• 沒有找到結果。

Advanced Calculus (I)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Advanced Calculus (I)"

Copied!
53
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Advanced Calculus (I)

WEN-CHING LIEN

Department of Mathematics National Cheng Kung University

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(2)

2.3 Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Definition

Let{xn}n∈N be a sequence of real numbers.

(i){xn}is said to be increasing (respectively, strictly increasing) if and only if x1x2 ≤ · · · (respectively, x1 <x2 <· · ·)

(ii){xn}is said to be decreasing (respectively, strictly decreasing) if and only if x1x2≥ · · · (respectively, x1 >x2 >· · ·)

(iii){xn}is said to be monotone if and only if it is either increasing or decreasing.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(3)

2.3 Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Definition

Let{xn}n∈N be a sequence of real numbers.

(i){xn}is said to be increasing (respectively, strictly increasing) if and only if x1x2 ≤ · · · (respectively, x1 <x2 <· · ·)

(ii){xn}is said to be decreasing (respectively, strictly decreasing) if and only if x1x2≥ · · · (respectively, x1 >x2 >· · ·)

(iii){xn}is said to be monotone if and only if it is either increasing or decreasing.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(4)

2.3 Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Definition

Let{xn}n∈N be a sequence of real numbers.

(i){xn}is said to be increasing (respectively, strictly increasing) if and only if x1x2 ≤ · · · (respectively, x1 <x2 <· · ·)

(ii){xn}is said to be decreasing (respectively, strictly decreasing) if and only if x1x2≥ · · · (respectively, x1 >x2 >· · ·)

(iii){xn}is said to be monotone if and only if it is either increasing or decreasing.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(5)

2.3 Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Definition

Let{xn}n∈N be a sequence of real numbers.

(i){xn}is said to be increasing (respectively, strictly increasing) if and only if x1x2 ≤ · · · (respectively, x1 <x2 <· · ·)

(ii){xn}is said to be decreasing (respectively, strictly decreasing) if and only if x1x2≥ · · · (respectively, x1 >x2 >· · ·)

(iii){xn}is said to be monotone if and only if it is either increasing or decreasing.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(6)

2.3 Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem

Definition

Let{xn}n∈N be a sequence of real numbers.

(i){xn}is said to be increasing (respectively, strictly increasing) if and only if x1x2 ≤ · · · (respectively, x1 <x2 <· · ·)

(ii){xn}is said to be decreasing (respectively, strictly decreasing) if and only if x1x2≥ · · · (respectively, x1 >x2 >· · ·)

(iii){xn}is said to be monotone if and only if it is either increasing or decreasing.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(7)

Theorem (Monotone Convergence Theorem) If{xn}is increasing and bounded above, or if it is decreasing and bounded below, then{xn}has a finite limit.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(8)

Theorem (Monotone Convergence Theorem) If{xn}is increasing and bounded above, or if it is decreasing and bounded below, then{xn}has a finite limit.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(9)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(10)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(11)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(12)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(13)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(14)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(15)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(16)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(17)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(18)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(19)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(20)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(21)

Proof:

We shall actually prove that an increasing sequence converges to its supremum, and a decreasing sequence converges to its infimum.

(i)

Suppose that{xn}is increasing and bounded above. By the Completeness Axiom, the supremum

a:=sup{xn:nN}exists and is finite. Letǫ >0. By the Approximation Property for Supremum, choose NN such that

a− ǫ <xNa.

Since xNxnfor nN. In particular, xna as n→ ∞.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(22)

(ii)

If{xn}is decreasing with infimum b:=inf{xn :nN}, then{−xn}is increasing with supremum−b (see Theorem 1.28). Hence, by part(i) and Theorem 2.12(ii)

b = −(−b) = − lim

n→∞(−xn) = lim

n→∞xn2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(23)

(ii)

If{xn}is decreasing with infimum b:=inf{xn :nN}, then{−xn}is increasing with supremum−b (see Theorem 1.28). Hence, by part(i) and Theorem 2.12(ii)

b = −(−b) = − lim

n→∞(−xn) = lim

n→∞xn2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(24)

(ii)

If{xn}is decreasing with infimum b:=inf{xn :nN}, then{−xn}is increasing with supremum−b (see Theorem 1.28). Hence, by part(i) and Theorem 2.12(ii)

b = −(−b) = − lim

n→∞(−xn) = lim

n→∞xn2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(25)

