• 沒有找到結果。

Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium Caused by Radiation and Radiotherapy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium Caused by Radiation and Radiotherapy"

Copied!
5
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.ae

182 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2015, 9, (Suppl 1: M2) 182-186

1874-2106/15 2015 Bentham Open

Open Access

Iatrogenic Damage to the Periodontium Caused by Radiation and Radiotherapy

Najeeb Kassim

1,*

, Syed Sirajuddin

2

, Shriparna Biswas

2

, Syed Rafiuddin

3

and Ashwini Apine

2

1International Clinic Salmiya, Kuwait; 2Department of Periodontology, Rajarajeswari Dental College & Hospital, Ban- galore-560074, Karnataka, India; 3Department of Orthodontics, Sri Hasanamba Dental College & Hospital, Hassan, Karnataka, India

Abstract: The radio-sensitivity of a tissue or organ is measured by its response to irradiation. Loss of moderate numbers of cells does not affect the function of most organs. However, with loss of large numbers of cells, all affected organisms display a clinical result. The severity of this change depends on the dosage and thus the extent of cell loss. Moderate doses to a localized area may lead to repairable damage. Comparable doses to a whole organism may result in death from dam- age to the most sensitive systems in the body.

Keywords: Iatrogenic, radiation, radiotherapy, periodontium.

INTRODUCTION

In dentistry, the size of the doses used routinely is rela- tively small and well below the threshold doses required to produce the somatic deterministic effects. However, the so- matic and genetic stochastic effects can develop with any dose of ionizing radiation. Dental radiology does not usually involve irradiating the reproductive organs, thus in dentistry somatic stochastic effects are the damaging effects of most concern.

HOW DO X-RAYS CAUSE DAMAGE

The precise mechanism of how X-rays cause these dam- aging effects is not yet fully known, but two main mecha- nisms are thought to be responsible.

• Direct damage to specific targets within the cell

• Indirect damage to the cell as a result of the ionization of water or other molecules within the cell.

Direct Damage

Specific targets within the cell, probably the chromoso- mal DNA or RNA in the nucleus, take a direct hit from an incoming X-ray photon, or an ejected high-energy electron, which breaks the relatively weak bonds between the nucleic acids. The subsequent chromosomal effects could include.

• Inability to pass on information

• Abnormal replication

• Cell death

• Only temporary damage - the DNA being repaired suc- cessfully before further cell division.

*Address correspondence to this author at the International clinic Salmiya, Kuwait, Tel: 0096599161122; E-mail: najeebkassim@hotmail.com

If the radiation hits somatic cells, the effects on the DNA (and hence the chromosomes) could result in a radiation- induced malignancy. If the damage is to reproductive stem cells, the result could be a radiation-induced congenital ab- normality. What actually happens in the cell depends on sev- eral factors, including:

• The type and number of nucleic acid bonds that is broken

• The intensity and type of radiation

• The time between exposures

• The ability of the cell to repair the damage

• The stage of the cell's reproductive cycle when irradiated.

Indirect Damage

As 75% of each cell consists of water, it is the water molecules that are most likely to be ionized by the incoming X-rays. The effects are shown below which illustrates that the damage to the cell results from the free radicals produced by the ionization process (Fig. 1).

SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF RADIATION

The short-term effects of radiation ona tissue are deter- mined primarily by the sensitivity of its parenchymal cells. If continuously proliferating tissues (e.g., bone marrow, oral mucous membranes) are irradiated with a moderate dose, cells are lost primarily by mitosis-linked death. The extent of cell loss depends on damage to the stem cell pools and the proliferative rate of the cell population. The effects of irra- diation of such tissues become apparent relatively quickly as a reduction in the number of mature cells in the series. Tis- sues composed of cells that rarely or never divide (e.g., mus- cle) demonstrate little or no radiation induced hypoplasia over the short term.

(2)

Fig. (1). A diagrammatic summary of the sequence of events following ionization of water molecules leading to indirect damage to the cell.

