全國法規資料庫（2006）：各縣市國民小學 組織規程學校規模分類標準。取自http://
www.phmhs.phc.edu.tw/pms/law/。[Laws
& Regulations Database of the Republic of China. (2006). Classification of elementary school scales based on the organization regulations. Retrieved December, 20, 2010, from http://www.phmhs.phc.edu.tw/pms/
law/, browsed on. ]
余 嬪、 吳 靜 吉、 程 蕙 瑤、 蔡 淑 敏、 楊 潔 欣
（2004）：玩興 ‧ 創造力與工作表現之 關係。發表於國立政治大學創造力計畫 跨領域交流研討會。臺北：國立政治大 學。[Yu, Ping, Wu, Jing-Ji, Cheng, Hui-Yao, Tsai, Shu-Min, & Yang, Chieh-Hsin (2004).
The relationship of playfulness, creative and job performance. International conference on innovation studies.]
吳璧如（2005）：教師效能感的縱貫性研究：
以幼教職前教師為例。教育與心理研 究，28（3），383-408。[Wu, Pi-Ju (2005).
A longitudinal study of early childhood education teachers´ sense of efficacy.
Journal of Education & Psychology, 28(3), 383-408.]
林偉文（2006）：學校創意守門人對創意教 學與創造力培育態度與教師創意教學 之 關 係。 教 育 學 刊，27，69-92。[Lin, Wei-Wen. (2006). The flow teachers: How teachers’ flow experiences relate to their creative teaching. Journal of National Taipei
Teachers College Education, 19(2), 111-128.]
林 碧 芳、 邱 皓 政（2008）： 創 意 教 學 自 我 效 能 感 量 表 之 編 制 與 相 關 研 究。
教 育 研 究 與 發 展 期 刊，4（ 1），141-169。[Lin, Pi-Fang, & Chiou, Haw-Jeng (2008). Construction and related study of the inventory of self-efficacy for creative teaching. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 4(1), 141-169.]
邱皓政（2002）：學校組織創新氣氛的內涵 與教師創造力的實踐：另一件國王的新 衣。應用心理研究，15，191-224。[Chiou, Haw-Jeng (2002). The construct of the campus organizational climate for creativity and the teachers´ creativity performance:
Another“new cloth of the king＂? Research in Applied Psychology, 15, 191-224.]
邱皓政（2011）：量化研究與統計分析。臺北：
五 南。[Chiou, Haw-Jeng (2011). Quantity research and statistic analysis. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book.
教育部（2006）：九年一貫課程綱要。中華 民國九十五年三月二十七日臺國（二）
字第0950030367C 號令修正。 [Grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines (2006).]
許玫琇、張富鈞、鄭秀貴（2008）：高中體 育教師創造人格特質、創意教學自我 效能、內在動機及教學行為之相關研 究。美和技術學院學報，27（ 2），113-124。[Hsu, Mei-Hsiu., Chang, Fu-Chang., &
Cheng, Hsiu-Kuei (2008). Creative teaching behavior of high school physical educator with their creative personality, self-efficiency and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Mei Ho Institute of Technology, 27(2), 113-124.]
陳玉樹、胡夢鯨（2008）：任務動機與組織
創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影 響： 階 層 線 性 模 式 分 析。 教 育 心 理 學 報，40（2），179-198。[Chen, Yu-Shu, &
Hu, Meng-Ching (2008). The impact of task motivation and organizational innovative climate on adult education teachers' creative teaching performance: An analysis of hierarchical linear modeling. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 40(2), 179-198.]
陳玉樹、莊閔喬（2010）：創意個人認定與 組織認同對創意教學表現之影響：多 元組織認定的調節效果。教育政策論 壇，13（3），155-184。[Chen, Yu-Shu,
& Juang, Min-Chiau (2010). The impact of creative personal identity and organizational identification on creative teaching performance: Moderating effects of multiple organizational identities. Educational Policy Forum, 13(3), 155-184.]
游 文 杉、 林 勁 宏、 陳 文 進（2013）： 國 中 體 育 教 師 知 覺 組 織 公 平 與 工 作 投 入 關 係 之 研 究。 屏 東 科 大 體 育 學 刊，
2，59-69。[Yu, Wen-Shan., Lin, Ching-Hung., & Chen, Wen-Chen. (2013). A study on the relationship between PE teachers’
perception of organizational justice and work involvement in junior high schools. Journal of NPUST Physical Education, 2, 59-69.]
黃惠君（2006）：國中教師人口變項、玩興、
教學動機、快樂感受與創意教學之關係
（未出版）。國立中山大學教育研究所 碩士論文。[Huang, Hui-Chun (2006). The relationships between demographic variables, playfulness, motivation of teaching, happiness and creative teaching among junior high school teachers. Unpublished master´s
thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University.]
黃惠君、葉玉珠（2008）：國中教師教學玩 興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教 學之關係。教育與心理研究，31（2），
85-118。[Huang, Hui-Chun, & Yeh, Yu-Chu (2008). The relationships between playfulness in teaching, motivation of teaching, perceived happiness in teaching and creative teaching among junior high school teachers. Journal of Education & Psychology, 31(2), 85-118.]
