Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649-1672. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561. doi:10.1037/
0022-0663.94.3.545
Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2009). Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 243-262. doi:10.1080/13504620802711282
Beetlestone, J. G., Johnson., C. H., Quin, M., & White, H. (1998). The science center movement:
Contexts, practice, next challenges. Public Understanding of Science, 7(1), 5-22. doi:10.1177/
096366259800700101
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Billett, S. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 27-43. doi:10.1177/074171302237202
Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2-16. doi:10.1177/096366 2515607406
Carrion, M. L. (2018). “You need to do your research”: Vaccines, contestable science, and maternal epistemology. Public Understanding of Science, 27(3), 310-324. doi:10.1177/09636625177 28024
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1-22. doi:10.1037/h0046743
Chang, M., Singh, K., & Mo, Y. (2007). Science engagement and science achievement: Longitudinal models using NELS data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(4), 349-371. doi:10.1080/
13803610701702787
Chen, H.-T., Wang, H.-H., Lu, Y.-Y., Lin, H.-S., & Hong, Z.-R (2016). Using a modified argument-driven inquiry to promote elementary school students’ engagement in learning science and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 170-191. doi:10.
1080/09500693.2015.1134849
Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,
王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒 公民科技素養及參與 253
176(1-4), 273-291. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1-171.
Falk, J. H. (2002). The contribution of free-choice learning to public understanding of science.
Interciencia, 27(2), 62-65.
Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 431-452. doi:10.1002/tea.21080 Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and
understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455-469. doi:10.1177/0963662506064240
Falkner, K., & Palmer, E. (2009). Developing authentic problem solving skills in introductory computing classes. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 4-8. doi:10.1145/1539024.1508871
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(2), 226-243. doi:10.1177/0162243 99001500204
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/
3151312
Fortmann, L. (2008). Participatory research in conservation and rural livelihoods: Doing science together. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi:10.3102/
00346543074001059
Grant, J. (1994). The drama of democracy: Contention and dispute in community planning. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender-and grade-level differences in science interest and participation.
Science Education, 81(3), 259-276. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199706)81:3<259::AID-SCE1>
3.0.CO;2-C
Henriksen, E. K., & Frøyland, M. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: Views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 393-415.
doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/304
Hidi, S., Berndorff, D., & Ainley, M. (2002). Children’s argument writing, interest and self-efficacy:
An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 429-446. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)
254 公民科技素養及參與 王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒
00009-3
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Hisschemöller, M., & Midden, C. J. H. (1999). Improving the usability of research on the public perception of science and technology for policy-making. Public Understanding of Science, 8(1), 17-33. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/8/1/002
Hong, Z.-R (2010). Effects of a collaborative science intervention on high achieving students’
learning anxiety and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(15), 1971-1988. doi:10.1080/09500690903229304
Hong, Z.-R, & Lin, H.-S. (2011). An Investigation of students’ personality traits and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 1001-1028. doi:10.1080/09500693.
2010.524949
Hong, Z.-R, & Lin, H.-S. (2013). Boys’ and girls’ involvement in science learning and their self-efficacy in Taiwan. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 272-284. doi:10.1080/
00207594.2011.628673
Hong, Z.-R, Lin, H.-S., Chen, H.-T., Wang, H.-H., & Lin, C.-J. (2014). The effects of aesthetic science activities on improving at-risk families children’s anxiety about learning science and positive thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 216-243. doi:10.1080/
09500693.2012.758394
Hong, Z.-R, Lin, H.-S., & Lawrenz, F. P. (2012). Effects of an integrated science and societal implication intervention on promoting adolescent’s positive thinking and emotional perceptions in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 329-352.
doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.623727
Hong, Z.-R, Lin, H.-S., Wang, H.-H., Chen, H.-T., & Yang, K.-K. (2013). Promoting and scaffolding elementary school students’ attitudes toward science and argumentation through a science and society intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1625-1648. doi:10.
1080/09500693.2012.734935
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
Hynd, C., Holschuh, J., & Nist, S. (2000). Learning complex scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 23-57.
doi:10.1080/105735600278051
王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒 公民科技素養及參與 255
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?
Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science.
International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703-710. doi:10.1080/095006999290363 Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Student motivation in co-operative groups: Social
interdependence theory. In R. M. Gillies & A. F. Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 136-176). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Johnson, H., & Wilson, G. (2000). Biting the bullet: Civil society, social learning and the transformation of local governance. World Development, 28(11), 1891-1906. doi:10.1016/
S0305-750X(00)00069-3
Jones, D., & Stein, J. K. (2005). The flandrau science center front-end evaluation (Unpublished technical report). Institute for Learning Innovation, Annapolis, MD.
Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures.
International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871-893. doi:10.1080/09500690600909091 Kolstø, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of
Science Education, 22(6), 645-664. doi:10.1080/095006900289714
Lin, H.-S., Lawrenz, F., Lin, S.-F., & Hong, Z.-R (2013). Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 941-954. doi:10.1177/0963662511429412
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Relationships between students’
conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies.
