丁素雯、段曉林（2007）：巢狀探究教學模式 對國二學生探究能力影響之探討。發表於 第二十三屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄：
國 立 高 雄 師 範 大 學 。[Ding, Su-Wen, &
Tuan, Hsiao-Lin (2007). Investigation of the nested-inquiry instruction model on the 8th
graders’ inquiry competence. Paper pre-sented at the 23rd Annual Conference of Sci-ence Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.]
李光烈、劉嘉茹、江新合（2010）：模型化活 動模組對國小學童科學推理能力之促進效 果。教育心理學報，41（4），751-772。
[Li, Guang-Lie, Liu, Jia-Ru, & Jiang, Xin-He (2010). Effects of fostering elementary stu-dent’s scientific reasoning ability through module of modeling activities. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 41(4), 751-772.]
李錦坤（2005）：網路化科學推理學習對國小 學生燃燒概念重建與推理能力提昇之影 響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在 職專班碩士論文（未出版）。[Lee, Jin-Kun (2005). The effects of web-based scientific reasoning on elementary students’ concep-tual reconstruction of combustion and rea-soning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Na-tional Chiao Tung Univiersity.]
林珮君、段曉林（2007）：探究教學對國中學 生知識觀與學習動機之影響。發表於第二 十三屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄：國立 高 雄 師 範 大 學 。[Lin, Pei-Jun, & Tuan, Hsiao-Lin (2007). The impact of inquiry-based teaching on junior-high students’ epis-temology and motivation. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of Science Edu-cation, National Kaohsiung Normal Univer-sity, Taiwan.]
周家卉（2006）：國小學童科學推理類型之研 究。國立臺南大學自然科學教育學系碩士 論 文 （ 未 出 版 ）， 臺 南 。[Zhou, Gu-Hui (2006). Types of the students’ scientific rea-soning in elementary school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National University of
Tainan, Tainan, Taiwan.]
洪振方（2003）：探究式教學的歷史回顧與創 造性探究模式之初探。國立高雄師範大學 高 雄 師 大 學 報，15 ， 641-662 。 [Hong, Zhen-Fang (2003). The historical review of inquiry teaching and preliminary exploration of creative inquiry model. Research Journal of National Kaohsiung Normal University, 15, 641-662.]
黃介仁、段曉林（2007）：巢狀式探究教學提 升國中生科學概念學習成效之行動研究。
發表於第二十三屆科學教育學術研討會。
高雄：國立高雄師範大學。[Huang, Jie-Ren, & Tuan, Hsiao-Lin (2007). An action research investigation the enhancement jun-ior high school student’s science learning through inquiry instruction. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of Science Education, National Kaohsiung Normal Uni-versity, Taiwan.]
教育部（2000）：國民中小學九年一貫課程總 綱。臺北：作者。[Ministry of Education (2000). Taiwan 1-9 curriculum. Taipei, Tai-wan: Ministry of Education.]
教育部（2002a）：創造力教育白皮書。臺北：
作 者 。[Ministry of Education (2002a).
White paper on creative education. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.]
教育部（2002b）：全國第一次科學教育會議資 料。臺北：作者。[Ministry of Education (2002b). Documents of the first national con-ference on education. Taipei, Taiwan: Minis-try of Education.]
潘裕豐（2006）：為何及如何進行創造思考教 學。生活科技教育月刊，39（ 2）， 38-55。[Pan, Yu-Feng (2006). Why and how creative thinking teaching. Living
Technol-ogy Education, 39(2), 38-55.]
蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤（2007）：巢狀探究 教學模式對國二學生理化學習動機之影 響。科學教育學刊，13，289-315。[Tsai, Chih-Chung, Tuan, Hsiao-Lin, & Chin, Chi-Chin (2007). Investigation of the nested-inquiry instruction model on the 8th graders’
motivation toward learning physical science.
Chinese Journal of Science Education, 13, 289-315.]
蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤（2009）：巢狀探究 教學對國二學生覺知教師溝通行為改變之 探討。課程與教學季刊，12（3），129-152。[Tsai, Chih-Chung, Tuan, Hsiao-Lin,
& Chin, Chi-Chin (2009). Investigating the 8th graders’ changes of perception of teach-ers’ communication behavior of nested-inquiry-based instruction. Curriculum & In-struction Quarterly, 12(3), 129-152.]
蔡典謨（1998）：資優學生充實課程彙編。高 雄：國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心。
[Tsai, Dian-Mo (1998). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University Special Education Center.]
謝州恩、吳心楷（2005）：探究情境中國小學 童科學解釋能力成長之研究。師大學報，
50（2），55-84。[Hsieh, Zhou-En, & Wu, Hsin-Kai (2005). Developing the skills sixth graders needs for constructing scientific ex-planations in inquiry-based learning envi-ronments. Journal of Taiwan Normal Uni-versity: Mathematics & Science Education, 50(2), 55-84.]
