一、中文文獻
宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-130。
【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 55(4), 97-130.】
高熏芳、江玟均（2007）。教育科技領域發展中的研究法－設計本位研究（Design-Based Research, DBR）之評析。教學科技與媒體，80，4-15。
【Kao, H.-F., & Jiang, W.-J. (2007). In search of an emergent research approach for educational technology: A critique of design-based research. Instructional Technology & Media, 80, 4-15.】
翁穎哲、譚克平（2008）。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育月刊，307，
15-30。
【Weng, Y.-C., & Tam, H.-P. (2008). Introduction to design research and its examples of application in educational research. Science Education Monthly, 307, 15-30.】
二、外文文獻
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-24.
Barab, S. A., Arici, A., & Jackson, C. (2005). Eat your vegetables and do your homework: A design-based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educational Technology, 65(1), 15-21.
Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719-756.
Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. D. (2004). Design-based research: Putting our stake in the ground.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
Barab, S. A., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E.-J., …Herring, S. C.
(2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5), 750-782.
Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253.
Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based recearch in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73-85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22 解析設計研究法 許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp.
455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114.
Dede, C. (2005). Why design-based research is both important and difficult. Educational Technology, 45(1), 5-8.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A. (1999, April). Computational science inquiry cycle (CSIC): Students
“doing” new science enabled by virtual reality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203-212.
許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強 解析設計研究法 23
Hoadley, C. M. (2005). Design-based research methods and theory building: A case study of research with SpeakEasy. Educational Technology, 45(1), 42-46.
Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O’Donnell, A. M. (2004). A commentary on design research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 255-260.
Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context:
Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201.
Tiberghien, A., Vince, J., & Gaidioz, P. (2009). Design-based research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275-2314.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
Wang, S.-K., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 169-192.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.
24 解析設計研究法 許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強
附錄
本研究選取的應用設計研究法於科學教育實徵研究之 SSCI 期刊論文：
1. Alexander, P. A., Fives, H., Buehl, M. M., & Mulhern, J. (2002). Teaching as persuasion.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 795-813.
2. Anderson, K. T., Zuiker, S. J., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Hickey, D. T. (2007). Classroom discourse as a tool to enhance formative assessment and practise in science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1721-1744.
3. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project:
Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719-756.
4. Barab, S. A., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E.-J., …Herring, S. C.
(2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5), 750-782.
5. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50-73.
6. Birchfield, D., & Megowan-Romanowicz, C. (2009). Earth science learning in SMALLab: A design experiment for mixed reality. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 403-421.
7. Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613-637.
8. Cronje, J. C., & Fouche, J. (2008). Alternatives in evaluating multimedia in secondary school science teaching. Computers & Education, 51(2), 559-583.
9. Degennaro, D. (2008). Sociotechnical cultural activity: Expanding an understanding of emergent technology practices. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 329-351.
10. Domin, D. S. (2008). Using an advance organizer to facilitate change in students’
conceptualization of the role of creativity in science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 291-300.
11. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
（續）
許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強 解析設計研究法 25