Journal of Taipei Municipal Teachers College, Vol.36, No.1 (May, 2005) 239~246 TAIPEI MUNICIPAL TEACHERS COLLEGE
239
Systematically Description of Yrast
Superdeformed Even-Even Hg Isotope
Nuclei
Lung-Ming Chen
*ABSTRACT
It is shown that the Project Shell Model may present a systemic description of the yrast superdeformed bands in even-even Hg isotopes nuclei. The calculated
γ
-ray energies are compared with data for which spin is unambiguously assigned. Excellent agreement with available data for all isotopes is obtained. The calculated electromagnetic properties provide a microscopic understanding agree with those measured ones.Key words: nuclear structure theory, extended shell model, projected shell model.
Systematically Description of Yrast
Superdeformed Even-Even Hg Isotope
Nuclei
Lung-Ming Chen
INTRODUCTION
Models, based on the Projected Shell Model (PSM) (Hara and Iwasaki, 1980, Hara and Sun, 1991) to describe the nuclear Superdeformed structure phenomena, has been applied extensively and make very successful in mass A~60, 130 and 190 regions (Sun and Guidry, 1995, Sun, Velazquez, Hirseh, and Sun, 1998, Sun, Zhang, and Guidry, 2002, Guo and Chen, 2003). The experimental data on superdeformed bands (SD) are given in the form of a series of
γ
-ray energies but only a few cases have the spins in an SD band been determined directly by experiment. 194Hg
is the one ofonly two SD nuclei in the mass A~190 region that the assigned spin of each
γ
-ray energy have been measured with high precision (Han and Wu, 1998). In addition, their transition quadrupole moments have also obtained from the lifetime measurements (Han and Wu, 1998). However, level spins in most of these neighboring nuclei were not determined due to the linking transitions between SD band and Normal-deformed band were not observed experimentally. Several models have been proposed for the spin assignments in these SD bands (Wu et al, 1992) but the model dependence of these theoretical spin determinations is not accurate enough to make a spin assignment within the estimate error . However, it is delighted that the spin determination studies for the SD states gave a bright light on the structure of these states (Hara and Sun, 1995). The PSM is a shell model truncated in a deformed (Nilsson-type) single particle basis, with pairing correlation incorporated into the basis by a BCS calculation for the Nilsson states. More precisely, the truncation is first implemented in the multi-quasiparticle basis with respect to the deformed BCS vacuum state; then the violation of rotational symmetry is removed by projection to form a shell model basisSystematically Description of Yrast Superdeformed Even-Even Hg Isotope Nuclei 241
in the laboratory frame. Finally a shell model Hamiltonian is diagonalized in the projected space. In this paper, a systemic description of the SD bands in even-eve
Hg
196 ~
188 isotopes based on the PSM is presented.
MODEL
For the present study, we chosed the multi-quasiparticle (qp) states,
Φ
κ , as}
0
,
0
,
0
,
0
{
α
n+iα
n+jα
+pmα
+pnα
n+iα
n+jα
p+mα
p+n (1)for double even nuclei. Where
α
+ is the creation operator for a quasi-particle and the index n (p) denotes neutrons(protons). The many-body wave function is a superposition of projected (angular momentum) multi-quasiparticle states,κ κ κ Φ = Ψ
∑
I MK K I K I M f P (2)where
P
MKI is the angular momentum projection operator and the coefficientsI K
f
κ are the variation parameters. We use the usual separable-force Hamiltonian (Hara and Sun 1995) µ µ µ µ µ µ χQ
Q
G
P
P
G
P
P
H
H
=
ˆ
0−
2∑
ˆ
+ˆ
−
Mˆ
+ˆ
−
Q∑
ˆ
+ˆ
(3)which has been used successfully to explain the system of the rotational spectra for a large number of nuclei. The first term is the spherical single particle Hamiltonian,
α α α α c E c Hˆ0 =
∑
