Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I., Joyce N., Sheikh S., & Cote, N. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 101-117. doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.568834
Allais, S. M. (2011). The impact and implementation of national qualifications frameworks: A comparison of 16 countries. Journal of Education and Work, 24(3-4), 233-258. doi:10.1080/
13639080.2011.584685
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. (2009). Mapping qualifications frameworks across APEC economies. Singapore: APEC Human Resources Development Working Group.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., & Sin, C. (2015). The quality of teaching staff: Higher education institutions’ compliance with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance:
The case of Portugal. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(3), 205-222.
doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9211-z
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007 SEM0902_5
Chow, A., Eccles, J. S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1612-1628. doi:10.1037/a0030194
Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation. Research Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243-251. doi:10.3102/0013189X16651080
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343. doi:10.1111/
洪榮昭、張瑞娥 職能政策接受態度研究 279
0161-4681.00057
Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 18(1), 3-49. doi:10.3102/0091732X018001003 Conley, A. M. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and
expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 32-47. doi:10.1037/
a0026042
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/
mnsc.35.8.982
Doherty, K. M., & Jacobs, S. (2013). State of the States 2013 Connect the Dots: Using evaluations of teacher effectiveness to inform policy and practice. National Council on Teacher Quality.
Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566876.pdf
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78-89. doi:10.1080/004615 20902832368
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C.
(1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’
achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. doi:10.2307/2065853
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312 Garcia, L. M., & Roblin, N. P. (2008). Innovation, research and professional development in higher
education: Learning from our own experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 104-116.
doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.007
Gonczi, A. (2013). Competency-based approaches: Linking theory and practice in professional education with particular reference to health education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(12), 1290-1306. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.763590
280 職能政策接受態度研究 洪榮昭、張瑞娥
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hermans, L., Cunningham, S., & Slinger, J. (2014). The usefulness of game theory as a method for policy evaluation. Evaluation, 20(1), 10-25. doi:10.1177/1356389013516052
Hopkins, M., & Spillane, J. P. (2015). Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction: Regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 421-450.
doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9257-1
Jones, V. (2009). The green collar economy: How one solution can fix our two biggest problems (EBook). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2014). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486-507. doi:10.1177/0049 124114543236
Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy.
Science Education, 92(1), 1-32. doi:10.1002/sce.20240
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, C. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2016). Recognizing the political in implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 233-242. doi:10.3102/0013189X16649945
Mitchell, D. E., Crowson, R. L., & Shipps, D. (2011). Shaping education policy: Power and process.
New York, NY: Routledge.
Moessinger, P. (2000). The paradox of social order: Linking psychology and sociology. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Norum, K., Grabinger, R. S., & Duffield, J. (1999). Healing the universe is an inside job: Teachers’
views on integrating technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 187-203.
Northcote, M. (2009). Educational beliefs of higher education teachers and students: Implications for teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 68-81. doi:10.14221/ajte.
2009v34n3.3
Norton, L., Richardson, J. T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50(4), 537-571. doi:10.
1007/s10734-004-6363-z
洪榮昭、張瑞娥 職能政策接受態度研究 281
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Qualifications systems: Bridges to lifelong learning. Paris, France: Author.
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise.
Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430. doi:10.1080/08886504.2001.
10782325
Pynoo, B., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Duyck, W., Sijnave, B., & Duyck, P. (2012). Teachers’
acceptance and use of an educational portal. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1308-1317.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.026
Ritter, R. M. (2002). The Oxford style manual. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schoonenboom, J. (2012). The use of technology as one of the possible means of performing instructor tasks: Putting technology acceptance in context. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1309-1316. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.009
Simpkins, S. D., Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Charting the Eccles’ expectancy-value model from mothers’ beliefs in childhood to youths’ activities in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1019-1032. doi:10.1037/a0027468
Sin, C. (2014). The policy object: A different perspective on policy enactment in higher education.
Higher Education, 68(3), 435-448. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9721-5
Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 141-179. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI 1802_01
Spillane, J. P., & Callahan, K. A. (2000). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 401-425. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<401::AID-TEA2>3.3.CO;2-4
Spillane, J. P., Parise, L. M., & Sherer, J. Z. (2011). Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms:
Policy, school administration, and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 586-619. doi:10.3102/0002831210385102
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431.
doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
Teo, T., & Milutinovic, V. (2015). Modelling the intention to use technology for teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers in Serbia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 363-380. doi:10.14742/ajet.1668
282 職能政策接受態度研究 洪榮昭、張瑞娥
Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M., & Verloop, N. (2007). The relationship between teachers general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 156-171. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.010
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model:
Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.
186.11926
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task value: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265-310. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Young, M. (2011). The educational implications of introducing a NQF for developing countries.
Journal of Education and Work, 24(3/4), 223-232. doi:10.1080/13639080.2011.584684
洪榮昭、張瑞娥 職能政策接受態度研究 283
Journal of Research in Education Sciences 2018, 63(2), 251-284
doi:10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0010
Constructing an Educational Policy Acceptance Model to Explore Attitudes Toward Policy Implementation: Using an Industrial Competency Standards System in
Science and Technology Universities
Jon-Chao Hong Jui-O Chang
Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University
Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University
Abstract
Studies related to the effectiveness of policy making have been focused on the concerns of domain experts, not stakeholders. The purpose of this study was to construct an acceptance model of educational policy to explore competency standards integration, and technical–vocational education and teaching. Based on the perspectives of professors from science and technology universities, this study examined the correlations among teaching progressive beliefs, perceived ease of policy understanding and application, perceived value to students, and attitudes toward policy implementation. Quantitative data from 257 participants were collected for confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling. The results revealed that teaching progressive beliefs was positively related to perceived ease of policy understanding and application to teaching settings;
perceived ease of policy understanding and application were positively associated with value to students; and value to students was positively correlated with attitude toward policy implementation.
In addition, teaching progressive beliefs positively predicted the implementation attitude that was mediated by the perceived value of policies; however, perceived ease of policy understanding and application were essential in explaining the expectancy–value research model. This study suggested
Corresponding Author: Jui-O Chang, E-mail: [email protected]
Manuscript received: Mar. 23, 2017; Revised: Nov. 20, 2017, Dec. 1, 2017; Accepted: Dec. 4, 2017.
284 職能政策接受態度研究 洪榮昭、張瑞娥
that formalization of the policy acceptance model can be applied to explore other policies related to education and policy making for understanding stakeholders’ attitudes toward the implementation of new policies.
Keywords: acceptance model of educational policy, competency standards, expectancy-value theory, technology acceptance model, unified acceptance model