• 沒有找到結果。

腰薦椎之臨床不穩定性系統分析研究-腰薦椎不穩定度的定性與定量量測(II)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "腰薦椎之臨床不穩定性系統分析研究-腰薦椎不穩定度的定性與定量量測(II)"

Copied!
8
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

(2)  

(3) -   (II) NSC88-2313-E-006-082  87 8 1

(4) 88 7 31

(5)   !. "#$. %   % &'()*+,-./012345 6+01234+7829: ;*<= 0>?782@AB*CDEF5G HI&JKLMN 7 ./01234O PQ(1 R 6 S)TUV W 58.1 X(YZ[ 42 X\ 82 X) 12 6+01234OP Q(4 R 8 S)TUV W 46.3 X(YZ[ 35 X\ 73 X)T]^OPQ+_`abcde Ofgh`ijkhli X mnop qI+jkhnors+OPQ12tu vw`xyz{*|}~>€‚I + j k h ƒ „ † H ‡ ˆ ‰ Š ‚‹Œ Putto’s ŽI‚‘’“Ž”•@ –‡ˆ—782u*˜ ™šI›œ +˜kT./01234OPQ+ žƒ„†HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T782 u > L4-L5 ^¡¢*£;<=¤T¥ ¦§¨¡¢£;*<=©ª6+012 34OPQ+žƒ„†HlŸ@– ‡ˆ—T782u > L5-S1 ¨¡¢*< =¤T¥¦§^¡¢*£;<=I+™ škT./0 6+01234*OP Q+žƒ„†HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T 782u(L1-S1)§^¡¢*£;<=I «¬­782T./01234T6+ 01234T9: %  ! The purposes of this study are to investigate the differences of lumbosacral kinematics between degenerative and induced spondylolisthetic subjects, and to understand the development and process of lumbosacral. instability. Total of nineteen subjects were included in the study: seven subjects with a diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis (one male and six females, ages ranged from 42 to 82 years with a mean of 58.1 years), and twelve subjects with a diagnosis of induced spondylolisthesis (four males and eight females, ages ranged from 35 to 73 years with a mean of 46.3 years). For each patient, one anteroposterior and three lateral radiographs in the neutral standing, flexion, and extension positions were prepared in the first clinic. In each lateral film we placed a specially designed calibration radiopaque ruler on the midline of the lower back of the subject. Flexion and extension positions were adopted from modified Putto’s method. Computer-assisted method was used to measure intervertebral translation and rotation of different positions. The results showed that the differences of translation among three positions (flexion, standing, and extension) at different level were no statistically significant (p>0.05) except at the level of L4-L5(p<0.05) in degenerative spondylolisthetic subjects and the differences of translation among three positions (flexion, standing, and extension) at different level were statistically significant (p<0.05) except at the level of L5-S1(p>0.05) in induced spondylolisthetic subjects. For rotation, the differences among three positions (flexion, standing, and extension) at different level were statistically significant (p<0.05) in both degenerative and induced spondylolisthetic.

(6) subjects. Key WordsLumbosacral, Degenerative and Induced spondylolisthesis, Kinematics.  . 782*@ABT®¯°±²³´ µ`¶·¸¹Tªº}782@AB* Ž»¼ƒ„†H X m½*¾¿ žÀÁ Ã* X m½¾¿Ä X m½¾¿IDª ÅÆ;Çȃ„ †H* X m½¾¿É ʂIˍŽ Knutsson Ì+ 50 fÍ® ÎÏTÐÑÒ^BӁÊ12Ô:*ÕI 1953 Tanz '(Ö×  TØÙ· BӁʙš(angulation)*ÚTÐGۙ šÜ WÝÞªßàTªáâ=0ãä I+ 1990 Putto et al[1]å QÎÏæ Ÿƒ„ †H X m½¾¿ç782@AB èº}T›œ¢é^ê#ëìBíTîï #ëfgð*ŽT@ñòó_ô72\ _`82(L2-S1)*Ô:šõöTªáò ÷šãøùúTûó^ü¶*²³ãòÈ ýOI+ 1987 Friberg[2]ÎÏTÈÀÁ Ã* X m½¾¿ç_þ7234* t T ¾  l  T ¾ z ‰ ¨ ´  (asymptomatic) ž t å ´  (moderate symptoms)  ü ¶ ´  (severe symptoms)IGÛ_þ72Éf˜ (maximal forward displacement)5´¨£ ;ÓTЉ_þ72f*˜5 ´^£;*Ó(p<0.001)T´ü ¶T˜I