(ii)

If{xn}is decreasing with infimum b:=inf{xn :nN}, then{−xn}is increasing with supremum−b (see Theorem 1.28). Hence, by part(i) and Theorem 2.12(ii)

b = −(−b) = − lim

n→∞(−xn) = lim

n→∞xn2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(26)

(ii)

If{xn}is decreasing with infimum b:=inf{xn :nN}, then{−xn}is increasing with supremum−b (see Theorem 1.28). Hence, by part(i) and Theorem 2.12(ii)

b = −(−b) = − lim

n→∞(−xn) = lim

n→∞xn2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(27)

Definition

A sequence of sets{In}n∈Nis said to be nested if and only if

I1I2 ⊇ · · · .

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(28)

Definition

A sequence of sets{In}n∈Nis said to be nested if and only if

I1I2 ⊇ · · · .

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(29)

Theorem (Nested Interval Property)

If{In}n∈N is a nested sequence of nonempty closed bounded intervals, then

E = \

n∈N

In := {x :xIn for all nN}

contains at least one number. Moreover, if the lengths of these intervals satisfy|In| →0 as n → ∞, then E contains exactly one number.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(30)

Theorem (Nested Interval Property)

If{In}n∈N is a nested sequence of nonempty closed bounded intervals, then

E = \

n∈N

In := {x :xIn for all nN}

contains at least one number. Moreover, if the lengths of these intervals satisfy|In| →0 as n → ∞, then E contains exactly one number.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(31)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(32)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1,and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(33)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(34)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1,and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(35)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(36)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN,it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(37)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(38)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN,it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence,a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(39)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(40)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence,a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(41)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(42)

Proof:

Let In = [an,bn]. Since{In}is nested, the real sequence {an}is increasing and bounded above by b1, and{bn}is decreasing and bounded below by a1. Thus by M.C.T, there exist a,bR such that ana and bnb as n→ ∞.

Since anbnfor all nN, it also follows from the Comparison Theorem that anabbn. Hence, a number x belongs to Infor all nN if and only if axb. This proves that E = [a,b].

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(43)

Suppose now that |In| →0 as n→ ∞. Then bnan→0 as n → ∞,and we have by Theorem2.12 that ba=0.

In particular, E = [a,a] = {a}contains exactly one number. 2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(44)

Suppose now that |In| →0 as n→ ∞. Then bnan→0 as n → ∞, and we have by Theorem2.12 that b−a=0.

In particular, E = [a,a] = {a}contains exactly one number. 2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(45)

Suppose now that |In| →0 as n→ ∞. Then bnan→0 as n → ∞,and we have by Theorem2.12 that ba=0.

In particular, E = [a,a] = {a}contains exactly one number. 2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(46)

Suppose now that |In| →0 as n→ ∞. Then bnan→0 as n → ∞, and we have by Theorem2.12 that b−a=0.

In particular, E = [a,a] = {a}contains exactly one number. 2

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(47)

Remark:

The Nested Interval Property might not hold if“closed′′ is omitted.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(48)

Remark:

The Nested Interval Property might not hold if“closed′′ is omitted.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(49)

Remark:

The Nested Interval Property might not hold if“bounded′′

is omitted.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(50)

Remark:

The Nested Interval Property might not hold if“bounded′′

is omitted.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(51)

Theorem (Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem)

Every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(52)

Theorem (Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem)

Every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

(53)

Thank you.

WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (I)

參考文獻

相關文件

In JSDZ, a model process in the modeling phase is treated as an active entity that requires an operation on its data store to add a new instance to the collection of

This proves that ρ is the radius of convergence of S, and that parts (i) and (iii) hold.. W EN -C HING L IEN Advanced

In addition, we successfully used unit resistors to construct the ratio of consecutive items of Fibonacci sequence, Pell sequence, and Catalan number.4. Minimum number

For the proposed algorithm, we establish its convergence properties, and also present a dual application to the SCLP, leading to an exponential multiplier method which is shown

Theorem 5.6.1 The qd-algorithm converges for irreducible, symmetric positive definite tridiagonal matrices.. It is necessary to show that q i are in

We use neighborhood residues sphere (NRS) as local structure representation, an itemset which contains both sequence and structure information, and then

 Sequence-to-sequence learning: both input and output are both sequences with different lengths..

Every sequence of n 2 +1 distinct real numbers contains a subsequence of length n+1 that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.