+ (4)wherec ,α+ cαis the single particle creation and annihilation operator respectively and
E
αis the single particle energy)]
ˆ
ˆ
(
ˆ
ˆ
2
[
N
l
s
l
2l
2E
α=
η
ω
−
κ
•
−
κµ
−
, (5)where
ω
is the harmonic-oscillator parameter which incorporates the principle of volume conservation for nuclei deformed form spherical shapes. The s and lrepresents the intrinsic nucleon spin and orbital angular momentum in the stretched coordinate basis. For the Nilsson parameters
κ
andµ
are taken from the N-dependent values in Bengtsson and Ragnarssio (1985), subject to modifications introduced by Zhang (1989). The value of deformation parameterε
2 in the Nilsson model will affect the energy gap and the selection of quasi-particle basis. Normally the values ofε
2 were set according to the experimental observation if available or the same as the nearest isotope otherwise. Since the deformation parameters were well-studied quantity for these nuclei with the range from 0.43 to 0.48 accordingly (Han and Wu, 1998). Adjusting these parameters slightly was not affect the final results significantly in our calculation. Thus, instead of deriving it from self-consistent mean-field calculations, we consider it to be known and use a value of 0.455 for all nuclei. The remaining terms in Eq. (3) are residual quadrupole-quadrupole, monopole pairing, and quadrupole pairing interaction, respectively. The strength of the quadrupole-quadrupole force was fixed to give the measured deformation of SD band. The strength of the monopole pairing interaction is critical for a quantitative discussion of the moment of inertia. Usually the incorporation of high-N shells in the valence space is important for the SD moment of inertia, thus the single-particle configurations are consisted of three major shells each for neutrons (N=5, 6 and 7) and protons (N=4, 5 and 6) in our calculation. The total dimension of qp basis in our case is 50. The pairing strength is a function of the size of single-particle space and decrease roughly as the inverse square root of the participating levels in the BCS correlation . The prescription introduced in Sun and Guidry (1995) of,1 ) 4 . 14 0 . 20 ( − − − = A A Z N Gn M (6)
Systematically Description of Yrast Superdeformed Even-Even Hg Isotope Nuclei 243 and 1
6
.
19
−=
A
G
p M (7)were used in our calculation, where n(p) is denoted for neutrons (protons). The strength of the quadrupole pairing force GQ in Eq.(3) is assumed to be proportional to the monopole pairing
G
M and will affect the spin value of the band crossing. One may carefully adjust the ratio of GQ/G
M during the calculation to get the best representation of experimental observation. In our case, the ratio is set to 0.3 after comparing with the well measured 194Hg
and is used for all nuclei in this calculation.After diagonalizing the Hamiltonian in the quasi-particle basis, the lowest energy for each spin are used to compare with the experimental SD yrast energy. The resulting wave functions are usually used to compute the transition quadrupole moment or the gyromagnetic factor if necessary. Since the wave functions are eigenfunctions of angular momentum, we can calculate unambiguously the transition quadrupole moment
Q
t as function of angular momentum. Usually, in the case of rigid rotor, theQ
t is constant as function of spin. When the band crossing occurs, theQ
t values are changed due to the small overlapping of the wave functions and bring about the shape changed in nuclei (Guo and Chen, 2003). In this calculation, we have used the relation betweenQ
t(I) and B(E2) transition probability through2 / 1
)
2
20
,
)
2
,
2
(
5
16
(
)
(
〉
−
〈
−
→
=
K
I
IK
I
I
E
B
I
Q
tπ
(8)Where we use the same effective charges of 1.5e for protons and 0.5e for neutrons as in the previous PSM calculations(Guo and Chen, 2003, Sun, Zhang, and Guidry 1997).
