• 沒有找到結果。

江志正(民88)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校效能發展策略與學校效能關係之研 究。國立高雄師範大學博士論文,未出版,高雄市。

行政院主計處(民89)。台灣地區婦女婚育與就業調查。

林佳慧(民88)。組織內部創新氣氛與知識管理機制關係之探討。國立中央大學碩士論文,

未出版,中壢市。

邱皓政(民88)。組織環境與創意行為:組織創新量表的發展與創新指標的建立(從科技 產業到政府機構)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。(計畫編號:

NSC88-2519-S-128-001-C),未出版。

邱皓政(民91)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐:另一件國王的新衣?應 用心理學學報,15,191-2240。

侯世昌(民91)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究。國立臺灣師 範大學博士論文,未出版,臺北市。

胡夢鯨(民84)。臺灣地區城鄉國民小學教育資源分配之比較。國立中正大學學報社會科 學分冊,6(1),1-35。

范熾文(民90)。國小校長領導行為,教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立台灣師 範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。

孫本初,湯皓宇(民89/7)。組織管理的新利器-知識管理。立法院院聞,327,40-60。

教育部(民 90)。創造力白皮書。民 90 年 4 月 20 日,取自:http://www.edu.tw/

consultant/bbs/y0107.htm

郭添財(民80)。台灣省南部地區國民小學最適經營規模之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育 研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。

陳賢舜(民89)。南投縣小型國民小學合併之研究。國立暨南國際大學碩士論文,未出版,

南投。

游玉梅(民 88)。知識管理-二十一世紀人力資源發展的新策略(上)。公務人員月刊,

40,28-30。

湯明哲(民89)。知識管理-哈佛商業評論,序三。臺北:天下文化。

黃秀君(民90)。知識經濟對學校教育之影響與因應策略。現代教育論壇「知識經濟與教 育」專輯,69-79。

廖勝能(民90)。學校組織創新氣氛與知識管理關係之研究。國立臺南師範學院碩士論文,

未出版,臺南市。

蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(民90)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。

管理學報,18(4),527-566。

蔡進雄(民90)。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北:師大書苑。

戴久永(民89/July)。突破慣性思考,邁向知識經濟。電子檢測與品管,43,78-80。

謝金青(民86)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。國立政治大學博士論文,

未出版,臺北市。

簡文娟(民87)。「組織創新氣候」評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象。國立 中央大學碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。

蘇水柳(民82)。臺北市立國民小學學校事務行政管理與學校組織效能相關之研究。國立 政治大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。

饒見維(民88)。九年一貫課程與教學革新,載於中華民國教材研究發展學會主編,邁向 課程改革的新紀元-九年-貫課程與教學革新,347-367。

Amabile, T. M. Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967.

Amabile, T. M., Conti , R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz , S. S. (1989). The creative environment scales: work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-253.

Ancess, J. (1995). An inquiry high school learner-centered accountability at the urban academy.

(REIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 648)

Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003/Feb). Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45-68.

Bernacki, E.(2002). Create a freewheelin’ creative climate. New Zealand Management, Nov98, 45(10), 36.

Cheong, C. Y. (2000). Cultural Factors in Educational Effectiveness: a framework for comparative research. School Leadership and Management, 20(2), 207-225.

Clarke, J. S. (1997). Personal and organizational structure correlates of receptivity and resistance to change and effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA.

Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). A lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 303-317.

Davis, G. A., & Thomas, M. A. (1989). Effective schools and effective teacher, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Dilthey, W. (1990): Einfuhrung in die Geisteswissenschaften. In ders: Gesammelte Schriften Band 1. Stuttgart: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.

Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.

Francis, L. J. (1992). Primary school size and pupil attitudes: Small is happy? Educational Management and Administration, 20(2), 100-104.

Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal,39, 37-63.

Gadamer, H. G. (1994). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans) (2nd ed.).

New York: Continuum.

Glick, W. H. (1988). Response: organizations are not central tendencies. Shadowboxing in the dark, round 2. Academy of Management Review, 13, 133-137.

Grove, A. S. (1996). Only the paranoid survive.

