Farmers are key to all rural growth experiments - Taipei Times
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2009/01/23/2003434479[2014/8/28 上午 11:41:18] Home / Editorials
Fri, Jan 23, 2009 - Page 8 News List
Print Mail Facebook Twitter plurk funp
Farmers are key to all rural growth experiments
By Hsu Shih-jung Lai Tsung-yu Yen Ai-ching 徐世榮 賴宗裕 顏愛靜Why is Taiwan’s countryside in such a sorry state, and what can be done about it? A bill for rural regeneration that recently passed its initial review seeks to remedy the situation mainly through “vitalizing” the land, which actually means taking what was originally arable land and reallocating it for construction. Can such a policy solve the problem, or would it make the problem even worse?
We believe the main reason why the rural economy is so depressed is that agricultural values have been overlooked for too long and have not been reflected in the incomes farmers receive.
These multiple values are production, life and ecology. Although these three values have become the mainstay of Taiwan’s agricultural and rural land policy, they have not been reflected in farmers’ incomes.
Agriculture and farmland are of great value for the environment. The land holds and conserves important reserves of groundwater, while crops absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen. But what have farmers been paid for this service? Nothing.
Another example: Agriculture and farmland have become an important cultural and tourism resource. City dwellers often go to the countryside on weekends to enjoy rural scenery.
Do farmers earn anything from this? Only a few proprietors of leisure farms make money from it, while most farmers gain nothing.
What about the productive value of farming and farmland? Does it get the recognition it deserves? The answer is disappointing.
As Uncle Kunbin (昆濱伯) says in the documentary Let it be (無米樂), “a pound of rice sells for less than a bottle of mineral water.” What a mockery. This situation has arisen because the government has for years had a policy of keeping grain prices low.
All in all, the ecological and productive values of agriculture and farmland have not been realized through market mechanisms. While successive governments have sought to stabilize consumer prices by holding down the price of grain, input costs have risen. Caught in a trap, farmers have seen their incomes drop to a pitiful level.
The experience of other countries has been different. Even under WTO rules, EU member states and many other advanced countries do everything in their power to support farmers, largely through direct subsidies, because they recognize the ecological and cultural value of agriculture and farmland.
For example, in Switzerland in 2006, direct payments to farmers accounted for 67 percent of total spending on agriculture — an amount roughly equivalent to NT$75 billion (US$2.25 billion).
自由電子報 | 影音娛樂 | 好康報報 | 自由部落
Home Front Page Taiwan News Business Editorials Sports World News Features Bilingual Pages
1 Apple iPhone 6 snag leaves supply chain scrambling
2 Octopus ability inspires camouflage fabric
3 Goldman agrees to US$3.15bn mortgage buyback
4 Farah breaks Euro 2 mile record
5 Tourism sector has eye on Icelandic eruption
MORE
Most Popular
Listing from 2014-08-21 to 2014-08-28 Most read Most e-mailed
Taipei Times 你覺得這真讚。 動態消息 讚 讚 20 小時前 Taipei Times
Profile: The woodturner Full story: http://is.gd/ahpCGe
Yeh Yan-chin, a third-generation woodworker, is trying to lead his century-old family business through tough times
Farmers are key to all rural growth experiments - Taipei Times
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2009/01/23/2003434479[2014/8/28 上午 11:41:18]
TOP
The Swiss government gave on average NT$1.2 million in financial support to each farmer in lowland areas and NT$1.4 million to those in the mountains in 2006. Government support for farmers in Taiwan pales by comparison.
In fact, the land has always been full of life — it is farmers’ incomes that are moribund. Many farmers have become so poor that all they have left is their land. If we want to help them, is “vitalizing” their land by building on it really the best way to go about it? What will farmers be left with if they sell their land? Surely it would be better to have them keep their land and gradually raise their incomes.
Hsu Shih-jung, Lai Tsung-yu and Yen Ai-ching are professors in the Department of Land Economics at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
This story has been viewed 2426 times. Ads by Google 買地送屋 328 萬搞定 www.stutivation.com.tw 輕鬆擁有自己的開心農園 有土斯有財，世代傳承，樂活人生。 仰德儀器—AED心臟去顫器 www.kttc.com.tw/aedweb 我們有AED完整Q&A ，讓您能安心使用， 在急救CPR 那一刻，每個人都可以做到。 無毒有機食材專賣店 www.gigade100.com 吉甲地嚴選在地有機食材，加入會員 立即送100 ，吃當令食材最新鮮！
Subscribe‧Advertise‧Employment‧About Us‧Contact Us‧ RSS Copyright © 1999-2014 The Taipei Times. All rights reserved. Home Front Page Taiwan News Business Editorials Sports World News Features Bilingual Pages
Print Mail facebook twitter plurk funp 0 讚 分享 Facebook 社群外掛元件 同時於 Facebook 上發表 你和其他 24,354 人都說 Taipei Times 讚。24,354 人 說 Taipei Times 讚。 免費註冊 建立帳號或登入，看看你的朋友都在 忙些什麼。
Linguist races to save Aboriginal language - Taipei Times
63 人都推薦這個。
Presidential Office denies story of fake taxi for first lady - Taipei Times
52 人都推薦這個。
Annual LGBT pride parade attracts 50,000 people - Taipei Times
394 人都推薦這個。
Facebook 社群外掛元件
留言 留言