RESULTS
The calculations were started with the well measured nucleus,194
Hg
, for a trialparameter. The calculated
E
γ, J
(1) and J(2) are defined as)
)](
(
/
)
1
2
[(
2 1 ) 1 (=
I
−
E
I
MeV
−J
γη
, and (9))
)](
(
)
2
(
/[
4
2 1 ) 2 (=
E
I
+
−
E
I
MeV
−J
γ γη
here the
γ
-ray energies are defined as Eγ =E(I)−E(I−2) and with the unit in MeV. Our calculations are compared with the experimental data (Han and Wu, 1998) and described on figure. The agreement between our calculations and experimental data are pretty good. The moment of inertia, J(2) rises gradually with the angular momentum for all nuclei and with various increase rate from nucleus to nucleus. The different rising slope has been indicated in Guo, Chou, and Chen (2004) as arise from the variation with particle number of effective interaction strengths and band crossing for different nuclei is also reproduced well in our calculations. Especially the observed downturn behavior in J(2) for 194Hg
at higher spin regions,the whole J(2) pattern forms a smooth bump with maximum at I = 44η. At this spin the SD ground-state band crosses, which is originated from the ground-state band crossing as suggested at Guo, Chou, and Chen (2004). Rather constant
Q
tdistributions for these nuclei were found in our calculations, except a smoothly decrease at higher spin. For 194
Hg
we have a value 16.9 eb up to I = 30η that iscomparable to the measured average
Q
t of 17.2±
2.0 eb. Above this spin, the theoretical values are slowly quenched. This is associated with gradual alignment processes that lead to a small reduction of collectivity (Guo, Chou, and Chen, 2004).CONCLUSION
We have systematically presented the calculations of even-even 188~196
Hg
SDbands via using the projected shell models with the same footing. The gradual increase of moment of inertia for double even SD nuclei in the Hg isotope region is due to the smoothly quenching of pair correlations by the Coriolis anti-pairing effect and the
Systematically Description of Yrast Superdeformed Even-Even Hg Isotope Nuclei 245
gradual rotational alignment of high-j quasi-particles. Hg nuclei have 80 protons and its ground state lies just below the shell-closure, at higher spins the proton pair correlations have higher possibility to be break and the align process will decrease the single neutron blocking effect. This results the slowly increasing of the moment of inertia. The PSM give us a microscopic understanding about the Hg double even SD nuclei in general.
REFERENCES
Bengtsson, T., & Ragnarsson, I. (1985). Rotational bands and particle-hole excitations at very high spin. Nucl. Phys. A436, 14-82.
Guo, R. S., & Chen, L. M. (2003). Projected shell model studies of high-spin properties in the superdeformed mass-60 region. Chinese J. of Phys. 41, 1-12.
Guo, R. S., Chou, C. H., & Chen, L. M. (2004). Study of yrast superdeformed even-even and odd-even nuclei in A~190 region with Projected shell model. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.
30, 989-998.
Han, X. L., & Wu, C. L. (1998). Nuclear Superdeformation Data Tables. Phys. Dep., Chung Yuan Christian Univ. (Taiwan) and Phys. Division, Oak Ridge National Lab. (USA). Hara, K., & Iwasaki, S. (1980). On the quantum number projection. Nucl. Phys. A348, 200-221. Hara, K., & Sun, Y. (1991). Studies of high-spin states in rare-earth nuclei using the angular
momentum projected method. Nucl. Phys. A529, 445-466.
Hara, K., & Sun, Y. (1995). Projected shell model and high-spin spectroscopy. International J.
of Mod.Phys. E4, 4, 637-661.
Sun, Y., & Guidry, M. (1995). Quantitative description of superdeformed bands with the projected shell model. Phys. Rev. C52, 6, R2844-R2847.
Velazquez, V., Hirseh, J. G., & Sun, Y. (1998). Self-consistency in the projected shell model.
Nucl. Phys. A643, 39-51.
Wu, C. S., Zheng, J. Y., Xing, Z., Chen, X. Q., & Meng, J. (1992). Spin determination and calculation of nuclear superdeformed bands in A~190 region. Phys. Rev. C45, 261-274. Zhang, J-y., Xu, N., Fossan, D. B., Liang, R. Ma, & Paul, E. S. (1989). Nilsson parameter set in