*,**** ** ** *** **** ***** 2000 SARS SARS 1999 2005 540±74 vs 445±73, 524±63 vs 409±43, p<0.05 p<0.05 p<0.05 p<0.01 SARS SARS
Case Report
* **** ** *** ***** 96 2 26 96 9 26 96 12 10 105 131[1] [2] [3] [4] SARS [5] SARS [6] 2003 SARS 2004 2002 [7] SARS 2005 15% [8] 2000 9 2001 2 2001 9 2003 4 SARS 2005 7
SARS 2001 2 SPSS 12.0 10 SARS 2003 4 2003 9 SARS 3 6 12 Paired-t P 0.05 2/3 1/3 E N T 539±13 vs 452±31, 1079±34 vs 1026±37, p<0.05 540±74 vs 445±73, 98±18 vs 75±21, 1596±68 vs 1338±223, 78±15 vs 60±14, 522±54 vs 404±55, 441±56 vs 334±114, 1091±84 vs 914±102, p<0.01 319±29 vs 267±48, p<0.05 2001 2 p<0.01 427±14 vs 366±20, 755±47 vs 576±47, p<0.05
ߒΙȈ ᎑ߖཱིᚂᏰϛЖԙҳᕊၼ ՝ȈؐТҁ֯Ρԩ ࠉࡣέএТШၶ ࠉࡣϲএТШၶ ࠉࡣΙԑ ࠉέএТ ࡣέএТ ̚ ࠉϲএТ ࡣϲএТ ̚ ࠉ এТ ࡣ এТ 3 ϱऋࡨຨ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ѵऋࡨຨ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ϱऋ՞ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ѵऋ՞ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨᖂΡԩ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨΣᖂΡԩ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˶ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˷ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ॖΡ٘Ϸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᄸҕ٘Ϸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ߳٘Ϸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᆋ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ
ߒΠȈ ॖΡઽΣ߳п ՝ȈؐТҁ֯Ρԩ ࠉࡣέএТШၶ ࠉࡣϲএТШၶ ࠉࡣΙԑШၶ ࠉέএТ ࡣέএТ ̚ ࠉϲএТ ࡣϲএТ ̚ ࠉ এТ ࡣ এТ ̚ ϱऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ѴऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ϱऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ѵऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨΣᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˶ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˷ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ॖΡ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᄸҕ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᆋ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ
ߒέȈ ઽೇॳخٱӇȞЫႫᐠڎཬᚽȃୄຨ Јȟ ՝ȈؐТҁ֯Ρԩ ࠉࡣέএТШၶ ࠉࡣϲএТШၶ ࠉࡣΙԑ ࠉέএТ ࡣέএТ ̚ ࠉϲএТ ࡣϲএТ ̚ ࠉ এТ ࡣ এТ 3 ϱऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ѴऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ϱऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ѵऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨΣᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˶ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˷ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ॖΡ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᄸҕ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᆋ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ
SARS p<0.01 p<0.05 2001 2 [9] [10] [11] [12,13]
ߒѲȈ ڙ 6$56 டᚂȞୄХᚂᕛ݈Ȃࡌјԑȟ ՝ȈؐТҁ֯Ρԩ ࠉࡣέএТШၶ ࠉࡣϲএТШၶ ࠉࡣΙԑШၶ ࠉέএТ ࡣέএТ ̚ ࠉϲএТҁ ࡣϲএТ ̚ ࠉ এТ ࡣ এТ ̚ ϱऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ѴऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ϱऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ѵऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨΣᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˶ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˷ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ॖΡ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᄸҕ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᆋ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ɏ ɲ ɲ
ߒϤȈ ᄂࢊӫ౩ᙽຨڙ࡙ᄲ፡ᐌഋϷ॒ᐊ ՝ȈؐТҁ֯Ρԩ ࠉࡣέএТШၶ ࠉࡣϲএТШၶ ࠉࡣΙԑШၶ ࠉέএТ ࡣέএТ ̚ ࠉϲএТҁ ࡣϲএТ ̚ ࠉ এТ ࡣ এТ ̚ ϱऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ѴऋࡨຨΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ϱऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ Ѵऋ՞Ρኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ࡨຨΣᖂΡኵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˵ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˶ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˷ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᔮ༌˸ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ॖΡ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᄸҕ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ᆋ߳ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ ɲ
[11] 10 30%-90% [14] SARS SARS [15] SARS 2 3 % [16] SARS 18% 13% 17% [17] SARS 20% 30% [18,19] SARS [20] SARS 2002 2004 20%
2005 7 [21] [22] 2005 15%[21] 2000 2005 1. 2. 3. SARS 4. 5. 6. SARS SARS
ߒϲȈ࢚ୢᚂᐣԑپ१σٱӇᘈΙԑࠉࡣϞࡨຨᚂᕛ݈໔Шၶ ՝ȈؐТҁ֯Ρԩ ࣺᜰᡐ໔ १σٱӇ ϱऋࡨ ຨΡኵ Ѵऋࡨ ຨΡኵ ϱऋࡨ ຨ՞ Ѵऋࡨ ຨ՞ ࡨຨᖂ Ρኵ ᖂࡨຨ ՞ኵ ˵ ኵ ˶ ኵ ˷ ኵ ˸ ኵ ࡨຨॖ ΡΡኵ ࡨຨᄸ ҕΡኵ ࡨຨ ߳Ρኵ ᎑ߖཱིᚂᏰϛ Жԙҳᕊၼ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ Ɏ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ॖΡઽΣ߳ п ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ઽೇॳخٱӇ ȞЫႫᐠڎཬᚽȃୄ ຨΪЈȃཬѶڍቇȟ ɎɎ ڙ 6$56 ட ᚂȞࡌ এТȟ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ Ɏ ɎɎ ɎɎ ɎɎ Ɏ ɎɎ ௰ଢ଼ӫ౩ᙽຨ ڙ࡙ᇄ፡ᐌҕಀ൷ᚂ ϞഋϷ॒ᐊ ɎɎ ɎɎ Ɏ Ɏ ɎɎ Ɏ ɎɎ Ɏ ̙ٷٱӇਢוܚԤᚂᕛ݈໔ࣱ֕౪ή६ޟᗍ༖ ̙ުҩޱȈή६Ґႀᡗಛॎ৯ Ɏ3 ȞࠉࡣΙԑޟ݈໔֕౪ಛॎ৯ȟ ɎɎ 3 ȞࠉࡣΙԑޟ݈໔֕౪ಛॎ৯ȟ
SARS [23] [24] [25] [26] 6 SARS 2005 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 2001 2 5.
