• 沒有找到結果。

賴亦恩、林照真( 2013)。你怎能不愛 上辯論:亦恩的辯論天堂。新北市

: INK印刻文學生活雜誌出版有限公 司。

普通高級中學英語科課程綱要補充說明

(2009) 02011年2 月 9 日,擷取自

http://www.edu.tw/fi les/site_ content/

B0035/03

Allen,M., & Berkowitz, S. (1999). A meta-) analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education, 48(1), 18-30.

Allen, M., Berkowitz, S., & Louden, A. (1995). A study comparing the impact of communication classes and competitive forensic experience on critical thinking improvement. The

Forensic,

81,

1-7.

Barfield, K. D. (1989). A study of the relationship between active participation in interscholastic debating and the development of critical thinking skills with implications for school administrators and instructional leaders.

Dissertation Abstracts International, 50-09A: 2714.

Bellon, J. (2000). A research-based justification for debate across the curriculum. Argumentation &

Advocacy,36 (3),161-175.

Beltran, S.,& Lowrie, S. (2002). Accenting debate: Increasing debate participation by English as a second language and limited English proficiency students.

Rostrum, 76 (5)

Bloom,B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Brembeck, W. L. (1949). The effects of a course in argumentation on critical thinking ability 句eech Monograp的,

16,177-189.

Brinton, D. (2000, March). Investigating the "C" in content-based instruction.

Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association ofApplied

December,2014 Secondary Education 73

Linguistics. 均ncouver, CA.

Byron, S., Goldstein, L., Murphy, D.,

&

Roberts, E. (1993). Interdisciplinary dimensions of debate. Hongkong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching. 16,31-52.

Carleton,W. G. (1949). Let us keep debating in our school 間的I Speeches of the Day,15 (22),703.

Ca汀, J. (2002). Debate: Academic virtues debate provides. The Rostrum, 76 (5).

Celce

basics: Issues and research in TESOL Rowley,MA: Newbury House.

Chang,S. (2008). An analysis of the Cicero English debate tournament 2004-2006 and its implications for coaching high school students for competitive English policy debate. English Teaching &

Learning,32(1), 1-44

Chang,S. (2009). A content analysis study of the debates from the 2007 Taipei High School Cicero English Debate Tournament. Journal of Applied English,2, 1-30.

Chi, F. (1996). Combination of speaking

αndwriting in English teaching: From discussion to debate (NSC No. 852418-BI-94003). Taipei: National Science

Council.

Church, R. (1975). The educational value of oral communication courses and intercollegiate forensics: An opinion survey of college prelegal advisors and law school deans. The Journal of the American Forensic Association,12, 49-53.

Colbert,K. (1987). The effects of CEDA and NDT debate training on critical thinking ability. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 23,

194-201.

Colbert, K., & Biggers, T. (1985). Why should we support debate? Journal of the American Forensic Association,21, 237-240

Cronin,M. (1990,April). Debating to learn across the curriculum: Implementing and assessment. Paper presented at the Southern States Communication Association Convention. Birmingham, AL. (ERIC No.: ED327092)

Dam & Volman (2004). Critical thinking as a

citize叩m 叫叫 ns帥恤 s咄也h凶i中叭 p

competence:

teachirε

strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14,359-379.

Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA:

Constraints, compensation, and

74

中等教育第65卷第 4期

輪不應在薑灣高中英語教育中缺席:論未來高中英語辯論教學之宗旨目標、面向內涵、推動管道及預期效益 Incorporating Debate intoT:創 wan'sHigh School Engljsh Education: Issues Regarding its Purposes,Content,Operation and ExpectedBene白的

enhancement. In C.J. Doughty& M.H. Durkin,K. (2008). The Middle Way: East Long (Eds.), The handbook of second Asian students' perceptions of critical language acquisition (pp. 256-310). argumentation in U.K. universities.

Malden,MA: Blackwell Publishing. Journal of Studies in International Doughty, c., & Long, M. (Eds). (2003). Education,12(1), 38-55.

The handbook of second language Fine, G. A. (2001). Gifted tongues: High acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell school debate and adolescent culture.

Publishing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University

Duff,P. (1997). Immersion in Hungary: an Press.

EFL experiment. In R.K. Johnson & Fine, M. F. (1999). My friends say, M. Swain (Eds),Immersion education: "Debate girl! Why are you alway International perspectives (pp.19- debating with me?" : A study of the 34). New York: Cambridge University New York Urban Debate League.

Press. Unpublished research report prepared

Duff, P. (2002). The discursive co- for the Open Society Institute (400 construction of knowledge, identity, West 59thS仕eet,New York,NY 10019).

and difference: An ethnography of Gee, J. P. (1994). From ‘the savage communication in the high school mind' to ‘way with words." In B.

mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, Steirer & J. Maybin (Ed.) Language 289-322. and literacy in social practice(pp. 168-Duff,P. (2003). New directions in second 192). Milton Keynes: Open University

language socialization research.Korean Press.

