Regional Economics (II) International Trade Theory
Shin-Kun Peng
Contents
Ch.0 Introduction
Ch.1 Conventional Trade Theory vs. New Trade Theory 1, Introduction: Conventional Trade Theory
2, Hecksher- Ohlin Model; Ricardian Model
3, Dixit- Stiglitz Model-Monopolistic Competition Model 3.1, Assumptions
3.2, The Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition 3.3, Utility Function
4. The Modify Model 4.1, Entry
4.2, Zero Profit Condition 4.3, Social Planner’s Problem 5, Krugman Model
5.1, Autarky 5.2, Open to Trade 5.3, The Gain from Trade
5.4, The Trade Cost and Home Market
Ch.2 The Modification Dixit-Stiglitz Model of Monopolistic Competition 1, Basic Revised Model
1.1 Assumption 1.2 Consumer Behavior
1.3 Price Index of Manufacturing Product
2, The Modification Dixit-Stiglitz Model with Spatial Context 2.1, Assumptions
2.2, The Model
2.3, The Analysis
2.4, The Normalizations and Further Simplification Ch.3, Core and Periphery Trade Model
1, Introduction 2, Assumption 3, Derivations 4, The model
5, Determination of equilibrium
6,The Core-periphery Model: the Numerical Simulation Ch. 4, The Various Specifications of New Trade Theory Model 1, Skilled and Unskilled Labor with Core-periphery Model 2, Capital and Immobile Labor with Core-periphery Model 3, Input-Output Linkage Model
4, Upstream-Downstream Vertical Linkage Model 5, The Framework with Quadratic Utility Function 5.1, The limitation of the Conventional model 5.2, The Motivation of this Framework 5.3, The Setting of this Framework 5.4, The Advantage of this Model
5.5, The Assumptions and the Structure of the Model 5.6, The Discussion of this Model
Ch. 5. The Heterogeneity of Firm and Intra-Industry Trade 1, Introduction
2, Motivation
3, The Characteristics 4, Major Findings 5, The Model
6, The Assumptions on Firms’ Behavior 7, The Firms’ value Function
7.1, The Distribution of Existing Firms
7.2, The Zero Cutoff Profit Condition 7.3., Free Entry and the Value of Firms 8, Equilibrium in Closed Economy
9, The Advantage of the Model Ch.6 Technology, Geography, and Trade
1, Contribution
2, Relation to the Literature 3, The Model
4, Frechet Distribution
5, The Properties of Price Distribution 6, The Gravity Specification
7, The Frist Estimation 8, Closing the Model 9, Counterfactuals
Ch.7 Plant, Productivity in International Trade 1, Introduction
2, Issues 3, The Model 4, Analytical Results
5, Major Research Agenda on Trade Model 6, New Economic Geography
7, NEG with Dixit-Stiglitz 8, Main Results
9, The Geography Model
Chapter 8, Richardian Model under Nonhomothetic Preference
1, Assumption 2, The Issues
3, The Model 4, Examination 5, Equilibrium
Ch.9, Economic integration and agglomeration in a middle product economy 1, Introduction
1.1, Trade and Equilibrium 1.2, Trade and Growth 1.3, Agglomeration and Trade 1.4, Agglomeration and Growth 2, The Basic Structure
3, The Intermediate Good Sector 4, The Final Good Sector
5, The Consumer 6, The Equilibrium 7, Stead-state Equilibrium 8, Comparative Static Analysis 9, Conclusion and Extensions 9.1, Conclusions
9.2, Extensions
References:
(I). Books
1. Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2003), Economic Geography and Public Policy, Princeton University Press.
2. Fujita, M. and Jacques-Francois Thisse (2002), Economics of Agglomeration - cities, industrial location, and regional growth, Cambridge University Press.
3. Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables, A.J., (1999), The Spatial Economy:Cities, Regions and International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Fujita, M., P. R. Krugman, and A. J. Venables (2000), The Spatial Economy, Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
5. Glaeser, E.L., (2008), Cities, Agglomeration and Spatial Equilibrium, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Helpman, E. and Krugman, P., (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Henderson, J. V., (1988), Urban Development: Theory, Fact, and Illusion.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Krouse Clement G. (1990), Theory of Industrial Economics, Basil Blackwell Ltd.
9. Kurgman, P. R. (1991), Geography and Trade, Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
10. Krugman, P. R. (1995), Development, Geography, and Economic Theory, Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
11. Krugman, P.R., Maurice Obstfeld and Marc J. Melitz, International Economics, (2010), Pearson.
12. Mills, E.S. and B.W. Hamilton, (1994), Urban Economics: Fifth Edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
13. Saxenian, A. (1996), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Tirole, Jean (1989), The Theory of Industrial Organization, The MIT Press, Combridge, Massachusetts.