溫福星（2006）：階層線性模式：原理方法 與應用。臺北市：雙葉書廊。[Wen, Fur- Hsing. (2006). Hierarchical linear modeling:
Principles, methods and applications. Taipei:
Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.]
溫福星、邱皓政（2009）：組織研究中的多 層次調節式中介效果：以組織創新氣 氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究 為 例。 管 理 學 報，26（2），189-211。
[Wen, Fur- Hsing., & Chiou, Haw-Jeng.
(2007). Multilevel moderated mediation of organizational study: An empirical analysis of organizational innovation climate, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Management, 26(2), 189-211.]
蔡啟通、高泉豐（2004）：動機取向、組織創 新氣候與員工創新行為之關係：Amabile 動 機 綜 效 模 型 之 檢 驗。 管 理 學 報，21
（5），571-592。[Tsai, Chi-Tung., &
Kao, Chuan-Feng. (2004). The relationships among motivational orientations, climate for organization innovation, and employee innovative behavior: A test of Amabile´s motivational synergy model. Journal of Management, 21(5), 571-592.]
蕭佳純（2007）：教師內在動機以及知識分 享合作對創意教學行為關聯性之階層 線 性 分 析。 當 代 教 育 研 究，15（4），
57-92。[Hsiao, Chia-Chun (2007). A study for multi-level analysis of teachers´
intrinsic motivation, knowledge sharing and cooperation, and creative teaching behavior.
Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 15(4), 57-92.]
蕭佳純（2011）：學校創新氣氛、教師內在 動機與教師創意教學表現關聯之研究：
多層次調節式中介效果之探討。當代 教 育 研 究，19（4），85-125。[Hsiao, Chia-Chun (2011). The relationship between schools´ climate of creativity, teachers´
intrinsic motivation, and teachers´
creative teaching performance: A discussion of multilevel moderated mediation.
Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 19(4), 85-125.]
蕭佳純（2012）：國小學生內在動機、學科知 識與創造力表現關聯之研究：教師創造 力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊，
37（3），89-113。[Hsiao, Chia-Chun (2012).
The relationship among intrinsic motivation, subject knowledge, and creative performance of students: The moderating effect of teachers´ creativities in teaching behavior.
Bulletin of Special Education, 37(3), 89-113.]
doi: 10.6172/BSE201211.3703004
謝俊義（2010）：HLM 多層次線性分析：理 論、方法與實務。臺北市：鼎茂圖書。
[Hsieh, Jun-Yi. (2010). Hierarchical linear modeling: Theory, methods and application.
Taipei: Tingmao.]
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in
organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J.,
& Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. doi:
10.2307/256995
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B.,
& Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity:
Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 5-32.
Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers’ knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221-251. doi: 10.1002/sce.20239 Barnett, L. A. (2007). The nature of playfulness
in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 949-958. doi:10.1016/
j.paid.2007.02.018
Berg, D. H. (2001). The power of a playful spirit at work. Journal for Quality & Participation, 24(2), 57-62.
Dunn, B. S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness:
Characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Texas.
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J.
H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis.
Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Fix, G. A. (2003). The psychometric properties
of playfulness scales with adolescents.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Fairleigh Dickinson, NJ.
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Beginning elementary teachers´ beliefs about the use of anchoring questions in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 94(2), 365-387.
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1993). Refining the nomological net of the Adult Playfulness Scale: Personality, motivational, and attitudinal correlates for highly intelligent adults. Psychological Reports, 72(3), 1023-1026. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3.1023 Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (2001). Creative
work: The case of Charles Darwin. American Psychologist, 56(4), 346-349.
Henry, J. (2009). Creativity and perception in management. London: Sage.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models.
Journal of Management, 23, 723-744. doi:
10.1177/014920639702300602
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D.
(2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90. doi: 10.1080/10400410709336883 Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz,
A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184. doi: 10.1207/
S15326934CRJ1302_5
James, L.R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.
Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096-1112.
Khourey-Bowers, C., & Simonis, D. G. (2004).
Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development:
Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(3), 175-195. doi: 10.1023/
B:JSTE.0000047083.14197.b8
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000).
From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211-236. doi:
10.1177/109442810033001
McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders, 8(3), 130-140. doi: 10.1177/106342660000800301 Montes, F. J. L., Moreno, A. R., & Fernandez, L.
M. M. (2004). Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation.
International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 167-180. doi: 10.1108/01437720410535972 Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999).
Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., Mayer, D. M., Saltz, J. L., & Niles-Jolly, K. (2005).
Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1017-1032. doi: 10.5465/
AMJ.2005.19573107
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects.
American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158. doi:
10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Staempfli, M. B. (2005). Adolescent Playfulness, Leisure and Well-Bing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Ontario,
Canada.
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
收稿日期：2015.04.12 接收日期：2015.10.07