1.
2006 49 169-172
2. Chen WK, Jung JJ, Cheng YC, et al. Payment and emergency medical serv-ice in Central Taiwan. Mid-Taiwan Journal of Medicine 2005: 10: 99-106. 3. Robert MW, Patricia K, Jonathan SA, et
al. Reorganizing an Academic Medical Service: Impact on Cost, Quality, Patient Satisfaction, and Education. JAMA 1998; 279: 1560-1565.
4. Gupta. YP, D. Chin. Organizational Life Cycles: A Review and Proposed Directions for Research. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business 1994;30: 269-293.
5.
2006 39 8-19
6. Chang HJ, Huang N, Lee CH, et al. The
impact of the SARS epidemics on the utilization of medical services: SARS and the fear of SARS. Am J public Health 2004; 94: 562-564. 7. 2006.03.28 http://www.doh.gov. tw/statistic/index.htm. 8. http://203.65.100.144:2119/index.jsp 2006/4/4 9. 2 0 0 4 23 316-323 10. 2001 3 330-349 11. 1998 19 161-172 12. 2001 20 61-68 13. 2006 12 27-37 14. 7 11
2004 16:414-424
15. Huang HH, David UT Yen, Kao WF, Wang LM, Huang CI, Lee CH. Declining Emergency Department vis-its and costs during the severe SARS outbreak. J Formosan Med Assoc 2006; 105: 31-37.
16.
2006 25
75-81
17. Tsai MC, Arnold JL, Chuang CC, Chi CH, Liu CC, Yan YJ g. Impactof an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome on a hospital in Taiwan, ROC. Emerg Med J 2004; 21: 311-316. 18. Man CY, Yeung RS, Chung JY, et al.
Impact of SARS on an emergency department in Hong Kong. Emerg Med 2003; 15: 418-422.
19. Cameron PA, Rainer TH. Update on emerging infections: News form the Centers for Disease Control and pre-vention. Annals of Emergency Med-icine 2003; 42: 110-116.
20. Huang CC, Yen HT, Huang HH,. Kao WF, Wang LM, Huang CI. Impact of
severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks on the use of Emergency Department medical resources. J Chin Med Assoc 2005; 68: 254-259. 21. 2006.04.10 http://www.doh.gov.tw/cht/index.aspx. 22. 2000 128-134 23. 2003 50 17-23
24. Rober JB, John HB, Catherine MD et al. The public’s response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in Toronto and the United States. CID 2004; 38: 925-931. 25. 2001 3 67-83 26. 2003 4 53-67
Association of Hospital Major Events and Service
Volume of Emergency Department—Evidence of
One Regional Hospital
Sheng-Pyng Chen, Te-Fang Wang, Jenn-Shing Sher, Chung-Jen Su, Chun-Fang Chen, Ming-Chin Yang
Abstract
Objectives: In the face of major flooding and hospital changes in
becoming a SARS exclusive hospital after 2000, the hospital encountered difficulties in operation. Emergency service volume was also showing a trend of decline. Outside the SARS incident, the purpose of this study is to better understand what types of incidents are prone to influence the operation of emergency services, to provide administrators with a reference for analysis and decision making.
Methods: Statistical analysis and comparison of relevant variables on the
volume of various kinds of medical services based on pre and post variation of relevant variables of medical service volume (except for the month that incidents occurred) for the period between 1999 and 2005.
Results: Taking the hospital as an example, natural disasters do not
greatly impact emergency medical service volume (p>0.05). After further analysis, the increase of competitors in medical environment and the inclusion of soldiers in health insurance have a more significant impact on the service volume of surgical ER and emergency as well as critical cases (540±74 vs 445±73, 524±63 vs 409±43, p<0.05). Policy intervention and the change in health insurance payment system had a greater influence on medical ER and lighter medical cases (p<0.05). The number of soldiers who seek emergency treatments is the major decisive factor in emergency medical service volume Sheng-Pyng Chen, No.131, Jiankang Rd., Songshan District, Taipei City 105, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Received: February 26, 2007
Revised: September 26, 2007 Accepted: December 10, 2007
(p<0.01). The SARS incident and adjustment of patient co-payment indeed was a major impact on emergency medical service volume. Nevertheless, amid major incidents, veteran emergency treatment volume showed the smallest change.
Conclusions: Preliminary results show no significant impact before and
after NARI Typhoon. However, after the establishment of nearby new medical centers, the inclusion of soldiers in the Health Insurance, hospital transformation to become a SARS exclusive hospital, and the increase of health insurance co-payment, some of variables relating to medical service volume showed significant statistical variance.
Key words: emergency medical service volume, major incidents, payment system, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, SARS