(7) ç 782@A Bµ 0BÓ 0BÓ` hžµTó782@AB*c ÞIDBÓ;^T +ÅÆ;Çȃ„†H* X m½¾¿” º}782@ABTDªËŸPT +Ê*t^ä*â=0Tª !ˍŽ+ÅÆ;TÈ"BT#Q ÊT#Q=ÊIDª 1994 Lin et al[3] å Qç $#%BÊ&@ABT®^. '(›œI)Žöf]òÈ hžT*á +xµu*â=0I ª)f'(,¾-./çÊ&@ Ê12Täà,-@Ê12 782@AB*õöT¸Ë&JK'(* )*·+,-./01234 6+0 1234+7829: *<=0>? 782@AB*CDEF5GHI. . &JK*OPQ§”C!"#$ ,12¤$bctÜ01T¯#$ !2c./01234´(degenerative spondylolisthesis) È6+0*1234 ´Q(induced listhesisT34Ê*jk X mÊTЃ„* X m½ò¢éÏ2u Ô:š*=Ê)©55&JK*OPQ67 89—:;<(1)=eO>?Ž@Q (2)¨¥Ñü¶*1AkB&âCT$: 1AjDž1AgD(3)67‰-^`x E(_F725_þ72µu(L4-L5)1 234*Tá34*åG_`xå G(grade I) (4 Ò^7282/(lumbar sacralization)& 8272/(sacral lumbarization) (5)^úš9š 55HQI.  X  I`OPQVJ— 4 i X m½T *‡ˆ—eOfgh jkh+jK (sidelying)ƒ„ †H@–*‡ˆ—eOj kh* X m782noLJM`iIfg hÎNOPpq©jkh”'(*¾ ¿IùOPQ+r*fkhjkh X m782no*rQ+OPQgkRw `x^STU*S~T+fkhJn X-ray rTSU·çVOjQ*WXtY©+j khJn X-ray rTSU·çVOPQ* Z[\,tYIˤT+I`i*jkh norT]^{>`x|}~(radiopaque ruler)TJn X m½rVvw OPQ*1.

(8) 2²,tUT€µ‚Iª+jkh *ƒ„ †H*‡ˆT&”‰Š‚ Putto’s *Ž[4]TÐ ^_ `*OPQ¨ Žè\T*á+ˇˆ—J X-ray noa b0úT\ cd0eT]^‹+j K*‡ˆ—TfgfɃ„ Ɇ HIh¤]^{#ëìBi”ìB# ëTó¥@ojõöI.  

