• 沒有找到結果。

吳清山、林天祐(1994)。全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。初等教育學刊,3,

1-28。

吳清基、黃嘉莉、張明文(2011)。我國師資培育政策回顧與展望。載於國家教育研 究院(主編),我國百年教育回顧與展望(頁 1-20)。新北市:國家教育研究院。

李奉儒(2012)。導論。載於楊深坑、王秋絨、李奉儒(主編),各國師資培育認證 制度之比較(頁 1-15)。臺北市:高等教育。

洪志成(2005)。教師檢定測驗不是教師專業最後防線。現代教育論壇,12,462-477。

張家宜、李怡禛(2002)。全面品質管理應用在高等教育行政之實證研究。教育研究 資訊,10(1),29-54。

張新仁、方德隆、丘愛鈴、李芊慧(2007)。師資培育機構評鑑:美國師資培育認可 委員會的評鑑制度及其啟示。高雄師大學報,22,1-20。

張鈿富(2002)。師資培育政策與供需機制建立之探討。載於中華民國師範教育學會

(主編),師資培育的政策與檢討(頁 51-72)。臺北市:學富。

黃嘉莉(2008a)。教師素質管理制度之建構。載於楊深坑、王秋絨、李奉儒(主編),

中小學教師素質管理制度比較研究(頁 1-16)。臺北市:高等教育。

黃嘉莉(2008b)。NCATE 師資培育認證制度問題之探討。教育政策論壇,11(3),

113-142。

黃嘉莉(2009)。超額教師對師資培育之啟示。中等教育,60(3),32-46。

黃嘉莉(2012a)。美國師資培育認證制度之研究。載於楊深坑、王秋絨、李奉儒(主 編),各國師資培育認證制度之比較(頁 41-81)。臺北市:高等教育。

黃嘉莉(2012b)。各國師資培育認證制度之理論與比較架構。載於楊深坑、王秋絨、

李奉儒(主編),各國師資培育認證制度之比較(頁 17-40)。臺北市:高等教育。

黃嘉莉(2013)。標準本位師資培育理念與實踐。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學出版中 心。

楊淵智(2007)。應用全面品質管理原理在服務和品質流程上。品質月刊,43(4),

43-45。

葉連祺(2004)。中小學教師檢定方法相關課題之分析。載於國立花蓮師範學院國民 教育研究所(主編),教師檢定之理論與實務會議論文集(頁 29-43)。臺北市:

國立教育資料館。

劉坤億(2003)。英國柴契爾政府改革背景與理念的探索。國立臺北大學行政暨政策 學報,36,81-118。

歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市:心理。

潘慧玲(2004)。邁向下一代的教育評鑑:回顧與前瞻。「教育評鑑回顧與展望學術 研討會」發表之論文,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心,臺北市。

Ballou, D. (2002). Sizing up test scores. Education Next, Summer, 10-15.

Campbell, C., & Rozsnyai, C. (2002). Quality assurance and the development of course programmes. Retrieved from

http://www.cepes.ro/publications/pdf/Campbell&Rozsnyai.pdf.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice, and pitfalls. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 9(11), 1-56.

Coggshall, J. G., Bivona, L., & Reschly, D. J. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of teacher preparation programs for support and accountability. Washington, DC:

National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.

Council for Higher Education Accreditation (1999). The emerging context for quality assurance. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org/Research/emerging-context.asp Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple

measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120-138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796

Dean, J. W., Jr., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392-418.

Edelfelt, R. A., & Raths, J. D. (1999). A brief history of standards in teacher education.

Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Education.

European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (2006). Mapping external quality assurance in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparative survey by the CEE network. Retrieve from http://www.enqa.net/pubs.lasso

Feigenbaum, A. V. (1982). Quality and business growth today. Quality Progress, 15(11), 22-25.

Gidenose, H. D. (1993). Appointments with ourselves: A faculty argument for NCATE.

