• 沒有找到結果。

Homework 6, Advanced Calculus 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Homework 6, Advanced Calculus 1"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Name and Student ID’s:

Homework 6, Advanced Calculus 1

!!! Please note the new group and classroom assignment !!!

1. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24ab.

Solution: (a) For every Cauchy sequences {pn}, {qn}, we readily verify

• limn→∞d(pn, pn) = limn→∞0 = 0 ⇒ {pn} ∼ {pn}.

• {pn} ∼ {qn} ⇒ 0 = limn→∞d(pn, qn) = limn→∞d(qn, pn) ⇒ {qn} {pn}.

• {pn} ∼ {qn} and {qn} ∼ {rn} ⇒ limn→∞d(pn, rn) ≤ limn→∞(d(pn, qn) + d(qn, rn)) = 0 + 0 = 0 ⇒ {pn} ∼ {rn}.

(b) Suppose {pn} ∼ {p0n} and {qn} ∼ {qn0}, we have limn→∞d(pn, p0n) = limn→∞d(qn, q0n) = 0.

Therefore

n→∞lim d(pn, qn) ≤ lim

n→∞d(pn, p0n) + lim

n→∞d(p0n, qn0) + lim

n→∞d(q0n, qn0)

and the first, third terms are both zero due to their equivalence. So the function ∆ is independent of choice of representatives and therefore defines a function on X. Since d is a metric, whose reflexivity and triangle inequality are preserved under limit operation, we see clearly that ∆ is a metric on X. For the remaining parts of this problem, we will write P for both a Cauchy sequence and the equivalence class it belongs.

2. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24c.

Solution: Let {Pm}m⊂ X be Cauchy (in ∆). For all  > 0, there are two  − N arguments we will utilize:

(i) Since {Pm}mis ∆− Cauchy, there exists M such that

∆(Pm, Pr) = lim

k→∞d(pmk, prk) <  3. for all m, r > M. The statement can be rephrased as

There exists M, K,m,n∈ N so that d(pmk, prk) < 

3 ∀m, r > M, k > K,m,n.

(ii) For all m ∈ N, since Pm= {pmn} is a Cauchy sequence in X, there exist Nmso that d(pmn, pml ) <



3 for all n, l > Nm.

From the sequence of sequences above, take P = {pkN

k}k, where Nk is chosen according to (ii) above. We must show that P is Cauchy in d and ∆(Pm, P ) → 0 as m → ∞. Again starting with an arbitrary  > 0, for k > l > M in (i), we have

d(pkNk, plNl) ≤ d(pkNk, pkv) + d(pkv, plv) + d(plv, plNl)

(2)

for any v. Take v > max(Nk, Nl, Kk,l, then according to the descriptions of (i) and (ii), the sum above is less than . Therefore, P is Cauchy in d.

To show that Pm→ P , we estimate

∆(Pm, P ) = lim

k→∞d(pmk, pkNk).

Follow similar logics, we have

d(pmk, pkN

k) ≤ d(pmk , pmv) + d(pmv , pkv) + d(pkv, pkN

k).

For m > M, k > max(M, Nm), and v > max(M, Nm, Nk, K,m,k), the above sum is then less than  and result follows.

3. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24d.

Solution: With the given constant (and therefore Cauchy) sequences Pp and Pq, it is clear from definition that ∆(Pp, Pq) = d(p, q). The surjective mapping ϕ : X → X given by ϕ(p) = Pp is clearly injective. Since for all p 6= q in X, we have ∆(Pp.Pq) = d(p, q) > 0 and therefore Pp6= Pq.

4. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24e.

Solution: Take any P ∈ X and  > 0, let the Cauchy sequence {pk} be a representative of P . Since it is Cauchy, there is N so that d(pn, pm) <  for all n, m > N. We then have

∆(PpN, P ) = lim

k→∞d(pk, pN) ≤ 

and therefore ϕ(X) is dense in X. If X is complete, {pk} is convergent with limit p. Therefore

∆(Pp, P ) = lim

k→∞d(p, pk) = 0 or Pp= P . Therefore ϕ(X) = X.

5. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 21.

6. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 22.

7. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 23.

8. Given f : A → B and {Eα} a collection of subsets of B, prove that (a) f−1(∪αEα) = ∪αf−1(Eα).

(b) f−1(∩αEα) = ∩αf−1(Eα).

(c) f−1(Eαc) = f−1(Eα)c.

9. Prove that 8a is still true with f−1 replaced by f , but 8b and 8c no longer hold.

Page 2

參考文獻

相關文件

Fill in the gaps in the construction of the non-measurable space

For the function h whose graph is given, state the value of each quantity, if it exists... Sketch the graph of the function and use it to determine the value of each limit, if

Motivated by recent work of Hajela, we here reconsider the problem of determining the minimum distance between output sequences of an ideal band-limiting channel,

This proves that ρ is the radius of convergence of S, and that parts (i) and (iii) hold.. W EN -C HING L IEN Advanced

2002, Kanpur, India, Agrawal, and university students Kayal and Saxena found a polynomial time algorithm for the primality testing problem, thereby proves it is a problem in class

Full credit if they got (a) wrong but found correct q and integrated correctly using their answer.. Algebra mistakes -1% each, integral mistakes

The purpose of this paper is to consider the Cauchy problem for the time- fractional (both sub- and super- diffusive) relativistic diffusion equation.. Based on the viewpoint of

In this paper we study the stability question of the inverse bound- ary value problem for the Schr¨odinger equation with a potential and the conductivity equation by partial