Ardasheva, Y., Wang, Z., Adesope, O. O., & Valentine, J. C. (2017). Exploring effectiveness and moderators of language learning strategy instruction on second language and self-regulated learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 544-582. doi:10.3102/003465431 6689135
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author: A fresh and expanded view of a powerful approach. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470743386
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198-215.
doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283-292. doi:10.3102/0013189X16656615
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.
112.1.155
Cole, M. W. (2014). Speaking to read: Meta-analysis of peer-mediated learning for English language learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(3), 358-382. doi:10.1177/1086296X14552179 Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D.
W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education.
Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220-234. doi:10.1177/0741932514557271
Cote, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davis, D. S. (2010). A met-analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
202 閱讀理解量化研究統合 謝進昌
De Boer, H., Donker, A. S., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effects of the attributes of educational interventions on students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 509-545. doi:10.3102/0034654314540006
De Lemos, M. M. (2002). Closing the gap between research and practices: Foundation for the acquisition of literacy. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. doi:10.1111/
j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English.
Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74-111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005).
Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education.
Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149-164. doi:10.1177/001440290507100202
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710-785. doi:10.17763/haer.
81.4.t2k0m13756113566
Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Ponnstone, C. C., …Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306-332. doi:10.1598/
RRQ.31.3.5
Hall, M. S., & Burns, M. K. (2018). Meta-analysis of targeted small-group reading intervention.
Journal of School Psychology, 66, 54-66. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.11.002
Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609-629. doi:10.1037/edu0000082
Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators.
Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128. doi:10.2307/1164588
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effect of teaching children how
謝進昌 閱讀理解量化研究統合 203
to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.
doi:10.3102/00028312031002338
Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Lipsey, M. W. (2009). Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In H. Cooper, L. V.
Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp.
146-158). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. doi:10.7758/9781610448864.11
Marín-Martínez, F., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2010). Weighting by inverse variance or by sample size in random-effects meta-analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 56-73.
doi:10.1177/0013164409344534
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016: International results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn – Student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III). Paris, France: Author. doi:10.
1787/9789264083943-en
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/
s1532690xci0102_1
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239-1252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
Puzio, K., & Colby, G. T. (2013). Cooperative learning and literacy: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(4), 339-360. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.775683 Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39(6),
516-522.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530. doi:10.2307/1170585
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A
204 閱讀理解量化研究統合 謝進昌
review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221. doi:10.
2307/1170607
Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. E. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representing and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211-236). New York, NY:
Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6
Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., Williams, K. J., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S. R., & Carroll, M.
(2016). A century of progress: Reading interventions for students in grades 4-12, 1914-2014.
Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 756-800. doi:10.3102/0034654316652942
Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4-12: 1980-2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369-390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Slavin, R. E. (1978). Student teams and achievement divisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 39-49.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14. doi:10.
3102/0013189X08314117
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391-1466. doi:10.3102/0034654309341374
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Measures inherent to treatments in program effectiveness reviews. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(4), 370-380. doi:10.1080/
19345747.2011.558986
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.
Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaugh, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grade 3 through 12: 1978-2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131-149. doi:10.1177/0741932517749940
Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 433-454.
doi:10.2307/747701
Suggate, S. P. (2010). Why “what” we teach depends on “when”: Grade and reading intervention
謝進昌 閱讀理解量化研究統合 205
modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1556-1579. doi:10.1037/
a0020612
Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77-96. doi:10.1177/0022219414528540
Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252-261. doi:10.1177/0741932504025 0040801
Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2008). A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD). Psychological Methods, 13(2), 130-149.
doi:10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.130
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. A.
(2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 301-315. doi:10.1177/07419325030240050501
Viechtbauer, W. (2019). Package ‘metafor’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/
metafor/metafor.pdf
Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis.
Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112-125. doi:10.1002/jrsm.11
Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 889-912. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). What works clearinghouse: Standards handbook (version 4.0).
Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_
v4.pdf
Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities?
A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73-84. doi:10.1177/00222194166 88170
206 閱讀理解量化研究統合 謝進昌
Journal of Research in Education Sciences 2019, 64(4), 175-206
doi:10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0007