• 沒有找到結果。

從研究結果與討論發現,後現代學校行政倫理能夠提供管理智慧,在領導者 權威面對挑戰時,只有能堅實地接納挑戰者並具整合的企圖,方能衍生管理智慧,

故提出以下幾點啟示供參酌,來確立後現代學校行政倫理能提供管理智慧的立論:

(一)後現代學校行政倫理之所以能提供管理智慧,在於領導者具備開放胸 襟的修為。後現代學校行政倫理強調對普遍規範的反駁、不明確實體的容忍、絕 對權威的挑戰,容易威脅到領導者的利益,輕者,領導者會權謀地面對挑戰者,

產生爾虞我詐的行為;嚴重者會對於挑戰者進行懲罰,部屬愈挑戰的結果,愈顯 弱勢,而無法彰顯協調整合的效力,以致管理智慧,難以顯揚於學校行政歷程中。

故後現代學校行政倫理之所以能提供管理智慧,在於領導者具備開放胸襟的修為。

(二)後現代學校行政倫理之所以能提供管理智慧,在於學校成員都有追求 效率的心向。後現代學校行政倫理強調對普遍性規則的質疑,並透過多元價值的 並存,做為組織協調的基礎,但卻容易出現混亂不堪的局面,故它之所以能夠提 供管理智慧,在於解放後偏見理解之後,不能流於意氣用事,而仍能以效率為心

向,來提升學校創新及學校效能,以期教育任務的有效實踐。故後現代學校行政 倫理之所以能提供管理智慧,在於學校成員都有追求效率的心向。

(三)後現代學校行政倫理之所以能提供管理智慧,在於領導者與被領導者 的關係能架構在理性卓越的互動上。後現代學校行政倫理強調向絕對權威或普遍 規則的挑戰,容易讓領導者失去行政主導權,挑戰的結果是使得不公平更為透明,

挑戰者的悲愴情緒,容易出現攻擊行為,或者被挑戰的領導者面子掛不住,進而 醜化抹黑挑戰者,故它之所以能提供管理智慧,在於領導者與被領導者的關係,

能架構在「理性與卓越」的互動上,既可催化溝通的持續進行,也能喚起超越性 的發展力量。故後現代學校行政倫理之所以能提供管理智慧,在於領導者與被領 導者能架構在理性卓越的互動關係上。

參考文獻

吳明清(2001)。教育向前跑──開放社會的教育改革。臺北市:師苑。

吳清山(2007)。教育行政的倫理面向。載於謝文全、黃乃熒、吳清山、陳麗珠、王麗雲、

王如哲等(合著),教育行政學:理論與案例(頁 70-99)。臺北市:五南。

黃乃熒(1996)。行政管理科際整合理論模式──國中行政問題與行政能力相關之研究。

教育研究資訊雙月刊,4(16),64-87。

黃乃熒(1999)。我國中等學校行政病態之診斷研究。教育研究資訊雙月刊,7(7),146-183。

黃乃熒(2004)。後現代學校行政倫理及其兩難困境之解決。教育研究集刊,50(3),1-29。

黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理。

謝馥宇(2007)。國民中學組織運作中教師人權之研究──以北部六縣市為例。國立臺灣 師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。

Ayers, D. F. (2005). Organizational climate in its semiotic aspect: A postmodern community college undergoes renewal. Community College Review, 33(1), 1-19.

Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil (P. Hallward, Trans.). New York: Verso. (Original work published 1998)

Balts, P. M., & Staudinger, U. M. (2001). A meta-heuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122-136.

Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of post-modernity. London: Routledge.

Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

Bierly, P. E., Kessler, E. H., & Christensen, E. W. (2000). Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(6), 595-618.

Blanke, V. (1990). Understanding organization. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.

Blanke, V. (1992). Education change. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.

Bourgeois, P. I. (2001). The search for a postmodern ethics. Research in Phenomenology, 32, 249-257.