15. Weber A., (1929), The Theory of Location of Industries, Translated by C.J.
Friedrich. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Zenou, Y. (2009), Urban Labor Economics, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
(II). Papers
1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson and J. Robinson (2002), “Reversal of fortune:
Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1231-1294.
2. Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, M. P. Feldman (1994), “R&D spillovers and recipient firm size,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336-340.
3. Alsleben, C., (2005), “The downside of knowledge spillovers: an explanation for the dispersion of high-tech industries,” Journal of Economics, 84, 217-248.
4. Alvarez, F. and R.E. Lucas, (2007), “General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1726-1768.
5. Amiti, M., (1998), “Inter-industry trade in manufactures: does country size matter?” Journal of International Economics, 44, 231-255.
6. Amiti, M. and L. Cameron (2007), “Economic geography and wages,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 15-29.
7. Anas, A and K. Xiong, (2003), “Intercity trade and the industrial diversification of cities,” Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 258-276.
8. Anderson, J.E. (2010), “The gravity Model,” Annual Review of Economics, 3, 133-160.
9. Anderson, S. P. and D. J. Neven (1991), “Cournot competition yields spatial agglomeration,” International Economic Review, 32, 793-808.
10. Anderson, J. E. and E. van Wincoop (2003), “Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle,” American Economic Review, 93, 170-192.
11. Anderson, J. E. and E. van Wincoop (2004), “Trade costs”, Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 691-751.
12. Antras, P., and Chor, C., (2013),”Organizing the global value chain,”
Econometrica, 81, 2127-2204.
13. Antras, P., and Helpman, E. (2004), “Global sourcing,” Journal of Political Economy, 112, 552-580.
14. Arkolakis, C., A. Costinot, and A. Rodriguez-Clare, (2012), “New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?” American Economic Review, 102, 94-130.
15. Armstrong, M. (1999), “Price discrimination by a many-product firm,” Review of Economic studies, 66, 151-168.
16. Antras, P. and E. Healman (2004), “Global Sourcing,” Journal of Political Economy, 112, 552-580.Atkeson, A. and A. T. Burstein (2010), “Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade,” Journal of Political Economy, 118, 433-484.
17. Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman (1996), “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production,” American Economic Review, 86, 630-640.
18. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand (2001), “The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity,” Journal of International Economics, 53, 1-27.
19. Baldwin, R. E. (1999), “Agglomeration and endogenous capital,” European Economic Review, 43: 253-280.
20. Baldwin, R. E. (2001), “Core-periphery model with forward-looking expectations,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31(1): 21-49.
21. Baldwin, R. E., H. Braconier and R. Forslid (2005), “Multinationals, endogenous growth, and technological spillovers: Theory and evidence,” Review of
International Economics, 13: 945-963.
22. Baldwin, R. E. and R. Forslid (2000a), “The core-periphery model and
endogenous growth: Stabilizing and destabilizing integration,” Economica, 67:
307-324.
23. Baldwin, R. E. and R. Forslid (2000b), “Trade liberalisation and endogenous growth: A q-theory approach,” Journal of International Economics, 50: 497-517.
24. Baldwin, R. E. and P. Martin (2004), “Agglomeration and regional growth.” In J.
V. Henderson and J.-F. Thisse (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban
Economics: Cities and Geography. Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier pp. 2671-2711.
25. Baldwin, R. E. and T. Okubo (2005), “Heterogeneous Firms, Agglomeration and Economic Geography: Spatial Selection and Sorting,” NBER Working Paper No.
11650.
26. Baldwin, R. E., P. Martin, G. I. P. Ottaviano (2001), “Global income divergence, trade, and industrialization: The geography of growth take-offs,” Journal of Economic Growth, 6: 5-37.
27. Baldwin, R. and T. Okubo (2006), “Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: Spatial selection and sorting,” Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 323-346.
28. Baldwin, R. E. and F. Robert-Nicoud (2008), “Trade and growth with heterogeneous firms,” Journal of International Economics, 74: 21-34.
29. Becker, G. and K. M. Murphy (1992), “The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1137-1160.
30. Beckman, M. J. (1976), “Spatial price policies revisited,” Bell Journal of Economics, 7, 619-630.
31. Behrens, K., A. R.Lamorgese, G. I. P. Ottaviano and T. Tabuchi (2004), “Testing the ‘home market effect’ in a multi-country world: A theory-based approach,”
CEPR Discussion Papers No.4468.
32. Behrens, K., A. R. Lamorgese, G. I. P. Ottaviano and T. Tabuchi (2005), “Changes in infrastructure and tariff barriers: local vs global impacts”, Centre for Economic Policy Research, International Trade, CEPR Discussion paper No. 5103.
33. Behrens, K., and J.-F. Thisse (2007), “Regional economics: a new geography perspective,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 457-65.
34. Behrens, K., G. Mion, and G.I.P. Ottaviano,( 2011), “Economic integration and industry reallocation,” in Jovanovic, Miroslav N., (ed.) International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume II, Edward Elgar, Chetenham, UK.
