• 沒有找到結果。

Table 2.1: Short introduction of TOPEX/Poseidon and JASON-1 altimetry satellites.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Table 2.1: Short introduction of TOPEX/Poseidon and JASON-1 altimetry satellites. "

Copied!
9
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

44

Table 2.1: Short introduction of TOPEX/Poseidon and JASON-1 altimetry satellites.

TOPEX/Poseidon JASON-1

Senors 1. Two altimeters (TOPEX/NASA, Poseidon-1/CNES) 2. TOPEX Microwave radiometer (NASA)

3. Global Positioning System tracking receiver (NASA) 4. Laser retroreflector array (NASA)

5. DORIS tracking system receiver (CNES)

1. Poseidon-2 altimeter (CNES)

2. JASON-1 Microwave Radiometer (NASA)

3. Global Positioning System tracking receiver (NASA) 4. Laser retroreflector array (NASA)

5. DORIS tracking system receiver (CNES) Orbits 1336km altitude, 66-degree inclination 1336km altitude, 66-degree inclination

Repeat cycle 10 days 10 days

Accuracy 4~5cm < 4 cm,

Launch August 10, 1992 December 7, 2001

(2)

45

Table 3.1: Comparison between observational mean D20 and RMS of TLM_NWPO;

left hand side is observation mean, right hand side is RMS (in the parentheses).

NERZ IERZ SERZ SNPG

5 67.8 (63.3) 90.2 (30.4) 183.6 (20.4) 195.7 (25.1) 6 49.7 (102.4) 81.5 (29.4) 204.4 (21.0) 201.6 (24.8) 7 55.9 (65.2) 90.6 (23.0 ) 182.3 (30.4) 197.4 (29.0) 8 69.2 (64.0) 98.2 (32.1) 193.6 (29.9) 190.5 (30.9) 9 72.4 (63.0) 94.7 (25.8) 173.6 (25.1) 183.8 (25.7) 10 86.5 (76.1) 105.1 (31.1) 174.8 (24.6) 188.0 (18.7)

Table 3.2: Comparison between observational mean D26 and RMS of TLM_NWPO;

left hand side is observation mean, right hand side is RMS (in the parentheses), N/A represents no comparison.

NERZ IERZ SERZ SNPG

5 N/A N/A 66.6 (32.5) 111.1 (23.6)

6 N/A 11.8 (12.8) 78.7 (29.9) 119.9 (17.0)

7 N/A 22.7 (10.5) 67.9 (20.8) 120.4 (17.2)

8 N/A 33.4 (13.5) 82.3 (20.3) 116.1 (19.5)

9 N/A 41.0 (10.3) 72.2 (14.7) 109.9 (15.6)

10 N/A 46.8 (17.4) 84.1 (24.8) 110.2 (19.0)

(3)

46

Table 3.3: TCHP inter-comparison between TLM_NWPO, NOAA/AOML and NPACNFS full ocean model in the IERZ, SERZ and SNPG.

Bias IERZ SERZ SNPG

TLM_NWPO 8.71 1.83 16.3 AOML -8.14 -15.83 -21.42 NPACNFS -25.15 -34.22 -47.18

RMSE IERZ SERZ SNPG

TLM_NWPO 20.14 21.39 32.08 AOML 20.34 30.41 34.01 NPACNFS 27.4 40.28 51.75

Error IERZ SERZ SNPG

TLM_NWPO 53% 26% 26%

AOML 56% 37% 28%

NPACNFS 71% 49% 41%

(4)

47

Table 3.4: D20 usability of TLM_NWPO and NOAA/AOML’s.

5 6 7 8 9 10

NERZ × × × × × ×

IERZ

SERZ

SNPG

Table 3.5: D26 usability of TLM_NWPO and NOAA/AOML’s.

5 6 7 8 9 10

NERZ × × × × × ×

IERZ × × ×

SERZ ×

SNPG

Table 3.6: D20 usability of NPACNFS.

8 9 10

NERZ × × × IERZ SERZ SNPG

Table 3.7: D26 usability of NPACNFS.

8 9 10

NERZ × × ×

IERZ × ×

SERZ ×

SNPG

(5)

48

Table 4.1: Saffir-Simpson Scale.

