• 沒有找到結果。

Three possible solutions for a problem of quadratic equation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Three possible solutions for a problem of quadratic equation "

Copied!
5
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

數學教育第三十八期 (12/2015)

Three possible solutions for a problem of quadratic equation

Mak Kin Wai

Cheung Chuk Shan College

1. Introduction

In this paper, we will present a typical area problem of quadratic equation which appears in public examination

3

or textbook

4

very often. We found that the problem itself has a very high educational value because it could be difficult if students go in an inappropriate direction. The details of the problem statement as well as three suggested solutions will be presented in the next section.

2. Problem Statement

Refer to the diagram shown (see Figure 1) below. ABCD is a square with side 20 cm long. Given that CM = CK = x cm and the area of MAK is 102 cm

2

, find the value of x .

Figure 1

3 For instance, Question 11 of Hong Kong Examinations Authority (1998). 1998 HKCEE

Mathematics Paper 2. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examinations Authority.

4 For instance, Question 21 & 22 of Exercise 3E in Leung, K. S., Wong, C. S., Hung, F. Y., Wan, Y. H., Wong, T. W., Ding, W. L. & Shum, S.W. (2014). New Century Mathematics

(2nd Edition) Book 4A, p. 3.37. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

(2)

3. Suggested Solutions

The possible solutions to solve the concerned problem are shown as follows.

 Method 1

This is the easiest method and also indirect in nature.

Area of MAK

= area of square – area of ABK – area of AMD –area of CKM

102 =

2

  

2

2 2 1 20 2 20

20  1  x   x

2

2

20 x  1 x =102 x

2

– 40x + 204 = 0 (x – 6)(x – 34) = 0

x = 6 or x = 34 (rejected as 0< x < 20)

 Method 2

For teaching purpose, we highly recommend students to try method 1 first. However, the following method can also be considered though it is complicated and involves much more tedious computation. The details are depicted as follows:

Draw AC cutting MK at E as shown (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

(3)

數學教育第三十八期 (12/2015)

ABK = ADM = 90° (property of square)

∴  ABK  ADM (SAS)

AK = AM (corr. sides, s) Similarly, we notice that:

CE = CE (common)

KCE = MCE = 45° (property of square) CK = CM = x cm (given)

∴ KCE  MCE (SAS)

KE = ME (corr. sides, s) Thus, AE ⊥ KM (property of isos. ) MK

2

= x

2

+ x

2

(Pyth. Theorem)

MK

2

= 2 x cm

By considering the area of CKM , we have

    cm. ( 0 )

2 1

2 2

1 2

1 x

2

CE xCExx

Next, AC

2

= 20

2

+ 20

2

(Pyth. Theorem) AC = 20 2 cm

have we 2 cm,

2 1 20

As 

 

 

AC CE x

AE

 

 

  x

x

2 2 1 20 2 2

1 = 102

20 2 x

2

x  = 102 204

2

 40 x

x = 0

x = 6 or x = 34 (rejected)

 Method 3

There is another way to find AE by considering AKE. But then it

will end up with an even more complicated solution. In order to alleviate

the workload of students, we propose to rephrase the problem by giving

more guidance to the students. The new problem statement and its solution

are depicted as follows:

(4)

* Problem: Let f ( x )x

4

80 x

3

1600 x

2

41616

(a) (i) Show that both (x – 6) and (x – 34) are the factors of f (x).

Solution

0 41616 )

6 ( 1600 )

6 ( 80 6 ) 6

( 

4

3

2

 

f

By Factor Theorem, (x – 6) is a factor of f (x).

Similarly, we also note that

0 41616 )

34 ( 1600 )

34 ( 80 34 ) 34

( 

4

3

2

 

f

and so (x – 34) is a factor of f (x).

(ii) Hence, factorize f (x) as a product of 2 linear factors and 1 quadratic factor.

Solution

By (a), we notice that (x – 6)(x – 34) = x

2

– 40x + 204 is a factor of f (x).

By long division, we get

f (x) = (x – 6)(x – 34)(x

2

– 40x – 204).

(b) (i) Express AE, DE and AE in terms of x respectively.

Solution

2 2

2

20 ( 20 x )

AK    (Pyth. Theorem) 40

2

800 x x

AK    .

cm 2x

MK  (proved in method 2) cm.

2 2 2

So, MK x

KE  

2 2

2

KE AK

AE   (Pyth. Theorem) 40 2 2 800

40 1 800

So,

2 2

2

2

x

x x

x x

AE       

cm.

2 40 800

i.e.,

x

2

x

AE   

(5)

數學教育第三十八期 (12/2015)

(ii) Using the result obtained in (a), find the value of x . Solution

  AE MK

2

1 = 102

x x   2 x

40 2 2 800

1

2

 

 

   = 102

 

  40  800 2 2

2

2

x x

x = 204

x

4

 80 x

3

 1600 x

2

= 204 i.e. x

4

 80 x

3

 1600 x

2

 41616 = 0 By (a), we have f (x) = 0

 x – 6 = 0 or x – 34 = 0 or x

2

– 40x – 204 = 0

∴ x = 6 or x = 34 (rejected) or x  44.6 (rejected) or x  –4.58 (rejected)

The result follows.

4. Concluding Remarks

It is not a good pedagogical practice to force our students to cram for rigid solutions. Instead, we should provoke them to think more and try out different strategies to solve the same problem. Among the three methods presented, method 1 is the best as it is short and simple. Method 2 is good for helping students revise materials about congruent triangles. It is noteworthy that we can also help our students to figure out that by considering the symmetry of the diagram. In fact, students can also find by just regarding it as half of the diagonal of a square having side x cm. Method 3 is the most complicated after reframing the problem, but it also helps us to assess more skills for our students as Factor Theorem from the topic of polynomials is involved.

Author’s e-mail: mmak2005@gmail.com

參考文獻

相關文件

• Adding restrictions on the allowable solutions (the solution space) may make a problem harder, equally hard, or easier.. • It is

• Adding restrictions on the allowable solutions (the solution space) may make a problem harder, equally hard, or easier.. • It is

• Adding restrictions on the allowable solutions (the solution space) may make a problem harder, equally hard, or easier.. • It is

• Adding restrictions on the allowable solutions (the solution space) may make a problem harder, equally hard, or easier.. • It is

More precisely, it is the problem of partitioning a positive integer m into n positive integers such that any of the numbers is less than the sum of the remaining n − 1

The main tool in our reconstruction method is the complex geometri- cal optics (CGO) solutions with polynomial-type phase functions for the Helmholtz equation.. This type of

Numerical results are reported for some convex second-order cone programs (SOCPs) by solving the unconstrained minimization reformulation of the KKT optimality conditions,

Chen, The semismooth-related properties of a merit function and a descent method for the nonlinear complementarity problem, Journal of Global Optimization, vol.. Soares, A new