35. Behrens, K., G. Duranton, and F. Robert-Nicoud (2014), “Productive cities:
Sorting, selection and agglomeration,” Journal of Political Economy, 122(3), 507-553.
36. Bekkers, E., and Francois, J., (2013), “Trade and industrial structure with large firms and heterogeneity,” European Economic Review, 60, 69-90.
37. Berliant, M., S.-K. Peng, and Ping Wang (2002), “Production externalities and urban configuration,” Journal of Economic Theory, 104, 275-303.
38. Bernard, A. B., J. Eaton, J. B. Jesen, and S. Kortum (2003), “Plants Productivity in International Trade,” American Economic Review, 93, 1268-1290.
39. Bernard, A. B., S. J. Redding, and P. K. Schoot (2007), “Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms,” Review of Economic Studies, 74, 31-66.
40. Bernard, A. B., S. J. Redding, and P. K. Schoot (2010), “Multi-product firms and trade liberalization,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1271-1318.
41. Brakman, S., Garretsen, H. and Schramm, M., (2006), “Putting new economic geography to the test: Freeness of trade and agglomeration in the EU regions,”
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 613-635.
42. Broda, C. and D.E. Weinstein (2006), “Globalization and the gains from variety,”
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 541-585.
43. Caselli, F., (1999), “Technological revolutions,” American Economic Review, 89, 78-102.
44. Chen, Y., Dubey, P., and Sen, D. (2011), “Outsourcing induced by strategic competition,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 484-492.
45. Chen, Y., Ishikawa, J., and Yu, Z. (2004), “Trade liberalization and strategic outsourcing,” Journal of International Economics, 63, 419-436.
46. Choi, C. and H. Shin (1992), “A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, 229-231.
47. Chu, Cyrus C. Y., and Huei-chung Lu (1998), “The multi-store location and
pricing decision of a spatial monopoly,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28, 255-281.
48. Claycombe, R. J. (1996), “Mill pricing and spatial price discrimination monopoly performance and location with spatial retail markets,” Journal of Regional Science, 36, 111-127.
49. Combes, P.-P. and G.. Duranton, (2006), “Labor pooling, labor poaching, and spatial clustering,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 1-28.
50. Combes, P.-P., G. Duranton and L. Gobillon (2008), “Spatial wage disparities:
Sorting matters!” Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 723-742.
51. Combes, P.-P., G. Duranton, L. Gobillon and S. Roux (2010), “Estimating Agglomeration Economies with History, Geology, and Worker Effects,”
Agglomeration Economics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 15-66.
52. Cordoba, J.-C. (2008), “On the distribution of city sizes,” Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 177-197.
53. Corden, W.M., (1984), “Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: Survey and consolidation,” Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 359-380.
54. Corden, W.M. and Neary, J.P., (1982), “Booming sector and de-industrialization in a small open economy,” The Economic Journal, 92, 825-848.
55. Cremer, H. and J.-F. Thisse (1991), “Location models of horizontal differentiation:
A special case of vertical differentiation models,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(4), 383-390.
56. Crozet, M., (2004), “Do migrants follow market potential?: An estimation of a new economic geograpgy model,” Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 439-458.
57. D’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin (1988), “Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers,” American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137.
58. D’Aspremont, C., J. J. Gabszewicz and J-F, Thisse (1979), On Hotelling’s
“stability in competition,” Econometrica, 47(5), 1145-1150.
59. Davis, D. R. (1998), “The home market, trade, and industrial structure,” American Economic Review, 88, 1264-1276.
60. Davis, D. R. and D. Weinstein (2002), “Bones, bombs, and break points: The geography of economic activity,” American Economic Review, 92(5), 1269-1289.
61. Davis, D. R. and D. Weinstein (2008), “A search for multiple equilibria in urban industrial structure,” Journal of Regional Science, 48(1), 29-65.
62. De Palma, A., V. Ginsburgh, Y. Y. Papageorgiou, J.-F. Thisse (1985), “The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity,”
Econometrica, 53, 767-781.
63. Demidova, S., (2008), “Productivity improvement and falling trade costs: Boon or Bane?” International Economic Review, 49, 1437-1462.
64. Dixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz (1977), “Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity,” American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308.
65. Dornbusch, R., S. Fischer, and P. Samuelson (1977), “Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods,”
American Economic Review, 67(5), 823-39.
66. Dunne, T., L. Foster, J. Haltiwanger, and K.R. Troske, (2004), “Wage and productivity dispersion in United states manufacturing: The role of computer investment,” Journal of Labor Economics, 22, 397-429.
67. Duranton, G. (2007), “Urban evolutions: The fast, the slow, and the still,”
American Economic Review, 97(1), 197-221.
68. Duranton, G. and D. Puga (2004), “Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies,” in (eds) J. Vernon Henderson and Jacques-Francois Thisse,
Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Volume 4: Cities and Geography, 2063.2117. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
69. Duranton, G. and M. Storper (2008), “Rising trade costs? Agglomeration and trade with endogenous transaction costs,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(1), 292-319.
