Advanced Calculus (II)
WEN-CHINGLIEN
Department of Mathematics National Cheng Kung University
2009
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Ch8: Euclidean Spaces
8.2: Planes and Linear Transformations
Definition (8.12)
A function T :Rn → Rm is said to be linear (notation:
T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)) if and only if it satisfies
T (x + y) = T (x) + T (y) and T (αx) = αT (x) for allx, y ∈ Rn and all scalars α.
Notations:x = (x1,x2, . . . ,xn) ∈Rn. [x] = [x1x2 · · · xn]
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Remark (8.13)
Ifx, y ∈ Rn and α is a scalar, then
[x + y] = [x] + [y], [x · y] = [x][y]T, and [αx] = α[x].
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Remark (8.14)
Let B = [bij]be an m × n matrix whose entries and real numbers, and lete1, . . . ,en represent the usual basis of Rn. If
(6) T (x) = Bx, x ∈ Rn,
then T is a linear function fromRntoRm and
(7) T (ej) = (b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj), j = 1, 2, . . . , n.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence,suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14.To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm).Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence,suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7).Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm).Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7).Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej)=
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej)=
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.15)
For each T ∈ L(Rn;Rm)there is a matrix B = [bij]m×n such that (6) holds. Moreover, the matrix B is unique.
Specifically, for each fixed T there is only one B that satisfies (6), and the entries of that B are defined by (7).
Proof.
Uniqueness has been established in Remark 8.14. To prove existence, suppose that T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Define B by (7). Then
T (x) = T
n
X
j=1
xjej
!
=
n
X
j=1
xjT (ej) =
n
X
j=1
xj(b1j,b2j, . . . ,bmj)
=
n
X
j=1
xjb1j,
n
X
j=1
xjb2j, . . . ,
n
X
j=1
xjbmj
!
=Bx.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Definition (8.16)
Let T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). The operator norm of T is the extended real number
kT k := inf {C > 0 : kT (x)k ≤ C kxk for all x ∈ Rn} one interesting corollary of Theorem 8.15 is that the operator norm of a linear function is always finite.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.17)
Let T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Then the operator norm of T is finite, and satisfies
(8) kT (x)k ≤ kT k kxk
for allx ∈ Rn. Proof.
Let B be the m × n matrix that represents T , and suppose that the rows of T are given byb1, . . . ,bm.By the
definition of matrix multiplication and our identification of Rm with m × 1 matrices,
T (x) = (b1· x, . . . , bm· x).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.17)
Let T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Then the operator norm of T is finite, and satisfies
(8) kT (x)k ≤ kT k kxk
for allx ∈ Rn. Proof.
Let B be the m × n matrix that represents T , and suppose that the rows of T are given byb1, . . . ,bm.By the
definition of matrix multiplication and our identification of Rm with m × 1 matrices,
T (x) = (b1· x, . . . , bm· x).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Theorem (8.17)
Let T ∈ L(Rn;Rm). Then the operator norm of T is finite, and satisfies
(8) kT (x)k ≤ kT k kxk
for allx ∈ Rn. Proof.
Let B be the m × n matrix that represents T , and suppose that the rows of T are given byb1, . . . ,bm.By the
definition of matrix multiplication and our identification of Rm with m × 1 matrices,
T (x) = (b1· x, . . . , bm· x).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O,then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2
and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2
and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2
and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2
and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2
and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0),it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0),it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Proof.
If B = O, then kT k = 0 and (8) is an equality.If B 6= O, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, the square of the Euclidean norm of T (x) satisfies
kT (x)k2 = (b1· x)2+ . . . + (bm· x)2
≤ (kb1k kxk)2+ . . . + (kbmk kxk)2
≤ m · max{kbjk2:1 ≤ j ≤ m} kxk2 =:C kxk2 and C > 0.Thus the set defining kT k is nonempty. Since it is bounded below (by 0), it follows from the Completeness Axiom that kT k exists and is finite.In particular, there are Ck >0 such that Ck ↓ kT k and kT (x)k ≤ Ckkxk for all x ∈ Rn.Taking the limit of this last inequality as k → ∞, we obtain (8).
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)
Thank you.
WEN-CHINGLIEN Advanced Calculus (II)