• 沒有找到結果。

結論與建議

剪膨脹與應變硬化。濕噴法結果亦與前述研究成果相同。實驗室內慣 以 MT 法製作三軸試體,藉以評估現地土壤性質,以試體製作方法對 麥寮砂試驗結果影響甚巨的角度來看,過去對台灣砂土的研究(變形 性與穩定性分析等),可能與現地實際情況不符,可能因此而對實際 情況有了錯誤的判斷。

5.2 建議

從試驗結果當中可以了解,濕噴法目前最大的缺點在於控制試體緊密 度。目前可預見而有助於控制緊密度的後續研究可以從濕振法(Wet Vibration)的緊密法開始著手。如 Tatsuoka et al.(1986)所做,首先 必須先量化(標準化)敲擊的能量接著以足夠多的試驗量來釐清孔隙 比的減少與敲擊的數(能)量之間的關係。如此一來或可對緊密化有 更近一步的認識,以利濕噴法的完備。

其次,數據雖然顯示出一些正向的結果,如濕噴法試體細料分布之均 勻性。但濕噴法本意是應用在大型標度槽試體的製作方法,在孔隙比 上的均勻性是否不佳等情況仍有待後續大型試驗來驗證;於緊密程度 與細料分布上都應具備一定水準才算是合適的製作法。得到再確認的 濕噴法於操作概念/儀器上應用於大型試體的製作具有相當的發展空 間。

參考文獻

1. Amini, F., and Qi, G.Z. (2000)."Liquefaction testing of stratified silty

sands."Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmantal Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 3, pp. 208-217.

2. Davila, R.S., Sego, D.C., and Robertson, P.K. (1992). Undisturbed

sampling of sandy soils by freezing. In Proceedings of the 45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, 26-28 October , Toronto, pp.13A-1-13A-10.

3. Frost, J.D., and Park, J.-Y. (2003). A critical assessment of the moist

tamping technique. ASTM, Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 26(1):

57-70.

4. Huang, Y.T., Huang, A.B., Kuo, Y.C., and Tsai, M.D. (2004). "A laboratory study on the undrained strength of a silty sand from Central Western

Taiwan." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.24, No.9-10, pp.733-743.

5. Konrad, J.M., St-Laurent, S., Gilbert, F., and Leroueil, S. (1995). Sand sampling below the water table using the 200 mm diameter Laval sampler.

Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 32: 1079-1086.

6. Kuerbis, R., and Vaid, V.P. (1988). Sand sample preparation - the slurry deposition method. Soil and Foundations 28(4): 107-118.

7. Ladd, R.S. (1974). Specimens preparation and liquefaction of sands.

J.Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 100(10): 1180-1184.

8. Ladd, R.S. (1977). Specimens preparation and cyclic stability of sands.

J.Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 103(6): 535-547.

9. Ladd, R.S. (1978). Preparing specimens using undercompaction. ASTM, Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 1(1): 16-23

10. Lambe, T.W. (1951). Soil testing for engineers, John Willy & Sons, Inc., Newyork.

11. La Rochel le, P.,Sarrai lh. J., Tavenas. F., Roy, M., and Leroueil, S.(198l).

"Causes of sampling disturbance and design of a new sampler for sensitive soils" Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 18(l): 52-66.

12. Lo Presti D., Pedroni S., and Crippa V. (1992). "Maximum dry density of cohesionless soils by pluviation and by ASTM D 4253-83: a comparative study." Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 180-189.

13. Mulilis, J.P., Chan, C.K., and Seed, H.B. (1975). The effects of method of sample preparation on the cyclic stress-strain behavior of sands. EERC Rep.

75-18, Coll. of Engrg., University of California, Berkley,Calif.

14. Mulilis, J.P., Seed, H.B., Chan, C.K., Mitchell, J.K., and Arulanandan, K.

(1977). Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction. J.Geotech.

Engrg., ASCE, 103(2): 91-108.

15. Plewes, H.D., Pilli, V.S., Morgan, M.R., and Kilpatrick, B.L. (1994). In situ sampling, density measurements and testing of foundation soils at Duncan dam. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31: 927-938.

16. Poet Aglietto, M. L., (1989). "Maximum dry density of cohesionless soils by pluviations. " M. Sc. thesis, Department of Structural Engineering, Technical University of Torino, Italy.

17. Rahardjo, P.P., Brandon, T.L., and Clough, G.W. (1995). “Study of Cone Penetration Resistance of Silty Sand in the Calibration Chamber.”

Proceedings, the International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT ’95, Swedish Geotechnical Society, Vol.2, pp.577-582.

18. Sasitharan, S.,Robertson, P.K., and Sego, D.C. (1992). Sample disturbance from shear wave velocity measurements. In Proceedings of the 45th

Canadian Geotechnical Conference, 26-28 October , Toronto, pp. 23:1-23:7.

19. Sego, D.C., and Robertson, P.K. (1994). Ground freezing and sampling of foundation soils at Duncan Dam. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31: 939-950.

20. Tatsuoka, F., Ochi, K., Fujii, S., and Okamoto, M. (1986)."Cyclic

undrained triaxial and torsional shear strength of sands for different sample preparation methods."Soils and Foundations, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 23-41.

21. Vaid, Y.P., and Negussey, D. (1984). Relative density of pluviated sand samples. Soil and Foundations 24(2): 101-105.

22. Vaid, Y.P., and Negussey, D. (1988). Preparation of reconstituted sand specimens. Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, ASTM STP 977, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp.405-417.

23. Vaid, Y.P., Sivathayalan, S., and Stedman, D. (1999). Influence of specimen-reconstituting method on the undrained response of sand.

ASTM, Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 22(3): 187-195.

24. Vucetic, M., and Dodry, R. (1988). Cyclic triaxial strain-controlled testing of liquefiable sands. Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, R. T.

Doaghe, R. C. Chaney, and M. L. Silver, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa., 475-485.

25. Yoshimi, Y., Hatanaka, M., and Oh-oka, H. (1978). Undisturbed sampling of saturated sands by freezing. Soil and Foundations 18(3): 59-71.

26. Yoshimi, Y., Tokimatsu, K., Kaneko, O., and Makihara, Y. (1984).

Undrained cyclic shear strength of a dense Nigata sand. Soil and Foundations 24(4): 131-145.

27. 張嘉偉(1997)“圓錐貫入試驗在粉砂中之標定”國立交通大學土木工 程系,碩士論文。

28. 王統立(2000)“高細料含量粉土細砂中 CPT 之標定試驗”國立交通大 學土木工程系,碩士論文。

29. 蔡明道(2002)“細粒料含量對粉土細砂不排水強度之影響” 國立交通 大學土木工程系,碩士論文。

30. 林靜怡(2003)“細粒料對粉土細砂小應變勁度之影響”國立交通大學 土木工程系,碩士論文。

31. 郭毓真(2004)“細粒料含量對麥寮砂動態行為之影響”國立交通大學 土木工程系,碩士論文。

相關文件