• 沒有找到結果。

行政院人事行政局(2006)。有關 96 年起行政機關績效獎金及績效管理制度相關 事宜。2006 年 12 月 29 日,取自:http://web.cpa.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1745

&CtNode=233&mp=1。

李沛良(1988)。社會研究的統計分析。台北:巨流出版社。

李姿慧、王家俊(2009)。監理所內玩 Facebook 公務員上班忙「種菜」,「開心 農場」遊戲夯 民罵:工作太閒氣死人,2009 年 9 月 20 日,取自:

http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/31955762/IssueID/20090920。

吳明隆(2009)。SPSS 操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南書局。

吳明隆(2011)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務。台北:易習出版社。

邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南出版社。

洪永泰(2004)。原始樣本、替代樣本、與追蹤樣本的比較:「2001 年台灣選舉 與民主化調查研究」訪問失敗問題的探討。選舉研究,10(2),37-58。

唐佩君(2009)。總統盼公務員聞聲救苦,人事局擬納入考核,2009 年 1 月 1 日,取自:http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id=826642。

黃村杉(2010)。北縣/清潔隊員聚賭,記過扣獎金,2010 年 5 月 8 日,取自:

http://www.nownews.com/2010/05/08/11459-2600890.htm#ixzz1Z8LtTm00。

葉奉達(2010)。喪偶心情差?直擊公務員上班打電玩,2010 年 5 月 20 日,取 自:http://www.tvbs.com.tw/news/news_list.asp?no=blue20100520191011。

魏祿卿(2006)。公務員上班結伴逛攤位 摸魚被抓包聲稱路過,2006 年 3 月 9 日,取自:http://news.ebc.net.tw/apps/index.htm。

Alonso, P., & B. L. Gregory (2001). Public service motivation and job performance:

Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363-380.

Beck, J. T., & B. Bozeman (2007). Public Values: An inventory. Administration &

Society, 39(3), 354-381.

Bretz, R. D., & T. A. Judge (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.

Brewer, G. A., & S. C. Selden (1998). Whistle-blowers in the Federal civil service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413-439.

Bright, L. (2007). Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361-379.

Coursey, D., J. L. Brudney, L. Littlepage, & J. L. Perry (2011). Does public service motivation matter in volunteering domain choices? A test of functional theory.

Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 48-66.

Crank, J. P., & M. A. Caldero (2000). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause.

Cincinati, OH: Anderson.

Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

7(4), 499-518.

DeLeon, L., & W. Taher (1996). Expectations and job satisfaction of local-government professionals. American Review of Public Administration, 26(4), 401-416.

Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Dilulio, J. D. (1994). Principled agents: The cultural bases of behavior in a federal government bureaucracy. Journal of Public administration Research and Theory, 4(3), 277-318.

Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Dull, M. (2009). Results-model reform leadership: Questions of credible commitment.

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 255-284.

Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ellickson, M. C. (2002). Determinants of job satisfaction of municipal government employees. Public service, 1987-1994. American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), 199-222.

Frederickson, H. G., & D. K. Hart (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 547-53.

Gailmard, S., & J. Patty (2007). Slackers and zealots: Civil service, discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 873-889.

Gailmard, S. (2009). Discretion rather than rules: Choice of instruments to constrain bureaucratic policy-making. Political Analysis, 17(1), 25-44.

Gailmard, S. (2010). Politics, principal-agent problems, and public service motivation.

International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 35-45.

Gould-Williams, J. (2003). The important of HR. Practices and workplace trust in achiving superior performance: A study of public-section organizations.

International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 28-54.

Grant, M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58.

Hair, J. F., B. Black, B. Babin, R. E. Anderson, & R. L. Tatham (1988). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Macmillan.

Horn, M. J. (1995). The political economy of public administration. New York:

Cambridge Press.

Houston, D. T. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public

Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713-727.

Houston, D. T. (2006). “Walk the walk” of public service motivation: public emplyees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 67-86.

Kiewiet, D. R., & M. D. McCubbins. (1991). The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kim, S. (2004). Factors affection state government information technology employee turn over intentions. American Review of Public Administration, 35(2), 137-156.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd Ed.).

New York: Guilford.

Knoke, D., & C. Wright-Isak (1982). Individual motives and organizational incentive systems. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 209-254.

Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.

Kristof-Brown, A. L., R. D. Zimmerman, & E. C. Johnson (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.

Langbein, L. (2010). Economics, public service motivation, and pay for performance:

Complements or substitutes? International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 9-23.

Leisink, P., & B. Steijn (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75 (1), 35-52.

Lewis, D. E. (2008). The politics of presidential appointments. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lewis, D. E. (2010). Measurement and public service motivation: new insights, old questions. International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 46-55.

Lewis, G. B., & S. A. Frank (2002). Who wants to work for government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395-404.

Liu, B., C. Hui, J. Hu, W. Yang, & X. Yu (2011). How well can public service motivation connect with occupational intention? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 191-211.

Liu, B., & N. Tang (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between

public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administrative Review, 71(5), 718-727.

Liu, B., N. Tang, & X. Zhu (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684-699.

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psycholog (pp. 1319-1328).

Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.