Saffir-Simpson Scale Category Winds (knots)

1 64~82

2 83~95

3 96~113

4 114~135

5 >135

(6)

49

Table 4.2: 33 intense and super typhoons in the NWPO between 1999 and 2004.

Year Month TC Maximum

wind (kts) Category

1999 09 Bart 140 5

2000 05 Damrey 155 5

2000 07 Kirogi 115 4

2000 08 Jelawat 125 4

2000 08 Bilis 140 5

2000 09 Saomai 140 5

2000 09 Shanshan 130 4

2001 07 Man-yi 115 4

2001 08 Wutip 130 4

2001 10 Podul 140 5

2002 05 Hagibis 140 5

2002 06 Chataan 130 4

2002 07 Halong 135 4

2002 07 Fengshen 145 5

2002 08 Phanfone 135 4

2002 08 Rusa 115 4 2002 09 Higos 135 4

2003 05 Chan-hom 115 4

2003 06 Soudelor 115 4

2003 07 Imbudo 130 4

2003 08 Dujuan 125 4

2003 09 Maemi 150 5

2003 10 Ketsana 125 4

2003 10 Parma 130 4

2004 05 Nida 140 5

2004 06 Diaumn 155 5

2004 06 Mindulle 125 4

2004 07 Namtheun 115 4

2004 08 Chaba 155 5

2004 08 Sangda 130 4

2004 09 Meari 120 4

2004 10 Ma-on 140 5

2004 10 Tokage 125 4

(7)

50

Table 4.3: Comparison of inner core SST cooling between using in situ profile and TLM_NWPO’s profile.

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 total

in situ mean 0.58 1.41 1.64 2.49 1.69 1.41

TLM_NWPO mean 0.54 1.06 1.43 2.46 2.37 1.44

RMS 0.25 0.37 0.28 0.85 0.83 0.57

(8)

51

Table 4.4: Inner-core SST cooling in each category phases of 21 category-4 typhoon cases. Gray represents no matching data (wind field or temperature profile); “X”

represents the category stage that typhoon did not experienced. (Unit: ℃)

Category

TC H1 H2 H3 H4

Kirogi 0.64 3.31 Jelawat 0.52 3.46 Shanshan 0.55 1.37 2.45

Man-yi 0.16 0.55 1.44

Wutip 1.2 3.09 Chataan 0.16

Halong 0.55 0.76 Phanfone 1.35 2.12 3.36

Rusa 0.67 1.98 2.88 Higos 0.59 2.3 2.5 Chan-hom 0.15

Soudelor Imbudo 0.41 0.76 1.04 3.74

Dujuan 0.97 2.02 Ketsana X 3.29

Parma

Mindulle X 2.79

Namtheun Sangda 0.46 3.99

Meari 1.98

Tokage 0.98

(9)

52

Table 4.5: Inner-core SST cooling in each category phases of 12 category-5 typhoon cases. Gray represents no matching data (wind field or temperature profile); “X”

represents the category stage that typhoon did not experienced. (Unit: ℃)

Category

TC H1 H2 H3 H4 H5

Bart 0.62 X 1.4 1.77 1.32 Damrey 0.48

Bilis 1.93 3.22 Saomai 0.52 1.24 3.16 Podul 0.26 0.67 0.79 1.58 Hagibis 0.06 1.23 X 1.35 Fengshen 0.73 1.76

Maemi 0.6 X 3.22

Nida 1 1.11

Diaumn X 2.89

Chaba 0.46 0.64 0.88 1.66

Ma-on 0.69 1.06 X

參考文獻

相關文件

Do you want bacon and eggs?.

It’s (between/next to) the church and the

Listen - Check the right picture striped hat polka dotted hat.. Which hat do

Play - Let’s make a big family How many people are in your family1. Write it

Sam: I scraped my knee and bumped my head.. Smith: What happened

straight brown hair dark brown eyes What does he look like!. He has short

While Korean kids are learning how to ski and snowboard in the snow, Australian kids are learning how to surf and water-ski at the beach3. Some children never play in the snow

I am writing this letter because I want to make a new friend in another country.. Maybe you will come to Gibraltar