70. Eaton J. and S. Kortum (2002), “Technology, Geography, and Trade,”
Econometrica, 70(5), 1741-1779.
71. Economides, N. (1986), “Nash equilibrium in duopoly with products defined by two characteristics,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17(3), 431-439.
72. Egger, P. and T. Seidel, (2008), “Agglomeration and fair wages,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 41, 271-291.
73. von Ehrlich, M. and T. Seidel, (2011), “Agglomeration and credit constraints,”
unpublished manuscript, ETH Zurich.
74. Faggio, G., G. Kjell, and J. Van Reenen, (2010), “The evolution of inequality in productivity and wages: Panel data evidence,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1919-1951.
75. Falvey, R., D. Greenaway, and Z. Yu, (2006), “Extending the Melitz model to asymmetric countries,” GEP Research Paper, 2006/07.
76. Falvey, R., D. Greenaway, and Z. Yu, 2011, “Catch up or pulling away:
Intraindustry trade, productivity gaps and heterogeneous firms,” Open Economies Review, 22, 17-38.
77. Feenstra, R. C., J. A. Markusen and A. K. Rose (2001), “Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2), 430-447.
78. Flam, H. and E. Helpman (1987), “Industrial policy under monopolistic competition,” Journal of International Economics, 22(1-2), 79-102.
79. Forslid, R. (1999), “Agglomeration with human and physical capital: An analytically solvable case, CEPR Discussion Paper 2102.
80. Forslid R. and G. I. P. Ottaviano (2003), “An analytically solvable core-periphery model,” Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 229-240.
81. Friedman, J. M., and J-F., Thisse (1993), “Partial collusion fosters minimum product differentiation,” Rand Journal of Economics, 24, 631-645.
82. Fujita, M. (1988), “A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration:
Differentiated product approach,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18(1), 87-124.
83. Fujita, M. (2007), “Towards the new economic geography in the brain power society,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37: 482-490.
84. Fujita, M. and T. Gokan (2005), “On the evolution of the spatial economy with multi-unit, multi-plant firms: The impact of IT development”. Portyguese Economic Journal, 4, 73-105.
85. Fujita, M., and P. R. Krugman (1995), “When is the economy monocentric? Von Thünen and Chamberlin unified,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 505-528.
86. Fujita, M., P. R. Krugman and T. Mori (1999a), “On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems,” European Economic Review, 43: 209-251.
87. Fujita, M., P. R. Krugman, and A. J. Venables (1999), The Spatial Economy, Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Chapter 4.
88. Fujita, M., and T. Mori (1997), “Structural stability and evolution of urban systems,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27, 399-442.
89. Fujita, M., and T. Mori (2005), “Frontiers of the new economic geography,”
Papers in Regional Science, 84, 377-405.
90. Fujita, M. and H. Ogawa (1982), “Multiple equilibria and structural transition of Non-monocentric urban configurations,” Regional Science and Urban
Economics, 12, 161-96.
91. Fujita, M., and S.-K. Peng (2009), “Labor Migration with Remittance in a core-periphery economy”. Working paper
92. Fujita, M., J.-F. Thisse (2003), “Does geographical agglomeration foster economic growth? And who gains and loses from it?” Japanese Economic Review, 54:
121-145.
93. Fujita, M., and J.-F. Thisse (2006), “Globalization and the evolution of the supply
chain: who gains and who loses?” International Economic Review, 47, 811-836.
94. Fujita, M. and J.-F. Thisse (2009), “New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman’s 2008 Nobel prize in Economic Sciences,”
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 109-19.
95. Gabszewicz, J. J. and J.-F. Thisse (1979), “Price competition, quality, and income disparities,” Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 340-359.
96. Gehrig, T. (1998), “Competing Markets,” European Economic Review, 42, 277-310. (*)
97. Glaseser, E.L and J.E. Kohlhase, (2004), “Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs.” Papers in Regional Science, 83, 197-228.
98. Goswami, A. (2013), “Vertical FDI versus outsourcing: The role of technology transfer costs,” North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 1-21.
99. Greenhut, M. L., and H. Ohta (1972), “Monopoly output under alternative spatial pricing techniques,” American Economic Review, 62, 705-713.
100. Greenstein, S. and G. Ramey (1998), “Market structure, innovation and vertical product differentiation,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 285-311.
101. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (2002), “Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 85-120.
102. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (2003), “Outsourcing versus FDI in industry equilibrium,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 317-327.
103. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (2005), “Outsourcing in global economy,”
Review of Economic Study, 72, 135-159.
104. Grossman, G. M. and E. Rossi-Hansberg (2008), “Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring,” American Economic Review, 98(5), 1978-1997.
105. Hanly, D. and Keith C. K. Cheung (1998), “Market structure of multi-product firms under free entry,” Economics Letters, 61, 159-163.
