• 沒有找到結果。

Effects of the process parameters on the microstructure and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline FeTaCN films

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Effects of the process parameters on the microstructure and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline FeTaCN films"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 272–276 (2004) 1406–1407

Effects of the process parameters on the microstructure and

magnetic properties of nanocrystalline FeTaCN films

C.Y. Chou

a,

*, P.C. Kuo

a

, Y.D. Yao

b

, S.C. Chen

c

, C.T. Lie

a

, A.C. Sun

a

a

Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan

b

Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan

c

Department of Mechanical Engineering, De Lin Institute of Technology, Taipei 236, Taiwan

Abstract

FeTaCN films were prepared by DC-magnetron reactive co-sputtering of Fe target and TaC composite target with Ar þ N2sputtering gas. Effects of annealing temperature and sputtering power density of the Fe target on the magnetic

properties and microstructure of the FeTaCN film were investigated. Transmission electron microscopy analysis indicated that the FeTaCN film was nanocrystalline structure. The in-plane coercivity Hcjj is about 123 Oe and

saturation magnetization 4pMsis about 12215 kG for the as-deposited film.

r2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PACS: 75.50.Bb; 75.50.Kj; 75.70.Ak

Keywords: FeTaCN film; Soft magnetic; Nanocrystalline film

We have reported that the as-deposited FeTaCN film with nanocrystalline structure and good soft magnetic properties (in-plane coercivity Hcjj ¼ 122 Oe and

4pMs¼ 12214 kG) can be obtained by simultaneous

addition of C and N to FeTa alloy film as well as controlling the N2flow rate ratio and film thickness[1].

In this work, the effect of the sputtering power density of the Fe target ðSPDFeÞ on the magnetic properties and

microstructure of the FeTaCN thin film was investi-gated.

FeTaCN films were deposited on quartz substrates by DC-magnetron reactive co-sputtering of TaC composite target and Fe target at room temperature. The N2flow

rate ratio ðN2=Ar þ N2Þ in the sputtering gas was fixed

at 5%. The TaC composite target was made by Ta disk overlaid with C chips which covers 18% of the disk surface area. The sputtering power density of the TaC target was fixed at 1:97 W=cm2: The SPDFe was varied

from 3.2 to 4:44 W=cm2: The film thickness was fixed at 200 nm: An SiNx cap layer of about 20 nm was

deposited on the FeTaCN film to prevent the oxidation of magnetic film. After deposition, the films were post-annealed in vacuum below 1  105Torr for 30 min at

temperature between 200C and 500C; then quenched in ice water. Composition of the film was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The microstruc-ture and crystal strucmicrostruc-ture of the film were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Magnetic properties of the films were measured by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature.

Fig. 1(a) and (b) shows the TEM bright field images and the corresponding selected area diffraction (SAD) patterns of the annealed Fe72:06Ta6:35C6:92N14:63 and

Fe77:75Ta5:85C6:16N10:25 films, respectively. The

anneal-ing temperature is 500C: The SPDFe is 3:7 W=cm2 for

the Fe72:06Ta6:35C6:92N14:63film and 4:44 W=cm2for the

Fe77:75Ta5:85C6:16N10:25 film. We can see that both

of the films have nanocrystalline structure, which consists of small a-Fe grains and more smaller Ta(C, N) precipitates. The average grain size of a-Fe is about 9 nm for the Fe72:06Ta6:35C6:92N14:63 film, which is

smaller than that of the Fe77:75Ta5:85C6:16N10:25 film.

The average grain size of a-Fe is about 11 nm for the Fe77:75Ta5:85C6:16N10:25film. During annealing at 500C;

ARTICLE IN PRESS

*Corresponding author. Tel.: 2-2364-8881; fax: +886-2-2363-4562.

E-mail address:a3150@ms3.hinet.net (C.Y. Chou).

0304-8853/$ - see front matter r 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.141

(2)

the impeding of the a-Fe grain growth by high melting point TaC(N) precipitates was decreased as the SPDFe

was increased from 3.7 to 4:44 W=cm2: The decrease of the pinning effect of the TaC(N) precipitates results in the increase of a-Fe grain size. Since the magnetocrystal-line anisotropy is known to be averaged out by the refinement of grains, the coercivity of the film is decreased according to the random anisotropy model

[2]. Therefore, the randomly oriented fine a-Fe nano-grains together with TaC or TaN precipitates in the film will result to the low coercivity.

