• 沒有找到結果。

地方政府方面,應發揮教育專業網絡功能,避免不必要的阻礙以及形式化工 作,從輔導增能的角度思考學校與教師的需要,當然,這需要中央協助地方建構 支持系統,特別是在縣市之間資源不均的情況下。同時,地方也需要避免在地社 群間互相排斥的現象,否則資源對學校來說就會成為負擔。

(三)對後續研究的建議

本研究僅針對量化資源進行分析,對於人際資源形成的相關連結,在解釋上 有所限制,僅能根據結果推論鄰近縣市間可能會形成某種人際網絡,有助於擴散 的產生。相關理論中指出,政策方案本身的特徵可能會影響政策擴散,然本研究 並未比較不同的類似方案,因此也無法解釋學習共同體本身特質造成的影響。另 外,本研究在探討學習共同體擴散的鄰近效應時,僅以研習辦理作為學習共同體 政策分析的代表,因資料取得不易,無法完整分析,是為研究的限制。因此,後 續研究可從不同的政策方案實施進一步的比較研究,並可由質性資料的分析,進 行影響政策擴散微觀因素的研究。

DOI: 10.3966/102887082017036301003

參考文獻

江大樹、孫同文、趙永茂(2001)。府際關係。臺北市:元照。

[Chang, D.-S., Song, T.-W., & Chao, Y.-M. (2001). Intergovernmental relations. Taipei, Taiwan:

Angle.]

佐藤學(2012)。學習的革命:從教室出發的改革(黃郁倫、鍾啟泉,譯)。臺北市:

親子天下。(原著出版於2006)

[Sato, M. (2012). The revolution of learning- The education innovation starting from classrooms (Y.-L. Huang & Q.-Q. Zhong, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Common Wealth Parenting. (Original work published 2006)]

佐藤學( 2014)。學びの共同体の改革:課題と展望。取自http://japan.school-lc.com/wp-content/uploads/794dd2acf4341ddf80f9cd76f54a101d.pdf

[Sato, M. (2014). The reform of school as learning community: Issues and prospect. Retrived from http://japan.school-lc.com/wp-content/uploads/794dd2acf4341ddf80f9cd76f54a101d.

pdf]

呂生源(2004)。地方教育財政制度評析。學校行政,31,240-256。

[Lue, S.-Y. (2004). Opinions for local government finance system. School Administration Monthly, 31, 240-256.]

李仲彬(2010)。影響全球電子治理發展的因素:以政策擴散理論為基礎的分析。公共

行政學報,36,39-89。

[Lee, C.-P. (2010). Factors affecting gobal e-governance development: An application of policy diffusion theory. Journal of Public Administration, 36, 39-89.]

李仲彬(2013)。政府創新的類型與分佈:我國地方政府 1999-2010年間的觀察。公共行 政學報,44,73-112。

[Lee, C.-P. (2013). Types and distribution of local government innovation. Journal of Public Administration, 44, 73-112.]

周孟嫻、紀玉臨、謝雨生(2010)。臺灣自殺率具空間群聚嗎?模仿效應或結構效應。

人口學刊,41,1-65。

[Jhou, M.-S., Chi, Y.-L., & Hsieh, Y.-S. (2010). Spatial analysis of suicide in Taiwan: Spatial imitation or structural similarity. Journal of Population Studies, 41, 1-65.]

林水波(2004)。制度移植的策略性評估—以公投法為例。國家政策季刊,3(1),

49-80。

[Lin, S.-P. (2004). Strategic evaluation on institution transfer: A study on Referendum Act.

National Policy Quarterly, 3(1), 49-80.]

林政宏(2016)。從[地方政府一般教育經費試算項目及公式原則]評析教育基本人事費

不足對偏鄉教育經營的困境—以臺東縣為例。臺灣教育評論月刊, 5(3),98-104。

[Lin, C.-H. (2016). Analyzing the shortage of education personal budget in rural school management thought “the principle of local government general education budget pre-counting items and formula”: The case of Taitung county. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 5(3), 98-104.]

姜宏尚(2013)。學校發展學習共同體歷程之個案研究—以臺南市一所國小為例(未

出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。

[Jiang, H.-S. (2013). A case study of developing learning community in the elementary school in Tainan city (Unpublished master’s thesis). National University of Tainan, Tainan, Taiwan.]

財政部國庫署(2016)。中央普通統籌分配稅款分配情形表。取自http://data.gov.tw/

node/6746

[National Treasury Administration, Ministry of Finance. (2016). Table of the distribution of the centrally allocated tax revenue. Retrieved from http://data.gov.tw/node/6746]

曾巨威(2004)。地方財政能力與教育經費負擔之分攤機制。人文及社會科學集刊,16

(2),197-238。

[Tseng, C.-W. (2004). An educational expenditure sharing mechanism connecting the fiscal capacities in local governments. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 16(2), 197-238.]

