• 沒有找到結果。

In this section we shall use the same method of Section 3 to determine the other situations of the Hilbert-Kunz function of the hypersurfaces of the following form:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "In this section we shall use the same method of Section 3 to determine the other situations of the Hilbert-Kunz function of the hypersurfaces of the following form:"

Copied!
4
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

4 The other cases

Let K be a field of characteristic p > 0 and

S = K[X, Y, Z].

In this section we shall use the same method of Section 3 to determine the other situations of the Hilbert-Kunz function of the hypersurfaces of the following form:

f := X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e with 0 < a ≤ b ≤ c.

Let q = p n and set R = S/hf i. We shall determine the assignment HK R (q) := dim k (S/hX q , Y q , Z q , f i) .

Let f + X [q] be the ideal of S generated by all X q , Y q , Z q , and f . Let τ be the lexicographic order on S induced by the variable order X > Y > Z. Denote by in f + X [q]  the initial ideal of f + X [q] . Then by (2.11), we get that HK R (q) is equal to dim K S/in f + X [q] .

By making use of Gr¨obner basis, we understand which monomials one has to add to fill the gap between in f + X [q]  and the ideal in(f) + X [q] .

We denote by [y] the greatest integer less than or equal to y, and S k (a, b) the element symmetric polynomial of a and b of degree k.

Let u = max{b, e}. We have

 q − 1 u



= min  q − 1 b



,  q − 1 e



for q ≫ 0. Define (v) + = max{0, v}.

Let l u be the integer  q−1

u , and ǫ be the remainder of q −1 divided by u. Then l u = q−1−ǫ u and one has q − l u b > 0 and q − l u e > 0. On the other hand, at least one of (q − (l u + 1)b) + and (q − (l u + 1)e) + must be zero.

4.1 The case for a < d < e

Proposition 4.1 The Hilbert-Kunz function of the hypersurface X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e

with 0 < a ≤ b ≤ c and a < d < e is

n 7−→ λp 2n + f 1 (n)p n + f 0 (n)

for n ≫ 0, where λ =

" 2 X

k=1

(−1) k+1 S k (a, b) e u k

#

and f k (n) is an eventually periodic function of n for each k.

11

(2)

Proof. Let τ be the lexicographic order on S induced by the variable order X > Y > Z.

Then X a Y b is bigger than Y c Z d and Z e .

First, we determine a Gr¨obner basis of the ideal

I q = hX q , Y q , Z q , f i, by the means of Buchberger’s algorithm (Algorithm 2.7).

By this algorithm, the elements

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e , Y (q−ib)

+

Z ie , i = 1, . . . , γ − 1, X q−ja Z je − j

1



X q−(j+1)a Y c−b Z d+je + · · · +(−1) γ−j−1

 γ − 2 γ − j − 1



X q−(γ−1)a Y (γ−j−1)(c−b) Z (γ−j−1)d+je , j = 1, . . . , γ − 1,

, where γ = [ q−1 a ], form a Gr¨obner basis of the ideal I q for q ≫ 0.

Thus the ideal in(I q ) is generated by

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b , Y (q−ib)

+

Z ie , i = 1, . . . , γ − 1, X q−ja Z je , j = 1, . . . , γ − 1.

That is, the ideal in(I q ) is generated by

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b , Y (q−δb)

+

Z δe , X (q−δa)

+

Z δe , δ = 1, . . . , l, where l = [ q−1 e ], which is the same as the result in Proposition 3.1.

With the same method, we have the same conclusion of Theorem 3.4.

4.2 The case for d < e < a

Proposition 4.2 The Hilbert-Kunz function of the hypersurface X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e

with 0 < a ≤ b ≤ c and d < e < a is

n 7−→ λp 2n + f 1 (n)p n + f 0 (n)

for n ≫ 0, where λ is a rational number and f k (n) is an eventually periodic function of n for each k.

Proof. Let τ be the lexicographic order on S induced by the variable order X > Y > Z.

Then X a Y b is bigger than Y c Z d and Z e .

First, we determine a Gr¨obner basis of the ideal

I q = hX q , Y q , Z q , f i,

12

(3)

by the means of Buchberger’s algorithm (Algorithm 2.7).