Fig. 2(a) and (b) shows the variations of the saturation magnetization 4pMs and in-plane coercivity

Hcjj with annealing temperature, respectively. In which

the FeTaCN films were deposited at different SPDFe:

We can see that the 4pMs value of the films was

increased with the SPDFeas shown inFig. 2(a). This is

due to the increase Fe content in the film or the increase of crystallinity of the film [3]. After anneal-ing at 500C; the 4pMs value is about 14 kG

when SPDFe is 3:2 W=cm2 (The film composition is

Fe69:22Ta7:07C8:53N15:18) and it will increase to 16 kG as

the SPDFe is increased to 4:44 W=cm2 (The film

composition is Fe77:75Ta5:85C6:16N10:25). FromFig. 2(b),

we can see that the Hcjj value could be decreased to

0:520:8 Oe if the film was annealed at 2002300C: This

is due to the stress relief resulting from the diffusing of C and N atoms out from a-Fe grains that will reduce the

Gibbs free energy [1]. After annealing at 500C; Hcjj

value of the film was increased slightly. The increase of Hcjj value was due to the large residual stress resulting

from quenching the film in ice water and the grain growth at high temperature annealing. As the grain grows, the larger value of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy results in higher value of the Hcjj [2].

In conclusion, 4pMsof the FeTaCN films is increased

with the SPDFe: The randomly oriented fine a-Fe

nanograins together with TaC or TaN precipitates in the film will result to the good soft magnetic properties.

This work was supported by the National Science Council and Ministry of Economic Affairs of ROC through Grant No. NSC 90-2216-E 002-036 and 92-EC-17-A-08-S1-0006, respectively.

References

[1] C.Y. Chou, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003) 7205. [2] G. Herzer, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26 (1990) 1397. [3] M. Naoe, et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 17 (1981) 3062.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

Fig. 1. TEM bright field image and electron diffraction pattern of the annealed (a) Fe72:06Ta6:35C6:92N14:63and (b) Fe77:75Ta5:85 C6:16N10:25films. 0 100 200 300 400 500 1 10 FeTaCN film, 200nm 3.2 W/cm2 3.95 W/cm2 3.46 W/cm2 4.2W/cm2 3.7 W/cm2 4.44 W/cm2 4 π Ms(kG) Hc // (Oe) Annealing Temperature(OC) 10 12 14 16 18 FeTaCN film, 200nm 3.2W/cm2 3.95 W/cm2 3.46 W/cm2 4.2 W/cm2 3.7W/cm2 4.44 W/cm2 (b) (a)

Fig. 2. Variations of (a) the saturation magnetization 4pMs and (b) the in-plane coercivity Hcjjwith annealing temperature

for the FeTaCN films with different SPDFe:

數據

Fig. 1. TEM bright field image and electron diffraction pattern of the annealed (a) Fe 72:06 Ta 6:35 C 6:92 N 14:63 and (b) Fe 77:75 Ta 5:85

參考文獻

相關文件

substance) is matter that has distinct properties and a composition that does not vary from sample

Wang, Solving pseudomonotone variational inequalities and pseudocon- vex optimization problems using the projection neural network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17

Then, we tested the influence of θ for the rate of convergence of Algorithm 4.1, by using this algorithm with α = 15 and four different θ to solve a test ex- ample generated as

Particularly, combining the numerical results of the two papers, we may obtain such a conclusion that the merit function method based on ϕ p has a better a global convergence and

Then, it is easy to see that there are 9 problems for which the iterative numbers of the algorithm using ψ α,θ,p in the case of θ = 1 and p = 3 are less than the one of the

Although we have obtained the global and superlinear convergence properties of Algorithm 3.1 under mild conditions, this does not mean that Algorithm 3.1 is practi- cally efficient,

We explicitly saw the dimensional reason for the occurrence of the magnetic catalysis on the basis of the scaling argument. However, the precise form of gap depends

Define instead the imaginary.. potential, magnetic field, lattice…) Dirac-BdG Hamiltonian:. with small, and matrix