• 沒有找到結果。

羅馬尼亞高等教育策略的定位

(一) Title:Strategic positioning in Romanian higher education (二) Abstract:

業技能,並且去分裂市場。利用去達成這些目標的過程,去面對高

識本身的價值已經越來越無法確立;教育的精神,在這樣的商業方式管理的 大學教育之下,教育的精神和我國的憲法、大學法和教育基本法已經快變成 只是參考用書了。

高等教育的市場化也喚起了一些道德和倫理的重視,公民責任也變得越 來越多與論探討高知識份子應盡的義務,對於高等教育的標準也越來越高,

各校競爭的情況也日益嚴重,都擔心著自己哪一天會召收不到學生。市場化 是人為的因素造成,只是目前回歸到教育本行,而經營管理只是在其他領域 市場化的結果用在原來產生這些問題的模式。

教育政策的市場化是一個難以抵擋的趨勢,無論在國家內是小政府還是 大政府,高等教育政策皆面臨這項挑戰,與其說是心的挑戰,還不如說是問 題的擴大到需要去重視。

我認為政府應該重視教育政策,嚴謹地規劃政策,對於未來做長、中、

短期的教育發展政策計畫。對於市場化應該當做是一個正常現象,不是一個 困難,只是環境的結構和要素有些改變,需求和供給發生一些問題。經營管 理的方式的酌量使用,會達到一個組織或機構完整或完美的運作。

在高等教育文化機構或組織內,從企業管理商學角度來借用的:「目標

管理」、「學習型組織」、「執行力」、「經營法則」、「管理未來」到近年的「願 景領導」,我想是高等教育文化機構或組織可操作的方式,不過在於這些商 管方面的專業之外,也要有非營利組織中最主要的核心價值,因為這將是所 有方式內的主要關鍵,無論是高等教育市場化還是經營管理的現象或問題,

國家在政策上非常且必要性的去訂定計畫,如上述的教育發展政策計畫,然 而最重要的是別忘了任何計畫的核心價值,因為那是一個政策為何要這樣制 定的關鍵鑰匙。

參考文獻

1. A Lin,C.H.,(2006). EDUCATION EXPANSION, EDUCATIONAL INEQUALITY,AND INCOME INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TAIWAN,1976–2003. Social Indicators Research ,80, 601–615.

2. Brown, G.(2007) .Managing good governance in higher education.MINERVA ,45(4),499-503.

3. Basu, R.(2007). Negotiating acts of citizenship in an era of neoliberal reform:

The game of school closures.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH,31(1),109-127.

4. Chan ,A.E.W. (2004).Gender, school management and educational reforms: a case study of a primary school in Hong Kong.GENDER AND EDUCATION, 16 ,(4),491-510.

5. Choi,J,A. (2005).New generation's career aspirations and new ways of marginalization in a postindustrial economy.BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION,26(2),269-283.

6. Dolenec,D.(2007).Marketization in higher education policy: An analysis of higher education funding policy reforms in Western Europe between 1980 and 2000.REVIJA ZA SOCIJALNU POLITIKU,13(1),15-35

7. Davidson,M.(2004) .Bones of contention: using self and story in the quest to professionalize higher education teaching - An interdisciplinary

approach.TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION,9(3),299-310.

8. Fletcher, C.,Boden, R.,Kent, J., &Tinson, J.(2007).Performing women: The gend-ered dimensions of the UK new research economy.GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION,14(5),433-453.

9. Guthrie, J.,&Neumann, R.(2007). Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities-The establishment of a performance-driven system for Australian higher education.PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW ,9 (2),231-252.

10. Husband,C.(2005).Globalization and marketization in education: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Singapore.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF

EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,25 (4),474-475.

11. Hemsley-Brown,J., & Goonawardana,S.,(2007) Brand harmonization in the international higher education market.Journal of Business Research,60,942–948.

12. Jao,J.C.,&McKeeve,M.(2006).Ethnic inequalities and educational attainment in Taiwan.SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION ,79(2),131-152.

13. Maton,K.(2005). A question of autonomy: Bourdieu's field approach and higher education policy.JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY,20(6),687-704.

14. Mok,K,H.(2005).Riding over socialism and global capitalism: changing education governance and social policy paradigms in post-Mao

China.COMPARATIVE EDUCATION,41(2),217-242.

15. Ngok, K.(2007).Chinese education policy in the context of decentralization and marketization: Evolution and implications.ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 8 (1),142-157.

16. Niculescu,M.,(2006).Strategic positioning in Romanian higher education.

Journal of Organizational Change Management,19(6),725-737.

17. Ngo,T,,M.Lingard,B.,&Mitchell,J.(2006).The policy cycle and vernacular globalization: a case study of the creation of Vietnam National University - Hochiminh City.COMPARATIVE EDUCATION,42 (2),225-242.

18. Pearce,M.(2004).The marketization of discourse about education in UK general election manifestos.TEXT,24(2),245-265.

19. Thornton, C.H.,& Jaeger, A.J.(2007).A new context for understanding civic responsibility: Relating culture to action at a research university.RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATIO,48 (8),993-1020.

20. Temple,P.(2005).Globalization and marketization in education: a comparative analysis of Hong Kong and Singapore.STUDIES IN HIGHER

EDUCATION,30(5),637-639.

相關文件