(9) +žƒ„ †H*I`ijkh * X m½;1 26 k(Ù 2-7)T»¼_`7 2 _þ72(L1-L5) I`x2Ä; 4 x ™l(corners)mT¾zL1 1 kTËk* w ¾ z  f ™ 2 k (anterosuperior ž anteroinferior lips)Tg™ 2 k(remnants of Luska’s joints)©ª+ S1 ;* 3 k¾z+_ `82*;no(upper end plate)* 2 x™ lg—*™lL1 1 k+|}~1 3 kI¸ê2Ä}pÄ(rigid body)Iª È;Lk*qr `s‘wPt£ ”  P T » u `  | m 0 v o Sigmascan softwareI+v/*EFt|} ~;^wUTxy*kTIæxk‰ ìB`z¾*{š>€µ‚TLk* qr|¯ }~J‚0*F Matlab • øæ2Ä*™š ˜I.   &JK]·MN*pqT·‰+P +žƒ„†HlŸ@–*‡ˆ— [_`72 _`82L€µu (L1-L2,L2-L3,L3-L4,L4-L5,L5-S1) * ™ š (segmental rotation)  ˜ (segmental translation)I&JK+2Ä;*qrt£‰ Š‚ Panjabi *qrt£[4]T¸ËT+ k*™š‰‚ƒ X „ †*™šIªø æ2Ä*™š‰ 2u‡ˆZ;—Fk] C*æ;xUµ‰™•T+•˜ rT‰ÈI`x2Ä*g—™*Š`kù 5ek”•I˘°BÓ:[;2. Ä*g—™(posteroinferior)*kç—`x 2Ä*g;™g—™]C*xUT UT‹Œk5;2Äg—™*kµŽ4 2Ę:*˜I+.žƒ„ †HlŸ@–*‡ˆ—]P*™š  ˜*˜ ™š(static translation and rotation)T‘ƒ„˜&™š5†H ˜&™šøç*<T˜’Ô:YZ & ™ š ’ Ô : Y Z (total intersegmental translation or rotation)I>õö“T+ ™š;T]^”1AgD*™š(kyphotic angle) 1 • Õ T 1 A fD*™š(lordotic angle)1ÕI+˜;T‘2Äf˜ (listhetic)1ÕT2Äg˜(retrolisthetic) 1•ÕI.  (1) #ëìB– OPQ+jKƒ„†H X mno rT67‚#ëìB–êOPQ*# ëìBíTó782Ô:š@sO\ #ë*fð&gð]ojT*áòÈ ÝÞJK*V0I (2) |}~ +|}~—˜^`™ 8cm*2cm*2mm  Ö*S™TS™;^wUTxyl x@LU*š›T›5›µu`z ¾T>€µ‚I (3) |m0vo(Back-lit tablet(REV-B© Gito Corporation)) I`i X m½T67+|m0v  o ; 1 ] œ B * 26 k T ¯ SigmaScan software †v/q rt£*pqI.  ¯ #$!2]ž0*OPQT I`67+žƒ„†H*‡ˆ —TeO X mfghjkh782n oTLFiI¥t+jkh* X m782 no* X m½t1 26 kI¯ `|m0 vo SigmaScan software †v/.

(10) *pqqrt£*pqT¯ Matlab program •™š ˜TDg¯ £¾ ¿µI. . YZ‰®¯^£;¢ƒ*<=(α=0.05)I ( 6 ) Š‚ Pearson ø«±v(correlation coefficient)õö./01234OPQ+ L4-L5 level ˜’Ô:YZ ™š’Ô: YZµu*«±(α=0.05)I ( 7 ) Š‚ Pearson ø«±v(correlation coefficient)õö6+01234OPQ+ L4-L5 level ˜’Ô:YZ ™š’Ô: YZµu*«±(α=0.05)I. &JKŸ· ¡*¢£ ¤¥OPQ ¦pqT»¼—²³(low back pain)

(11) ÊÔ: §(daily activity limitation)*¢ £¨(JOA Score)[5]\&pq($ Wž ©úžÄ¶ž0zå )I+ JOA Score ¢£ ¨’L^ 23 ¾T¾v@–ª¨ÅÆ´ü  ¶Fš*@–T‘¾v¾z+ 16 ¾ 23 &JKLMN L4-L5 ./01234 ¾T8 ¾ 15 ¾T0 ¾ 7 ¾µuT¾z 7 (3 «š¬­ 4 tš¬­)UV. «š¬­(mild disability)žtš¬­ W 58.1 XT¥t 1 R²T6 S² L4-L5 (moderate disability)¶š¬­(severe 6+01234 12 (6 «š¬­ 6  disability)I tš¬­) UV W 46.3 XT¥t 4 R ²T8 S²Ih¤T³ Meyerding *¾´