Long-term Effects of Radiation

The long term deterministic effects of radiation ontissues and organs depend primarily on the extent of damage to the fine vasculature. The relative radio-sensitivityof capillaries and connective tissue is intermediate between that of differ- entiating intermitotic cells and reverting postmitotic cells.

Irradiation of capillaries causes swelling, degeneration, and necrosis. These changes increase capillary permeability and initiate a slow progressive fibrosis around the vessels. As a result, deposition of fibrous scar tissue is increased around thevessels, leading to premature narrowing and eventual obliteration of vascular lumens. This impairs the transport of oxygen, nutrients, and waste products and results in death of all cell types. The net result is progressive fibro-atrophy of the irradiated tissue. Such progressive atrophic changes lead to a loss of cell function and a reduced resistance of irradi- ated tissue to infection and trauma. These cellular changes are the basis for long-term radiation-induced atrophy of tis- sues and organs. Death of parenchymal cells after moderate exposure is thus the result of mitotic linked death of rapidly dividing cells in the short term and the consequences of pro- gressive fibro-atrophyon all cell types over time.

GENERAL GUIDELINES ON PATIENT CARE

• For intraoral radiography the patient should be positioned comfortably in the dental chair, ideally with the occlusal plane horizontal and parallel to the floor. For most pro- jections the head should be supported against the chair to minimize unwanted movement. For intraoral radiography the patient should be seated comfortably in the dental chair, ideally with the occlusal plane horizontal and par- allel to the floor. For most projections the head should be

supported against the chair to minimize unwanted movement. Some clinicians elect to X-ray their patients in the supine position along with most other dental sur- gery procedures. All techniques need to be modified ac- cordingly, but it can sometimes be more difficult to as- sess angulations and achieve accurate alignment of film and tubehead with the patient lying down.

• For extraoral views the patient should be reassured about the large, possibly frightening or unfriendly-looking equipment, before being positioned within the machine.

This is of particular importance with children.

• The procedure should be explained to the patients in terms they can understand, including warning them not to move during the investigation.

• Spectacles, dentures or orthodontic appliances should be removed. Jewellery including earrings may also need to be removed for certain projections.

• A protective lead thyroid collar, if deemed appropriate for the investigation being carried out, should be placed on the patient.

• The exposure factors on the control panel should be se- lected before positioning the intraoral film packet and X- ray tube head, in order to reduce the time of any discom- fort associated with the investigation.

• Intraoral film packets should be positioned carefully to avoid trauma to the soft tissues taking particular care where tissues curve, e.g. the anterior hard palate, lingual to the mandibular incisor teeth and distolingual to the mandibular molars.

(3)

184 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2015, Volume 9 Kassim et al.

• The radiographic investigation should be carried out as accurately and as quickly as possible, to avoid having to retake the radiograph and to lessen patient discomfort.

• The patient should always be watched throughout the exposure to check that he/she has obeyed instructions and has not moved.

PERIODONTAL CHANGES IN PATIENTS UNDER- GOING RADIOTHERAPY

Cancer is currently the cause of 12% of all deaths worldwide andis animportant global health problem with more than 10 million new cases and 6 million deaths each year worldwide [1].

Among them, head and neck neoplasia (HNN) is a major form of cancer in India, accounting for 23% of all cancers in males and 6% in females; Depending upon the sub-site of origin and the clinical extent of the disease the 5 -year sur- vival varies from 20% to 90% [2].

The three most common modalities used in head and neck cancer treatment are surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, either used singly or in combination.

While these modalities are effective in eliminating the tu- mor, they also adverselyaffect the normal head and neck structures surrounding the tumor.

Radiation therapy has cytotoxic effects on both normal cells and malignant cells.

Direct damage to the oral structures (soft and hard tissue) commonly occurs from radio- and chemotherapy, and indi- rect damage may also occur from systemic toxicity. These oral complications may arise during and following cancer treatment and are commonly grouped into two broad catego- ries: acute and chronic [3].

The reported acute oral complications are mucositis, xerostomia, dysphagia, dysguisia, and opportunistic infec- tions, and chronic complications such as trismus, irradiation caries, osteoradionecrosis, and changes in periodontal at- tachment.

