• 沒有找到結果。

Let n be any natural number and h = √n b

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Let n be any natural number and h = √n b"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

1. Some Examples Definition 1.1. Let a be any positive real number. We define

a0= 1.

Example 1.1. Let b > 1 and f : [1, b] → R be the function f (x) = 1/x for 1 ≤ x ≤ b. In this example, we are going to show that f is Riemann integrable (under certain assumption).

Let n be any natural number and h = √n

b. Set xi= hi for 0 ≤ i ≤ n. Then Pn= {xi: 0 ≤ i ≤ n}

is a partition of [1, b]. We let Miand mibe the supremum and infimum of f on [xi−1, xi] respectively.

For each 1 ≤ i ≤ n, we have

Mi = 1 xi−1

= 1

hi−1, mi= 1 xi

= 1 hi.

The upper Riemann sum U (f, Pn) and the lower Riemann sum of L(f, Pn) are given by U (f, Pn) =

n

X

i=1

Mi∆xi=

n

X

i=1

1

hi−1hi−1(h − 1) = n(h − 1) U (f, Ln) =

n

X

i=1

mi∆xi=

n

X

i=1

1

hihi−1(h − 1) =n(h − 1)

h .

By definition,

n(h − 1)

h ≤

Z b 1

1 xdx ≤

Z b 1

1

xdx ≤ n(h − 1).

More precisely,

(1.1) n(√n

b − 1)

n

b ≤

Z b 1

1 xdx ≤

Z b 1

1

xdx ≤ n(√n b − 1).

Suppose we know the following facts:

(1) lim

n→∞n(n

b − 1) exists. We set I = lim

n→∞n(n

√ b − 1).

(2) If lim

n→∞an= a and lim

n→∞bn= b with b 6= 0, then

n→∞lim an

bn = a b. (3) lim

n→∞

n

b = 1.

Then

n→∞lim n(√n

b − 1)

n

b = I.

Taking n → ∞ of (1.1), we obtain that I ≤

Z b 1

1 xdx ≤

Z b 1

1

xdx ≤ I.

Hence

Z b 1

1 xdx =

Z b 1

1

xdx = I.

Therefore f (x) = 1/x, 1 ≤ x ≤ b, is Riemann integrable and Z b

1

1

xdx = I.

Remark. We will see (define) that

ln b = Z b

1

1 xdx.

1

(2)

2

Example 1.2. Let m ∈ N be a natural number and 0 < a < b. Let f : [a, b] → R be the function f (x) = xm. Show that f is Riemann integrable and

Z b a

xmdx = bm+1− am+1 m + 1 .

Let h = pb/a and xn i = ahi for 0 ≤ i ≤ n. Then Pn= {xi: 0 ≤ i ≤ n} forms a partition of [a, b].

Let Mi and mi be the supremum and infimum of f on [xi−1, xi] respectively. Then for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, Mi= xmi , mi= xmi−1.

Hence the upper Riemann sum U (f, Pn) and the lower Riemann sum L(f, P ) are given respectively by

U (f, Pn) =

n

X

i=1

(ahi)mahi−1(h − 1) =am+1(h − 1) h

n

X

i=1

h(m+1)i= am+1hm+1 h − 1

hm+1− 1 · (h(m+1)n− 1) L(f, Pn) =

n

X

i=1

(ahi−1)mahi−1(h − 1) = am+1(h − 1)

m

X

i=1

h(m+1)(i−1)= am+1 (h − 1)

hm+1− 1(h(m+1)n− 1).

Use the fact that hn= b/a, one finds that

h(m+1)n = (hn)m+1= b a

m+1

= bm+1 am+1. Hence U (f, Pn) and L(f, Pn) can be rewritten as

U (f, Pn) = h − 1

hm+1− 1(bm+1− am+1)hm L(f, Pn) = h − 1

hm+1− 1(bm+1− am+1).