Baldwin, V. (1994). The seven plus story: Devel-oping hidden talents among students in so-cioeconomically disadvantaged
environ-ments. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 80-84.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R.
(2000). How people learn: Brain, mind ex-perience and school. Washington, DC: Na-tional Academy Press.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy.
Heinemann, NH: Portsmounth.
Bybee, R. W., & Landes, N. M. (1988). The bio-logical sciences curriculum study (BSCS).
Science and Children, 25(8), 36-37.
Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (1997). Introduc-tion and overview. In N. Colangelo, & G. A.
Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 3-23). Boston, MA: Allyn & Ba-con.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles of science teacher. Jour-nal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
Dalzell, H. J. (1998). Giftedness: Infancy to ado-lescence-A developmental perspective.
Roeper Review, 20, 259-265.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduc-tion: Entering the field of qualitative re-search. In N. K. Denzin, & T. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research.
Thousand (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
DeVries, R., Edmiaston, R., Zan, B., &
Hildebrandt, C. (2002). Developing con-structivist early childhood curriculum: Prac-tical principles and activities. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Educa-tion, 38, 39-72.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1995).
Young Peoples’ images of science. Milton, KE: Open University Press..
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in re-search on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of reach on teaching (3rd ed., pp.
119-161). New York: MacMillan Press.
Ferrell, B., Kress, M., & Croft, J. (1988). Charac-teristics of teachers in a full day gifted pro-gram. Roeper Review, 10, 136-139.
Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, E. A.
(2001). Relationships among informal learn-ing environments, teachlearn-ing procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 535-549.
Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge:
An introduction to critical thinking (3rd ed.).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hogan, K., & Fisherkeller, J. (1999). Dialogue as data: Assessing students' scientific reasoning with interactive protocols. In J. J. Mintzes, J.
D. Novak, & J. W. Wandersee (Eds.), Assess-ing science understandAssess-ing: A human con-structivist view (pp. 96-124). San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).
Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Eds.). (2001).
Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Khan, S. (2007). Model-based inquiries in chem-istry. Science Education, 91(6), 877-905.
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48.
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988).
The development of scientific thinking skills.
New York: Academic Press.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking.
Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
Lawson, A. E. (1978). Development and valida-tion of the classroom test of formal reasoning.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11-24.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publica-tions.
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explana-tion. New York: Routledge press.
Lott, G. W. (1983). The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizations upon student out-comes in science education. Journal of Re-search in Science Teaching, 20(5), 437-446.
Loving, C. C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education＇s journey through positivist-postmodern terri-tory. American Educational Research Jour-nal, 34(3), 421-452.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R.
T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban sys-temic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080.
Marzano, R. J. (1998). Dimensions of learning- Teacher’s manual. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
McDonald, S., & Songer, N. B. (2008). Enacting classroom inquiry: Theorizing teachers’ con-ceptions of science teaching. Science Educa-tion, 92(6), 973-993.
McGinnis, J. R., & Stefanich, G. P. (2007). Spe-cial needs and talents in science learning. In S. Abell, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook
of research on science education (pp. 287-317). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moshman, D. (1997). Cognitive development beyond childhood. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of Child psychology (5nd ed., pp.
947-978). New York: Wiley.
National Research Council (1996). National sci-ence education standards. Washington, DC:
Author.
Renzulli, J., S. (1977). The enrichment trial model:
A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield, CT:
Creative Learning Press.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explana-tion-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry.
Science Education, 88, 345-372.
Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scien-tific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts.
Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 102-119.
Shavelson, R. J., Solano-Flores, G., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (1998). Towards performance assess-ment technology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 171-184.
Shymansky, J. (1984). BSCS programs: Just how effective were they? The American Biology Teacher, 46(1), 54-57.
Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & Kam, R. (2002).
Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.
Sousa, D. A. (2003). How the gifted brain learns.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock
Press.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2005). A longitudinal study of children’s developing knowledge and reasoning in science. Research in Sci-ence Education, 35(1), 63-98.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Feldhusn, J. (1994). Com-prehensive curriculum for gifted learners.
Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The impact of technology on the enactment of
‘‘inquiry’’ in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. Journal of Re-search in Science Teaching, 44(1), 154-182.
Waters, L. J., Siegal, M., & Slaughter, V. (2000).
Development of reasoning and the tension between scientific and conversational infer-ence. Social Development, 9, 383-396.
Wu, H. K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Inscriptional practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: A case study of seventh graders’ use of data ta-bles and graphs. Journal of Research in Sci-ence Teaching, 43(1), 63-95.
收稿日期：2011.11.09 接受日期：2012.05.04