第五章 結論與建議
5.2 建議
(1) 本研究僅進行室內降雨沖蝕試驗，未來可以考慮選擇一適當之示範區域，進行 現地水泥噴凝植生覆蓋技術之施作，並於施工完成後，進行強度、覆蓋等現地 試驗。並於後續持續追蹤其工程成效，評估其生態效益，包括植生演替情形、
生物多樣性調查等。也可進行成本分析，持續觀察後續維護的情形，做整體工
(2) 本研究主要的目的是針對一般邊坡進行模擬試驗，未來可增加水泥噴凝植生技 術(SVMT)抵抗水流的沖蝕試驗，測試其在高灘地、高流速，如草溝、河岸邊 坡等的適用性研究。傳統植生技術易受水流破壞，故在高流速區域的應用有一 定的限制，如果能夠有效利用水泥噴凝植生覆蓋技術於上述區域，不但可以達 到環境美化，更可以兼顧生態環境的需求。
(3) 本研究的控制變因為齡期，未來可以增加水泥噴凝植生覆蓋技術於不同坡度、
不同降雨強度下，逕流量、沖蝕量、試體表面強度、表面流速、植生覆蓋情形 等研究，以了解不同坡度、不同降雨強度下，該技術之成效。
1. 王鐵橋(2006)，「邊坡綠化技術及其施工方法選擇」，中國水土保持科學， 83 年度水土保持及集水區經營研究計畫成果彙編，pp.238-242。
6. 張于漢(2006)，「石塊覆蓋對纹溝間土壤沖蝕及薄膜流流速之影響」，國立台灣 大學生物環境系統工程學研究所，碩士論文。
7. 許文年、王鐵橋 (2001)，混凝土護坡綠化添加劑，專利、公開號：CN1358685A。
8. 許榮峰(2002) ，「土壤團粒化劑濃度對紅壤抗蝕性與種子發芽之研究」，國立中
12. Al-Durrah, M.M., and J.M. Bradford. (1982). Parameters for describing soil detachment due to single water-drop impact. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46(4): 836-840.
13. Alder, R. B. (1950), Ifluence of seasonal and cultural conditions on aggregation of Hagerstown soil. Soil Sci: 193-203.
14. Daniel, P. R., A. J. M. Smucker and D. Santos., (2000). Alfalfa Root and Shoot Mulching Effects on Soil Hydraulic Properties and Aggregation, Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:725-731.
15. Edwards, W.M., and W.E. Larson. (1969). Infiltration of water into soils as influenced by surface seal development. Trans. ASAE 12:463-465,470.
16. Fan, J.C, W.J. Yang, M.F. Wu and C.H. Liu, (2006) “Determination and analysis of interrill erosion of a soil with coarse fragments in Taiwan”, Transactions of the ASABE, 49(5)：1305-1314.
Journall 92, 5-18.(in Taiwan)
18. Foster, G.R. (1982). Modeling the erosion process. In Hann, C.T., Jonson, H.P., and Brakensiek, D.L. (eds), Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds, Monogr. Ser., vol. 5. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph. 297-380.
19. Foster, G.R., C.B. Johnson, and W.C. Moldenhauer. (1982). Hydraulics of failure of unanchored cornstalk and wheat straw mulches for erosion control. Transactions of the ASAE 25(4):940-947.
20. Gilley, J. E., D. A. Woolhiser, and D. B. McWhorter. (1985)a. Interrill soil erosion - part I: Development of model equations. Transactions of the ASAE 28(1):147-153,159.
21. Gilley, J. E., D. A. Woolhiser, and D. B. McWhorter. (1985)b. Interrill soil erosion - part II: Testing and use of model equations. Transactions of the ASAE 28(1):
154-159.
22. Green-Growing Concrete Group, (2000) “Green-Growing Concrete Using Coal Ash from Power Plant Developed.”.
23. Gyasi-Agyei, Y. (2004), ”Optimum Use of Erosion Control Blankets and Waste Ballast (Rock) Mulch to Aid Grass Establishment on Steep Slopes”, ASCE,Volume 9, Issue 2, 150-159.
24. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F. and Luque, M (2004), “Some Issues on Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations,” European Journal of Operational Research,_154, 98-109.
25. Jennings, G. D., A. R. Jarrett, and J.R. Hoover. (1988). Evaluating the effect of puddling on infiltration using the Green and Ampt equation. Transactions of the ASAE 31(3): 761-768.
26. Kirby, M. J. and R. P. C. Morgan. (1980). Soil Erosion. John Wiley & Sons.
27. Kruse, R. et al. (2004), “Native plant regeneration and introduction of non-natives following post-fire rehabilitation with straw mulch and barley seeding”, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands 196, 299-310.