Habermas, J. (1987). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1. Frankfurt/ M.:

Suhrkamp.

Haller, E. J. (1992). High school size and student indiscipline: Another aspect of the school consolidation issue? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(2), 145-156.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.

Hanna, J. W. (1998). School Climate: Changing Fear to Fear. Contemporary Education, 69(2), 83-85.

Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.

Insel, P. M., & Moos, R. H. (1975). Work Environment Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Isaksen, S. G., & Kaufmann, G. (1990). Adaptors and climate for creativity. Studia Psychologica, 32, 129-141.

Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K.J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the Best and Worst Climates for Creativity: Preliminary Validation Evidence for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.

James, L. R., Joyce, W. F., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1988). Comment: organizations do not cognize.

Academy of Management Journal, 13, 129-132.

Johannessen, J. A., & Dolva, J. O. (1994). Competence and innovation, palo alto, CA:

Consulting Psychologists press.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research (Interaction Book Company, Edit, MN).

Kangis, P., & Williams, D. G. S. (2000). Organizational climate and corporate performance: an empirical investigation. Management Decision, 38, 531-540.

Kanter, R. M. (1984). The change masters-innovation for productivity in the American Corporation, Simon & Schuster. New York.

Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.

Kirton, M. J., Treffinger, D. ,Ekvall, G., & Kaufmann, G. (1998). The Relationship Between

Cognitive Style and Individual Psychological Climate: Reflections on a Previous Study.

Creative Problem Solving Group-Buffalo.

Lauer, K. J. (1994). The assessment of creative climate: An investigation of Ekvall’s Creative Climate Questionnaire. Unpublished master’s thesis, State University College, Buffalo, New York.

Luyten, H. (1998). School effectiveness and student achievement, consistent across subjects?

Evidence from Dutch elementary and secondary education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, 281-308.Manis, J. G. & Meltzer, B. N. (1972). Symbolic Interaction, Boston:

Allyn and Bacon, 9.

Mang, P. Y. (2000/August). Strategic innovation: constantinos markides on strategy and management. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 43-45.

Manis, J. G., & Meltzer, B. N. (1972). Symbolic Interaction, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 9.

McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000/ Fall). Antisocial Behavior, Academic Failure, and School Climate: A Critical Review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(3), 130-140.

Meador, S. (Ed.). (1997/Winter). Survey reveals parents’ attitudes on school practices. School Safety, 30.

Pauly, E. (1991). The Classroom Crucible. New York: Basic Books.

Payne, R. L., & Pugh, D. D. (1976). Organizational structure and climate. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1125-1172. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Peterson, R. E. (2002, December/January). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 7-10.

Phillips, R. A. (1997). A Stakeholder Theory and A principle of Fairness, Business Ethics Journal, 7(1), 51-66.

Powell, W. W. (1996). Trust-Based Forms of Governance, In T. R. Tyler, and R. M.

Kramer(eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers pf Theory and Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 51-67.

Reynolds, D. (1992 ). School effectiveness and school improvement: an updated review of the British literature. In Reynolds, D., & P. Cuttance(Eds.), School effectiveness: Research, policy and practice. London: Cassell.

Ruppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (2000). The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 313-328.

Sharman, D., & Johnson, A. (1997). Innovation in all things! Developing creativity in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(3), 85-87.

Thomas, S. (2001). Dimensions of secondary school effectiveness: Comparative analysis across regions. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(3), 285-322.

Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. Bantam Books.

Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. Callfornla Management Review, 28(3),74-92.

Walberg, H. J. (1989). District size and student learning. Educational and urban Society, 21(2), 145-163.

Welsh, J. F., Petrosko, J. M., & Metcalf, J. (2003). Institutional effectiveness activities: faculty and administrator support at two-year institutions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 75-94.

Wiles, J. W. (1995). Middle level education in rural America.(ERIC Document Reproduction Services No .ED 385426)

Wikeley, F., Stoll, L., & Lodag, C. (2002). Effective School Improvement: English Case Studies.

Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(4), 363-385.

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.

The Study of Organizational-Innovation

相關文件