Top PDF The Effect of Organizational Trust, Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Creation on Innovation and Business Performance of Taiwan High Technology Companies
We live in the era of globalization, an era where a call can be made from Asia and received in Africa at virtually no cost thanks to the internet and advances in telecommunications. An era where markets have merged and have become more aggressive, and where companies, in order to stay competitive, try to hire the most qualified employees from all across the globe. Due to this new trend, companies must provide their employees with conditions that allow them to achieve their full capabilities in order to be more profitable. Nevertheless, this creates issues, since there are so many different options when picking a strategy to obtain innovationand optimal businessperformance, with so many factors that may influence the results. Thus, this study examined and analyzed the effects oforganizationaltrust, knowledgesharing, andknowledgecreationoninnovationandbusinessperformanceof Taiwanese hightechnology company employees. A quantitative study was implemented and statistical analysis tested the relationship of said variables. The study used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Partial Least Squares (PLS), as tools to analyze the collected data, this study includes the descriptive statistics, path coefficients, coefficient of determination (R 2 ), bootstrapping, t-value, Composite Reliability results, Cronbach’s Alpha, correlation, average variance extracted (AVE), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual, Fornell-Larcker Criterion and Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio. The data for this study was collected from employees ofhightechnologycompanies in Taiwan. The results of this study showed that there is a strong and positive significant relationship between organizationaltrustandknowledgesharing, organizationaltrustandknowledgecreation, , knowledgecreationandknowledgesharing, knowledgecreationandinnovation, innovation andbusinessperformance, a weak correlation between organizationaltrustandbusinessperformanceand finally with regards to knowledgesharingandinnovation, the results showed that there was not a significant correlation between the two variables, this was explained because in order to protect their confidentiality, departments don’t usually share their information with others unless strictly required and get their innovation process trough knowledgecreation.
I
ABSTRACT
In today’s global business, competition is fierce and is gaining momentum across frontiers, and organisations are working hard to keep performance steady and sustainable. The phenomenon of organisation performance is not peculiar in the management science researches, as such numerous studies has been conducted on it. However, measuring it was considered a difficult task in the sense it entails critical and salient dimensions that sometimes makes it hard to measure. Therefore, it’s multidimensional. Notwithstanding the magnitude of study on organisational performance, focus on sub-Saharan countries, especially in The Gambia has limited literatures. This study aims to examine theeffectof motivation, knowledgecreation process, knowledgesharing, andinnovationonThe Gambia Telecom and Cellular Company’s performance. It is important to note that this study is non-comparative instead treating the two companies as one based on their commonalities both in terms of management practices and operation mode. Most importantly, for easy access to diverse employees for convenient data collection, thus help present justifiable and reasonable results. The research approach was typically quantitative and Partial Least Squares (PLS) was purely used to analyse the obtained data, with a total of 206 valid participants who completed online questionnaires. The participants of this study included employees of both (Gamtel/Gamcel), which excluded auxiliary staff, contract staff and trainees. The results reveal that both motiving factors has a positive and significant effectonknowledgesharing. Likewise, knowledgesharingandinnovation has positive and significant effectonorganizationalperformance. Onthe other hand, knowledgecreation process has a weak effectonknowledgesharing thus the null hypothesis for this relationship was accepted.
Background ofthe Study
It is a world ofknowledge-based economy, and there is no doubt that resources and competencies are essential for organizations to survive and thrive in this competitive world (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). Knowledge becomes increasingly important for organization. In the past, information, products and services spread from other continents is difficult and slow. But globalization and technological advances have changed the way how to run thebusiness nowadays. Information, products and services can be quickly spread out by technology. Customers can use internet to get information easily to compare the value of products or services. For example, Google, Facebook or Twitter can be one of way to get information. Organizations can also get feedback immediately through technology. Globalization andtechnology makes market becomes more and more competitive.
b) Concerning intellectual capital: In order to improve its structure capital the organization may want to focus onthe key factors that enable innovation within the organization which in descending order are; the management style which support and encourages innovation, the open-minded culture that supports the development of ideas andthesharingof these ideas within the organization. Another approach that would enhance the structure capital would be improving process capital. This could be done by concentrating resources on bettering the key factors that affect process capital which in descending order are: theknowledge management software (KMS) used in by the organization, the adequacy ofthe hardware that supports the KMS and finally taking full advantage ofthe information and communications technology available to facilitate the transfer of information through the company. The organization may also wish to focus on its customer capital by aiming onthe key factors that affect it. In descending order these factors are; a high value-added customer service, the circulation of customer feedback and comments that enables employees to have a better understanding of customer needs and finally, customer satisfaction. The company may also wish to improve its structural capital. This can be achieved by working onthe structure capital key factors, which in descending order are: regular updates oftheknowledge management system that provides the employee with real-time information, a knowledge management system that meet the employee needs and lastly, a knowledge management system that will improve the employee’s job performance.