106. Hanson, G. H. (1996), “Agglomeration, dispersion, and the pioneer firm,”
Journal of Urban Economics, 39, 255-281.
107. Hanson, G.H. (1996), “Localization economies, vertical organization, and trade,”
American Economic Review, 86(5), 1266-78.
108. Hanson, G. H. (1997), “Increasing returns, trade, and the regional structure of wages,” Economic Journal, 107, 113-133.
109. Hanson, G. H. (1998), “Regional adjustment to trade liberalization,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28(4), 419-44.
110. Hanson, G. H. (2005), “Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration,” Journal of International Economics, 67(1), 1-24.
111. Hanson, G. H., and Chong Xiang (2004), “The home market effect and bilateral trade patterns,” American Economic Review, 94(4), 1108–29.
112. Harrigan, J. and C. Evans (2005), “Distance, time, and specialization: Lean retailing in general equilibrium,” American Economic Review, 95(1), 292-313.
113. Harrigan, J. and A. J. Venables (2006), “Timeliness and agglomeration,” Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 300-316.
114. Helpman, E. (1998), “The size of regions,” in D. Pines, E. Sadka and I. Zilcha, Topics in Public Economics: Theoretical and Applied Analysis, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 33-54.
115. Helpman, E. (2006), “Trade, FDI and the Organization of Firms,” Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 589-639.
116. Helpman, E and O. Itskhoki (2010), “Labour market rigidities, trade and unemployment,” Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1100-1137.
117. Helpman, E, O. Itskhoki , and S. Redding (2010), “Inequality and unemployment in a global economy,” Econometrica, 78, 1239-1283.
118. Helpman, E., M.J. Melitz and S. R. Yeaple, (2004), “Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous firms,” American Economic Review, 94, 300-316.
119. Henderson, J. V. (2003), “Marshall’s scale economies,” Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 1-28.
120. Henderson, J. V. and A. J. Venables (2008), “The dynamics of city formation,”
NBER Working Paper, 13769.
121. Henderson, J. V. and H. G. Wang (2007), “Urbanization and city growth: The role of institutions,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(3), 283-313.
122. Holahan, W. L. (1975), “The welfare effects of spatial price discrimination,”
American Economic Review, 65, 498-503.
123. Holmes, T. J. and J. J. Steven (2002), “Geographic Concentration and
Establishment Scale,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 682-690.
124. Holmes, T. J., W.-T. Hsu and S. Lee (2014), “Allocative Efficiency, Mark-ups, and the Welfare Gains from Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 94(2), 195-206.
125. Hotelling, H (1929), “Stability in competition,” Economic Journal, 39, 41-57.
126. Hsieh C.-T and P. J. Klenow (2009), “Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124 (4), 1403-1448.
127. Hsu, S.-K. (1983), “Pricing in an urban spatial monopoly: A general analysis,”
Journal of Regional Science, 23, 165-175.
128. Hwang, H. and C. C. Mai (1990), “Effects of spatial price discrimination on output welfare and location,” American Economic Review 80, 567-575.
129. Hwang, H. and C. C. Mai (1999), “Optimal export taxes with endogenous location,” Southern Economic Journal, 65, 940-952.
130. Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson (1993), “Geographic localization of knowledge spillover as evidenced by patent citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economies, 108, 577-598.
131. Jehiel, P. (1992), “Product differentiation and price collusion,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 633-643.
132. Krugman, P. (1981), “Intra-industry specialization and the gains from trade,”
Journal of Political Economy, 89, 959-973.
133. Krugman, P. R. (1980), “Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade,” American Economic Review, 70, 950-959.
134. Krugman, P., (1987), “The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: Notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies,” Journal of Development Economics, 27, 41-55.
135. Krugman, P. R. (1991a), “Increasing returns and economic geography,” Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-499.
136. Krugman, P. R. (1991b), “History versus expectations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 651-667.
137. Krugman, P. R. (1993), “First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location,”
Journal of Regional Science, 33, 129-144.
138. Krugman, P. R., and A. J. Venables (1995), “Globalization and the inequality of nations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 857-880.
139. Krugman, P. R., and A. J. Venables (1996), “Integration, specialization and adjustment,” European Economic Review, 40, 959-967.
140. Latsis, O., (2005), “Dutch Disease Hits Russia,” Moscow News, June 8-14.
141. Leamer, E., (1980), “The Leontief Paradox, Reconsidered,” Journal of Political Economy, 88(3), 495-503.
142. Limao, N. and A. J. Venables (2001), “Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade,” World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451-79.
143. Lu, Chia-Hui, S.-K., Peng and Ping Wang (2012), "The Organization of
Production and Trade", International Journal of Economic Theory, 8, 179-195.
