Name and Student ID’s:
Homework 6, Advanced Calculus 1
!!! Please note the new group and classroom assignment !!!
1. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24ab.
Solution: (a) For every Cauchy sequences {pn}, {qn}, we readily verify
• limn→∞d(pn, pn) = limn→∞0 = 0 ⇒ {pn} ∼ {pn}.
• {pn} ∼ {qn} ⇒ 0 = limn→∞d(pn, qn) = limn→∞d(qn, pn) ⇒ {qn} {pn}.
• {pn} ∼ {qn} and {qn} ∼ {rn} ⇒ limn→∞d(pn, rn) ≤ limn→∞(d(pn, qn) + d(qn, rn)) = 0 + 0 = 0 ⇒ {pn} ∼ {rn}.
(b) Suppose {pn} ∼ {p0n} and {qn} ∼ {qn0}, we have limn→∞d(pn, p0n) = limn→∞d(qn, q0n) = 0.
Therefore
n→∞lim d(pn, qn) ≤ lim
n→∞d(pn, p0n) + lim
n→∞d(p0n, qn0) + lim
n→∞d(q0n, qn0)
and the first, third terms are both zero due to their equivalence. So the function ∆ is independent of choice of representatives and therefore defines a function on X∗. Since d is a metric, whose reflexivity and triangle inequality are preserved under limit operation, we see clearly that ∆ is a metric on X∗. For the remaining parts of this problem, we will write P for both a Cauchy sequence and the equivalence class it belongs.
2. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24c.
Solution: Let {Pm}m⊂ X∗ be Cauchy (in ∆). For all > 0, there are two − N arguments we will utilize:
(i) Since {Pm}mis ∆− Cauchy, there exists M such that
∆(Pm, Pr) = lim
k→∞d(pmk, prk) < 3. for all m, r > M. The statement can be rephrased as
There exists M, K,m,n∈ N so that d(pmk, prk) <
3 ∀m, r > M, k > K,m,n.
(ii) For all m ∈ N, since Pm= {pmn} is a Cauchy sequence in X, there exist Nmso that d(pmn, pml ) <
3 for all n, l > Nm.
From the sequence of sequences above, take P = {pkN
k}k, where Nk is chosen according to (ii) above. We must show that P is Cauchy in d and ∆(Pm, P ) → 0 as m → ∞. Again starting with an arbitrary > 0, for k > l > M in (i), we have
d(pkNk, plNl) ≤ d(pkNk, pkv) + d(pkv, plv) + d(plv, plNl)
for any v. Take v > max(Nk, Nl, Kk,l, then according to the descriptions of (i) and (ii), the sum above is less than . Therefore, P is Cauchy in d.
To show that Pm→ P , we estimate
∆(Pm, P ) = lim
k→∞d(pmk, pkNk).
Follow similar logics, we have
d(pmk, pkN
k) ≤ d(pmk , pmv) + d(pmv , pkv) + d(pkv, pkN
k).
For m > M, k > max(M, Nm), and v > max(M, Nm, Nk, K,m,k), the above sum is then less than and result follows.
3. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24d.
Solution: With the given constant (and therefore Cauchy) sequences Pp and Pq, it is clear from definition that ∆(Pp, Pq) = d(p, q). The surjective mapping ϕ : X → X∗ given by ϕ(p) = Pp is clearly injective. Since for all p 6= q in X, we have ∆(Pp.Pq) = d(p, q) > 0 and therefore Pp6= Pq.
4. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 24e.
Solution: Take any P ∈ X∗ and > 0, let the Cauchy sequence {pk} be a representative of P . Since it is Cauchy, there is N so that d(pn, pm) < for all n, m > N. We then have
∆(PpN, P ) = lim
k→∞d(pk, pN) ≤
and therefore ϕ(X) is dense in X∗. If X is complete, {pk} is convergent with limit p. Therefore
∆(Pp, P ) = lim
k→∞d(p, pk) = 0 or Pp= P . Therefore ϕ(X) = X∗.
5. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 21.
6. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 22.
7. Rudin Chapter 3 Exercise 23.
8. Given f : A → B and {Eα} a collection of subsets of B, prove that (a) f−1(∪αEα) = ∪αf−1(Eα).
(b) f−1(∩αEα) = ∩αf−1(Eα).
(c) f−1(Eαc) = f−1(Eα)c.
9. Prove that 8a is still true with f−1 replaced by f , but 8b and 8c no longer hold.
Page 2