By this algorithm, the elements

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e , Y (q−ib)

+

Z ie , i = 1, . . . , γ, X q−ja Z je − j

1



X q−(j+1)a Y c−b Z d+je + · · · +(−1) γ−j−1

 γ − 2 γ − j − 1



X q−(γ−1)a Y (γ−j−1)(c−b) Z (γ−j−1)d+je

+(−1) γ−j X q−γa Y γc−(γ−j)b Z γd + (−1) γ−j γ 1



X q−γa Y (γ−1)c−(γ−j)b Z (γ−1)d+e + · · · + (−1) γ−j

 γ j − 1



X q−γa Y (γ−j+1)c−(γ−j)b Z (γ−j+1)d+(j−1)e , j = 1, . . . , γ − 1,

, where γ = [ q−1 a ], form a Gr¨obner basis of the ideal I q . Thus the ideal in(I q ) is generated by

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b , Y (q−ib)

+

Z ie , i = 1, . . . , γ, X q−ja Z je , j = 1, . . . , γ − 1.

That is, the ideal in(I q ) is generated by

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b , Y (q−δb)

+

Z δe , X (q−δa)

+

Z δe , δ = 1, . . . , l, where l = [ q−1 e ], which is the same as the result in Proposition 3.1.

With the same method, we have the same conclusion of Theorem 3.4.

4.3 The case for d < a < e < b

Proposition 4.3 The Hilbert-Kunz function of the hypersurface X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e

with 0 < a ≤ b ≤ c and d < a < e < b is

n 7−→ λp 2n + f 1 (n)p n + f 0 (n)

for n ≫ 0, where λ is a rational number and f k (n) is an eventually periodic function of n for each k.

Proof. Let τ be the lexicographic order on S induced by the variable order X > Y > Z.

Then X a Y b is bigger than Y c Z d and Z e .

First, we determine a Gr¨obner basis of the ideal

I q = hX q , Y q , Z q , f i,

13

(4)

by the means of Buchberger’s algorithm (Algorithm 2.7).

By this algorithm, the elements

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b + Y c Z d + Z e , Y (q−ib)

+

Z ie , i = 1, . . . , γ − 1, X q−ja Z je − j

1



X q−(j+1)a Y c−b Z d+je + · · · +(−1) γ−j−1

 γ − 2 γ − j − 1



X q−(γ−1)a Y (γ−j−1)(c−b) Z (γ−j−1)d+je

+(−1) γ−j X q−γa Y γc−(γ−j)b Z γd + (−1) γ−j γ 1



X q−γa Y (γ−1)c−(γ−j)b Z (γ−1)d+e + · · · + (−1) γ−j

 γ j − 1



X q−γa Y (γ−j+1)c−(γ−j)b Z (γ−j+1)d+(j−1)e , j = 1, . . . , γ − 1,

, where γ = [ q−1 a ], form a Gr¨obner basis of the ideal I q . Thus the ideal in(I q ) is generated by

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b , Y (q−ib)

+

Z ie , i = 1, . . . , γ, X q−ja Z je , j = 1, . . . , γ − 1.

That is, the ideal in(I q ) is generated by

X q , Y q , Z q , X a Y b , Y (q−δb)

+

Z δe , X (q−δa)

+

Z δe , δ = 1, . . . , l, where l = [ q−1 e ], which is the same as the result in Proposition 3.1.

With the same method, we have the same conclusion of Theorem 3.4.

14

參考文獻

相關文件

利用 determinant 我 們可以判斷一個 square matrix 是否為 invertible, 也可幫助我們找到一個 invertible matrix 的 inverse, 甚至將聯立方成組的解寫下.

Then, we tested the influence of θ for the rate of convergence of Algorithm 4.1, by using this algorithm with α = 15 and four different θ to solve a test ex- ample generated as

Numerical results are reported for some convex second-order cone programs (SOCPs) by solving the unconstrained minimization reformulation of the KKT optimality conditions,

Particularly, combining the numerical results of the two papers, we may obtain such a conclusion that the merit function method based on ϕ p has a better a global convergence and

Then, it is easy to see that there are 9 problems for which the iterative numbers of the algorithm using ψ α,θ,p in the case of θ = 1 and p = 3 are less than the one of the

By exploiting the Cartesian P -properties for a nonlinear transformation, we show that the class of regularized merit functions provides a global error bound for the solution of

volume suppressed mass: (TeV) 2 /M P ∼ 10 −4 eV → mm range can be experimentally tested for any number of extra dimensions - Light U(1) gauge bosons: no derivative couplings. =&gt;

For pedagogical purposes, let us start consideration from a simple one-dimensional (1D) system, where electrons are confined to a chain parallel to the x axis. As it is well known