(12)   ŽT1234ò°¾FxåGTª&J ( 1 ) Š‚ Repeated measures ANOVA test K*OPQ! Meyerding *¾´ñòê¥ õö./01234OPQT+žƒ ¾ Grade II./0 6+01234O „†HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T782u(L1-L2 PQ+žƒ„†HlŸ@–‡ˆ L5-S1)˜ ™š‰®¯^£; —T782u˜ ™š*Õµ¨`I+ ˜kT./01234OPQ+ ¢ƒ*<=(α=0.05)I ( 2 ) Š‚ Repeated measures ANOVA test žƒ„†HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T782 õö6+01234OPQT+žƒ u > L4-L5 ^¡¢*<=¤(p<0.05)T¥ „†HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T782u(L1-L2 ¦§¨¡¢£;*<=(P>0.05)I‘ææ L5-S1)˜ ™š‰®¯^£; ‡ˆõöT >ƒ„5†H^¡¢*<= ¤(p<0.05)T¥¦5ƒ„5†H ¢ƒ*<=(α=0.05)I ( 3 ) Š‚ Independent-Samples t-test õö §¨¡¢*£;<=(p>0.05)Iª6+0 ./0 6+01234OPQ+˜’ 1234OPQ+žƒ„†HlŸ Ô:YZ ™š’Ô:YZT+782u @–‡ˆ—T782u > L5-S1 ¨¡¢ (L1-L2 L5-S1)‰®¯^£;¢ƒ*< *<=¤(F=2.531Tp>0.05)T¥¦§^¡ ¢*£;<=(p<0.05)I‘æ懈õ =(α=0.05)I ( 4 ) Š‚¨°v* Mann-Whitney eKõ ö T   >   5 † H ¨ ¡ ¢ *<=¤ ö«š¬­ tš¬­./01234´ (p>0.05)T¥¦5ƒ„ƒ„5†H§ OPQ+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’Ô ^¡¢*£;<=(p<0.05)I+™š : Y Z ‰ ® ¯ ^ £  ; ¢ ƒ * < = kT./01234OPQ+žƒ„ †HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T782u(L1-S1) (α=0.05)I ( 5 ) Š‚ Independent-Samples t-test õö §^¡¢*£;<=(P<0.05)I‘ææ‡ «š¬­ tš¬­6+01234´O ˆõöTL1-L5  >5†H¨¡¢*< PQ+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’Ô: =¤(p>0.05)T¥¦5ƒ„ƒ„5†.

