王叢桂（1999）：性別角色信念、家庭承諾、工作承諾與工作價值之關係。本土心理學研究，11，
59-89。[Wang, C. K. (1999). Relationship between gender roles belief, family commitment, work commitment and work value. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 11, 59-89.
DOI: 10. 6254/1999.11.59]
王叢桂、羅國英（2010）：自我發展與利他服務價值觀的融合：華人工作價值的變遷與發展。本土 心理學研究，33，3-57。[Wang, C K. & Lo, K Y. (2010). The integration of self-development and altruistic values: The change and development of Taiwanese work values. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 33, 3-57. DOI: 10.6254/2010.33.3]
行政院主計總處（2017a）：表 8、歷年年齡組別勞動力參與率。取自行政院主計總處網站：
https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40928&ctNode=3102，2017 年 11 月 17 日。[Directorate- General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan (2017, November 17). Table 8.
Labor force participation rate by age. Retrieved from https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40 928&ct Node= 3102.]
行政院主計總處（2017b）：薪資及生產力統計資料查詢系統。取自行政院主計總處網站：
http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc5/EarningAndProductivity/Default.aspx，2017 年 11 月 17 日。
[Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan (2017, November 17).
Earnings and Productivity Statistics Database. Retrieved from http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas 04/bc5/EarningAndPro-ductivity/Default.aspx.]
行 政 院 主 計 總 處 （2017c ）： 婦 女 婚 育 與 就 業 調 查 報 告 。 取 自 行 政 院 主 計 處 總 網 站 ： https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2841，2017 年 11 月 17 日。[Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan (2017, November 17). Report on Women’s marriage, fertility and employment. Retrieved from https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2841.]
余民寜（2011）：教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量（第三版）。台北：心理出版社。[Yu, M. N.
(2011). Educational testing and assessment: Achievement test and teaching evaluation (3rd ed.).
Taipei, Taiwan: Psych-ological Publishing Co.]
金耀基（2013）：中國社會與文化。香港：牛津大學出版社。[King, Y. C. (2013). Chinese society and culture. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.]
張晉芬、李奕慧（2007）：“女人的家事”、“男人的家事”：家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文及 社會科學集刊，19（2），203-229。[Chang, C. F., & Li, Y. H. (2007). Women's housework, men's housework: Explanations for the continuing gender division of housework. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 19(2), 203-229.]
陳學志、李威震、周泰安、卓淑玲（2002）：以內隱聯結測驗〈IAT〉測量國人自尊的可行性研究。
測驗年刊，49(2)，217-234。[Chen, H. C., Li, W. C., Chou, T. A., & Cho, S. L. (2002). Measuring the self-exposure of Chinese people using the implicit association test. Psychological Testing, 49(2), 217-234.]
陳學志、黃宏宇、邱發忠、楊立行、卓淑玲（2011）：態度的表象與真實：內隱測量典範的現況與 發展。αβγ 量化研究學刊，3（1），54-77。[Chen, H. C., Huang, H. Y., Chiu, F. C., Yang, L. S.,
& Zhuo, S. L. (2011). Implicit measure: A new perspective for measuring attitude in social science. αβγ of the Journal for Quantitative Research, 3(1), 54-77.]
陸洛、黃茂丁、高旭繁（2005）：工作與家庭的雙向衝突：前因、後果及調節變項之探討。應用心 理研究，27，133-166。[Lu, L., Hwang, M. T., & Kao, S. F. (2005). The bi-directional conflict of work and family: Antecedents, consequences and moderators. Research in Applied Psychology, 27, 133-166.]
蔡志浩（2005）：菜市場名的背後。取自蔡志浩個人網站：http://taiwan. chtsai.org/ 2005/08/11/caishichang _ming_de_beihou/，2014 年 5 月 1 日。[Tsai, C. H. (2014, May 1). Behind popular names for birth.
