Original Article
Correlation of panoramic high-risk markers with the cone beam CT findings in the
preoperative assessment of the mandibular third molars
Shaima Al Ali
a, Mohamed Jaber
b*
aDepartment of Oral Surgery, Hamdan Bin Mohamed College of Dental Medicine, United Arab Emirates
bCollege of Dentistry, Ajman University, United Arab Emirates
Received 15 April 2019; Final revision received 17 August 2019 Available online 19 October 2019
KEYWORDS
Cone beam computed tomography;
Nerve injury;
Third molar;
Panoramic radiography
Abstract Background/purpose: Preoperative radiographic examination of mandibular third molars (MTM) is essential to prevent inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The aim of this study was to assess the panoramic radiography (PAN) signs considered as indicators of increased risk of IAN injury and to correlate them with the cone beam CT (CBCT) findings.
Materials and methods: 58 patients who had MTMs extraction between January 2012 and January 2018. OPG were evaluated for the following signs: interruption of the roof of the canal, root darkening, roots deflection and narrowing, canal deviation, superimposition between the MTM roots and mandibular canal. Loss of canal cortication, root grooving, thinning and perfora- tion of lingual cortex were assessed in CBCT images. Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression tests were used to test the relationship between PAN signs and CBCT findings.
Results: A total of 79 MTMs were examined. Loss of canal cortication in CBCT was seen in 22 (27.8%) of the cases. Root darkening in PAN images was the most frequent radiographic sign. Ca- nal deviation and interruption of white line in PAN demonstrated a statistically significant corre- lation with the loss of canal cortication between the MTM and the mandibular canal on CBCT images (pZ 0.004 and p Z 0.012, respectively). No statistically significant association was observed for the other PAN signs and CBCT findings.
Conclusion: Canal deviation and interruption of white lines were associated with loss of canal cortication on CBCT, indicating a direct contact between the roots and the mandibular canal which required a further assessment prior to the extraction.
ª 2019 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
* Corresponding author. Department of Oral Surgery, Ajman University, Ajman P. O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates. Fax:þ971 050 5178052.
E-mail addresses:mjaber4@hotmail.com,mohamed.jaber@ajman.ac.ae(M. Jaber).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.08.006
1991-7902/ª 2019 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Available online atwww.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e - j d s . c o m
Introduction
Extraction of mandibular third molar (MTM) is one of the most common procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery;
therefore several complications may arise postoperatively.
These complications generally considered being minor and infrequent; however, the incidence and severity can vary considerably.1,2 Pain, edema and decreased function are commonly reported and typical postoperative complica- tion; however, these symptoms will normally resolve within a few days of the procedure.3,4
The most serious postoperative complication that arises after mandibular third molar surgery is nerve injury, spe- cifically injury to lingual and inferior alveolar nerve. The reported incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) pares- thesia was varied between 0.35% and 8.4%.5e8 In most cases, IAN paresthesia is temporary and recovers within 6 months,9however, in less than 1% of the cases the injury may become permanent and lasts longer than 6 months.10
The panoramic radiograph is the standard diagnostic image for the initial preoperative assessment of mandibular third molars and their anatomical relationship with the inferior alveolar canal. One of the limitation of the pano- ramic radiography is that they provide information in only two dimensions, thus panoramic images alone are not suf- ficient for evaluating the proximity of the inferior alveolar canal to the roots of lower third molar teeth.11,12 If the panoramic radiograph shows a close relationship between the root of the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal, then an additional investigation using computed tomogra- phy (CT) was recommended to verify the anatomical rela- tionship in a three-dimensional (3D) view.13e15
The close anatomic relationship between the mandib- ular third molar and the IAC may result in injury to the IAN during third molar extraction. To prevent this serious postoperative complication, several studies have identified radiographic signs on panoramic radiographs, which may suggest a close relationship between the mandibular canal and mandibular third molars.16e18
Before considering routine use of CBCT in the preoper- ative assessment of MTMs, it is imperative to know if it is superior and likely give the treating practitioner more de- tails than the conventional radiographic techniques in predicting IAN injuries. Numerous studies have been con- ducted to correlate the high-risk signs of IAN injury seen on panoramic or periapical radiographs with the findings on CBCT.11,12,17e19 Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the radiographic signs considered as indicators of increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in panoramic radiographs and to correlate them with the cone beam CT (CBCT) findings in the preoperative assessment of MTMs.