Problem Statement
Nowadays, due to thehigh level of competition among people, classmates, coworkers, universities and organizations, it is becoming very difficult to observe trust between people from the same company or organization. In this regard, people will tend to hind information, data and any other tools that could put that in the best position for their own competitive advantage. By not having trust inside the organization and not sharingtheknowledge between people will tend to decrease theperformanceandthe competitive advantage oftheorganizational learning. Nevertheless, it is important for all those involved in the organization to learn and create new knowledge in order to maintain and improve theperformanceof all those in the organization, including the organization itself. From knowledge management theories, organizational satisfaction is one ofthe result ofthe service provided by the organization to those in which are enrolled. High level of satisfaction is the result of many factors such as organizationaltrust, knowledgesharingandorganizational learning. In this regard, this study examined students from different financial support in their universities as they have different privileges and support.
For the last century, the world has swiftly moves from its industrial economic base, which mostly depends on tangible assets, toward a knowledge base which is tied to the capability of developing and managing knowledge resources. Theknowledge economy is built on continuous dynamic value creation, and profits are increasingly coming from knowledgecreation, integration, and system-solutions instead of from tangible assets. This change is uprising globally due to the increase of travellers, expenditures, immigration, and communication technologies, making the world more connected and interdependent. Globalisation has facilitated the exchange of goods, services, labour, information, and most importantly, the share of unique ideas andknowledge. Beside all the mutual gains brought by globalisation, competitiveness is accordingly increasing. Short product’s life cycles and a rapid change rate in customers’ needs and preferences are considered typical features as well as challenges ofthe current industrial paradigm.
44
which 180 ofthe responses are valid. The largest group of respondent is between the ages of 20-26 corresponding to a total of 68% ofthe respondents.
Regarding the gender ofthe respondents, there is not a significant difference between the genders, being 44% female andthe other 56% male. Regarding the level of education, the majority ofthe respondents are enrolled in a Bachelors program corresponding to 51% ofthe participants, followed by 38% of students who are enrolled in a Master’s degree program, 4% of students doing PhD studies, 4% from language programs, andthe remaining 3% students from other programs, including Military education, and other technical courses. Regarding the origin ofthe participants, the largest group is from Central and South American corresponding to 52% ofthe respondents, followed by Asia with 22%, and Europe with 12%. Africa and North America are the smallest groups of respondents with 8% and 6% respectively. Regarding the student status, a classification provided by the MOE is used for the study. The biggest group of respondents is Degree seeking students with a total of 71% ofthe respondents, after this 16% correspond to International exchange students, 8% study Mandarin Chinese and a total of 2% are Overseas compatriot students and Mainland China Students studying for a degree,. The remaining are Overseas compatriot Youth technical training classes 1%
,87-120。 19.汪金城(民91)。研發機構知識分享機制之研究-以工研院光電所研發團隊為例。國立政治大學公共行政研究所之碩士 論文。 20.吳明隆(主編)(民89)。統計應用實務SPSS。台北市:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。 21.吳萬益與林清河(民89)。企 業研究方法。台北市:華泰書 局 22.林行宜與戚樹誠(民83)。企業高階主管親信關係之研究。管理科學學報,11(2),281-312。 二、英 文部分 1. Adkins, C. L., Meglino, B. M. & Ravlin, E. C.(1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 424-432. 2. Anderws, M. C. & Kacmar, K. M.(2001).
KeyWords Plus: HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACT;
GROWTH; TECHNOLOGY; PREDICTORS; TURNOVER; BEHAVIOR; INDUSTRY;
SYSTEMS
Abstract: This longitudinal study examined whether HRM effectiveness and dynamic innovationperformance increase the level and growth rate oforganizationalperformance. In 2002 we sent questionnaires to the top 1,000 manufacturing companies in Taiwan, and 181 valid questionnaires were returned. Otherwise, innovationandorganizationalperformance between 2002 and 2005 were measured by research intensity and labor productivity. Latent growth curve modeling methodology was used to analyze the panel data over the 4-year period. Our results indicated that there was significant individual variability in terms ofthe intercept and slope factors for research intensity and labor productivity. HRM effectiveness was found to be a significant predictor ofthe intercept and slope factors of labor productivity.
