1 第一作者自 1998 年起開始經歷電腦處理質性資料的相關議題，早期曾使用 Microsoft Excel 和 FileMaker Pro 處理資料，2000 年開始使用 QDA 軟體進行質性研究，
十年來使用過的 QDA 軟體及版本包括 Nud*ist 4、Nud*ist 5、NVivo 2、和 NVivo 8。第 二作者自 2004 年起使用 NVivo 2 進行研究，協助專案計畫以 NVivo 8 分析研究資料，
並以 NVivo 8 管理與分析其博士論文資料。
2在本文撰寫時（2010 年 4 月），NVivo 8 為最新版本，但 QSR 已預告 NVivo 9 將 於 2010 年 10 月上市。新版的介面設計會有變化，強調在功能的使用上更為方便。
參考文獻
胡幼慧（主編）。（2003）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。
郭玉霞（2009）。質性研究資料分析：NVivo 8 活用寶典。台北：高等教育。
黃世奇、何明軒（2009a）。NVivo 8 軟體基本功能介紹（一）。載於郭玉霞（主編），質 性研究資料分析：NVivo 8 活用寶典（頁 27-82）。台北：高等教育。
黃世奇、何明軒（2009b）。NVivo 8 軟體基本功能介紹（二）。載於郭玉霞（主編）， 質 性研究資料分析：NVivo 8 活用寶典（頁 83-152）。台北：高等教育。
黃世奇、何明軒（2009c）。NVivo 8 軟體基本功能介紹（三）。載於郭玉霞（主編），質 性研究資料分析：NVivo 8 活用寶典（頁 153-218）。台北：高等教育。
American Evaluation Association. (2010). Qualitative analysis software. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.eval.org/Resources/QDA.htm
Baker, C. D. (1997). Transcription and representation literacy research. In J. Flood, S. B.
Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual art (pp. 110-120). New York: Macmillan.
Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds:
Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47-94.
Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2001). Constructing networks of action-relevant episodes: An in situ research methodology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 63-112.
Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., et al. (2010).
Conducting video research in the learning sciences: guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3-53.
di Gregorio, S. (2000, September). Using NVivo for your literature. Paper presented at the Strategies in Qualitative Research: Issues and Results from Analysis Using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST, London, UK.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittroc (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K.
G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 1155-1173).
Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gilbert, L. S. (2002). Going the distance: ‘Closeness’ in qualitative data analysis software.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 215-228.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1963). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of complementary methods in education research (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In
D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education (pp. 89-115).
New York: Praeger.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In D. K.
Norman & S. Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gumperz, J. J., & Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchanges. In J. A.
Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transoiption and coding in discourse research (pp. 91-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
Johnston, L. (2006). Software and method: Reflections on teaching and using QSR NVivo in doctoral research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5), 379-391.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
Lewis, R. B. (2004). NVivo 2.0 and ATLAS/ti 5.0: a comparative review of two popular qualitative data-analysis programs. Field Methods, 16(4), 439-469.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moschkovich, J. N., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Integrating a naturalistic paradigm into
research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp.
457-486). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richards, L. (2002). Qualitative computing—a methods revolution? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 263-276.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Education Research. (2010). Transana Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://www.transana.org/
Walsh, M. (2003). Teaching qualitative analysis using QSR NVivo. The Qualitative Report 8(2), 251-256.
Weitzman, E. A. (2000). Software and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 803-820). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wickham, M., & Woods, M. (2005). Reflecting on the strategic use of CAQDAS to manage and report on the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 687-702.
Wu, H.-K., & Huang, Y.-L. (2007). Ninth grade student engagement in teacher-centered and student-centered technology-enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91,
727-749.
Wu, H.-K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Exploring middle school students' use of inscriptions in project-based science classrooms. Science Education, 90(5), 852-873.
Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842.