• 沒有找到結果。

乳癌病人疾病管理與治療結果之分析

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "乳癌病人疾病管理與治療結果之分析"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

乳癌病人疾病管理與治療結果之分析 - 以論質計酬試辦計畫 參與醫院為例

研究目的:比較「全民健康保險乳癌醫療給付改善方案試辦計劃」試辦醫院的收案病人

,在醫療資源的利用、治療方式和醫療品質等情形是否有顯著差異。

研究方法:擷取試辦醫院於 2003 年 4 月至 2004 年 12 月開始治療、無復發狀況且完治 的個案共 2033 人,觀察上述個案自治療日起 1 年內全國西醫醫院及基層診所的門、住 診醫療費用申報資料,並經由勾稽全民健康保險之保險對象承保資料檔、全民健康保險 重大傷病檔、治療完成個案醫療明細檔( B 表),以分別取得投保、死亡、重大傷病 及復發等資料。以百分比及平均數(標準差)來描述病人與醫院的特質;以卡方檢定、

平均值 t 檢定及 F 檢定來了解病人及醫院的特質,在醫療利用、治療方式和醫療品質等 情形是否有顯著差異;以線性複迴歸分析及羅吉斯複迴歸分析來評值醫療利用、治療方 式和醫療品質等方面,在醫院間是否有顯著差異。

研究結果: B 、 C 、 E 、 F 醫院病人的平均總就醫次數顯著偏高。 B 醫院之病人急診 情形顯著偏高。各醫院間收案病人之跨院就醫次數沒有顯著差異。除第 0 期病人外,醫 院間對相同期別的病人存在著不同的治療方式。 B 及 C 醫院之第 0 及 1 期手術病人執 行乳房保留手術情形顯著偏低。 C 醫院病人治療開始一年內之復發情形顯著偏高。 E 醫院病人治療開始一年內之死亡情形顯著較低。

結論:試辦醫院在疾病管理與治療結果上有顯著的差異,中央健康保險局應繼續監測各 醫院的治療及品質狀況。

(2)

Disease Management and Outcome Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients

Objectives: To compare the health care utilization, treatment modality and clinical outcome among patients enrolled in the “National Health Insurance Breast Cancer Disease Management Program”.

Methods: A total 2,033 newly diagnosis breast cancer patients participated in this program during April 20 03 and December 2004 were identified from Enrollment list ( Table A ) and Closed case list ( Table B ) . The National Health Insurance ( NHI ) claims data related medical uses were traced for one year f rom the date of principal treatment. Information on patients’ treatment modality and clinical outcome was r etrieved from Table B and Death file.

Percentage and mean ( standard deviation ) were used to describe patient’s characteristics and institutio n’s factors. χ2 test, t test and F test were used to test whether health care use, treatment modality and clinic al outcome were significantly different among patient’s characteristics and institution’s factors. Multiple L ogistic regression was employed to assess whether health care use, treatment modality and clinical outcom e were significantly different among hospitals.

Results: Compared with patients treated in Hospital A, patients treated in Hospital B 、 C 、 E and F have higher number of visits. Compared with patients treated in Hospital A, patients treated in Hospital B have h igher number of emergency visits. There was no significant difference in number of irregular visits. Except for non- invasive patients treatment modalities were significantly different among hospitals. Compared wit h patients treated in Hospital A, patients treated in Hospital B and C were significantly less likely to under go breast conserving surgery. Compared with patients treated in Hospital A, patients treated in Hospital C was significantly more likely to recurrent within one year. Compared with patients treated in Hospital A, p atients treated in Hospital E was significantly less likely to die within one year.

Conclusions: There were significant differences exist in disease management and outcome between hospita

ls participated in this program. The NHI should keep monitoring on treatment and quality of the hospitals.

參考文獻

相關文件

Evaluation of the association between t he characteristics of physicians and th eir practices with the availability of electronic health records.. Association with the availability

National Institutes of Health National Institute of Mental Health(n.d.). The science of

The 2007 Health Care Survey collected information from 713 health care establishments, comprising the 3 hospitals providing hospital care services, 477 private clinics and

Health Management and Social Care In Secondary

“Social welfare” if defined in a narrow sense refers to the services provided by the Social Welfare Department (SWD) and Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs),

The Senior Secondary Health Management and Social Care Curriculum and Assessment Guide incorporates the key recommendations in the Curriculum Development Council's

The elderly health centres provide people aged 65 or above with comprehensive primary healthcare services which include health assessments, physical check-ups, counselling,

Topic 4 - Promotion and Maintenance of Health and Social Care in the Community 4CAspects of risk assessment and