翁興利(2005)。公共政策分析。臺北市:五南。

[Wong, S. -L. (2005). Public policy analysis. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.]

孫培真、周志宏(2011)。教師嘗試使用先進資訊科技創新教學之研究。中山管理評

論,19(2),423-465。

[Sun, P.-C., & Chou, C.-H. (2011). A research on teachers trying to innovate teaching with advance information technology. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 19(2), 423-465.]

張素貞、李俊湖(2014)。面對十二年國民基本教育:精進教學有效學習的教師專業成

長方案規劃之研究。師資培育與專業發展期刊,7(1),1-22。

[Chang, S.-C., & Lee, J.-F. (2014). Facing the twelve-year compulsory education: Enhancement teaching and effective learning of teachers’ professional development program planning study. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 7(1), 1-22.]

張素貞、張明文、林和春(2012)。師資培育的「售後服務?」地方教育輔導功能與運

作之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,29(2),93-131。

[Chang, S.-C, Chang, M.-W., & Lin, H.-C. (2012). After-sale services of teacher education:

Researching the function and operation of professional services for local schools. National HsinChu University of Education bulletin, 29(2), 93-131.]

張鈿富(2011)。五都新局面的教育政策展望。師友月刊,531,39-43。

[Chang, T.-F. (2011). The prospection of education policy after five metro transformations. The Eductor Monthly, 531, 39-43.]

教育部統計處(2014)。小規模國中小縣市別分布。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/

important/OVERVIEW_M04.pdf

[Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2014). Distribution of small type elementary and junior high schools by jurisdictions. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/

important/OVERVIEW_M04.pdf]

許添明(2003)。教育財政制度新論。臺北市:高等教育。

[Sheu, T.-M. (2003). New theory of educational finance system. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.]

許添明、高慧容(2012)。我國教育財政統計資料問題與建議。市北教育學刊,41,

1-28。

[Sheu, T.-M., & Gao, H.-R. (2012). Analyzing the problems of education finance data in Taiwan.

University of Taipei Education Bulletin, 41, 1-28.]

許添明、張熒書(2014)。十二年國民基本教育財務規劃的虛與實。教育科學研究期

刊,59(1),69-100。

[Sheu, T.-M., & Chang, Y.-S. (2014). Rhetoric and reality of 12-year basic education financing in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(1), 69-100.]

陳序廷、黃東益(2011)。為什麼創新先驅成為後進者?臺北市政府的行車倒數計時顯

示器政策學習過程。公共行政學報,40,77-112。

[Chen, H.-T., & Huang, T.-Y. (2011). Why did the pioneer turn into a follower? The policy learning process of Taipei city’s adoption of traffic signal countdown displays. Journal of Public Administration, 40, 77-112.]

陳宗文(2012)。社會 創新如何可能?一種塔德式的理解。政治與社會哲學評論,

41,153-203。

[Chen, T.-W. (2012). A tardean perspective on social/innovations. A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs, 41, 153-203.]

陳協勝、張儀民(

2010)。地理鄰近性對創新活動影響模型之研究。地理學報,58,89-114。

[Chen, H.-S., & Chang, I.-M. (2010). A study on the model of influences on innovation action by geographical proximity an example of fastener industry in Taiwan. Journal of Geographical Science, 58, 89-114.]

陳麗珠(1995)。國民教育經費不夠嗎?師友月刊,338,40-41。

[Chen, L.-J. (1995). Is there existing the problem of shortage in compulsory education budget?

The Educator Monthly, 338, 40-41.]

陳麗珠(2009)。我國教育財政改革之回顧與展望:教育經費編列與管理法實施之檢

視。教育學刊,33,1-34。

[Chen, L.-J. (2009). Taiwan’s education finance reform in retrospect and prospect: The implementation of the compilation and administration of education expenditure act.

Educational Review, 33, 1-34.]

陳麗珠、陳明印(2013)。我國教育財政政策之變革與展望。台灣教育,681,2-12。

[Chen, L.-J., & Chen, M.-I. (2013). The reforms and prospect of Taiwan’s education finance policy. Taiwan Education Review, 681, 2-12.]

陳麗華、陳劍涵、陳茜茹(2014)。你的教室ㄇ了沒?臺灣導入學習共同體學校的模式

與策略省思。載於林文生、張文斌(主編),新北市教育:學習共同體特刊2(頁

18-45)。新北市:新北市政府教育局。

[Chen, L.-H., Chen, J.-H., & Chen, C.-R. (2014). Are you “C” already in the classroom?

Rethinking the model and strategies of introducing SLC in Taiwan. In W.-S. Lin & W.-P.

Chang (Eds.), New Taipei city education: SLC special issue, 2 (pp. 18-45). New Taipei, Taiwan: Education Department, New Taipei City Government.]

