• 沒有找到結果。

民視(2012,4月15日)。建中生連署,籲暫緩十二年國教。Yahoo奇摩新聞網。取自 http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%AD%E7%94%9F %E9%80%A3%

E7%BD%B2-%E7%B1%B2%E6%9A%AB%E7%B7%A912%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8 B%E6%95%99-070138998888.111.34.179/

[Formosa TV. (2012, April 15). Students in Jianguo high school submit a petition for postponing K-12 policy. Yahoo News. Retrieved from http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%BB%BA%E4

%B8%AD%E7%94%9F%E9%80%A3%E7%BD%B2-%E7%B1%B2%E6%9A%AB%E7

%B7%A912%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99-070138998888.111.34.179/]

林曉雲(2012,3月25日)。「磚頭硬疊上去就會垮下來」 建中校長開砲12年國教應再 延6年。自由時報電子報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/ life/paper/570754

[Lin, H.-Y. (2012, March 25). Principal of Jianguo high school suggested K-12 policy should be postponed. Liberty Times Net. Retrieved from http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/ life/

paper/570754]

洪志成(1989)。學業自我概念與學業成就、重要他人的相關研究回顧。台東師院學

報,2,99-148。

[Hung, C.-C. (1989). The review of academic self-concept, academic achievement and significant others. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 2, 99-148.]

張苙雲(2003)。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫的規劃:問卷架構、測驗編製與抽樣設計。

臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。

[Chang, L.-Y. (2003). Taiwanese Education Panel Survey: Questionnaire design, test design and sampling design. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.]

張郁雯(2008)。對比效應對學業自我概念之影響—發展的觀點。教育心理學報,40

(1),23-38。

[Chang, Y.-W. (2008). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 40(1), 23-38.]

教育部(2012)。十二年國民基本教育資訊網。取自http://140.111.34.179/

[Ministry of Education. (2012). The website for K-12 policy. Retrieved from http://

140.111.34.179/]

陳映竹(2012,3月25日)。十二年國教,馬總統:明星高中不會江河日下。中廣新聞

網。取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5 %B9%B4%E5%

9C%8B%E6%95%99-%E9%A6%AC%E7%B8%BD%E7%B5%B1-%E6%98%8E%E6%

98%9F%E9%AB%98%E4%B8%AD%E4%B8%8D%E6%9C%83%E6%B1%9F%E6%B 2%B3%E6%97%A5%E4%B8%8B-063426093.html

[Chen, Y.-J. (2012, March 25). President Ma: “Top high schools will not decline due to K-12”.

News Ridio. Retrieved from http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5

%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99-%E9%A6%AC%E7%B8%BD%E7%B5%B1-%E6

%98%8E%E6%98%9F%E9%AB%98%E4%B8%AD%E4%B8%8D%E6%9C%83%E6%

B1%9F%E6%B2%B3%E6%97%A5%E4%B8%8B-063426093.html]

陳瑄喻(2013,3月30日)。基北特色招生建北提85%名額。聯合報。取自http://mag.udn.

com/mag/edu/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=448135

[Chen, H.-Y. (2013, March 30). Top two high schools suggest threshold of 85% of quota for special examination admissions in Taipei-keelung metropolitan region. United Daily News.

Retrieved from http://mag.udn.com/mag/edu/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=448135]

馮昭(2012,4月16日)。學區不同,房價每坪差20萬。Yahoo奇摩新聞網。取自http://

tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%AD%B8%E5%8D%80%E4%B8%8D%E5 %90%8C-%E6

%88%BF%E5%83%B9%E6%AF%8F%E5%9D%AA%E5%B7%AE20%E8%90%AC-044808113.html

[Feng, C. (2012, April 16). Sgnificantly different house prices between school districts. Yahoo News. Retrieved from http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%AD%B8%E5%8D%80%E4%B8%

8D%E5%90%8C-%E6%88%BF%E5%83%B9%E6%AF%8F%E5%9D%AA%E5%B7%

AE20%E8%90%AC-044808113.html]

黑白集:明星學校(1971,4月28日)。聯合報,2版。

[Editorial: Star schools. (1971, April 28). United Daily News, p. A2.]

顏文廷(2012,4月16日)。搶進名校學區,教育品質反被稀釋。聯合晚報。取自https://

house.udn.com/mag/house/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=261969

[Yen, W.-T. (2012, April 16). Education resources will be diluted when parents rush for top school district slots. United Evening News. Retrieved from https://house.udn.com/mag/

house/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=261969]

關秉寅(2016)。國中讀前段班有差嗎?能力分班對學習成影響的反事實分析。教育研

究集刊,62(1),1-33。

[Kuan, P.-Y. (2016). Does it make a difference in being assigned to high-ability groups in junior high? A counterfactual analysis of the effects of ability grouping on students’ academic achievement in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-33.]

Arcidiacono, P., & Nicholson, S. (2005). Peer effects in medical school. Journal of Public Economic, 89(2-3), 327-350.

Burke, M. A., & Sass, T. R. (2013). Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 51-82.

Carrell, S. E., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. E. (2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 439-464.

Ding, W., & Lehrer, S. F. (2007). Do peers affect student achievement in China’s secondary schools? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 300-312.

Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1739-1774.

Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527-544.

Hoxby, C. M., & Weingarth, G. (2006). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects (Working paper). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kang, C. (2007). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement quasi-randomization evidence from South Korea. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 458-495.

Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 326-370.

Liker, J. K., Augustyniak, S., & Duncan, G. J. (1985). Panel data and models of change: A comparison of first difference and conventional two-wave models. Social Indicator Research, 14(1), 80-101.

Lyle, D. S. (2009). The effect of peer group heterogeneity on the production of human capital at West Point. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 69-84.

Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 799-806.

Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280-295.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623-636.

Marsh, H. W. (1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 445-480.

Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-culture (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools.

American Psychologist, 58(5), 364-376.

Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213-231.

Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 337-349.

Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G.

(2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implication for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350.

McEwan, P. J. (2003). Peer effects on student achievement: Evidence from Chile. Economics of Education Review, 22(2), 131-141.

Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Differential school contextual effects for math and English: Integrating the big-fish-little-pond effect and the internal/

external frame of reference. Learning and Instruction, 23, 78-89.

Preckel, F., & Brüll, M. (2010). The benefit of being a big fish in abig pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 522-531.

Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681-704.

Sung, Y.-T., Huang, L.-Y., Tseng, F.-L., & Chang, K.-E. (2014). The aspects and ability groups in which little fish perform worse than big fish: Examining the big-fish-little-pond effect in the context of school tracking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 220-232.

Trautwein, U., Gerlach, E., & Lüdtke, O. (2008). Athletic classmates, physical self-concept, and free-time physical activity: A longitudinal study of frame of reference effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 988-1001.

Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9-23.

相關文件