The long-termeffects comprise alteration in vascularity of soft tissue and bone, salivary gland damage, reduction in cellularity of connective tissue, and risk of increased colla- gen synthesis which results in fibrosis [4].

Radiation treatment induces obliterative end- arteritis that results in the soft tissue ischemia and fibrosis while the irra- diated bone become hypovascular and hypoxic [5].

The peridontium is sensitive to the effect of radiation at high doses.

Diminished vascularity and cellularity of the periodontal ligament membrane with widening of periodontal space,thickening, rupturing, and disorientation of Sharpeys fibers have been reported [6].

The direct and indirect effect of high-dose radiotherapy (RT) on the periodontium results in greater risk of periodon- tal attachment loss and tooth loss and greater risk for the development of osteoradionecrosis [7]. The extensive perio- dontal destruction may occur in the absence of good oral hygiene. Periodontitis in patients scheduled for head and

neck radiotherapy results in acute and chronic complications such as osteoradionecrosis. Maintenance of good oral hy- giene in patients undergoing radiotherapy may reduce mor- bidity of the known oral and periodontal side effects. Pa- tientslated to receive the head and neck radiation therapy need dentalconsultation at the earliest possible time. Pre- irradiation treatment depends on patient prognosis, compli- ance, and residual dentition, in addition to fields, ports, dose and, immediacy of radiotherapy.

Diseases of teeth and supporting structures are a worry- ing finding in a patient about to undergo tumoricidal radio- therapy for a malignant condition in the maxillofacial region because oral pain and infection are common and a potentially serious sequence to radiotherapy for head andneck tumors in patients with healthy mouth.

The loss of integrity of the gingival crevicular tissues, as a result of periodontitis and radiotherapy induced thinning of these tissues together with xerostomia, mucositis, altered diet, and poor oral hygiene that often follow high-dose radio- therapy to the jaws, can create oral problems that affect the quality of life, which can cause interruption to cancer ther- apy [8].

The periodontal blood vessels are affectedby radiation leading towidening of periodontal ligament space and de- struction of bony trabeculae which may result in increased risk of periodontal disease and altered healing with dimin- ished capacity for bone remodeling and repair [9].

Llory et al. in 1972 showed a radiation-induced down- shift of periopathogens [10]. Markitziu et al. [11] in 1992 and Leung et al. [12] in 1998reported that due to radiation- induced hypo-salivation and a concomitant increase in plaque accumulation and shift in oral micro florathe risk of periodontal infection is also increased Fig. (2). Shwarze et al. in 1999found a greater number of shallow periodontal pockets in radiated patients [13]. The reduced probing pocket depth does notindicate the histologicalpocket depth since the probe generally penetrates coronal level of junctional epithe- liumdue to inflammation of underlying connective tissue or may be due to disparity between probing technique, probing force, or angle of insertion of the probe. Studies by Epstein [14] and Yusuf and Bakri [15] showed that direct and indi- rect effects of high dose of radiotherapy on periodontium resulted in increased attachment loss. Marx et al. in 1987 reported that generally increasing the doses of irradiation above 7000 rads carries the risk and severity of osteoradi- onecrosis [16].

Marciani et al. in 1992 reported that dosage can indicate potential irradiation injury [17]. Smaller irradiation doses administered at higher dose rates may be more injurious than higher doses dispensed at lower dose rates. Marques et al. in 2004 stated thatradiotherapy canadd to a greater or lesser degree to progression of attachment loss [18]. Oral mucositis is the most distressing of all the complications following head and neck radiotherapy.

Damage to oral mucosa is intenselyassociated with radia- tion dose, fraction size, volume of irradiated tissue, fraterni- zation scheme, and type of ionizingradiation.

The severe mucosal reaction to radiotherapy is a result of mitotic death of epithelial cells, since the cell cycle time of the basal keratinocytes is about 4 days.

(4)

Fig. (2). Radiation effects on human submandibular salivary glands. A-Normal gland. B- A gland 6 months after exposure to radiotherapy.

Note the loss of acini and presence of chronic inflammatory cells. C-A gland 1 year after exposure to radiotherapy. Note the loss of acini and extensive fibrosis.