and reverse knowledgesharing in developing regions, mainly the Asian countries. As a result, this study will be conducted in Vietnam. There are two main reasons why this research aims at Vietnam. Firstly, Vietnam has played an increasingly important role as a proactive member in international business activities such as joining negotiations to build up free trade frameworks, and through participating deeply and comprehensively in multi-lateral forums. Secondly, Vietnam is becoming a favoured manufacturing location for high-tech multinational enterprises such as Intel, LG Electronics, Nokia and Samsung because of its cost effective advantages. Thirdly, the majority of foreign companies in Vietnam usually set up partnerships with domestic firms so low-tech enterprises have more opportunity to access advanced technologies. The sample population for this research was taken from manufacturing and services companies in Ho Chi Minh City. The population was restricted to one city rather than the whole nation due to differences in geography, level of economic development, and presence of major industry between states. Ho Chi Minh City, located in the southern part of Vietnam, with a population of over nine million is a center of commerce, economy and finance in Vietnam. There were 58394 SMEs (23.3%) ofthe 250689 registered SMEs in Vietnam operating business in Ho Chi Minh in the year of 2008 (Table 3.1). In the same year, the number of small and medium-sized businesses accounted for 23.5% and 21% respectively.
sector agencies throughout the country. Therefore, sample’s representativeness is a notable concern of this study. A study with more national coverage could reveal more disparities in various regions andthe sector is encouraged for future research.
Secondly, the population empirically studied were public-sector employees. Therefore, in the process of applying the results ofthe study to other kinds of occupational employees, care should be taken. Also, beware that the employees of those public agencies are full-time working professionals. Collecting data of employees from different contexts and categories can increase the generalizability ofthe research model of this study. Thirdly, this study measured attitudes to KS instead ofthe actual behavior to KS. Various studies have presented that behavior to KS and attitude to KS are different to some degree. Additionally, the affective commitment items in OC were used instead of all three components in OC. Finally, by means of survey method, this study is also limited for cross sectional design which implies that the population under study is obtained and analyzed from a representative subset. This technique undermines the changing patterns ofthe population across time which would could not represent the relationship between independent and dependent variables accurately.
ABSTRACT
A contingency model describing the mediation effects ofKnowledgeSharing Behavior onthe Job Satisfaction, TrustandOrganizational Citizenship Behavior was proposed and tested. This study aimed to examine the relationship among Job Satisfaction, Trust, KnowledgeSharing Behavior, Personal Traits andOrganizational Citizenship Behavior. Finally, we discuss whether Personal Traits has a moderate effect between KnowledgeSharing Behavior andOrganizational Citizenship Behavior. A survey research was conducted using a sample of elementary school’s teachers in Chang Hwa County. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis and Hierarchical Regression analysis were used to test the hypotheses. The major findings of this re-search are as follows:(1) Job Satisfaction had a direct positive prediction in Organiza-tional Citizenship Behavior; (2) Trust had a direct positive prediction in Organizational Citizenship Behavior; (3) Job Satisfaction had a direct positive prediction in KnowledgeSharing Behavior; (4) Trust had a direct positive prediction in KnowledgeSharing Be-havior; (5) Trust had an indirect positive prediction, through the
ABSTRACT
With the advent ofknowledge economy, knowledge has become one ofthe most important assets for modern enterprises. Consequently, implementation oftheknowledge management system is a key success to businesses. It is believed that a company who keeps up knowledgecreation can continuously maintain competitive advantages. Therefore, adoption of a knowledgecreation mode would highly influence the ability ofknowledgecreation. To be a remarkable creative organization, it has been seen that the characteristics oforganizational culture could have impact on a knowledgecreation mode andknowledgecreationperformance. However, the question of how a company considers the characteristics of organization culture in order to appropriately adopt a knowledgecreation mode becomes critical to knowledgecreationperformance. In consequence, this research conducted an empirical investigation for the relationships among organizational culture, knowledgecreation modes, andknowledgecreationperformance.
ABSTRACT
In the past few years, knowledgesharing has become the important study issue ofknowledge management. According to the person who was the key element of whether knowledgesharing will be succeeded or not in organizations. The purposes of this study are two folds:(1)to explore the relationships between motivating factors andknowledgesharingontheHigh-Tech employees.(2)to explore the moderating effects oftrust be-tween motivating factors andknowledgesharing.
In relation to the support from top management, the mean score for TM3 which indicated that top management provides rewards in efforts of building a knowledgesharing culture (M=3.21) was the lowest. Goodman and Darr (1998) study indentified rewards as an important element in fostering a knowledgesharing culture. With that said, management may need to consider providing adequate rewards in order to developing such a culture. This may indicate how much top management values knowledgesharing. When it comes to organization structure, two items OS1 and OS4 had the lowest mean scores. Therefore in order to increase the flexibility ofthe organization structure, management may consider addressing issues related to delegation of power and employee participation in decision making. Management may also encourage horizontal communication among members in organization units/ departments as a way to improve employees’ perceptions of organization structure’s flexibility.