28. Liebenow, A. M., W. J. Elliot, J. M. Laflen, and K. D. Kohl. (1990). Interrill erodibility: Collection and analysys of data from cropland soils. Transactions of the ASAE 33(6): 1882-1888.
29. Meyer, L. D. (1981). How rain intensity affects interrill erosion. Transactions of the
interrill erosion. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J. 48:1152-1157.
31. Mohammed Ibrahim, et al. (1999), “Use of Surface Treatment Materials to Improve Concrete Durability”, ASCE Volume 11, Issue 1, 36-40.
32. Mutchler, C. K., and L. M. Hansen. 1970. Splash of a water-drop at terminal velocity. Science 169: 1311-1312.
33. Nijlawan, S.D. and L.E. Clmstead (1947). The effect of sample pretreatment upon soil aggregation in wet-sieve analysis. Soil Sci. Am. Proc. :21-50.
34. Randy, B. Foltz and Natalie S Copeland (2007), ” Field Testing of Wood-based Biomass Erosion Control Materials on Obliterated Roads”, paper number 078046, ASABE Annual Meeting, Sponsored by ASABE Minneapolis Convention Center, Minneapolis, 17 - 20 June 2007.
35. Simonson, W. H., US Bureau of Public Road, and US Department of Commerce (2003), Landscape design and its relation to the modern highway, US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
36. Shangning, J. and P. W. Ungerb (2001), ”Soil Water Accumulation under Different Precipitation, Potential Evaporation, and Straw Mulch Conditions”, Soil Science Socity of America Journal 65:442-448.
37. Toyo Greenland Co. Ltd, “Sustainable Vegetation System on Steep Concrete Slope at Princess Margaret Hospital Building.”
38. Takenaka Corporation (1999),“Implementation of Green-Growing Concrete for Planting Arboreal Vegetation”
39. Watson, D. A., and J. M. Laflen. (1986). Soil strength, slope and rainfall intensity effects on interrill erosion. Transactions of the ASAE 29(1): 98-102.
40. Wu, H. L. and Feng, Z. Y. (2006), “Ecological Engineering Methods for Soils and Water Conservation in Taiwan”, Ecological Engineering 28, 333-344.
41. Winterkorn, Han F. (1942), Mechanism of water attack on dry cohesive soil system.
Soil Sci:259-273.
42. Yoder, R.E. (1936), A direct method of aggregate analysis and a study of the physical natural of erosion losses. J.Am.Soc.Agron:28,337-351.
『坡面困難工址植生技術之適用性評估指標』
一、問卷說明 ... 1 二、評估指標影響因子之相互權重調查 ... 2 三、填寫個人資料 ... 3
~問卷調查~
現行各式可應用於坡面困難工址之植生技術，其在施工方 法、使用限制等特性皆不盡相同。而本研究為能較為客觀性的 遴選出適用性高之工程方法，首先篩選出可能將影響其工法適 用性之因子，期能藉此建立一客觀之適用性評估指標。
鑒於上述，本問卷調查之主要目的即在於瞭解您對於『坡
面困難工址植生技術之適用性評估指標』中，各影響因子相互重要性之評估。此一問卷的填寫方式，係完全依據您的主觀認
知決定，懇請您不吝提供寶貴意見！敬祝
順安
國立台灣大學
生物環境系統工程學系 研究主持人：范正成 教授 聯絡人：楊智翔
連絡電話：0930‐860499
E‐mail：[email protected]
本研究係利用 Herrera-Viedma 等，於 2004 年提出之模糊偏好關係
(Fuzzy Preference Relations, Fuzzy PreRa)，期能建立一較為客觀之評估
指標，藉以遴選適用性較高之工程方法。其中，需考量之層面包括技
1.範例說明-技術層面因子之相互權重比較
絕
絕
最後請留下您的相關資料：
1.您的身份是？
□政府機關工程人員 □規劃設計工作 □營造業人員
□維護管理工作 □學術研究機關人員 □其他________
2.請問您的學歷是：
□ 高中以下 □ 高中 □ 大專 □ 碩士 □ 博士
感謝您花費時間於本問卷上，如尚有其他不同之指正意見，煩請 您詳填於下，我們將會參考改正，以期提升本研究之深度與廣度。
本問卷到此全部結束，再次謝謝您的合作！
本研究取中央試區24 點均勻分布量測降雨量，降雨控制為降 2 秒停 0.5 秒， 10 562.50 150.00 412.50 178.31 132.50 11 568.30 144.50 423.80 183.20 138.30 12 599.20 150.10 449.10 194.14 169.20 13 420.10 151.50 268.60 116.11 9.90
傳統試體，第一天，第一組。
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)
(min) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)