Material and methods
Study design/sampleThis is a cross sectional study which included patients who consulted the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine for MTMs removal between January 2012 and January 2018.The sample consist of 58 individuals with 79 MTMs whose digital
panoramic radiograph (PAN) suggested a close relationship between the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) and MTM and therefore underwent an additional radiographical investi- gation with cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Pa- tients were selected according to the following inclusion exclusion criteria: 1) patients over 18 years old, 2) pano- ramic images of the MTMs showing at least one of the high- risk markers and 3) availability of acceptable CBCT images of the same patient. The exclusions criteria were 1) pres- ence of periapical pathology associated with MTM or IAC, 2) mandibular third molars with incomplete root formation, 3) presence of artifacts, which obscure the mandibular third molar and IAC and 4) images with poor density and inade- quate contrast.
Digital panoramic radiographs were obtained with (Gendex orthoralix 9200, Cusano Milanino, Italy) DDE device operated at 60e84 kV and 3e15 mA and an exposure time of 12 s. GALILEOS Dental CBCT imaging machine was used to take CBCT views (GALAXIS, REKO software, Bensheim, Germany). It is operating at 85 kVp/7 mA, with a 0.5 mm voxel size and a field of view of 8 cm. The scan time is 14 s.
To determine the topographic relationship between the MTM and the inferior alveolar canal, an experience maxil- lofacial radiologist with more than twenty years of work history evaluated the digital panoramic and CBCT images independently. All the images were viewed blindly. They were assigned with an identification number for the first evaluation. After 30 days, the images were randomly selected and assigned to a new identification number by person who was blind to the study design and re-evaluated by the examiner. The digital panoramic images were eval- uated on a computer monitor (21-inch LCD monitor with 1280 1024 resolution), in dark room, with the use of the
“zoom” tool and manipulation of brightness and contrast.
After 30 days, all images were re-evaluated by the same observer. Panoramic images were evaluated according to the criteria established by Rood and Shehab.16 Four of these signs were tooth related (darkening, root deflection, root narrowing, and a bifid apex), and the other three were canal related signs (diversion, narrowing, and interruption in the canal white line).20 (see Fig. 1). The seven radio- graphic signs were described according to Huang et al.,21 (see Table 1). On the CBCT images, the presence or absence of cortication between the MTM and the mandib- ular canal was evaluated. The images were evaluated in all three dimensions: sagittal, coronal and axial plane. The position of the mandibular canal in relation to the MTM was classified as: buccal, lingual, inferior and intra-radicular position. All data were collected and entered into Excel data sheets using a special form.
In panoramic radiographs, the primary variable was the radiographic relationship of the mandibular third molar to the IAC or tooth-related findings (darkness of the root, narrowing of the root, and deflection of the root) and canal-related findings (narrowing of the canal, diversion of the canal, and interruption of the white line). The sec- ondary variable was the superimposition between the root of MTM and the inferior alveolar canal in the absence of the other radiographic signs.
For the CBCT images, the main variable was presence or absence of cortication between the tooth and the IAC in CBCT images. Absence of cortication was defined as loss of
cortical lines between the tooth and the IAC. The sec- ondary variable was position of inferior alveolar canal in relation to the root of the MTM, grooving of the root by the mandibular canal, thinning and perforation of the lingual cortex.
Data collection and statistical analyses were carried out with Statistical Package for Social Sciences program (SPSS) version 24 (USA). The frequencies of the panoramic and CBCT findings were calculated. The demographic factors for the study population were analyzed. The association of each panoramic variable with the CBCT findings was compared by Cross-tabulations and chi-square test. Multi- ple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the
contributions of panoramic findings and age on the loss of canal cortication in CBCT view. Multivariate ORs and 95%
confidence intervals were also calculated. The relation between the patient age and loss of canal cortication was evaluated by t-test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. McNamara statistic was used to calculate intra- observer agreement. The Research Ethics committees of the HBMCDM approved this study. Intra examiner agree- ment for the repeated radiographic readings were analyzed using McNamara’s Test. For panoramic radiographs, there was concordance for all the radiographic signs. For CBCT the entire findings showed concordances between the two readings.
Figure 1 The radiographic relationship of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal.