(13) H § ^ ¡ ¢ * £ ;<=(p<0.05)Iª L5-S1   >5ƒ„¨¡¢*<=¤ (p>0.05)T¥¦5†Hƒ„5†H§ ^¡¢*£;<=(p<0.05)I ª6+0 1234*OPQ+žƒ„†Hl Ÿ@–‡ˆ—T782u(L1-S1)*™š£ ;<=5./01234OPQø–I ¨`›œ¢é+˜’Ô:YZ kTD6+01234OPQ+˜’ Ô:YZ > L5-S1 ¤T¥¦782ud õ./01234´OPQTÐ+£ ;   > L3-L4 ^ ¡ ¢ * < = ¤ (t=-2.832Tp<0.05)T¥¦782u§¨¡ ¢*£;<=(p>0.05)I ¨`›œ¢é +™š’Ô:YZkTD6+012 34OPQ+™š’Ô:YZdõ./0 1234OPQTÐ+£;§¨¡¢ *£;<=(p>0.05)I +./01234¶OPQt^l «š¬­Ftš¬­T·^+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’Ô:YZ*UVÕ rV<µ¨ôI ¨ô›œ¢étš¬ ­./01234OPQ+ɘ  ˜’Ô:YZdõ«š¬­TЯ Mann-Whitney U eK¾¿«š¬­ t š ¬­./01234OPQ+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’Ô:YZT›œæ Q ¾ z § @ ¯ ^ £  ; ¢ ƒ*<= (p=0.4Tp=1.0) I +6+01234¸ôOPQt^ ¹«š¬­¹tš¬­T·^+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’Ô:YZ* UVÕ rV<µ¨lI ¨l›œ¢é tš¬­6+01234OPQ+É ˜ ˜’Ô:YZdõ«š¬­TÐ ¯ Independent-Sample t-test ¾¿«š¬ ­ tš¬­6+01234OPQ+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’Ô:YZT ›œæQ¾z§@¯^£;¢ƒ*<= (p=0.078Tp=0.111) I ./0 6+01234OPQ+ L4-L5 level ¾z瘒Ô:YZ ™š. ’Ô:YZÖ*«±è'(T[¨` º . / 0 6 + 0 1 2 3 4 OPQ+ L4-L5 level *˜’Ô:YZ ™š’Ô :YZdõ¥Ñ level T¯ Pearson ø «±v*£¾¿gT›œGÛ+./0 1234OPQ+ L4-L5 level *˜’Ô :YZ ™š’Ô:YZÖµuÒ^« ±»+(p=0.504, r=-0.306)Iª6+012 34OPQ+ L4-L5 level *˜’Ô:Y Z ™š’Ô:YZÖµu¯ Pearson ø«±v*£¾¿gT›œæQµuã Ò^«±»+(p=0.369, r=0.300)I.  ‚: X m½”P˜ ™š sOt£&©*¼<žX m½o½*¾¿ š&©12‰®^¥ÑUk †*o jIÀ¥‰P˜*pqT¸ X m½ o½s°RI¸ËT+]^*JKEF tT>ßÁ)_¸Â*ojT]^0à o½¾¿* X m½T*á+M X m½*r Q]^s+OPQ*12tuRw`x| }~TÈf*'(õö@¶}|}~*¶ ·0T+è:*EFt]^sÄÅ12 „ †ÆE 20 š&jyD„ÆE 10 šT )ÇÍ@soj]^+ X m½;1r¤ [6]T)Ç+•˜*pqÈVI+ Pt£kT]^ê`im½1 26 kT ¶É 20 a”P˜ ™šTGÛ˜ ™š*â=±vd+òeO*YZ—I¸ ËT]^]\*pq‰òN5e*TÊ `@Ë*EÍ‰MN*v@ÌÍI D‚ƒ„†Hm½¾¿OPQ°:* 9:õ:*9:T)xθòȉ. OPQ+ƒ„r¸Ï³È fƒ„ *Ô:šO §IDª&JK\ cde ]^Š‚‹Œ Putto’s ŽT)ŸŽû óOPQ^ü¶*—²³ãòÈPÐT] ÈˍŽÑ°:9:*<=‰ÒÖ*TÓ Ô‰òÈÕÖ*I1234*Ÿ´ø ùÍT^*^´T^*¨´©^*‰.