Journal of English Language and Harklau,L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream Linguistics,3,309-339. classes: Contrasting L2 learning Durkin,K. (2008). The adaptation of East environments. TESOL Quarter妙\ 28,

Asian masters students to western 241-272.

norms of critical thinking and Harklau, L. (2003). Representational argumentation in the UK. Intercultural p rae tic e san d m uIt i - mod aI Education,19(1), 15-27. communication in US high schools:

December,2014 Secondary Education

75

Implications for adolescent immigrants.

In R. Bayley & S. Schecter (Eds.), Language socialization in bilingual and multilingual societies (pp. 83-97).

Clevedon,UK. Multilingual Matters.

Harvey, K., & Woods, S. (2008). “Let' s talk" : A methodology for participatory community discourse. In A. C. Snider (Ed.), Frontiers of the 21'1

centuη­

Argumentation, debate and the struggle for a civil society (pp. 115-137). New York: International Debate Education Association.

Huang L. (2002). Debate as a pathway to academic discussion. TESOL Journal, 11 (4),30-31.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated

learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, W. (2005). The 妙的s of debate on oral communication skills among university students in Taiwan: A case study. Unpublished master' s thesis, National Tsing Hua University,Taiwan, ROC.

Lustigov 丸L. (2011). Speak your mind:

Simplified debates as a learning tool at the university level. Journal

on ξfficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science,4(1), 18-30.

Iverson, J.O., & Hoerer, J. (2001). Debate as a whole language tool for migrant students.Rostrum,75(5).

Jackson, M. (1973). Debate: A neglected teaching tool. Peabody Journal of Education,50(2),150-155.

Jerome, L., & Algar悶, B. (2005). Debating debating: A reflection on the place of debate within secondary schools.

Curriculum Journal,16(4),493-508.

Johnston,G. (1994). The logic & language of English debate: A practical guide for Chinese students of EFL. Taipei:

Bookman.

Lee,W. (2005). The 電flectsofdebate on oral communication skills among university students in Taiwan: A case study.

Unpublished master' s thesis,National Tsing Hua University,ROC.

Maloy,K. (1993). Toward a new science of instruction. Pittsburgh,PA: National Research Center on Student Learning.

Malton, R. J., & Keele, L. M.

(1州). f'

survey of participants in the National Debate Tournament, 1947-1980.

Journal of the American Forensic Association,20,194-205.

76

中等教育第65卷第 4期

論不應在臺灣高中英語教育中缺席:論未來高中英語辯論教學之宗旨目標、面向內涵、推動管道及預期效益

Lncorporating Debate into Taiwan's High School English Education: Issues Regardingits 叭』巾的俗,Content,Operation and Expected Benefits

Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language debates. Journal of the American development: Language acquisition Forensic Association,13,194-196.

and language socialization in a Samoan Sheckels, Jr.,T. F. (1983). Three strategies village. Cambridge: Cambridge for deliberative discourse: A lesson University Press. from competitive debating. College Pollock,A. (1982). The relationship of a Composition and Communication, 31

background in scholastic forensics (1),31-42.

to effective communication in the Snider,A.,& Schnurer, M. (2006). Many legislative assembly. Speaker and sides: Debate across the curriculum.

Gaνell夕, 17. New York: International Debate Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Education Association.

thinking: Cognitive development in Stewart, T. (2003). Debate for ESOL social context. New York: Oxford students. TESOL Journal,12(1),弘15.

UniversityPress. Street, B. V. (1994). Cross cultural Qualifications and Curriculum Authority perspectives on literacy.InB. Steirer&

(1998). Education for citizenship and 1. Maybin (Ed.)Language and literacy the teaching of democracy in schools. in socialpractice 印p. 1 訝-150).Milton Final report of the Advisory Group on Keynes: Open University Press.

Citizensh伊 (London, QCA). Tumpos旬,N. R. (2004). The debate debate.

Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Clearing House,78 (2),52-55

(1999). The national curriculum Vygotsky,L. (1978). Mind in society: The

(London,QCA). 的velopment of higher psychological

Schroeder,A., & Schroeder, P. (1995). processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education objectives and forensics: An University Press

administration perception. The Forensic Williams,D. E., McGee, B. R.,& Worth, ofPiKappaDelta, 13-21. D. S. (2001). University student

Semi此, W. D.,& Shields,D. (1977). The perceptions of the efficacy of effect of debate training on students debate participation: An empirical participation in the bicentennial youth investigation. Argumentation and

December,2014 Secondary Education

77

cy, 3 久 198-209.

Wood,鼠, &Rowland-Morin,P. A. (1989).

Motivational tension: Winning vs pedagogical in academic debate.

National Forensic Journal, 7,81-97.

Zompetti, J. P. (2008). The role of debate activism for civil societies. In A.

C. Snider (Ed.) Frontiers of the 21st century: Argumentation, debate and the strugglefor a civil society(pp. 157-172). New York: International Debate Education Association.

相關文件