Table 1 Radiographic signs of the intimate relationship between the mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal (Huang et al.).21
Radiographic signs Description Darkening of the
mandibular third molar root
Radiolucency of the mandibular third molar root area, where mandibular third molar root and mandibular canal are superimposed
Interruption of the radiopaque line
Absence of continuity of mandibular canal cortex
Diversion of the mandibular canal
Obviously, direction change of the mandibular canal in passage of the mandibular third molar root
Dark and bifid apex Bifid and darkening of the mandibular third molar root, where mandibular canal is superimposed to it Deflection of the root Dilacerations root morphology of mandibular third molar, where mandibular canal is contact or
superimposed to it Narrowing of the
mandibular canal
Narrowing of the mandibular canal dimension where the canal and mandibular third molar root are contact or superimposed
Narrowing of the root Narrowing of the mandibular third molar root, where the mandibular canal and mandibular third molar root are contact or superimposed
Result
A total of 79 lower third molars were examined in 58 patients.
The study sample consisted of 31 females (53.4%), 27 males (46.6%) with a mean age of 39.62 (SDZ 9.89) and range of 21e67 years. Twenty-one patients (36.2%) had bilateral MTMs while 37 patients (63.8%) had unilateral MTMs.
Panoramic images were investigated according to Rood’s criteria;16the most frequent radiographic sign which is an indicators of a close relationship between the MTMs and the inferior alveolar canal was root darkening. The second most frequent radiographic sign was root deflection, which was observed in Seventeen cases (21.5%) while narrowing of the canal was detected in 16 cases (20.3%). Interruption of the white line of the canal was the least frequently seen panoramic signs (9 cases, 11.4%).
Superimposition between the MTM roots and the IAC in the absence of all other high risk signs in PAN was observed in 13 cases (16.5%),Table 2.
As determined on CBCT images out of 79 MTMs teeth investigated in this study, 22 (27.8%) showed loss of canal cortication, which represent a direct contact between MTM root and IAC (Fig. 2). The frequencies of CBCT findings were
listed in (Table 3). Cross tabulations were carried out for the loss of canal cortication in CBCT and the radiographic signs in the panoramic radiograph (Table 4). Most cases of the loss of canal cortication in CBCT (12 cases, 54%) showed root darkening in panoramic images. Loss of canal cortica- tion was also observed in 7 cases (70%) of canal deviation, 7 cases (41.2%) of root deflection, 7 cases (43.8%) of canal narrowing, and 6 cases (50%) of root narrowing. Loss of canal cortication was least frequently observed in cases, which showed bifid apex in panoramic radiograph. Super- imposition between the MTMs roots and IAC in the absence of the other seven panoramic signs showed loss of canal cortication in 3 cases. However, this finding was not sta- tistically significant (pZ 0.482). Interruption of white line (Fig. 3) and deviation of the canal demonstrated a statis- tically significant association with the loss of canal corti- cation (p< 0.012 and p < 0.004, respectively). No statistically significant association was observed for the other panoramic radiographic signs (p> 0.05). The rela- tionship between the patient age and loss of canal corti- cation was evaluated by t-test and showed non-significant relationship (pZ 0.319). We found no statistically signifi- cant relationship between gender and loss of canal corti- cation (PZ 0.071) (Table 5).
Results of Logistic regression analysis showed that (26.8%) of loss of canal cortication on CBCT images was predicted by interruption of white lines in panoramic radiograph after adjustment for deviation of the canal, root darkening, narrowing of canal, gender and patient’s age.
Model of fitness was valid (p< 0.013) (Table 6).
Table 2 The frequencies of the panoramic radiographic signs.
Radiographic sign
Number of cases (NZ 79)
Percentage
%
Root darkening 52 65.8
Narrowing of the root 12 15.2
Deflection of the roots 17 21.5
Bifid apex 12 15.2
Narrowing of the canal
16 20.3
Interruption of white line
9 11.4
Deviation of the canal 10 12.7
Superimposition in the presence of other signs
54 68.4
Super imposition in the absence of other signs
13 16.5
Figure 2 Cross sectional view of loss of canal cortication on cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) images.
Table 3 The frequencies of CBCT findings.