Case, P., & Gosling, J. (2007). Wisdom of the moment: Pre-modern perspectives on organizational action. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 87-111.

Christie, P. (2005). Education for an ethical imagination. Social Alternatives, 24(4), 39-44.

de Zwart, F. (2002). Administrative practice and rational inquiry in postmodern public administration theory. Administration & Society, 34(5), 482-498.

English, F. W. (2003). The postmodern challenge to theory and practice of education administration. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

Fox, C., & Miller, H. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Freeman, S. J., Engels, D. W., & Altekruse, M. K. (2004). Foundations for ethical Standard and codes: The role of moral philosophy and theory in ethics. Counseling and Values, 48, 163-173.

Gibson, P. (2007). Developing practical management wisdom. Journal of Management Development, 27(5), 528-536.

Hallstein, L. O. (1999). A postmodern caring: Feminist standpoint theories, revisioned caring, and communication ethics. Western Journal of Communication, 63(1), 32-56.

Hamelink, C. J. (2000). The ethics of cyberspace. London: Sage.

Heinze, E. A. (2005). Commonsense morality and the consequentialist ethics of humanitarian inter- vention. Journal of Military Ethics, 4(3), 168-182.

Jordan, H. (1997). Leadership wisdom: Balancing on the high wire. (ED 407015)

Lalas, J., & Valle, E. (2007). Social justices and authentic student voices: Enhancing leadership for educational justice. Educational Leadership and Administration, 19, 75-102.

Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN:

University of Minnesota Press.

Malan, L. C., & Kriger, M. P. (1998). Making sense of managerial wisdom. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7(3), 242-252.

Mason, M. (2001). The ethics of integrity: Educational values beyond postmodern ethics. The Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, 35(1), 47-69.

Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical Wisdom (Phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 371-394.

Nuyen, A. T. (1998). Lyotard’s postmodern ethics and the normative question. Philosophy Today, 42(4), 411-417.

Nuyen, A. T. (2004). Lyotard’s postmodern ethics and information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 185-191.

Ojeili, C. (2002). Post-modernism, the return to ethics and the crisis of the crisis of socialist values. Democracy & Nature, 8(3), 397-421.

Pojamn, L. P. (1995). Ethics: Discovery right and wrong. Belomnt, CA: Wadworth.

Powell, J. L. (2005). ‘Modernist’ sociology in a ‘postmodern’ world. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 25(10), 1-13.

Reed, D. (1999). Three realms of corporate responsibility: Distinguishing legitimacy, morality, and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 23-35.

Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. (2007). Wisdom in organizations: Whence and wither. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 113-138.

Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. (2008). Wisdom in public administration: Looking for a sociology of wise practice. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 709-721.

Rowley, J. (2005). Where is the wisdom that we have lost in knowledge? Journal of Documentation, 62(2), 251-270.

Ryan, S. (1999). What is wisdom? Philosophical Studies, 93, 119-139.

Seidman, S. (1994). Contested knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. Oxford, MA:

Blackwell.

Slattery, P., & Morris, M. (1999). Simone de beauvoir’s ethics and Postmodern ambiguity: The assertion of freedom in the face of the absurd. Educational Theory, 49(1), 21-36.

Small, M. W. (2004). Wisdom and now managerial wisdom: Do They have a place in management development programs? The Journal of Management Development, 23(7), 751-764.

Smith, C. (2007). Working from the inside out: Management and leadership. Through the lens of perennial wisdom tradition. Journal of Management Development, 26(5), 475-483.

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). WICS: A model of educational leadership. The Educational Forum, 68(4), 108-114.

VanSciver, J. H. (1998). Informed courage in local leadership: Essential in overcoming barriers to courage in education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED421772)

Yang, S.Y. (2008). A process view of wisdom. Journal of Adult Development, 15(2). Retrieved September 3, 2008, from http://www. springerlink.com/content/67q8t3761350v42u/

相關文件