Phi Delta Kappan, 75(2), 174-179.

Goldhaber, D. (2007). Everyone’s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness? Journal of Human Resources, 42(4), 765-794.

Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Graham, P. A., Lyman, R. W., & Trow, M. (1995). Accountability of college and universities. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA:

Sage.

Hall, J. N., Ahn, J., & Greene, J. C. (2011). Values engagement in evaluation: Ideas, illustrations, and implications. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(2), 195-207.

doi:10.1177/1098214011422592

Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. doi:10.1080/0260293930180102

House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Huberman, M., & Cox, P. L. (1990). Evaluation utilization: Building links between action and reflection. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16(1), 157-179.

doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80077-X

Imig, D. G., & Imig, S. R. (2007). Quality in teacher education: Seeking a common definition. In T. Townsend & R. Bates (Eds.), Handbook of teacher education (pp.

95-112). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Kraft, N. P. (2001, April). Standards in teacher education: A critical analysis on NCATE, INTASC, and NBPTS. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from ERIC database.

(ED462378)

MacDonald, B. (1976). Evaluation and the control of education. In D. Tawney (Ed.),

Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implication (pp. 125-136). London, UK:

Macmillan.

Murray, F. B. (2001). From consensus standards to evidence of claims: Assessment and accreditation in the case of teacher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001(113), 49-66. doi:10.1002/he.4

Nicklin, J. (1992). Teacher-education programs debate the need for accrediting agency’s stamp of approval. Chronicle of Higher Education, 38(35), A19-A22.

Offe, C. (1990). Reflections on the institutional self-transformation of movement politics:

A tentative stage model. In R. J. Dalton & M. Koehler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in western democracies (pp.

233-250). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Oliver, D., & Drewry, G. (1996). Public service reforms: Issues of accountability and public law. New York, NY: Pinter.

Patton, M. Q. (2000). Utilization-focused evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus,

& T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 425-438). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

Prahalad, C. K., & Krishnan, M. S. (1999). The new meaning of quality in the information age. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 109-118, 184.

Pring, R. (1992). Standards and quality in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 40(1), 4-22. doi:10.1080/00071005.1992.9973907

Reeves, C. A., & Bednar, D. A. (1994). Defining quality: Alternatives and implications.

Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 419-445.

Roth, R. A. (1996). Standards for certification, licensure, and accreditation. In J. Sikula, T.

Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp.

242-278). New York, NY: Simon & Scbuster Macmmillan.

Sanders, J. R. (2002). Presidential address: On mainstreaming evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 253-259. doi:10.1177/109821400202300302

Sibolski, E. H. (2012). What's an accrediting agency supposed to do? Institutional quality and improvement vs. regulatory compliance: Do everything possible to let others know that we are open to discussion and that we do not believe that everything we do is perfect the way it is. Planning for Higher Education, 40(3), 22-28.

Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Schroeder, R. G. (1994). Distinguishing control form learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 537-564.

Spencer, B. A. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 446-471.

Stake, R. E. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Stake, R. E. (2004). Standard-based & responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F.

Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed.)(pp. 279-317). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instruction guide to theory and practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Tamir, E., & Wilson, S. M. (2005). Who should guard the gates? Evidentiary and professional warrants for claiming jurisdiction. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 332-342. doi:10.1177/0022487105279840

Teacher Education Accreditation Council (2010). Guide to accreditation. Washington, DC: Author.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2009, July).

Communique (8 July 2009) (ED.2009/CONF.402/2). 2009 World Conference on Higher Education: The New Dynamics of Higher Education and Research for Societal Change and Development. UNESCO, Paris, France.

Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Instiute.

Wilson, S. M., & Youngs, P. (2005). Research on accountability process in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on teacher education (pp. 591-643).

Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.

Wise, A. E. (2001). Creating a high-quality teaching force. Educational Leadership, 58(4), 18-21.

相關文件