CBCT findings
Number of cases (NZ 79)
Percentage
% Loss of canal cortication 22 27.8 Canal location
Buccal 45 57
Lingual 18 22.8
Inferior 14 17.7
Intra-radicular 2 2.5
Root perforated by the canal 0 0 Thinning of lingual cortex 39 49.4 Perforation of lingual cortex 1 1.3 Root notching by the canal 6 7.6
Table 4 The relation between of the panoramic signs and inferior alveolar canal (IAC) cortication.’
Panoramic signs Loss of canal cortication in CBCT Chi-square value P-value
Yes (nZ 22) NO (nZ 57)
Root darkening
Present (nZ 52) 12 (54.5%)a 40 (70.2%) 1.724 0.147
Absent (nZ 27) 10 (45.5%) 17 (29.8%)
Root narrowing
Present (nZ 12) 6 (27.3%) 6 (10.5%) 3.456 0.07
Absent (nZ 67) 16 (72.7%) 51 (72.7%)
Root deflection
Present (nZ 17) 7 (31.8%) 10 (17.5%) 1.915 0.141
Absent (nZ 62) 15 (68.2%) 47 (82.5%)
Bifid apex
Present (nZ 12) 3 (13.6%) 9 (15.8%) 0.57 0.558
Absent (nZ 67) 19 (86.4%) 48 (84.2%)
Canal Narrowing
Present (nZ 16) 7 (31.8%) 9 (15.8%) 2.525 0.103
Absent (nZ 63) 15 (68.2%) 48 (84.2%)
Interruption of white lines
Present (nZ 9) 6 (27.3%) 3 (5.3%) 7.617 0.012
Absent (nZ 70) 16 (72.7%) 54 (94.7%)
Canal deviation
Present (nZ 10) 7 (31.8%) 3 (5.3%) 10.124 0.004
Absent (nZ 69) 15 (68.2%) 54 (94.7%)
Super imposition in absence of other signs
Present (nZ 67) 3 (13.6%) 10 (17.5%) 0.176 0.482
Absent (nZ 12) 19 (86.4%) 47 (82.5%)
aPercentage within loss of canal cortication.
Figure 3 A. Interruption of white line in panoramic radiography. B. Loss of canal cortication in cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) cross sectional view.
Table 5 The relationship between gender and loss of canal cortication.
Gender (nZ 58)*
Number of mandibular third molars (nZ 79)
Loss of canal cortication Chi-square value P-value Yes (nZ 22) No (nZ 57)
Female (nZ 31) 38 14 (63.6%) 24 (42.1%)* 2.948 0.071
Male (nZ 27) 41 8 (36.4%) 33 (57.9%)
* Percentage within thinning of lingual cortex.
* nZ number of patients.
The Inferior alveolar canal was most frequently posi- tioned buccal to the third molar in 45 (57%) of the cases while lingual course of the canal was seen in 18 (22.8%) of the cases. Inferior position of the canal was observed in 14 (17.7%) cases (Table 7).
Thinning of the lingual cortex was reported in 39 (49.4%) cases, with the canal most frequently located buccally to the roots of the MTM. No statistically significant association was observed between the canal positions and thinning of the lingual cortex (Table 8).
Table 9shows the statistical relationship between the root darkening on panoramic view and thinning of lingual cortex in CBCT view. In twenty-three cases (59%) of thin- ning of lingual cortical plate observed in CBCT view, root darkening was detected in panoramic radiograph. However, this relationship was not statistically significant (pZ 0.152).
Table 10shows the statistical relationship between the root darkening on panoramic view and notching of the root in CBCT view. Notching of the root by the IAC was seen in 6 CBCT views (7.6%), while, in four cases of the root grooving, root darkening was observed in panoramic radiograph. However, this rela- tionship was not statistically significant (pZ 0.668).
Discussion
The close anatomical relationship between the roots of the MTM and inferior alveolar canal can result in nerve injuries during the surgical removal of the tooth. Accurate radio- graphic examinations are essential to assess and estimate the possible risk of IAN injury. Panoramic radiography enable the oral and maxillofacial surgeons to initially examine the relationship of the MTM to the inferior alveolar canal, however, this radiographic method provides only a two-dimensional view of a three-dimensional structures.