Maesschalck, J., Z. V. Wal, L. Huberts (2008). Public service motivation and ethical conduct. In J. L. Perry, & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Managerial dilemma: The political economy of hierarchy (pp. 157-176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McCubbins, M., R. Noll, & B. Weingast (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3(2), 265-300.

Meier, K. J. (1994). The politics of sin. New York: M. W. Sharpe.

Miller, G. J. (1992). Managerial dilemma: the political economy of hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, G. J., & A. B. Whitford (2002). Trust and incentives in principal-agent negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14(2), 231-267.

Moynihan, D. P. (2010). A workforce of cynics? The effects of contemporary reforms on public service motivation. Internatiobal Public Management Journal, 13(1), 24-34.

Moynihan, D. P. & S. K. Pandey (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40-53.

Mueller, D. C. (1989). Public choice II. New York: Cambridge Press.

Muchinsky, P. M., & C. J. Monohan (1987). What is person-environment congruence?

Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268-277.

Naff, K. C., & J. Crum (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.

Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3), 617-643.

O’Reilly, C. A., & J. Chatman (1986). Organization commitment and psychological

attachment: The influences of compliance, identification, internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.

Perry, J., & L. R. Wise (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-23.

Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation.

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 471-488.

Piliavin, J. A., & H. Charng (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research.

Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27-65.

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In searching of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288-302.

Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Rainey, H. G., & P. Steinbauer (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1-32.

Rosdil, D. (1991). The context of radical populism in U.S. cities: a comparative analysis.

Journal of Urban Affairs, 13(1), 77-96.

Samantrai, K. (1992). Factors in decision to leave: Retaining social workers with MSWs in public child welfare. Social Work, 37(5), 454-458.

Schwartz, H. S. (1983). A theory of deontic work motivation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(2), 203-214.

Sharp, E. B. (2005). Morality politics in American cities. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

Taylor, J. (2008). Organizational influences, public service motivation and work outcomes: An Australian study. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 67-88.

Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Towards a public administration theory of public service motivation. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545-556.

Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: corroborating and extending perry’s measurement instrument.

International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143-167.

Van Der, W. Z., L. Huberts, H. V. Heuvel, & E. Kolthoff (2006). Central values of

government and business: Differences, similarities and conflicts. Public Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 314-364.

Verquer, M. L., T. A. Beehr, & S. H. Wagner (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473-489.

Wiseman, A. (2009). Delegation and positive sum bureaucracies. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 998-1014.

Wright, B. E., & R. K. Christensen (2010). Public service motivation: A test of the job attraction–selection–attrition model. International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 155-176.

Wright, B. E., & B. S. Davis (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector: The role of the work environment. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 70-90.

Wright, B. E., & S. K. Pandey (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of Person-Organization Fit testing the mediating effect of value congruence.

Administration & Society, 40(5), 502-521.

附錄一 Perry 測量公共服務動機的構面與題目

構面 題目

自我犧牲

1.對我而言,為社會盡一份心力比自我的成就更重要 2.我把責任感看得比自我利益更重要

3.實現正義價值比獲得我個人的經濟效益更重要 4.我的行動中,有很大部分是為了個人利益以外的原因 5.即使沒有得到任何回饋,服務民眾還是帶給我良好的感覺 6.我認為人們應該回饋給社會,不能只是取之於社會 7.即使對我有些損失,我也會盡力去幫助他人 8.為了使社會更加美好,我會願意犧牲奉獻

同情心

9.我同情弱勢族群

10.當前的社會中,許多社會福利政策都是必要的 11.當我看到人們的悲慘或痛苦時,我會感到難過 12.促進他人的福祉,是我對國家的責任之一 13.即使是不認識的人,我也會考慮到他們的福利 14.我認為日常事務的完成需要人們彼此的互助 15.對於不願努力上進的人,沒有什麼好同情的 16.我會全力支持大部份的公共計劃

公共利益及公民 責任的承諾

17.我有興趣參與我們社區的事務 18.我無私的奉獻給我們社區

19.我認為有價值的公共服務是很重要的 20.我認為公共服務是我的公民責任

21.我樂意看到政府做出對社會有益的事,即便會損害我的利益 對公共政策之關

注度

22.我不是很關心政治人物的作為

23.制定公共政策會涉及妥協、協商,因此我不感興趣 24.政治是骯髒的

資料來源:翻譯自Perry(1996)

附錄二 因素分析與信度結果分析

附錄二 因素分析與信度結果分析(續) 因素分析的習慣值,惟經查統計學者Hair、Black Babin、Anderson 及 Tatham(1988)

的說法,渠認為納入共同因素當中的題項之負荷量值標準,要同時考量到因素分析時 樣本的大小,若是樣本數較少,則因素負荷量的選取標準須較高;相對的,若是樣本 數較多,則因素負荷量的選取標準可以較低。樣本數為 100 時,其選取標準為 .55,

樣本數為120 時,其選取標準為 .50,樣本數超過 350 時,選取標準為 .30(吳明隆,

2009:288-289)。據此,因本研究樣本超過 350,各題項之因素負荷量均逾 .50,應 符合擇取標準。

資料來源:作者自行整理

An Empirical Study of Impact of PSM on Work

相關文件