There is an increased gingival recession observed after radiotherapywhich may be due to changes invascularity and cellularity of periodontal ligament and hypovascular, hypocellular, and hypoxic changes in alveolar bone. In the absence of good oral hygiene rampant periodontal destruc- tion may occur.

The gingival recession associated with radiotherapy is mainly due to reduction in gingival blood flow and alteration in immune response. The gingival recession represents loss of attachment, which is an indicator of disease progres- sion.The gingival recession may lead to sensitivity, dental caries, and difficulty in maintenance of oral hygiene.

The inflammatory and degenerative changes of ionizing radiation on the salivary gland parenchyma, especially the serous a cinar cells leads toxerostomia.

Xerostomia has the potential to affect mastication, speech, and patients overall quality of life [19].

Difficulty in swallowing is encountered because the re- duction in salivary flow diminishes lubrication and liquefac- tion of food, and irritation of mucosa makes chewing pain- ful. Irradiation also causes fibrosis and atrophy of muscles in the pharynx.

EFFECTS OF IRRADIATION ON TEETH

Irradiation of teeth with therapeutic doses during their development severely retards their growth. Such irradiation may be for local disease (e.g., eosinophilic granuloma) or a generalized condition (leukemia being treated with whole- body irradiation followed by bone marrow transplantation).

If it occurs before calcification, irradiation may destroy the tooth bud. Irradiation after calcification has begun may in- hibit cellular differentiation, causing malformations and ar- resting general growth.

Children undergoing radiation therapy to the jawsmay show deficiencies in the permanent dentition such as re-

tarded root development, dwarfed teeth, or failure to form one or more teeth (Fig. 3). Teeth irradiated during develop- ment may complete calcification and erupt prematurely. In general, the severity of thedamage is dose-dependent.

Fig. (3). Retarded development of the mandibular second premolar crowns with stunting of the mandibular incisor, canine, and premo- lar roots at 9 years.

Irradiation of teethmay retard or abort root formation, but the eruptive mechanism of teeth is relatively radiation- resis- tant. Irradiated teeth with altered root formation still erupt.

Adult teeth are very resistant to the direct effects of ra- diation exposure.

Pulpal tissue, which consists primarily of reverting and fixed post mitotic cells, demonstrates long-term fibroatrophy after irradiation. Radiation has no discernible effect on the crystalline structure of enamel, dentin, orcementum, and radiation does not increase their solubility.

The increased rate of caries may be due to the indirect ef- fect of radiation produced by reduced salivary flow rate and its associated consequences (Fig. 4).

(5)

186 The Open Dentistry Journal, 2015, Volume 9 Kassim et al.

Fig. (4). Radiation caries. Note the extensive loss of tooth structure in both jaws resulting from radiation-induced xerostomia.

The pain in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) may be due to edema, cell destruction, and fibrosis resulting from radia- tion. Limited mouth opening complicates oral hygiene pro- cedures and provision of dental care [19].

Anxiety or lack of physical and emotionalmotivation, as well as decreased salivary flow, trismus, and other important factors make oral hygiene more difficult and accelerate loss of attachment.

The occurrence of microorganisms associated with these dental diseases increases the possibility of compromised bones being infected. Plaque control in irradiated patients is necessary to prevent colonization of microorganisms in the gingival crevice. Altered nature of microorganisms and re- duced host defense mechanism toward plaque caused by radiotherapy may lead to attachment loss.

CONCLUSION

For a patient about to undergo tumoricidal radiotherapy for malignancy in the maxillofacial region, diseases of teeth and supporting structures are a worrisome finding because oral pain and infections are common and possibly severe sequelae to radiotherapy for head and neck tumors in pa- tients with healthy mouth. Oral hygiene maintenance meas- ures can give better outcome in maintenance of periodontal health during and after radiotherapy. Furthermore, dental treatment should be aimed at improving the oral hygiene status of patients through professional dental care. Patients should be constantly motivated toward maintaining a meticu- lous oral hygiene status before, during and after radiotherapy to prevent and control the oral and periodontal sequelae. The periodontist is an important member in the oncological team as increased oral hygiene maintenance can lead to reduction in post-radiation complications of peridontium.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no con- flict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] Petersen PE. Oral cancer prevention and control--the approach of the World Health Organization. Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 454-60.