Retrieved from http://taiwan. chtsai.org/ 2005/08/11/caishichang_ming_de_beihou/]
蔡孟寧、王倫婷、林烘煜（2015）：情感錯誤歸因程序的自動化反應態度測量檢視。中華心理學刊，
57，261-280。 [Tsai, M. N., Wang, L. T., & Lin, H. Y. (2015). Affect misattribution procedure as an automatic evaluative reaction measurement. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 57, 261-280. DOI:
10.6129/ CJP.20150202]
蕭英玲（2005）：台灣的家務分工：經濟依賴及性別的影響。台灣社會學刊，34，115-145。[Hsiao, Y. L. (2005). The division of household labor in Taiwan: Economic dependence and gender.
Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 34, 115-145.]
Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures.
Behavior Research Methods, 46, 668-688. DOI: 10.3758/s 13428-013-0410-6.
Bass, B. C. (2014). Preparing for parenthood? Gender, aspirations, and the reproduction of labor market inequality. Gender and Society, 29(3), 326-385. DOI: 10.1177/0 891243214546936.
Becton, J. B., Walker, H. J., & Jones-Farmer, A. (2014). Generational differences in work-place behavior.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 175-189. DOI:10.1111/jasp.12208.
Cennamo, L. & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person organization values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 891-906. DOI: 10.1108/02683940 810904385
Charles, M. & Grusky, D. B. (2004).Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Civettini, N. (2016). Housework as non-normative gender display among lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 74, 206-219. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-015-0559-9.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208-1233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3 737.2000.01208.x.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood,W. (2011). Social role theory. A biosocial analysis of sex differences and similarities. In P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 485-476). London: Sage.
Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., Escorial, S., & Privado, J. (2014). Explicit and implicit assessment of gender roles. Psicothema, 26, 244-251. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema-2013.219.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries.
American Sociological Review, 69(6), 751-767.
Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002).
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Persona lity and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
Grunow, D., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H. (2012). What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage? International Sociology, 27, 289-307. DOI: 10.1177/0268580911423 056.
Hodges, A. J., & Park, B. (2013). Oppositional identities: Dissimilarities in how women and men experience parent versus professional roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 193-216. DOI: 10.1037/a0032681.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385. DOI: 10.1177/0 146167205275613.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. DOI: 10.10 80/10705519909540118.
Knudsen, K., & Waerness, K. (2008). National context and spouses housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97-113. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcm037
Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63, 767-780. DOI: 10.1007/s11199 -010-9797-z.
Lennon, M. C., Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506-531. DOI: 10.1086/230545.
McDonald, P. (2002). Sustaining fertility through public policy: The range of options. Population, 57, 417-446. DOI: 10.3917/popu.203.0423.
Nosek,B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., Axt, J. and Greenwald, A. G. (2014). Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recom-mended scoring procedures. Plos One, 9(12), e110938.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0110938.
Park, B., Smith, J. A., & Correll. (2010). The persistence of implicit behavioral associations for moms and dad. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 809-815. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.009.
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge?
The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16-31. DOI: 0.1037/0 022-3514.94.1.16.
Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable trait. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178. DOI: 10.1177/014 6167201279009.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes and engagement among lower secondary school students in thirty-eight countries. Retrieved from http:// www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload /Publications/Electronic_versi ons/ICCS2009_ International_Report.pdf
Treas, J. (2010). Why study housework? In J. Treas & S. Drobniˇc (Eds.), Men, women, and housework in cross-national perspective (pp. 3-19). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Treas, J., & Tai, T. (2016). Gender inequality in housework across 20 European Nations: Lessons from gender stratification theories. Sex Roles, 74, 495-511. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-015-0575-9.
Van Well, S., Kolk, A. M., & Oei, N. Y. L. (2007). Direct and indirect assessment of gender role identification. Sex Roles, 56, 617-628. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9203-7.
收 稿 日 期：2016 年 12 月 14 日 一稿修訂日期：2017 年 07 月 13 日 二稿修訂日期：2017 年 12 月 11 日 三稿修訂日期：2017 年 12 月 22 日 接受刊登日期：2017 年 12 月 25 日
Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 2018, 50(2), 189-217 National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Instrument Development and Validation of Implicit and Explicit Measures of Gender Stereotypes in the
Division of Housework