By definition,

(1.2) h − 1

hm+1− 1(bm+1− am+1) ≤ Z b

a

xmdx ≤ Z b

a

xmdx ≤ h − 1

hm+1− 1(bm+1− am+1)hm. Let us recall a formula:

1 + h + · · · + hm= hm+1− 1 h − 1 for any m ≥ 1. Hence

h − 1

hm+1− 1 = 1

1 + h + · · · + hm. Recall that

n→∞lim h = lim

n→∞

n

rb a = 1.

Hence we obtain that

n→∞lim

h − 1

hm+1− 1 = 1

n→∞lim(1 + h + · · · + hm)= 1 m + 1. Suppose that we know the following fact:

Lemma 1.1. Let (an) and (bn) be sequences and lim

n→∞an= a, lim

n→∞bn = b.

Then

n→∞lim anbn= ab.

(3)

3

Using the above fact, we have

n→∞lim

h − 1

hm+1− 1(bm+1− am+1)hm= (bm+1− am+1) lim

n→∞

h − 1

hm+1− 1· lim

m→∞hm=bm+1− am+1 m + 1 . By taking n → ∞ of (1.2), we obtain that

bm+1− am+1

m + 1 ≤

Z b a

xmdx ≤ Z b

a

xmdx ≤ bm+1− am+1 m + 1 . This shows that

Z b a

xmdx = Z b

a

xmdx = bm+1− am+1 m + 1 , i.e. f is Riemann integrable and

Z b a

xmdx = bm+1− am+1 m + 1 . Let us define a function F : [a, b] → R by

F (x) = Z x

a

tmdt, a ≤ x ≤ b.

By the previous example, we know that

F (x) = xm+1− am+1

m + 1 , a ≤ x ≤ b.

Let us recall the binomial theorem:

Theorem 1.1. (Binomial Theorem) Let x, y be real numbers (assume nonzero). For any natural number n,

(x + y)n= xn+n 1



xn−1y + · · · +

 n n − 1



xyn−1+ yn=

n

X

i=0

n i

 xn−iyi.

Heren i



= n!

i!(n − i)!.

(We will define the derivative of a function more precisely later). Let a < x < b and h be a number so that x + h is contained in (a, b). Then

F (x + h) − F (x)

h = xm+ h

m + 1

m + 1 2



xm−1+ · · · + hm

 . Hence

F0(x) = lim

h→0

F (x + h) − F (x)

h = xm.

In fact such a statement holds for integration of continuous function. More precisely:

Theorem 1.2. (Fundamental Theorem of Calculus I) Let f : [a, b] → R be a continuous function (It must be Riemann integrable). Define a function F : [a, b] → R by

F (x) = Z x

a

f (t)dt, a ≤ x ≤ b.

Then F is continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b) so that F0(x) = f (x) for a < x < b.

Theorem 1.3. (Fundamental Theorem of Calculus II) Let f : [a, b] → R be a continuous function.

Suppose G : [a, b] → R is continuous and differentiable on (a, b) so that G0(x) = f (x) for a < x < b.

Then

Z b a

f (x)dx = G(b) − G(a).

參考文獻

相關文件

 This theorem implies that the completion of a metric space is unique up to isomorphisms..

Algebraic Methods in the Study of Compact Riemann surface All the Riemann surfaces are assumed to be connected.. Let X be a

Let {f n } be a sequence of real-valued continuous functions on [a, b] which converges uniformly to a continuous function f on

Generalization Theorem Let f be integrable on K = [a, b] × [c, d] to R and suppose that for each y ∈ [c, d], the function x 7→ f (x, y) of [a, b] into R is continuous except

The proof is left to the reader as an exercise.. If f is differentiable at x 0 , its derivative

Let F be the field of real numbers or the field of

Remark: All the sequences are sequence of real numbers.. Formula that might be useful: Let θ

(Cauchy condensation theorem) Let (a n ) be a nonnegative non increasing sequence of real numbers.. The proof follows from the