一、中文文獻
王君玉（2010）。結合部落格工具於華語文寫作教學環境之建置與歷程分析。國立臺灣師範大 學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
【Wang, C.-U. (2010). Using blog in writing Chinese as a foreign language and process analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
宋曜廷、邱佳民、劉欣宜、曾芬蘭、陳柏熹（2009）。以國中基本學力測驗成績探討班級規模 效應。教育科學研究期刊，54（2），59-83。
【Sung, Y.-T., Chiou, J.-M., Liu, H.-Y., Tseng, F.-L., & Chen, P.-H. (2009). Investigating the class size effect in junior high schools through students’ basic competence test scores. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(2), 59-83.】
宋曜廷、劉俊廷（2007）。教學卷宗在中小學教師專業評鑑的應用：評析 NBPTS 經驗。教育 研究集刊，53（1），55-86。
【Sung, Y.-T., & Liu, C.-T. (2007). Teaching portfolios as a tool for teacher appraisal: A critical evaluation of the experiences of America’s National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Bulletin of on Educational Research, 53(1), 55-86.】
吳心楷、宋曜廷、簡馨瑩（2010）。錄影分析在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），
1-37。
【Wu, H.-K., Sung, Y.-T., & Chien, H.-Y. (2010). Conducting video analysis in educational research. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 1-37.】
邱兆偉（1981）。實用主義的源流、哲學與教育。教育文粹，1（10），77-90。
【Chiou, J.-W. (1981). The origin, philosophy, and education of pragmatism. Selected Educational Articles, 1(10), 77-90.】
高宣揚（1994）。實用主義和語用論。臺北市：遠流。
【Gao, X.-Y. (1994). Pragmatism and pragmatics. Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou.】
葉至誠（1997）。社會學。臺北縣：揚智。
【Yeh, C.-C. (1997). Sociology. Taipei County, Taiwan: Yang-Chih.】
二、外文文獻
Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium of motivation (pp. 211-269). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bergman, M. M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD:
宋曜廷、潘佩妤 混合研究應用於教育 125
Rowman & Littlefield.
Black, A. C., Little, C. A., McCoach, D. B., Purcell, J. H., & Siegle, D. (2008). Advancement via individual determination: Method selection in conclusions about program effectiveness. Journal of Education Research, 102(2), 111-123.
Bråten, I., & Olaussen, B. S. (2000). Motivation in college: Understanding Norwegian college students’ performance on the LASSI motivation subscale and their beliefs about academic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 12(2), 177-187.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of style. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago, IL:
Rand McNally.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springer Verlag.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches set (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological method (2nd ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Duran, D., & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 179-199.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schacter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicated the destruction of the world. New York:
126 混合研究應用於教育 宋曜廷、潘佩妤
Harper & Row.
Goldman, R., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graue, E., Rauscher, E., & Sherfinski, M. (2009). The synergy of class size reduction and classroom quality. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 178-201.
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixing methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New directions for evaluation, 74 (pp.
5-18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
Guba, E. G. (1987). What have we learned about naturalistic evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8(1), 23-43.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzine
& Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluence. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hammersley, M. (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 22-36). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Hanson, W. E., Crewell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., & Crewell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research design in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224-235.
Hong, E., Sas, M., & Sas, J. C. (2006). Test-taking strategies of high and low mathematics achievers.
Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 144-155.
Hou, H.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2010). “What kinds of knowledge do teachers share on blogs”? A quantitative content analysis of teachers’ knowledge-sharing on blogs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 964-967.
Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard.
Educational Research, 17(8), 10-16.
Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M. T. (2005). Exploring differences in students’ copy-and
宋曜廷、潘佩妤 混合研究應用於教育 127
paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 103-116.
Iqbal, H. M., Nageen, T., & Pell, A. W. (2008). Attitudes to school science held by primary school children in Pakistan. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(4), 269-302.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green.
James, W. (1975). Pragmatism and the meaning of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality
& Quantity, 43(2), 265-275.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(1), 61-69.
Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forms:
A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23-40.
Maxcy, S. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori & C.
Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51-90).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The failure of educational research to impact educational practice: Six obstacles to educational reform. In G. D. Phye, D. H. Robinson, & J. Levin (Eds.), Empirical methods for evaluating educational interventions (pp. 67-84). New York: Elsevier Academic Press.
Mayring, P., Huber, G. L., Gürtler, L., & Kiegelmann, M. (Eds.). (2007). Mixed methodology in psychological research. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
McCandliss, B. D., Kalchman, M., & Bryant, P. (2003). Design experiments and laboratory approaches to learning: Steps toward collaborative exchange. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 14-16.
Menand, L. (Ed.). (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. New York: Vintage Books.
Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed models and the politics of human research: The transformative- emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in
128 混合研究應用於教育 宋曜廷、潘佩妤
social and behavioral research (pp. 135-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, S. I., & Gatta, J. L. (2006). The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity, 40(4), 595-610.
Morgan, D. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods:
Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362-376.
Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 12(1), 35-44.
Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A.
Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., Collins, K. M. T., Filer, J. D., Wiedmaier, C. D., & Moore, C. W.
(2007). Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation from using a mixed-methods analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 113-160.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Pell, A. W., Iqbal, H. M., & Sohail, S. (2010). Introducing science experiments to rote-learning classes in middle schools. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(3), 191-212.
Popper, K. (1970). The logic of scientific discovery (T. Einaudi, Trans.). London: Hutchinson.
(Original work published 1934)
Ridenour, C. S., & Newman, I. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-643.
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate:
Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity, 36(1), 43-53.
宋曜廷、潘佩妤 混合研究應用於教育 129
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robber’s cave experiment. Norman, OK: Institute of Intergroup Relations, University of Oklahoma.
Sieber, S. D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1335-1359.
Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue.
Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Lee, Y.-H., & Yu, W.-C. (2008). Effects of a mobile electronic guidebook on visitors’ attention and visiting behaviors. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 67-80.
Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., Liu, C.-K., & Chang, K.-E. (2010). Mobile guide system using problem- solving strategy for museum learning: A sequential learning behavioral pattern analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 106-115.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
Todd, Z., Nerlich, B., McKeown, S., & Clarke, D. D. (Eds.). (2004). Mixing methods in psychology:
The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. Hove, UK:
Psychology Group.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol.
17; pp. 237-307). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
130 混合研究應用於教育 宋曜廷、潘佩妤
Journal of Research in Education Sciences 2010, 55(4), 97-130
Applications of Mixed Methods Research in Educational Studies