林福來（2010）。數學臆測活動的設計、教學與評量：總計畫。載於楊德清（主編），行政院國家 科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告-數學教育學門專題研究成果討論會（B 冊，89－100 頁）。 嘉義：國立嘉義大學。【Lin, Fou-Lai (2010). Designing, teaching, and assessing mathematical conjecturing activity: Leading project. In Der-Ching Yang (Ed.), Conference proceedings for research reports in mathematics education discipline: National Science Council research project report(Volume B, pp. 89-100). Chiayi: National Chiayi University. (in Chinese)】
陳英娥、林福來（1998）。數學臆測的思維模式。科學教育學刊，6（2），192-218。【Chen, Ing-Er, & Lin, Fou-Lai (1998). A thinking model of mathematical conjecturing. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 192-218. (in Chinese)】
鄭英豪（2010）。數學臆測與證明學習連續性的教與學研究。載於林福來（主編），數學臆測活動 的設計、教學與評量（27-52 頁）。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學。【Cheng, Ying-Hao (2010).
Coherence of mathematical conjecturing and proving: A study of teaching and learning. In Fou-Lai Lin (Ed.), Designing, teaching, and assessing mathematical conjecturing activity (pp. 27-52).
Taipei: National Taiwan Normal Univeristy. (in Chinese)】
Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A congnitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 34(3), 66-72.
doi: 10.1007/BF02655708
Baccaglini-Frank, A., Mariotti, M. A., & Antonini, S. (2009). Different perceptions of invariants and generality of proof in dynamic geometry. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M. & Sakonidis, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.89-96). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin,
& D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principals and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27-44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Boero, P. (2006). Habermas' theory of rationality as a comprehensive frame for conjecturing and proving in school. In Novotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátká, M., & Stehlíková, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.185-192). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.
Cañadas, M. C., Deulofeu, J., Figueiras, L., Reid, D., & Yevdokimov, O. (2007). The conjecturing process: Perspectives in theory and implications in practice. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 55-72.
Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students' justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359-387. doi:
10.1007/BF01273371
Cheng, Y. H., & Lin, F. L. (2006). Using reading and coloring to enhance incomplete prover's performance in geometry proof. In Novotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátká, M., & Stehlíková, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.289-296). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.
Cheng, Y. H., & Lin, F. L. (2007). The effectiveness and limitation of reading and coloring strategy in learning geometry proof. In Woo, J. H., Lew, H. C., Park, K. S. & Seo, D. Y. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 113-120). Seoul, Korea: PME.
Cheng, Y. H., & Lin, F. L. (2008). A study on left behind students for enhancing their competence of geometry argumentation. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 2, pp. 305-312). Morelia, Mexico:
PME.
de Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11-18.
de Villiers, M. (1999). A sketchpad discovery involving areas of inscribed polygons. Mathematics in School, 28(2), 18-21.
de Villiers, M. (2004). Using dynamic geometry to expand mathematics teachers' understanding of proof.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(5), 703-724. doi:
10.1080/0020739042000232556
Duval, R. (1995). Geometrical pictures: Kinds of representation and specific processings. In R.
Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 142-157). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-57771-0_10
Erez, M. M., & Yerushalmy, M. (2006). If you can turn a rectangle into a square, you can turn a square into a rectangle..." Young students experience the dragging tool. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(3), 271-299. doi: 10.1007/s10758-006-9106-7
Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Ellmore (Eds.), Handbook of complimentary methods in education research (pp. 177-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139-162. doi: 10.1007/BF01273689
Fischbein, E., & Nachlieli, T. (1998). Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1193-1211. doi: 10.1080/0950069980201003
Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: Analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 163-183. doi:
10.1007/s10649-010-9232-y
González, G., & Herbst, P. (2009). Students' conceptions of congruency through the use of dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(2), 153-182. doi: 10.1007/s10758-009-9152-z
Greeno, J. G. (1980). Some examples of cognitive task analysis with instructional implications. In R. E.
Snow, P. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, Vol. 2: Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem solving (pp. 1-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Haspekian, M. (2005). An "instrumental approach" to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematic teaching: The case of spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(2), 109-141. doi: 10.1007/s10758-005-0395-z
Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2001). Software tools for geometrical problem solving: Potential and pitfalls.
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 235-256. doi:
10.1023/A:1013305627916
Hegarty, M. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In A. Blackwell, K. Marriott, & A. Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Third international conference, diagrams 2004, Cambridge, UK, March 2004 proceedings (pp. 1-13). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-25931-2_1
Hsu, H. Y. (2008). Learning opportunity of reasoning: The interplay between gestures and diagrammatic properties. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Monterrey, Mexico.
Hsu, H. Y. (2010). The study of Taiwanese students' experiences with geometric calculation with number (GCN) and their performance on GCN and geometric proof (GP). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Klaczynski, P. A., & Narasimham, G. (1998). Representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 865-881. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.865
Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 511-550. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1404_2 Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary
Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Laborde, C. (2000). Dynamic geometry environments as a source of rich learning contexts for the complex activity of proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 151-161. doi:
10.1023/A:1012793121648
Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-Geometry.
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283-317. doi:
10.1023/A:1013309728825
Laborde, C. (2005). The hidden role of diagrams in students' construction of meaning in geometry. In J.
Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, O. Skovsmose, & P. Valero (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education (pp.
159-179). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/0-387-24040-3_11
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proof and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139171472
Leung, A. (2008). Dragging in a dynamic geometry environment through the lens of variation.
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13(2), 135-157. doi:
10.1007/s10758-008-9130-x
Lin, F. L., & Wu Yu, J. Y. (2005). False proposition - As a means for making conjectures in mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the Invited speech in Asian Mathematical Conference, Singapore.
Mariotti, M. A. (2001). Justifying and proving in the Cabri environment. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 257-281. doi: 10.1023/A:1013357611987
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London, UK: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Michener, E. R. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2, 361-383. doi:
10.1016/S0364-0213(78)80052-4
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Olivero, F., & Robutti, O. (2007). Measuring in dynamic geometry environments as a tool for conjecturing and proving. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(2), 135-156. doi: 10.1007/s10758-007-9115-1
Reid, D. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1), 5-29. doi: 10.2307/749867
Resnick, L. B. (1975). Task analysis in instructional design: Some cases from mathematics. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 115486) Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research:
Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences.
Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329-342. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09338513
Selden, J., & Selden, A. (1995). Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(2), 123-151. doi: 10.1007/BF01274210
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488. doi: 10.3102/00028312033002455
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169. doi:
10.1007/BF00305619
Wu Yu, J. Y., Hsu, H. Y., Lin, C. J., & Chin, E. C. (2009). Validating a conditional statement: The role of empirical examples. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M. & Sakonidis, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.
1, p. 492). Thesalloniki, Greece: PME.
Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (1990). Overcoming visual obstacles with the aid of the Supposer.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(3), 199-219. doi: 10.1007/BF00305090