144. Lucas, R. E., (2001), “Externalities and Cities,” Review of Economic Dynamics 4, 245-274.
145. Lucas, R. E., and E. Rossi-Hansberg, 2002, “On the internal structure of cities,”
Econometrica 70, 1445-1476.
146. Mai, C. C. and H. Hwang (2002), “The tariff -jumping argument and location theory,” Review of International Economics, 10, 361-368.
147. Mai, C. C. and S.-K. Peng (1999), “Cooperation vs. competition in a spatial model,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, 463-472.
148. Mai, C. C., S.-K. Peng, and T. Tabuchi (2008), “Economic geography with tariff competition,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38, 478-486.
149. Markusen, J. R. (1989), “Trade in producer services and other specialized intermediate inputs,” American Economic Review, 79, 85-95.
150. Marrakech, M. (2005), “Trade integration with emerging countries with substantial resources in skilled labour: What effects are to be expected for European countries?” Paper prepared for the International Conference- The new Frontiers of European Union.
151. Martin, P. (1999), “Public policies, regional inequalities and growth,” Journal of Public Economics, 73: 85-105.
152. Martin, P. and G. I. P. Ottaviano (1999), “Growing locations: Industry location in
a model of endogenous growth,” European Economic Review, 43: 281-302.
153. Martin, P. and G. I. P. Ottaviano (2001), “Growth and agglomeration,”
International Economic Review, 42, 947-968.
154. Martin, P. and C.A. Rogers, (1995), “Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure,” Journal of International Economics, 39, 335-351.
155. Martin, R. and P. Sunley (1996), “Paul Krugman’s geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: A critical assessment,”
Economic Geography, 72: 259-292.
156. Matsuyama, K. (1991), “Increasing returns, industrialization, and indeterminacy of equilibrium,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 617-650.
157. Matsuyama, K., (1992), “Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and the economic growth,” Journal of Economic Theory, 58, 317-334.
158. Matsuyama, K. (2000), “Financial Market Globalization and Endogenous Inequality of Nations,” Discussion Papers 1334.
159. Mayer, T. (2008), “Market potential and development,” CEPR Discussion Paper, 6798.
160. McCawley, P., (1980), “Indonesia’s new balance of payments problem: A surplus to get rid of,” Ekonomi danKeuangan Indonesian, 28, 39-58.
161. Melitz, M., (2003), “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity,” Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725.
162. Melitz, M.J. and G..I.P. Ottaviano, (2008), “Market size, trade, and productivity,”
Review of Economic Studies, 75, 295-316.
163. Michaels, G., F. Rauch and S. J. Redding (2008), “Urbanization and structural transformation,” CEPR Discussion Paper, 7016.
164. Mori, T. and A. Turrini (2005), “Skills, agglomeration and segmentation,”
European Economic Review, 49: 201-225.
165. Motta, M. (1992), “Cooperative R&D and vertical product differentiation,”
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 643-661.
166. Mukherjee, A., and Tsai, Y. (2013), “Multi-sourcing as an entry deterrence strategy,” International Review of Economics and Finance, 25, 108-112.
167. Murata, Y., (2003), “Product diversity, taste heterogeneity. And geographic
distribution of economic activities: Market vs. non-market interactions,” Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 126-144.
168. Murata. Y., J.-F. Thisse, (2005), “A simple model of economic geography a la Helpman-Tabuchi.” Journal of Urban Economics, 58, 137-155.
169. Mussa, M. and S. Rosen (1978), “Monopoly and product quality,” Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301-317.
170. Naghavi, A., and Ottaviano, G. (2009), “Offshoring and product innovation,”
Economic Theory, 38, 517-532.
171. Naghavi, A., S. -K. Peng, and Y. Tsai, (2015), “Outsourcing, relationship-specific investments, and supplier heterogeneity,” (working paper).
172. Neary, J. P. (2001), “Of hype and hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography,” Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 536-561.
173. Neary, J. P. (2003),”Globalization and market structure,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 245-271.
174. Neary, J. P. , and Tharakan, J., (2012),”International trade with endogenous mode of competition in general equilibrium,” Journal of International Economics, 86, 118-132.
175. Neven, D. J. (1986), “On Hotelling’s Competition with Non-uniform Customer Distributions,” Economics Letters, 21, 121-126.
176. Neven, D. J. (1985), “Two stage (perfect) equilibrium in Hotelling model,”
Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 317-325.
177. Neven. D. J. (1987), “Endogenous sequential entry in a spatial model,”
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 5, 419-434.
178. Nocke, V., (2006), “A gap for me: Entrepreneurs and entry,” Journal of European Economic Association, 4, 929-955.
179. Okubo, T., P.M. Picard and J.-F. Thisse, (2010), “The spatial selection of heterogeneous firms,” Journal of International Economics, 82, 230-237.
180. Ottaviano, G. and D. Puga (1998), “Agglomeration in the global economy: A survey of the ‘New economic geography’,” World Economy, 21, 707-731.
181. Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2011), “”New’ new economic geography: Firm Heterogeneity and agglomeration economies,” Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 231-240.
182. Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2001), “Monopolistic competition, trade, and endogenous spatial fluctuations,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, 51-77.
183. Ottaviano, G. I. P. and J.-F. Thisse (2002), “Integration, agglomeration and the political economics of factor mobility,” Journal of Public Economics, 83, 429-456.
184. Ottaviano, G. I. P., T. Tabuchi and J.-F. Thisse (2002), “Agglomeration and trade revisited,” International Economic Review, 43(2), 409-435.
185. Ottaviano, G.., and J.-F. Thisse (2004), “Agglomeration and economic
geography,” In J.V. Handerson and J.-F. Thisse (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2563-2608.
186. Ottaviano, G. I. P., J.-F. Thisse (2005), “New economic geography: What about the N?” Environment and Planning A, 37, 1707-1725.
187. Pack, H. and Saggi, K. (2001), “Vertical technology transfer via international outsourcing,” Journal of Development Economics, 65, 389-415.
188. Papageorgiou, Y. Y. and D. Pines (2000), “Externalities, indivisibility,
nonreplicability and agglomeration,” Journal of Urban Economics, 48, 509-535.
189. Peng, S.-K. (1992), “The effect of government taxation policies on spatial monopoly,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 197-211.
190. Peng, S.-K. (2004), “Spatial monopoly with production differentiation,”
Southern Economic Journal, 70, 646-600.
191. Peng, S.-K. (2004), “Advanced insights in central place theory,” Urban Dynamics and Growth: Advances in Urban Economics, Edited by Robert, Capello and Peter Nijkamp, Elsever, Amesterdam, North Holland.
192. Peng, S.-K., J.-F. Thisse, and P. Wang (2006), “Economic integration and
agglomeration in a middle product economy,” Journal of Economic Theory, 131, 1-25.
193. Peng, S.-K, and Dao-Zhi Zeng (2014), “Globalization without industrial delocation,” (working paper).
194. Pflüger, M. (2004), “A simple, analytically solvable, Chamberlinian
agglomeration model,” Regional Science & Urban Economics, 34, 565-573.
195. P‡üger, M. and J. Südekum, (2009), “Subsidizing firm entry in open economies,”
IZA Discussion Paper No. 4384.
196. P‡üger, M. and J. Südekum (2008), “A synthesis of footloose-entrepreneur new economic geography models: When is agglomeration smooth and easily
reversible?” Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 39-54.
197. P‡üger, M. and J. Südekum (2008), “Integration, agglomeration and welfare,”
Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 544-566.
198. Pflüger, M. and T Tabuchi (2010), “The size of regions with land use for production,” Regional Science & Urban Economics, 40, 481-489.
199. Picard., P. M. and D. Z. Zeng (2005), “Agricultural sector and industrial agglomeration,” Journal of Development Economics, 77, 75-106.
200. Puga, D. (1999), “The rise and fall of regional inequalities,” European Economic Review, 43, 303-334.
201. Ranch, J. (1993), “Productivity gains from geographic concentration,” Journal of Urban Economics, 34, 380-400.
202. Redding, S. J. and P. K. Schott (2003), “Distance, skill deepening and
development: Will peripheral countries ever get rich?” Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 515-41.
203. Redding, S. J. and A. J. Venables (2004), “Economic geography and international inequality,” Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 53-82.
204. Reiganum, J. (1983), “Technology adoption under imperfect information,” Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 57-69.
205. Reinganum, J. (1981a), “On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach,” Review of Economic Studies, 48, 395-405.
206. Reinganum, J. (1981b), “Market structure and the diffusion of new technology,”
Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 618-624.
207. Rivera-Batiz, F. (1988), “Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and agglomeration economies in consumption and production,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18, 125-153.
208. Rivera-Batiz, L. A., and P. M. Romer (1991), “International trade with
endogenous technological change, “European Economic Review, 35, 971-1001.
209. Robert-Nicoud, F. (2005), “The structure of simple New Economic Geography models (or, on identical twins),” Journal of Economic Geography, 5(2), 201-34.
210. Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian, and F. Trebbi (2004), “Institutions rule: The
primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development,”
Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-65.
211. Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2005), “A spatial theory of trade,” American Economic Review, 95(5), 1464-1491.
212. Rossi-Hansberg, E. and M. L. J. Wright (2007), “Establishment size dynamics in the aggregate economy,” American Economic Review, 97(5), 1639-1666.
213. Kortum, S. (1997), “Research, Patenting, and Technological Change,”
Econometrica 65(6), 1389-1419.
214. Krugman, P. R., (1979), “Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade,” Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469-479.
215. Saito, H., M. Gopinath and J.J. Wu, (2011), “Heterogeneous firms, trade
liberalization and agglomeration,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 44, 541-560.
216. Salop, S. (1979), “Monopolistic competition with outside goods,” Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 141-156.