(14) `E34T^*‰æxEÈ;*3 4Tªá34*åG×@`ÇI¸ËT& JK>·V%12@ABT]^ ]MN*OPQd‰`xE34T^ ´*1234áåG‰ Grade I & Grade IIIÐ &JKMN*ru^ v@ ÌÍTÈ Ò^ Grade II 1234*O PQT¸Ë¨Ž¾¿^« Grade II 123 4OPQ*pqI +./0 6+0*™škTL1-L5 level 5†HÒ^¡¢£;*<=T òȉ +r«€kõöØÙíá «€kyõöÚyk(sagittal plane)TÈ g†H*Ô:šÛußÁ *ÜÝIª L5-S1 level +5ƒ„Ò^ £;<=Tòȉ+ L5-S1 level gk* Þßiàõ¥Ñ level ᥫ€kõöÚ yâk(coronal plane) TÈ fƒ„ rÔ:šsO\ §©+˜kT6+ 0 L1-L5 level +5†HÒ^£;< =TòÈ㉠r«€kõöØÙ íTÈ g†H*Ô:šßÁ*Ü ÝIª L5-S1 level Ò^£;<=TòÈ ‰+ L5-S1 level gk*Þßiàõ¥Ñ level ᥫ€kõöÚyâk(coronal plane)Tª@‰Ñ L1-L5 level *«€k`Ç õöÚyk(sagittal plane)TÈ  fƒ„rÔ:šsO\ §I [¨`›œtGÛ6+01234 ˜ ’ Ô : Y Z ™ š ’ Ô : YZ > L5-S1 ˜’Ô:YZ¤¥¦dõ./0 1234˜’Ô:YZ ™š’Ô:Y ZTD-^+ L3-L4 level ˜’Ô: YZ^£;*<=¤T¥¦V¨¡¢£ ;*<=TÐ)òÈ͉782[@A B\AB*CDEF5GH*`ŸãˆI [JKt¨ô ¨lGÛ./0 6 +0tš¬­õ«š¬­*ɘ  ˜’Ô:YZUVÕTШ¡¢£; *<=T)Ñ 1987 Friberg[1]ç 45 1 234OPQ]è*'(+ɘ¨£ ;*<=TÐ+˜’Ô:YZ^£. ;*<=‰@–*TòÈ*θ‰ M N«š¬­tš¬­v@Ì&Q‰. äåæçÞßiàÝÞ]è*I¸ ËTŸ·ÍÅÆOPQT{*”é êÈ;pq*â/Tȓë]^È¾ì ¡í@–´*ü¶Fš‰®s瘒 Ô:YZ^ojI [¨îGÛ./01234+ L4-L5 level ˜’Ô:YZ ™š’Ô:YZõ ¥Ñ level dTÐ[&JK*›œ¢éæ QµuÒ^ï#ø«ãˆ©[¨`GÛ6 +01234+ L4-L5 level ˜’Ô:Y Z ™š’Ô:YZõ¥Ñ level dT¥ ›œã¢éæQµuÒ^ï#ø«ãˆI )›œ5 1990 Kalebo et al [7]ç 29 ^ ´*1234OPQ]è*'(›œø ðI ËòºT+34E*˜’Ô: YZ*@ª¨™š’Ô:YZI.  &JKȃ„†H X m½ç./ 0 6+01234OPQT,-lŸ@ –‡ˆ—782u˜ ™š*¾¿T ›œ¾¿ȗ›ñI (1) 6+0*˜’Ô:YZ ™š’Ô :YZ+ L1-S1 uÓÔdõ./0*’ ˜Ô:YZ ’™šÔ:YZT)òÈ Í‰782[@AB\AB*CDEF5 GH*`ŸãˆI (2) [ƒ„\†H‡ˆ*EFtT™š*‹ âÓԉ[öÖ*fò™š\ö*fò ™šI (3) ´ü¶Fš*@ª¨+34E É˜˜’Ô:YZ*I (4) +34E*˜’Ô:YZ* @ª¨™š’Ô:YZI.  [1]E. Putto and K. Tallroth,”.

(15) Extension-flexion radiographs for motion studies of the lumbar spine: A comparison of two methods”, Spine 15:2:107-110, 1990. [2]O. Friberg, ”Lumbar instability: A dynamic approach by traction-compression Radiography”, Spine 12:119-29, 1987. [3]RM Lin, CJ Chang, FC Su and CY Yu,”Flexion-Extension Rhythm in the Lumbosacral Spine”, Spine 19:2204-2209,1994. [4]AA White and MM Panjabi,” Clinical. Biomechanics of the spine” Second Ed.Philadephia,J.B.Lippincoot,1990. [5]

(16) ósôõö÷øùúûùüýþùü5-ýü9öõ% [6]EN Hanley, RE Matteri and JW Frymoyer,”Accurate Roentgenograohic Determination of Lumbar Flexion-Extension”, Clinical Orthopedic and Related Research 115: 145-148,1976. [7]P Kalebo, Kadziolka R and Sward L,” Compression-traction radiography of lumbar segmental instability”, Spine 15:351-355,1990..