The buccolingual relationship between the lower third molar and the IAC cannot be evaluated in panoramic view.22 CBCT was reported by many investigators to be more accurate imaging technique for the preoperative assessment of the relationship of MTMs to the IAC.22e24
Several studies highlighted the close relationship be- tween the MTMs and IAC in the presence of high-risk radiographic signs on PAN and compared with the CBCT findings.11,18,24e27
In the present study, root darkening was the most frequent panoramic signs indicating a close contact be- tween the roots of the MTM and IAC. This finding is in agreement with the results reported by other in- vestigators.29,30While interruption of the canal white line is the least frequent panoramic sign this is in contrast with the findings of other studies.17,18,25,30
The frequency of loss of canal cortication in CBCT was found in 22 cases (27.8%) of the MTMs. This is lower than the 94% loss of canal cortication reported by Ohman et al.,15 and 85% reported by Ghaeminia et al.,22 and similar to findings reported by Tantanapornkul et al.19
Deviation of the canal was seen in 10 cases (12.7%) out of 79 cases. Nakamori et al.,18 found a lower incidence of (2.7%), while Umar et al.,29reported a higher incidence of Table 6 Multiple logistic regression models for predicting loss of canal cortication based on panoramic signs.
Variables Odds ratio 95% Confidence intervals P-value*
Deviation of the canal 0.328 0.048e2.264 0.258
Interruption of white line 0.136 0.023e0.806 0.025
Root darkening 2.343 0.695e7.894 0.170
Narrowing of the canal 0.737 0.155e3.496 0.70
Gender 2.365 0.678e8.252 0.177
Age 0.979 0.920e1.642 0.509
* Significant level p< 0.05.
Table 7 The relation of the canal position and loss of canal cortication in CBCT.
Canal position
Number Loss of canal cortication (nZ 22)
Buccal 45 7 (31.8%)a
Lingual 18 10 (45.5%)
Intra-radicular 2 2 (9.1%)
Inferior 14 3 (13.6%)
a Percent within loss of canal cortication.
Table 8 The relationship between canal position and thinning of lingual cortex.
Canal position Number Thinning of lingual cortex Chi-square value P-value*
Yes (nZ 39) No (nZ 40)
Buccal 45 26 (66.7%)* 19 (47.5%) 2.959 0.085
Lingual 18 7 (17.9%) 11 (27.5%) 1.024 0.312
Intra-radicular 2 0 (0.0%) 2 (5%) 2.001 0.157
Inferior 14 6 (15.4%) 8 (20%) 0.288 0.591
* Percentage within thinning of lingual cortex.
* Significant level p< 0.05.
canal deviation, which was seen in 15 (30%) out of 50 cases.
In our study, Loss of canal cortication was seen in 70% of the cases in particular in association with deviation of the IAC and this result demonstrated a statistically significant cor- relation with the loss of canal cortication. This finding is consistent with the result of Nakamori et al.,18 who re- ported statistically significant correlation between canal deviation and loss of canal cortication in CBCT. Similar result was also reported by Umar et al.29However, Monaco et al.,14and Jhamb et al.,31observed non-significant rela- tionship between the two signs.
In the panoramic findings, interruption of the canal white line found in 9 cases (11.4%). This incidence was lower than those reported by Nakagawa et al.,11 (57.5%) and Umar et al.,29(68%) and higher than that reported by Nakamori et al.,18(9.4%). Out of 9 cases showing interruption of canal white line in PAN, 6 cases (66.7%) showed loss of canal cor- tication in CBCT. Nakagawa et al.,11concluded that in 86% of cases in which the canal superior white line was interrupted on panoramic view, the CBCT images showed loss of canal cortication between the third molar root and IAC. Ghaeminia et al.,22reported a comparable high percentage of 88%. In our study, interruption of white line was significantly asso- ciated with loss of IAC cortication (pZ 0.012). This finding was in agreement with previous studies.11,14,27,29,31
Nakamori and co-workers,18 found that 21 out of 43 cases of interruption of canal white line also showed con- tact relation between the root of MTM and IAC but their results were not statistically significant.