郭迺鋒、梁益誠、賴和成(2009)。美國各州創新活力之空間分析:Super GIS與Matlab 軟體應用。地理資訊系統季刊,3(2),15-19。

[Kuo, N.-F., Liang, I.-C., & Lai, H.-C. (2009). The spatial Analysis of American states innovation ability: The application of super GIS and Matlab software. Geographic Information System, 3(2), 15-19.]

黃政傑(2013)。學習共同體風起雲湧。師友月刊,552,0-4。

[Huang, C.-J. (2013). The school as learning community is arising. The Educator Monthly, 552, 0-4.]

黃敏雄(2015)。學生數學表現的城鄉差異。教育研究集刊,61(4),33-61。

[Huang, M.-H. (2015). Rural-nonrural differences in student mathematics performance.

Education Research Bulletin, 61(4), 33-61.]

監察院(2013)。糾正案字號102教正0022。臺北市:作者。

[Control Yuan. (2013). Corrective Measure Report No. 102Edu.0022. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]

廖興中、呂佩安(2013)。臺灣縣市政府貪腐現象之空間自相關分析。臺灣民主季刊,

10(2),39-72。

[Liao, H.-C., & Lu, P.-A. (2013). A spatial autocorrelation analysis for the corruption of counties in Taiwan. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 10(2), 39-72.]

潘慧玲、黃淑馨、李麗君、余霖、劉秀嫚、薛雅慈(2015)。學習領導下的學習共同體

進階手冊2.0版。取自https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook [Pan, H.-L., Huang, S.-S., Lee, L.-J., Yu, L., Liu, S.-M., & Hsueh, Y.-T. (2014). Handbook of

learning leadership and learning community ver. 2.0. Retrieved from https://sites.google.

com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook.]

簡宗德(2016)。地方教育發展研究—論財政收支劃分法。臺灣教育評論月刊,5

(6),134-138。

[Jian, C.-D. (2016). The research of local education development-discussion about the act governing the allocation of government revenues and expenditures. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 5(6), 134-138.]

顏銓志、鐘敏華(2007)。臺北縣國小體育教師終身學習素養與創新接受度之研究。臺

灣運動教育學報,2(2),41-55。

[Yen, C.-C., & Chung, M.-H. (2007). The study of the lifelong learning literacy and the innovativeness of elementary school physical education teachers in Taipei county. Taiwan Sport Education Bulletin, 2(2), 41-55.]

Allison, P. D. (2014). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Event history and survival analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Anselin, L., Syabri, I., & Kho, Y. (2006). GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis.

Geographical Analysis, 38(1), 5-22.

Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415.

Cohen-Vogel, L., & Ingle, W. K. (2007). When neighbours matter most: Innovation, diffusion and state policy adoption in tertiary education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(3), 241-262.

Eseonu, C. I., & Wyrick, D. A. (2014). A heat transfer model for policy diffusion. Engineering Management Journal, 26(2), 39-48.

Gilardi, F. (2012). Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse,

& B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (2nd ed., pp. 453-477). London, UK: Sage.

Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174-1185.

Haelermans, C. (2010). Innovative power of Dutch secondary education. Innovation:

Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 154-165.

Horowitz, M. C. (2010). The diffusion of military power: Causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jakobi, A. P. (2009). International organizations and lifelong learning. Basingstoke, UK:

Palgrave Macmillan.

Karakhanyan, S., van Veen, K., & Bergen, T. (2011). Educational policy diffusion and transfer:

The case of Armenia. Higher Education Policy, 24(1), 53-83.

Karmeshu, Raman, R., & Nedungadi, P. (2012). Modelling diffusion of a personalized learning framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 585-600.

Koski, C. (2010). Greening America’s skylines: The diffusion of low-salience policies. Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 93-117.

LaVenia, M., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Lang, L. B. (2015). The common core state standards initiative: An event history analysis of state adoption. American Journal of Education, 121(2), 145-182.

McLendon, M. K., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Wachen, J. (2014). Understanding education policymaking and policy change in the American states: Learning from contemporary policy theory. In B. Cooper, J. Cibulka, & L. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (2nd ed., pp. 86-117). New York, NY: Routledge.

Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148.

Raman, R., & Nedungadi, P. (2012). Modelling diffusion of a personalized learning framework.

Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 585-600.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788-796.

Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (Eds.). (2008). The global diffusion of markets and

democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Starke, P. (2013). Qualitative methods for the study of policy diffusion: Challenges and available solutions. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 561-582.

Sugiyama, N. B. (2008). Theories of policy diffusion: Social sector reform in Brazil.

Comparative Political Studies, 41(2), 193-216.

Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899.

Weyland, K. (2009). Bounded rationality and policy diffusion: Social sector reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Yamaguchi, K. (1991). Event history analysis (Vol. 28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2008). What drives charter school diffusion at the local level: Educational needs or political and institutional forces? Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 571-591.

相關文件