(17) ˜ (mm) €u. ´z. . ˜’Ô :YZ. . ƒ„. †H. ™š’Ô :YZ. L4-L5 ./0 -0.7(0.7) -0.2(1.0) -0.6(0.8). 0.3(1.0). 7.5(2.4). 4.1(3.0). 8.6(3.6). 4.5(2.5). L1-L2 L4-L5 6+0 -0.6(0.9) 0.2(1.0) -0.6(1.2). 0.8(1.0). 9.5(3.5). 3.7(1.9). 9.8(3.2). 6.0(3.6). L4-L5 ./0 -1.5(0.5) -0.7(0.3) -1.0(0.7). 0.3(0.9). 9.9(4.0). 6.0(2.5). 11.8(3.3). 5.8(2.3). L2-L3 L4-L5 6+0 -1.2(1.0) 0.0(0.7) -1.1(1.1). 1.1(0.8). 14.3(3.6). 5.4(2.6). 13(2.6). 7.6(2.4). L4-L5 ./0 -1.8(1.7) -0.9(1.2) -1.4(1.8). 0.6(0.9). 12.5(3.1). 6.0(2.7). 13.6(2.6). 7.6(3.4). L3-L4 L4-L5 6+0 -1.3(0.9) 0.3(1.4) -1.6(1.2). 1.9(1.0). 14.9(3.1). 2.7(3.9). 13.9(3.2) 11.2(3.8). 5.0(2.6) 3.2(2.3). 1.8(1.1). 9.6(4.9). 4.6(4.4). 12.4(4.2). L4-L5 L4-L5 6+0 -0.7(1.3) 1.2(2.6) -1.1(0.8). 2.2(2.3). 14.5(5.7). 3.7(4.0). 16.1(5.6) 12.5(5.7). 14(5.2). 11.3(6.1). 18(5.4). 6.7(3.5). 13.8(8.3). 9.7(4.1). 20(7.7). 10.2(6.1). L4-L5 ./0 3.9(2.8). ƒ„. †H. ™š(degrees). L4-L5 ./0 -1.6(1.7) -2.0(2.0) -1.6(1.6) -0.4(0.7) L5-S1 L4-L5 6+0 -1.2(1.1) -1.1(1.3) -1.3(1.6). 0.2(1.3). 7.7(4.8). ¨` ./0 6+01234OPQ+žƒ„†HlŸ@–‡ˆ—T782u˜ ™š*U VÕ(rV<). ´z L4-L5 ./0. €u. ü¶š. ɘ. ˜’Ô:YZ. «š¬­. 3.8(2.3). 1.7(1.3). tš¬­. 5.9(2.6). 1.9(1.0). L4-L5. ¨ô «š¬­ tš¬­./01234+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’ Ô:YZUVÕ(rV<). ´z L4-L5 6+0. €u. ü¶š. ɘ. ˜’Ô:YZ. «š¬­. -0.2(1.2). 1.2(0.8). tš¬­. 2.5(3.1). 3.3(2.9). L4-L5. ¨l «š¬­ tš¬­6+01234+ L4-L5 level ɘ ˜’ Ô:YZUVÕ(rV<).

(18)

參考文獻

相關文件

圖三 104 年度數學學門研究單位計畫件數分佈.. 民國 104 年 11 月 自然科學簡訊第二十七卷第四期 統計. 統計學門 104 年度大批申請專題研究計畫 共核定通過 118

貴重儀器共同使用服務計畫 105 年度核定 通過 217 件,其中包括汰舊換新及新購設備 22 件,運作服務 195 件,使用總經費 51,304

• 克夫拉49具有傑出的高強度和斷裂伸 度,太空級的克夫拉49須具有3.5 GNm-2

莊子美學中所呈現的「開放性系統」, 試圖來彌合菁英系統與庶民 系統之間的落差, 因為社會的穩定維繫於庶民教育體系的建立。毫

當系統的特徵根均有負實部時,系統是穩定的,在滿足穩定

(三) 變率與微分、 求和與積分: “變率” 與 “求和” 是函數的兩種定量型 (quantitative) 的基本性質。 但是它們的定義本身就是理論的起點, 有如當年

 統計報表-全院及各單位均可設定日期區間監測 MDROs 數量趨勢:(1)泡泡圖:可設定菌種數量級 距及泡泡呈現的大小,以便從統計圖上監測

基於 TWSE 與 OTC 公司之特性,本研究推論前者相對於後者採取更穩定之股利政 策 (Leary and Michaely, 2011; Michaely and