In the current study, loss of canal cortication was seen in 12 (23.07%) cases out of 52 showing root darkening and 7 (43.7%) cases out of 16 cases showing narrowing of the canal in panoramic views, however this relationship was not statistically significant. This result was not in agreement with findings reported by many investigators.1,14,29,31
During surgical extraction of MTMs, intraoperative IAN exposure has been linked to increased risk of nerve injuries and loss of canal cortication in the CBCT is a radiographic
sign that predisposes this exposure. In the present study, logistic regression analysis showed that (26.8%) of loss of canal cortication on CBCT images was predicted by inter- ruption of white lines in panoramic radiograph after adjustment for deviation of the canal, root darkening, canal narrowing, gender and patient’s age. This is in agreement with the finding of Nakagawa et al.,11 which showed that interruption of white line on panoramic radi- ography was a predictor of increased risk of contact be- tween the third molar and the mandibular canal on CBCT, even when the effects of tooth position, age, and gender were considered, likewise, Nakamori and co-workers,18 indicated that when an attached relationship was recog- nized, narrowing of the canal became a powerful predictor for absence of cortication. Ohman et al.,15reported that a dark band is an indicator of root grooving by the inferior alveolar canal, although grooving can be seen in the absence of this panoramic sign. However, Tantanapornkul et al.,28 concluded that this sign represents a cortical thinning or perforation of the lingual cortical plate in 80% of the cases rather than grooving of the tooth that observed in only 20% of the cases. Umar et al.,29confirmed this finding and attributed the root darkening not to loss of root structure but to thinning of a cortical plate. In our study, grooving of the root by the IAC was seen in 6 cases (7.6%), in 4 cases, it is associated with root darkening and in 2 cases the root darkening was absent, however, this relationship was not statistically significant. Thinning of the lingual cortex was seen in 39 (49.4%) cases, while perforation of the lingual cortex by the root of the MTM was observed in 1 case only. Twenty-three cases (44.2%) of the root darkening showed thinning of lingual cortical plate in CBCT view.
We found a non-significant correlation between root darkening in panoramic radiograph and thinning of the lingual cortex in CBCT view. This finding is critical for the oral surgeons during the third molar surgery to avoid lingual nerve injuries, fracture of the lingual cortex or displace- ment of the root accidently into close anatomical spaces.
Table 9 The relationship between root darkening and thinning of lingual cortex.
Radiographic sign Thinning of lingual cortex Chi-square value P-value*
Yes (nZ 39) No (nZ 73)
Root darkening
Present (nZ 52) 23 (59%)* 29 (72.5%) 1.606 0.152
Absent (nZ 27) 16 (41%) 11 (27.5%)
* Significant level p< 0.05.
* Percentage within thinning of lingual cortex.
Table 10 The relation between root darkening and notching of the root.
Radiographic sign Notching of the root Chi-square value P-value*
Yes (nZ 6) No (nZ 73)
Root darkening
Present (nZ 52) 4 (66.7%)* 48 (65.8%) 0.002 0.668
Absent (nZ 27) 2 (33.3%) 25 (34.2%)
* Significant level p< 0.05.
* Percentage within notching of the root.
As determined on CBCT images, the Inferior alveolar canal was most frequently positioned buccally to the MTM root. This is in accordance with the reported findings of other investigators,13,14,32 while others observed more lingually positioned canals.15,22 An inter-radicular canal course was the least frequent position, which was observed in 2 (2.5%) cases only. Similar findings have been reported by previous studies.13,15,19 Knowing the most common course of the mandibular canal is extremely important to the surgeons because multiple previous studies reported that the IAN was more frequently exposed following third molar extraction when the inferior alveolar canal was located lingually or at inter-radicular position in relation to MTM roots than in a buccal position.13,22,31Tay and Go33and Leung and Cheung34 found about 20% increases in the risk IAN impairment following MTM extraction when the nerve visualized intraoperatively. In contrast to our findings Matzen et al.,35 in a recent study reported that PAN and CBCT are not reliable risk factors for neurosensory distur- bances of the IAN, and CBCT appears not to improve the risk assessment.
This is a retrospective study, which had several limita- tions: the panoramic radiographs were already taken and we had no role in minimizing any errors or controlling the quality of images, CBCT scans was done with standard settings, but the dataset could not be reoriented as sug- gested by Lubbers et al.,23who reported that oblique plane scanning, which needs a small number of slices with a relatively small volume, can be helpful if the IAC is difficult to visualize.