Second, looking only at the UNGC variable, the dominant factor ofthe UNGC dimension is environment principle. In comparison between IT industry andthe other industries the dominant factor remain same for both of them. It is followed by anti-corruption principle. This suggests that the best way to follow the UNGC principles is to increase the effort focused on environmental principles and issues within companies. This means, in concrete terms that managers should be counseled to promote company’s commitment and responsibility in terms of environment and anti-corruption principles order to build up CSR awareness. Environmental principle is also important these days, because society has now high demand for environmental behavior from firms and it is more apparent now than it was in Taiwan’s industrial period. Results also showed that multinational companies have high priority on anti-corruption principles so Taiwan policy makers should be aware to improve regulations in terms of anti-corruption. Two other principles (human rights and labour) have lower impact but it’s for discussion why are these two principles less important for companies. Therefore Taiwancompanies should more work on human rights principles and labour principle awareness.
To meet this purpose, data was collected from Taiwanand Bosnia & Herzegovina. A TOKSIP structural research framework model was created, and Partial Least Square (PLS) was employed to conduct a comparative analysis ofthe results. After sending out 300 questionnaires, the researchers received 225 usable completed forms, and this brought the response rate to 75%. The empirical results indicated that transformational leadership has a positive and highly significant effectonorganizationaltrust, in which organizationaltrust has significant effecton customer relationship management, as well as customer relationship management on innovational capabilities. Furthermore, the results showed that innovation capabilities have a significant positive effectonbusinessperformance. This comparative study contributes a lot to the investigation of transformational leadership similarities and differences between Taiwanand Bosnia & Herzegovina. The study ends by providing practical implications and suggestions for future research.
ABSTRACT
In a knowledge-based economy, knowledge is regarded as the source of personal or organizational power, competitive advantage, and expert power. Thus, knowledge management is crucial to enhance the corporate competitiveness andperformance. The research fields ofknowledge management include organizational learning, organizational culture, organizational psychology, organizational management, information management, andknowledgesharing. This study focuses onthe relationships among organizational learning, knowledgesharing, andorganizationalperformance, investigates how organizational learning andknowledge in a company affect its organizationalperformance, and further constructs a knowledge management model onorganizationalperformance.A total of 281 questionnaires were distributed to life insurance companies, and 240 valid samples were returned; the valid return rate was 85.41%. Results showed that organizational learning has positive effectonknowledgesharingandorganizationalperformance, while knowledge sharingandorganizationalperformance are not positively correlated. In addition, organizational learning measures may certainly transfer to promote businessperformance.
Although Taiwan isn’t located at the core of financial tsunami, but many company have bought Lehman Brother and other company’s structured note. Therefore, financial institution and its clients were influenced In Taiwan, financial industry may effectTaiwan’s economic. In Taiwan, financial industry is very important. They are many industry rely on financial institution to survive. Financial industry is the engine for economic growth hence if we have financial crisis it will have huge impact to other industries. There are three major genres for global financial crisis. First, it’s all about human frailty. But there’s a whole world of explanations that it’s the predatory instincts. The delusion of investors andthe greed and all the rest of it. The second genre is that there are institutional failures. Regulators were asleep at the switch. We look at the institutional level and say that has failed and that has to be reconfigured. The third genre is to say, everybody was obsessed with a false theory. They read too much Hayek and believe in the efficiency of markets. And it’s time we actually got back to something like Keynes. Or we took seriously Hyman Minski’s theory about the inherent instability of financial activities. Out of this comes a theory which is very, very important that Capitalism never solves its crisis problems. It moves them around geographically and what we’re seeing right now is a geographical movement of that. In order to fully explore the global financial crisis. A KMS system influence model was build in this study.
2.1.3 Interpersonal Trust (IPT)
Interpersonal trust comprises the foundation of interactions between individuals, and includes individual cognition and emotions related to specific incidents, processes or individuals.
Interpersonal trust is formed over a long period, and results from the accumulated experiences of both parties that gradually form a trust system (Dwyer et al., 1987; Hardin, 1992). Rotter (1980) asserted that a close relationship exists between the level of interpersonal trustand socio-economic status. For instance, children from families with high socio-economic status generally have high levels of interpersonal trust, whereas those from low social status families feel that they have little reason to trust others due to personal dissatisfaction and their realization ofthe benefits enjoyed by those with power and denied to themselves. The levels of interpersonal trustand reliability are strongly related.