Instructional Science, 36(5-6), 445-462. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9065-6
Lui, A. K., Kwan, R., Poon, M., & Cheung, Y. H. Y. (2004). Saving weak programming students:
Applying constructivism in a first programming course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(2), 72-76.
doi:10.1145/1024338.1024376
Maienschein, J. (1998). Scientific literacy. Science, 281(5379), 917. doi:10.1126/science.281.
5379.917
McCallie, E., Bell, L., Lohwater, T., Falk, J. H., Lehr, J. L., Lewenstein, B. V., …Weihe, B. (2009).
Many expert, many audiences: Public engagement with science and informal science education.
Paper presented at the conference of the Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, DC.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
256 公民科技素養及參與 王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒
Miller, J. D. (1987). Scientific literacy in the United States. In D. Evered & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Communicating science to the public (pp. 19-40). London, UK: Wiley.
Miller, J. D. (1996). Scientific literacy for effective citizenship. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/
technology/society as reform in science education (pp. 185-204). New York, NY: State University Press of New York.
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203-223. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
Miller, J. D. (2000). The development of civic scientific literacy in the United States. In D. D.
Kumar & D. E. Chubin (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice (pp. 21-47). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 273-294. doi:10.
1177/0963662504044908
Miller, J. D. (2010a). Civic scientific literacy: The role of the media in the electronic era. In D.
Kennedy & G. Overholser (Eds.), Science, technology, and the media (pp. 44-63). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Miller, J. D. (2010b). The conceptualization and measurement of civic scientific literacy for the twenty-first century. In J. Meinwald & J. G. Hildebrand (Eds.), Science and the educated American: A core component of liberal education (pp. 241-255). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Miller, J. D. (2012). The sources and impact of civic scientific literacy. In M. W. Bauer, R. Shukla, &
N. Allum (Eds.), The culture of science: How the public relates to science across the globe (pp.
217-240). New York, NY: Routledge.
Miller, J. D. (2016). Civic scientific literacy in the United States in 2016. Retrieved from https://
smd-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/science-red/s3fs-public/atoms/files/NASA%20CSL%20in%2020 16%20Report_0_0.pdf
Miller, J. D., Pardo, R., & Niwa, F. (1997). Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Bilbao, Spain:
Fundación BBV.
Miller, S., Caro, P., Koulaidis, V., de Semir, V., Staveloz, W., & Vargas, R. (2002). Benchmarking the promotion of RTD culture and public understanding of science. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒 公民科技素養及參與 257
National Academy Press.
National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board. (2016). Science and engineering indicators 2016. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2016/nsb20161.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Student questionnaire for PISA 2006. Paris, France: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2009. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2009-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: Author.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London, UK:
Nuffield Foundation.
Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803-821. doi:10.1002/sce.20071
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic- dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse:
Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921. doi:10.1002/tea.20327
Shein, P. P., Li, Y.-Y., & Huang, T.-C. (2015). The four cultures: Public engagement with science only, art only, neither, or both museums. Public Understanding of Science, 24(8), 943-956.
doi:10.1177/0963662515602848
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., & Parisi, J. M. (2011). The adult development and cognition and learning. In K. Rubenson (Ed.), Adult learning and education (pp. 41-46). Saint Louis, MO: Academic Press.
Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1-44.
doi:10.1080/03057260903562284
Tett, L., & St. Clair, R. (2011). Adult literacy education. In K. Rubenson (Ed.), Adult learning and education (pp. 100-105). Saint Louis, MO: Academic Press.
Tsai, C.-Y., Li, Y.-Y., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2017). The relationships among adult affective factors,
258 公民科技素養及參與 王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒
engagement in science, and scientific competencies. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 30-47.
doi:10.1177/0741713616673148
Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 19-38. doi:10.
1007/s11165-009-9144-y
United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). Report of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/2012/
session-11-UNEP.pdf
Wang, H.-H., Chen, H.-T., Lin, H.-S., Huang, Y.-N., & Hong, Z.-R (2017). Longitudinal study of a cooperation-driven, socio-scientific issue intervention on promoting students’ critical thinking and self-regulation in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2002-2026. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1357087
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers.
Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131
Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia.
International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1588-1608. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.
871658
Wu, K.-C., Shein, P. P., Tsai, C.-Y., Chou, C.-Y., Wu, Y.-Y., Liu, C.-J., …Huang, T.-C. (2012). An investigation of Taiwan’s public attitudes toward science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.613643
Yang, K.-K., Hong, Z.-R, Liu, M.-C., & Lin, H.-S. (2015). Exploring the role of visitors’
self-identity in marine museum learning. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 5(4), 375-393. doi:10.1080/21548455.2015.1046152
Yearley, S. (2006). Bridging the science-policy divide in urban air-quality management: Evaluating ways to make models more robust through public engagement. Environment and Planning C:
Government and Policy, 24(5), 701-714. doi:10.1068/c0610j
Yearley, S., Cinderby, S., Forrester, J., Bailey, P., & Rosen, P. (2003). Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study. Environmental Values, 12(2), 247-262. doi:10.3197/096327103129341315
王薪惠、林煥祥、洪瑞兒 公民科技素養及參與 259
Journal of Research in Education Sciences 2018, 63(4), 229-259
doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0008
Exploring Taiwan Citizens’ Scientific Literacy, Interest in, and Engagement in
Learning Science