未來展望

B. 車速變更模式：本研究為了簡化，所以加速度皆設定為 1，最高速 度和最低速度也有所設定。可是依據車輛的品牌和性能的不同，每 臺車的加速度和最高速度也會不同。

C. 車輛皆為小客車：避免複雜，本研究車輛皆設定為小客車。真實路 網除了小客車外，還有大大小小不同的其它車輛存在。除了汽車之 外，真實路網還會有摩托車、腳踏車等等交通工具的存在。

參考文獻

Abolhasan, M., Wysocki, T., & Dutkiewicz, E. (2004). A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks , 2, pp. 1-22.

Bechler, M., & Wolf, L. (2005). Mobility management for vehicular ad hoc networks.

Vehicular Technology Conference, (pp. 2294-2298).

Bernsen, J., & Manivannan, D. (2009). Unicast routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks: A critical comparison and classification. Pervasive and Mobile

Computing , 5, pp. 1-18.

Biswas, S., Tatchikou, R., & Dion, F. (2006, January). Vehicle-to-Vehicle Wireless Communication Protocols for Enhancing Highway Traffic Safety. IEEE Communications Magazine , 74-82.

Blum, J. J., Eskandarian, A., & Hoffman, L. J. (2004). Challenges of Intervehicle Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 5 (4), pp. 347-351.

Boone, C., Brabander, B. D., & Witteloostuijn, A. V. (1999). The impact of

personality on behavior in five Prisoner's Dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology , 20, pp. 343-377.

Chang, B. R., Tsai, H. F., & Young, C. P. (2010). Intelligent data fusion system for predicting vehicle collision warning using vision/GPS sensing. Expert Systems with Applications , 37 (3), pp. 2439-2450.

Costa, P., Frey, D., Migliavacca, M., & Mottola, L. (2006). Towards Lightweight Information Dissemination in Inter-Vehicular Networks. 3rd international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks, (pp. 20-29).

Douceur, J. R. (2002). The Sybil Attack. 1st International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS '02), Cambridge, MA.

Garg, A., & Reddy, A. N. (2004). Mitigation of DoS attacks through QoS regulation.

Microprocessors and Microsystems , 28, pp. 521-530.

Karp, B., & Kung, H. (2000). GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless sensor networks. 6th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '00).

Kitani, T., Shinkawa, T., Shibata, N., Yasumoto, K., Ito, M., & Higashino, T. (2008).

Efficient VANET-Based Traffic Information Sharing using Buses on Regular Routes. Vehicular Technology Conference.

Kofman, F., & Lawarree, J. (1996). A prisoner's dilemma model of collusion deterrence. Journal of Public Economics , 59, pp. 117-136.

Korkmaz, G., Ekici, E., Ozguner, F., & Ozguner, U. (2004). Urban Multi-Hop BroadcastProtocol for Inter-Vehicle Communication Systems. 1st ACM international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks, (pp. 1-10).

Legge, S. (1996). Cooperative lions escape the Prisoner's Dilemma. Trends in Ecology

& Evolution , 11, pp. 2-3.

Leinmuller, T., Schoch, E., & Kargl, F. (2006). Position verification approaches for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Wireless Communications , pp. 16-21.

Leinmuller, T., Schoch, E., Kargl, F., & Maihofer, C. (2005). Influence of Falsified Position Data on Geographic Ad-Hoc Routing. second European Workshop on Security and Privacy in Ad hoc and Sensor Networks.

Li, L., Rus, D., & Haas, Z. (2002). Gossip-based ad hoc routing. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 3, pp.

1707- 1716.

Lin, X., Sun, X., & Shen, X. (2007). GSIS: A Secure and Privacy-Preserving Protocol for Vehicular Communications. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY , 56 (6), pp. 3442-3456.

Little, T. D., & Agarwal, A. (2005). An information propagation scheme for VANETs.

Intelligent Transportation Systems, (pp. 13-15).

Liu, C., & Yu, J. T. (2006). An analysis of DoS attacks on wireless LAN. 6th IASTED Int. Multi-Conf. Wireless Opt. Commun., (pp. 346–351). Banff, AB, Canada.

Marco, F., Jerome, H., Fethi, F., & Christian, B. (2007). Vehicular Mobility Simulation for VANETs. 40th Annual Simulation Symposium, (pp. 301-309).

Ohara, K., Nojima, Y., & Ishibuchi, H. (2007). A Study on Traffic Information Sharing Through Inter-Vehicle Communication. 22nd IEEE International

Symposium on Intelligent Control Part of IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control, (pp. 670-675). Singapore.

Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner's Dilemma. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rabow, G. (1988). The social implications of nonzero-sum games. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine , 7, 12-18.

Surbey, M. K., & McNally, J. J. (1997). Self-deception as a mediator of cooperation and defection in varying social contexts described in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. Evolution and Human Behavior , 18, pp. 417-435.

Taleb, T., Ochi, M., Jamalipour, A., Nei, K., & Nemoto, Y. (2006). An

efficientvehicle-heading based routing protocol for VANET networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2006).

Tang, A., & Yip, A. (2010). Collision avoidance timing analysis of DSRC-based vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention , 42, pp. 182-195.

Toh, C. K. (2002). Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks. Protocols and Systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR.

Uno, K., & Namatame, A. (1999). Agent-based simulation for policy issue. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

Yan, G., Olariu, S., & Weigle, M. C. (2008). Providing VANET security through active position detection. Computer Communications , 31, pp. 2883-2897.

Yanlin, P., Abichar, Z., & Chang, J. M. (2006). Roadside-Aided Routing (RAR) in Vehicular Networks. Communications, IEEE International conference, 8, pp.

3602-3607.

Zhao, J., & Cao, G. (2008). VADD：Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , 57 (3), pp.

1910-1922.

附錄 A

(a)最新時戳法則

(b)加權時戳法則

(c)地理+最新時戳法則

(d)地理+加權時戳法則

圖 A.1 偽造路況：路網密度對網路影響之分析

(a)最新時戳法則

(b)加權時戳法則

(c)地理+最新時戳法則

(d)地理+加權時戳法則

圖 A.2 偽造路況和時戳：路網密度對網路影響之分析

附錄 B

(a)最新時戳法則

(b)加權時戳法則

(c)地理+最新時戳法則

(d)地理+加權時戳法則

圖 B.1 偽造路況：路網密度對繞路比例影響之分析

(a)最新時戳法則

(b)加權時戳法則

(c)地理+最新時戳法則

(d)地理+加權時戳法則

圖 B.2 偽造路況和時戳：路網密度對繞路比例影響之分析

附錄 C

(a)嘉義市(10%)

(b)基隆市(15%)

(c)臺中市(20%)

圖 C.1 偽造路況：路況更新方法對繞路比例影響之分析

(a)嘉義市(10%)

(b)基隆市(15%)

(c)臺中市(20%)

圖 C.2 偽造路況和時戳：路況更新方法對繞路比例影響之分析