. Quaglio G, Talamini G, Lechi A, et al; Gruppo Intersert Di Collaborazione Scientifica. Study of 2708 heroin-related deaths in north-eastern Italy 1985–98 to estab-lish main causes of death. Addiction 2001;96:1127–37. 7. Baker A, Boggs TG, Lewin TG. Characteristics of

regular amphetamine users and implications for treat-ment. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001;20:49–56.

8. Greenblatt JC, Gfroerer JC. Increasing morbidity and mortality associated with abuse of methamphetamine— United States, 1991–1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly

Rep 1995;44:882–6.

9. Hall W, Hando J, Darke S, et al. Psychological morbid-ity and route of administration among amphetamine users in Sydney, Australia. Addiction 1996;91:81–7. 10. Hando J, Topp L, Hall W. Amphetamine-related harms

and treatment preferences of regular amphetamine users in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 46:105–13.

11. Klee H, Morris J. Factors that lead young amphetamine misusers to seek help: implications for drug preven-tion and harm reducpreven-tion. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 1994;1:289–97.

12. Tuchfeld BS. Spontaneous remission in alcoholics. Empirical observations and theoretical implications.

J Stud Alcohol 1981;42:626–41.

13. Morgan P, Beck J, Joe K, et al. Ice and Other

Metham-phetamine Use. Final Report to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Maryland: National Institute of Health,

1994.

14. Hall W, Hando J. Route of administration and adverse effects of amphetamine use among young adults in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 1994;13:277–84. 15. Lennings CJ, Kenny DT, Nelson P. Substance use and

treatment seeking in young offenders on community orders. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006;31:425–32.

16. McKetin R, Kelly E. Socio-demographic factors associ-ated with methamphetamine treatment contact among dependent methamphetamine users in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007;26:161–8.

17. Narrow WE, Regier DA, Norquist G, et al. Mental health service use by Americans with severe mental ill-ness. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35:147–55. 18. Schutz CG, Rapiti E, Vlahov D, et al. Suspected

deter-minants of enrollment into detoxification and meth-adone maintenance treatment among injecting drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 1994;36:129–38.

19. Shah NG, Celentano DD, Vlahov D, et al. Correlates of enrollment in methadone maintenance treatment pro-grams differ by HIV serostatus. AIDS 2000;14:2035–43. 20. Ross HE, Lin E, Cunningham J. Mental health service use: a comparison of treated and untreated individuals with substance use disorders in Ontario. Can J

Psychiatry 1999;44:570–7.

21. Weisner C. Toward an alcohol treatment entry model: a comparison of problem drinkers in the general population and in treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1993; 17:746–52.

22. Rounsaville BJ, Kleber HD. Untreated opiate addicts: how do they differ from those seeking treatment? Arch

Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:1072–7.

23. Booth RE, Corsi KF, Mikulich SK. Improving entry to methadone maintenance among out-of-treatment injection drug users. J Subst Abuse Treat 2003;24: 305–11.

24. Zule WA, Desmond DP. Factors predicting entry of injecting drug users into substance abuse treatment.

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2000;26:247–61.

25. Green-Hennessy S. Factors associated with receipt of behavioral health services among persons with sub-stance dependence. Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:1592–8. 26. Broome KM, Simpson DD, Joe GW. The role of social

support following short-term inpatient treatment. Am J

Addict 2002;11:57–65.

27. Davey MA, Latkin CA, Hua W, et al. Individual and social network factors that predict entry to drug treat-ment. Am J Addict 2007;16:38–45.

28. Finney JW, Moos RH. Entering treatment for alcohol abuse: a stress and coping model. Addiction 1995;90: 1223–40.

29. Kessler RC, Nelson CB, McGonagle KA, et al. The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders: implications for prevention and service utilization. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1996;66:17–31.

30. Robin RW, Chester B, Rasmussen JK, et al. Factors influencing utilization of mental health and substance abuse services by American Indian men and women.

Psychiatr Serv 1997;48:826–32.

31. Rosen D, Tolman RM, Warner LA. Low-income women’s use of substance abuse and mental health services. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2004;15:206–19. 32. Kertesz SG, Larson MJ, Cheng DM, et al. Need and non-need factors associated with addiction treatment utilization in a cohort of homeless and housed urban poor. Med Care 2006;44:225–33.

33. Fiorentine R, Anglin MD. Perceiving need for drug treatment: a look at eight hypotheses. Int J Addict 1994; 29:1835–54.

34. Yen CF, Wu HT, Yen JY, et al. Effects of brief cognitive-behavioral interventions on confidence to resist the urges to use heroin and methamphetamine in relapse-related situations. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004;192: 788–91.

35. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing:

Prepare People for Change, 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press, 2002.

36. Newman RG. Methadone treatment. N Engl J Med 1987;317:447–50.

37. Plomp HN, Van der Hek H, Ader HJ. The Amsterdam methadone dispensing circuit: genesis and effective-ness of a public health model for local drug politics.

Addiction 1996;91:711–21.

38. McLellan AT, Arndt IO, Metzger DS, et al. The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment.

JAMA 1993;269:1953–9.

39. Woody GE, Luborsky L, McLellan AT, et al. Psychotherapy for opiate addicts: does it help? Arch

 !"VS==R==PN=  !"VS==NM==NV=  !"#$%&'  !"!#$%  UMT !"#$NMM

 !"#$%&'()*+,-.

 !"#$%&'(

 NIO= =  P= =  Q= =  P  P== OIPIQ N  !"#$%& = =  O  !"!= =  !"#$ P  !"!#$ %= =  Q  !"!= =  != =  !



!"!#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<#=>,- !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123'456789:&';<=

 !"#$%&'=NVS= !"=OOS= !"#$%&'()*%+,

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./(0123/(40567839$:;<

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456!78(9:;<=>?6

 !"#$%&'()"*+,-./0)123-456789:;<50

 !"#$%&'!#()*+,-./0123!"4 567'!89:

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01%'()*+,-./-.+,

 !"#$%&'()*!+#,!-./0123456#(/0789

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0)123*45$6789:;<=4>

 !"#$%&'(%)*+,-./012345 6783459 !:;

 !"#$%&'()*"+,-./0123,%&4567'89%6'

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123+456789-:;<

  !"# $%&' ()*+ E !=OMMUXOQWSPTNF