本研究嘗試以引文分析方式，探究成大作者發表、引用及被引用之期刊概況、各出版 社期刊被使用的比例、Big Deal套裝期刊使用效益分析，以及期刊館藏對學術研究的支援 度等面向。分析發現，無論是成大發表、引用或被引用之期刊，館藏滿足率皆達80%以
型之差異。此外，本研究僅針對Web of Science所收錄之期刊論文進行分析，未來可與 Scopus資料作比較，或進一步分析博、碩士論文，以了解圖書館支援學生研究的程度，及 其引文分析之結果是否與教職員生所發表的文章有所不同。
雖然引文分析可以幫助圖書館更了解機構作者進行研究時所使用的期刊資源為何，並 能藉以調整館藏發展方向，使館藏更貼近作者研究所需，但引文分析仍有諸多的限制，應 用上仍必須謹慎考量。MacRoberts和MacRoberts（1989）指出引文分析的結果可能會受 到引文索引工具涵蓋的內容範圍所影響，且無法確定研究人員引用參考文獻之動機，以及 不同領域的研究人員會有不同的引用行為等。White（2019）也提到僅利用引文索引資料 庫進行引文分析可能的問題，單純使用Web of Science作為資料來源會排除那些未被資料 庫索引或收錄的出版品，這可能會導致新期刊的重要性或新興領域期刊的代表性不足。此 外，進行引文分析較大的問題是耗費人力與費時（本研究耗時數月），且沒有統一的分析 流程可依循參考，因此實際能有資源且周期性地進行引文分析的圖書館並不多。本研究期 望能藉由此次實作之經驗，逐步建立引文分析之比對流程與相關對照表，以作日後周期性 的分析與檢討，並列入館藏評估之參考，使大學圖書館館藏更能充分發揮其價值。
參考文獻
丁櫻樺、梁伶君、張麗君、羅思嘉、蘇蓉波（1998）。國立成功大學圖書館西文期刊評鑑 計畫研究報告。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，2，35-51。
邱子恒（2004）。引用文獻分析在健康科學館藏經費分配之應用。圖書資訊學刊 ，2(1)，
19-33。
徐怡華（2008）。藉Web of Science論文分析成功大學近五年之學術研究概況。成功大學圖 書館館刊。17，72-84。
黃俊升、周惠婷（2014）。核心期刊館藏支援教師研究需求的評估：以中興大學圖書館為 例。大學圖書館，18(2)，95-118。
詹麗萍（2006）。引文分析與電子期刊使用評鑑。數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文 集。
蔡明月（2011）。期刊影響力指標探析。教育資料與圖書館學，49(2)，195-214。
蘇蓉波（2003）。從博士學位論文引用文獻探討成功大學圖書館館藏支援程度。成功大學 圖書館館刊，12，53-69。
Alyson Vaaler, A. (2018). Sources of resources: A business school citation analysis study.
Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 23(2), 154-166.
Bakker, C. (2015). Tracing the Social Work Literature: Exploring Connections to Allied Health through Citation Analysis. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 31(1), 15-31.
Chung, H. K. (2007). Evaluating academic journals using impact factor and local citation score.
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 393-402.
Currie, L. & Monroe-Gulick, A. (2013). What do our faculty use? An interdisciplinary citation analysis study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39, 471-480.
Deborah D. Blecic, Stephen E. Wiberley Jr., Joan B. Fiscella, Sara Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, &
Rebecca Lowery (2013) Deal or no deal? Evaluating big deals and their journals. College &
Research Libraries, 74(2), 178-193.
Edwards, S. (1999). Citation analysis as a collection development tool: a bibliometric study of polymer science theses and dissertations. Serials Review, 25(1), 11-20.
Edwards, S. E. (2015). Making Hard Choices: Using Data to Make Collections Decisions.
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(1), 43-52.
Gao, W. (2016). Beyond journal impact and usage statistics: Using citation analysis for collection development. Serials Librarian, 70, 121-141.
Ho, L. (2018). Collection assessment for a middle eastern, english curriculum university library.
Collection and Curation, 37(3), 128-133.
Kayongo, J., & Helm, C. (2012). Relevance of library collections for graduate student research:
A citation analysis study of doctoral dissertations at Notre Dame. College &Research Libraries, 73(1), 47-67.
Kelly, M. (2015). Citation paterns of engineering, statistics, and computer science researchers:
An internal and external citation analysis across multiple engineering subfields. College and Research Libraries, 76, 859-882.
Kelsey, P. & Diamond, T. (2003). Establishing a core list of journals for forestry: A citation analysis from faculty at Southern universities. College and Research Libraries, 64, 357-377.
LaBonte, K. (2005). Citation analysis: A method for collection development for a rapidly developing field. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 43.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(5), 342-349.
Martin, V., Gray, T., Kilb, M., & Minchew, T. (2016). Analyzing Consortial“Big Deals”via a Cost-Per-Cited-Reference (CPCR) Metric. Serials Review, 42(4), 293-305.
Monroe-Gulick, A., Currie, L. & Weller, T. (2014). Local Citation Analysis of National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health Grant Applications: Meeting the Needs of Researchers. Serials Librarian, 67(4), 399-414.
Ramamoorthi, P., & Jeyshankar, R. (2016). Is there a correlation between access to journals and their productive use? Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63, 24-30.
Salisbury, L. & Smith, J. S. (2010). The use of Web of Knowledge to study publishing and citation use for local researchers at the campus level. Collection Management, 35(2), 69-82.
Sherriff, G. (2010). Information Use in History Research: A Citation Analysis of Master’s Level Theses. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 10(2), 165-182.
Smith, E. T. (2003). Assessing collection usefulness: An investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use. College & Research Libraries, 64(5), 344-355.
Timms, G. (2018). Citations and Citation Metrics in a Serial Assessment Using Master’s Theses.
Collection Management, 43(3), 177-197. doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1451794
Tucker, C. (2013). Analyzing faculty citations for effective collection management decisions.
Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services, 37, 19-33.
Vaaler, A. (2018). Sources of resources: A business school citation analysis study. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 23(2), 154-166.
Watson, A. P. (2010). Tips for conducting citation analysis in an academic setting. Mississippi Libraries, 74(1), 14-16.
White, P. B. (2019). Using data mining for citation analysis. College and Research Libraries, 80(1), 76-93.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
Wilson C. S., & Tenopir, C. (2008). Local Citation Analysis, Publishing and Reading Patterns:
Using Multiple Methods to Evaluate Faculty Use of an Academic Library’s Research Collection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(9), 1393-1408.