第五章 結論與未來研究方向
5.2 未來研究方向
個人化文件推薦為知識分享的重要一環。個人化文件推薦協助使用者有效地 找尋所需文件,大幅減少搜尋成本,以增加個人工作效率。在未來整合標籤標記 於推薦的研究中可分成幾點作為努力方向,分述如下。
使用者標籤分群
研究中將標籤視為一個興趣,許多興趣可能相似,若將標籤分群可以有效地 區分使用者的興趣,不僅從標籤特徵檔瞭解興趣,也可以從一組相似的標籤 文字說明興趣。
文件之標籤結構
一份文件被許多人用許多標籤標記,從使用者需求分析這些記錄再轉換成標 籤結構,得知文件會滿足何種需求。
即時推薦
本研究中以模擬方式進行實驗,意即把資料切割成訓練資料與測試資料,若 能採取真實使用者進行實驗,以即時性方式推薦文章會更具實務上效益。
興趣標籤結構
未來的研究中可以對標籤資料進行統計分析,瞭解使用者的長期與短期興趣 標籤穩定性。依據穩定性將資料區開來,再分別以常騎與短期進行探討。
參考文獻
[1] M. Balabanovic, Y. Shoham, “Fab: Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation,” Communications of the ACM, pp.66-72, 1997.
[2] K. Bischoff, C.S. Firan, W. Nejdl, R. Paiu, “Can all tags be used for search?”
Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, p.p.193-202., 2008
[3] C. Fox, “A stop list for general text,” ACM SIGIR Forum, vol.24, no. 1, p.p.19-21, 1990
[4] N. Glance, D. Arregui, M. Dardenne, “Knowledge pump: Community-centered collaborative filtering,” Fifth DELOS Workshop. Filtering and Collaborative Filtering. Budapest, ERCIM report, ERCIM-98-W001, 1997.
[5] N. Glance, D. Arregui, M. Dardenne, “Knowledge pump: supporting the flow and use of knowledge,” Information Technology for Knowledge Management, 1998.
[6] U. Hanani, B. Shapira, P. Shoval, “Information filtering: Overview of issues, research and systems,” User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, vol.11, no.3, p.p.203-259, 2001.
[7] T. Kamba, K. Bharat, M.C. Albers, “The Krakatoa Chronicle-an interactive personalized newspaper on the Web,” Proceedings of the Fourth International World Wide Web Conference, p.p.11-14, 1995.
[8] H.L. Karen, B.M. Leandro, S.T. Lars, “Tag-aware Recommender Systems by Fusion of Collaborative Filtering Algorithms,” Proceedings of 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, p.p.16–20, 2008.
[9] J.A. Konstan, B.N. Miller, D. Maltz et al, “GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news,” Communications of the ACM, vol.40 no.3, p.p.77-87, 1997.
[10] B.Y.L. Kuo, T. Hentrich, B.M. Good et al., “Tag clouds for summarizing web search results,” Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, p.p.1203 – 1204, 2007.
[11] K. Lang, “Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews,” Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, p.p.331-339, 1995.
[12] A. Mathes, “Folksonomies cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata” Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC (Doctoral Seminar), Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 2004.
[13] R.J. Mooney, L. Roy “Content-Based Book Recommending Using Learning for Text Categorization,” Proc. ACM SIGIR, 99 Workshop Recommender Systems:
Algorithms and Evaluation, 1999.
[14] R.Y. Nakamoto, S. Nakajima, J. Miyazaki et al., “Reasonable tag-based collaborative filtering for social tagging systems,” Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Information credibility on the web, p.p.11-18, 2008.
[15] M. Pazzani, D. Billsus, “Learning and Revising User Profiles: The Identification of Interesting Web Sites,” Machine Learning, p.p.313-331, 1997.
[16] T. Rattenbury, N. Good, M. Naaman, “Towards automatic extraction of event and place semantics from flickr tags,” Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.p.03-110, 2008.
[17] J. Rucker, M.J. Polanco, “Siteseer: Personalized navigation for the web,”
Communications of the ACM, vol.40, no.3, p.p.73-75, 1997.
[18] U. Shardanand, P. Maes, “Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "word of mouth",” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.p.210-217, 1995.
[19] A. Shepitsen, J. Gemmell, B. Mobasher et al., “Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering,” Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems, p.p.259-266, 2008.
[20] B. Sigurbjornsson , R. Van Zwol, “Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge,” Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, p.p.327-336, 2008.
[21] T. Vanderwal, “Off the Top: Folksonomy Entries.” 2005.
[22] J. Vig, S. Sen, J. Riedl, “Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags,” Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, p.p.47-56, 2009.
[23] J. Voss, “Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing?”
Proceedings of the International Symposium of Information Science, p.p.234–254, 2007.
[24] J. Wang, B.D. Davison, “Explorations in tag suggestion and query expansion,”
Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Search in social media, p.p.43-50, 2008.
[25] P.S. Yu, “Data mining and personalization technologies,” Proceedings of the sixth international conference on database system for advanced application, p.p.6-13, 1999.
[26] S. Zhao, N. Du, A. Nauerz et al., “Improved recommendation based on collaborative tagging behaviors,” Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, p.p.413-416, 2008.