This study concluded that canal deviation and inter- ruption of white line observed on PAN were associated with loss of canal cortication on CBCT, indicating a direct contact between the root of MTM and the IAC. Such findings on PAN required a further three-dimensional assessment by CBCT prior to the extraction. No statisti- cally significant association was observed for the other panoramic radiographic signs. Prospective studies with larger sample size to confirm the findings of this study are warranted.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None declared.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.08.006.
References
1.Bui C, Seldin E, Dodson T. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Max- illofac Surg 2003;61:1379e89.
2.Chuang S, Perrott D, Susarla S, Dodson T. Age as a risk factor for third molar surgery complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;
65:1685e92.
3.Phillips C, White Jr R, Shugars D, Zhou X. Risk factors associ- ated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1436e48.
4. Bienstock D, Dodson T, Perrott D, Chuang S. Prognostic factors affecting the duration of disability after third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1272e7.
5. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar sur- gery: an audit of the indications for surgery, postoperative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;33:33e5.
6. Haug R, Perrott D, Gonzalez M, Talwar R. The American asso- ciation of oral and maxillofacial surgeons age-related third molar study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1106e14. 7. Cheung L, Leung Y, Chow L, Wong M, Chan E, Fok Y. Incidence
of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:320e6.
8. Smith W. The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2013;115:18e24.
9. Valmaseda-Castello´n E, Berini-Ayte´s L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2001;
92:377e83.
10. Gu¨licher D, Gerlach K. Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:
306e12.
11. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, et al. Third molar position:
reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1303e8.
12. Susarla S, Dodson T. Preoperative computed tomography im- aging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:83e8.
13. Maegawa H, Sano K, Kitagawa Y, et al. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2003;96:639e46.
14. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti G, Gatto M, Checchi L.
Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topo- graphic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:312e8. 15. O¨hman A, Kivija¨rvi K, Blomba¨ck U, Flygare L. Preoperative
radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:30e5.
16. Rood J, Shehab B. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;28:20e5.
17. Sedaghatfar M, August M, Dodson T. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;
63:3e7.
18. Nakamori K, Fujiwara K, Miyazaki A, et al. Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomog- raphy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:2308e13.
19. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relation- ship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2007;
103:253e9.
20. Palma-Carrio´ C, Garcı´a-Mira B, Larrazabal-Moro´n C, Pen˜arro- cha-Diago M. Radiographic signs associated with inferior alve- olar nerve damage following lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:886e90.
21. Huang C, Man Lui, Cheng D. Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction
of impacted mandibular third molars. J Chin Med Assoc 2015;
78:617e22.
22. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Berge SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964e71.
23. Lu¨bbers H, Matthews F, Damerau G, et al. Anatomy of impacted lower third molars evaluated by computerized to- mography: is there an indication for 3-dimensional imaging?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2011;
111:547e50.
24. Neves F, Souza T, Almeida S, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas D, Bo´scolo F. Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship be- tween impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:553e7.
25. Nakayama K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y, et al. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:
2587e91.
26. Harada N, Vasudeva S, Joshi R, et al. Correlation between pano- ramic radiographic signs and high-risk anatomical factors for impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg 2013;6:129e36. 27. Peker I, Sarikir C, Alkurt MT, Zor ZF. Panoramic radiography
and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:71.
28. Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Correlation of darkening of impacted
mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:11e6.
29.Umar G, Bryant C, Obisesan O, Rood J. Correlation of the radiological predictive factors of inferior alveolar nerve injury with cone beam computed tomography findings. Oral Surg 2010;3:72e82.
30.Szalma J, Lempel E, Jeges S, Szabo´ G, Olasz L. The prognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferior alveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molar removal: retrospective study of 400 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2010;109:294e302.
31.Jhamb A, Dolas R, Pandilwar P, Mohanty S. Comparative effi- cacy of spiral computed tomography and orthopantomography in preoperative detection of relation of inferior alveolar neu- rovascular bundle to the impacted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:58e66.
32.Kaeppler G. Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evalu- ation of mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int 2000;31:
49e56.
33.Tay A, Go W. Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:592e600.
34.Leung Y, Cheung L. Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:1e10.
35.Matzen L, Petersen L, Schropp L, Wenzel A. Mandibular canal- related parameters interpreted in panoramic images and CBCT of mandibular third molars as risk factors to predict sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve. Int J Oral Max- illofac Surg 2019;S0901e5027(19):31020e3.