[2] Mehrotra R, Singh M, Gupta RK, Singh M, Kapoor AK. Trends of prevalence and pathological spectrum of head and neck cancers in North India. Indian J Cancer 2005; 42: 89-93.

[3] Hancock PJ, Epstein JB, Sadler GR. Oral and dental management related to radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 585-90.

[4] Dreizen S, Daly TE, Drane JB, Brown LR. Oral complications of cancer radiotherapy. Postgrad Med 1977; 61: 85-92.

[5] Marx RE. Osteoradionecrosis: a new concept of its pathophysiol- ogy. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 1983; 41: 283-8.

[6] Silverman S Jr, Chierici G. Radiation therapy of oral carcinoma. I.

Effects on oral tissues and management of the periodontium. J Pe- riodontol 1965; 36: 478-84.

[7] Yusof ZW, Bakri MM. Severe progressive periodontal destruction due to radiation tissue injury. J Periodontol 1993; 64:1253-8.

[8] Marx RE, Johnson RP. Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradione- crosis and their clinical significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64: 379-90.

[9] Epstein JB, Corbett T, Galler C, Stevenson-Moore P. Surgical periodontal treatment in the radiotherapy-treated head and neck cancer patient. Spec Care Dentist 1994; 14: 182-7.

[10] Llory H, Dammron A, Gioanni M, Frank RM. Some population changes in oral anaerobic microorganisms, Streptococcus mutans and yeasts following irradiation of the salivry glands. Caries Res 1972; 6: 298-311.

[11] Marciani RD, Ownby HE. Treating patients before and after irra- diation. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 108-12.

[12] Leung WK, Jin LJ, Samaranayake LP, Chiu GK. Subgingival mi- crobiota of shallow periodontal pockets in individuals after head and neck irradiation. Oral MicrobiolImmunol 1998; 13:1-10.

[13] Schwarz E, Chiu GK, Leung WK. Oral health status of southern Chinese following head and neck irradiation therapy for naso- pharyngeal carcinoma. J Dent Res 1999; 27: 21-8.

[14] Epstein JB, Stevenson-Moore P. Periodontal disease and periodon- tal management in patients with cancer. Oral Oncol 2001; 37: 613- 9.

[15] Yusof ZW, Bakri MM. Severe progressive periodontal destruction due to radiation tissue injury. J Periodontol 1993; 64:1253-8.

[16] Marx RE, Johnson RP. Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradione- crosis and their clinical significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64: 379-90.

[17] nMarciani RD, Ownby HE. Treating patients before and after irra- diation. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 108-12.

[18] Marques MA, Dib LL. Periodontal changes in patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1178-87.

[19] Scully C, Epstein JB. Oral health care for the cancer patient.Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32: 281-92.

Received: December 22, 2014 Revised: March 04, 2015 Accepted: March 10, 2015

© Kassim et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/- licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

參考文獻

相關文件

Animal or vegetable fats and oils and their fractiors, boiled, oxidised, dehydrated, sulphurised, blown, polymerised by heat in vacuum or in inert gas or otherwise chemically

Milk and cream, in powder, granule or other solid form, of a fat content, by weight, exceeding 1.5%, not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter.

[This function is named after the electrical engineer Oliver Heaviside (1850–1925) and can be used to describe an electric current that is switched on at time t = 0.] Its graph

Consistent with the negative price of systematic volatility risk found by the option pricing studies, we see lower average raw returns, CAPM alphas, and FF-3 alphas with higher

You are given the wavelength and total energy of a light pulse and asked to find the number of photons it

Reading Task 6: Genre Structure and Language Features. • Now let’s look at how language features (e.g. sentence patterns) are connected to the structure

Wang, Solving pseudomonotone variational inequalities and pseudocon- vex optimization problems using the projection neural network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17

Define instead the imaginary.. potential, magnetic field, lattice…) Dirac-BdG Hamiltonian:. with small, and matrix