217. Samuelson, P. A. (1952), “The transfer problem and transport costs: The terms of trade when impediments are absent,” Economic Journal, 62, 278-304.
218. Samuelson, P. A. (1954), “The transfer problem and transport cost, II: Analysis pf effects of trade impediments,” Economic Journal, 64, 264-289. (*)
219. Samuelson, P. A. (1983), “Thünen at two hundred,” Journal of Economic Literature, 21, 1468-1488.
220. Schwarz, C. and Suedekum, J., (2014), “Global sourcing of complex production processes,” Journal of International Economics, 93, 123-139.
221. Shaked, A. and J. Sutton (1982), “Relaxing price competition through product differentiation,” Review of Economic Studies, 49, 3-13.
222. Spence, M. (1976), “Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition,” Review of Economics Studies, 43, 217-235.
223. Stahl, K. (1982a), “Location and spatial pricing theory with non-convex transportation cost schedules,” Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 575-582.
224. Stahl, K. (1982b), “Differentiated products, consumer search, and location oligopoly,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 31, 97-113.
225. Storper, M. and A. J. Venables (2004), “Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy,” Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351-370.
226. Stokey, N. L. (1991), “Human Capital, Product Quality, and Growth,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 587-616.
227. Suedekum, J., (2006), “Agglomeration and regional costs of living,” Journal of Regional Science, 46, 529-543.
228. Syverson, C. (2004), “Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example,”
NBER Working Paper No. 10501.
229. Tabuchi, T. (1998), “Urban agglomeration and dispersion: A synthesis of Alonso and Krugman,” Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 333-351.
230. Tabuchi, T. and J.-F. Thisse (2002a), “Taste heterogeneity, labor mobility and economic geography,” Journal of Development Economics, 69, 155-177.
231. Tabuchi, T. and J.-F. Thisse (2002b), “Regional specialization and transport costs,,” Discussion Paper Series No.3542, CEPR.
232. Tabuchi. T. and J.-F. Thisse (2006), “Regional specialization, urban hierarchy, and commuting costs,” International Economic Review, 47(4), 1295-1317.
233. Tabuchi, T. and D. Z. Zeng (2004), “Stability of spatial equilibrium,” Journal of Regional Science, 44, 641-660.
234. Tabuchi, T., Thisse, J.-F. (1995), “Asymmetric equilibria in spatial competition,”
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 213-227.
235. Tabuchi, T. and Thisse, J.F., (2011), “A new economic geography model of central places,” Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 240-252.
236. Takatsuka, H. and D.-Z. Zeng, (2009), “Discussion forms: an interaction of market access, competition, and urban costs,” Journal of Regional Science, 49, 177-204.
237. Takahashi, T., (2011), “Directional imblance in transport prices and economic geography,” Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 92-102.
238. Thisse, J.-F. and X. Vives (1988), “On the strategic choice of spatial price policy,” American Economic Review, 78, 122-137.
239. Trefler, D., (1993), “Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy,” Journal of Political
Economy, 101(1), 138-160.
240. Trefler, D., (1995), “Union wage sensitivity to trade and protection: Theory and evidence,” Journal of International Economics, 1995, 39(1-2), 1-25.
241. Venables, A.J., (1987), “Trade and trade policy with differentiated products: A Chamberlinian-Ricardian model,” Economic Journal, 97, 700-717.
242. Venables, A. J. (1995), “Economic integration and the location of firm,”
American Economic Review, 85(2), 296-300.
243. Venables, A. J. (1996), “Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries,”
International Economic Review, 37, 341-359.
244. Venables, A. J. (1999), “The international division of industries: Clustering and comparative advantage in a multi-industry model,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101: 495-513
245. Vives, X. (1990), “Trade association disclosure rules, incentives to share information, and welfare.” Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 409-430.
246. Walz, U. (1996), “Transport costs, intermediate goods, and localized growth,”
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26: 671-695.
247. Walz, U. (1997), “Growth and deeper regional integration in a three-country model,” Review of International Economics, 5: 492-507.
248. Waugh, M. E., (2010),”International trade and income differences,” American Economic Review, 100, 2093-2124.
249. Yamamoto, K. (2003), “Agglomeration and growth with innovation in the intermediate goods sector,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33:
335-360.
250. Yang X. and J. Borland (1991), “A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 460-82.
251. Yi, Kei-Mu (2003), “Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade?” Journal of Political Economy, 111, 52-102.
252. Young, A., (2000), “The Razor’s edge: distortions and incremental reform in the People’s Republic of China,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1091-1135.
253. Zeng, D. Z. (2002), “Equilibrium stability for a migration model,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 123-138.
254. Zeng, D. Z. (2006), “Redispersion is different from dispersion: Spatial economy of multiple industries,” The Annals of Regional Science, 40: 229-247.
255. Zhang, Z. J. (1995), “Price-matching policy and the principle of minimum differentiation,” The Journal of Industrial Economic, 43, 287-299.
