• 沒有找到結果。

王怡琄(2009)。《大學生對科學新聞報導之理解與詮釋》。政治大學廣播電視學 研究所碩士論文。

王超群、韓國棟(2006 年 2 月 13 日)。〈144 所學校受害 電磁波圍攻逾萬學 生〉,《中國時報》,A1 版。

王道環(2006)。〈閱讀類型回顧 科普︰期許科普出版,邁步向前〉,《誠品好 讀月報》,62: 104-107。

王憶萍(2005)。《科博館簡訊科普文章內容分析及教師閱讀偏好之研究》。臺中 師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士班碩士論文。

王儷靜、方念萱(2004 年 11 月 2 日)。〈是新聞或戲劇?〉,《中國時報》,

A15 版。

全嘉莉(2004)。《報紙報導新療法的醫藥新聞與讀者就醫行為影響之研究:以更 年期荷爾蒙療法(HRT)報導為例》。政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班碩士 論文。

朱淑娟(2005 年 2 月 3 日)。〈錄影帶血淋淋 拆穿皮草美麗謊言〉,《聯合 報》,A3 版。

吳翠珍(2002)。〈教育新觀念──資訊時代的媒體教育〉,《人本教育札記》,

157: 40-41。

呂立翔(2007)。《重建科技社會中科學新聞產製的圖像──以中時、聯合、自由 三報為例》。南華大學傳播管理學碩士論文。

李國秀(2000)。《科學的社會視角》。合肥:安徽人民出版社。

周桂田(2004)。〈獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」—在地公

眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,56:

徐美苓(1999)。〈愛滋病報導的議題與消息來源設定〉,《新聞學研究》,58:

171-199。

徐美苓、丁志音(2004)。〈小病微恙的真實再現──以「感冒」的新聞論述為

教育部社會教育司(2002)。〈媒體素養教育政策白皮書〉。上網日期:2008 年 12 月 20 日,取自 http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/Web/SOCIETY/index.htm

教育部國民教育司(1998)。〈九年一貫課程綱要〉。上網日期:2008 年 12 月 20 日,取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/Web/EJE/ index.htm

陳思穎(2005)。《食品污染新聞報導內容與品質之研究──以 2005 年「戴奧辛 鴨蛋」與「孔雀石綠石斑魚」為例》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論 文。

陳恆安(2003)。〈科學媒體化〉,《科學發展》,369: 84-85。

陳琪惠(2006)。《有機食品的媒體再現──以中國時報、聯合報以及民生報的報 之理解差異為例〉,《科學教育學刊》,16(1): 105-124。

黃俊儒(2006)。〈科學新聞為中心的教學設計及教育推廣──以「能源汽車」單 元模組為例〉,《科學教育月刊》,289: 36-42。

黃俊儒、簡妙如(2008)。〈「科學家發明了什麼?」──解析學生對於科學新聞 中的科技產物意象〉,《科學教育學刊》,16(4): 415-438。

黃俊儒、簡妙如(2006)。〈科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈:構思另個科學 傳播的起點〉,《新聞學研究》,86: 135-170。

黃俊儒、簡妙如(2004 年 12 月)。〈科學新聞之類型分析及對科學教學之意 涵〉,「中華民國第二十屆科學教育學術研討會」,高雄:高雄師範大學。

楊玉齡(2000)。〈我看科普──臺灣科學傳播專輯〉,《科學月刊》,31(1): 12-13。

究》。政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。

謝瀛春(1992)。〈全國科技會議新聞之分析〉,《新聞學研究》,46: 131-147。

韓尚平(1990)。〈台灣科技新聞報導的現況及問題〉,《科學月刊》,

21(8): 617-620。

Aikenhead, G. S. (1990). Scientific/technological literacy, critical reasoning, and classroom practice. In S. P. Norris & L. M. Phillips (Eds.), Foundations of literacy policy in Canada (pp. 127-145). Calgary, Canada: Detselig.

Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science.

Science Education, 69, 453-475.

Bridgstock, M., Burch, D., Gorge, J., Laurent, J., & Lowe, I. (1998). Science, Technology and society: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bucchi, M., & Mazzolini, R. G. (2003). Big science, little news: Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997. Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), 7-24.

Bucchi, M. (1998). Science and the media: Alternative routes in scientific communication.

New York: Routledge.

Clemens, E. S. (1986). Of asteroid and dinosaurs: The role of the press in shaping the scientific debates. Social Studies of Science, 16, 421-456.

Cloitre, M., & Shinn, T. (1985). Expository practice: Social, cognitive and epistemological linkages. In T. Shinn & R. Whitley (Eds.), Expository science (pp.

31-60). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

Curd, M., & Cover, J. A. (1998). Philosophy of science: The central issues. New York:

Norton.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.

DiBella, S. M., Ferri, A. J., & Padderud, A. B. (1991). Scientists’ reasons for constructing

to mass media interviews: A national survey. Journalism Quarterly, 68(4), 740-749.

Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2002). The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 225-241.

Dornan, C. (1990). Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of “science and media”.

Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1), 48-71.

Dunwoody, S., & Ryan, M. (1985). Scientific barriers to the popularization of science in the mass media. Journal of Communication, 35, 26-42.

Einsiedel, E., & Thorne, B. (1999). Public responses to uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman, S.

D. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty (pp. 43-57).

Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Felt, U. (2000). Why should the public “understand” science? A historical perspective on aspects of the public understanding of science. In M. Dierkes & C. Grote (Eds.), Between understanding and trust: The public, science and technology (pp. 7-38).

London: Routledge.

Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1999). Introduction. In S. M. Friedman, S. D. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty (pp. xi-xiv).

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Galison, P. (1992). The many faces of big science. In P. Galison & B. Hevly (Eds.), Big science: The growth of large-scale research (pp. 1-17). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Green, J. (1985). Media denationalization and science: The case of the criminal chromosome. In T. Shinn & R. Whitley (Eds.), Expository science (pp. 139-161).

Boston: D. Reidel.

Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.

Griswold, W. (1994). Cultures and societies in a changing world. London: Pine Forge Press.

Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(12), 693-708.

Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(7), 335-349.

Hilgartner, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20, 519-539.

Hisschemöler, M., & Midden, C. J. H. (1999). Improving the usability of research on the public perception of science and technology for policy-making. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 17-33.

Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703-710.

Kerckhove, D. D. (1995). The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality.

Toronto: Somerville House.

Klee, R. (1997). Introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns of students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689-1716.

Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). ‘To trust or not to trust,… ‘-pupils’ ways’ of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877-901.

Kolstø, S. D. (2001b). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.

Kolstø, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645-664.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Logan, R. A. (1991). Popularization vs. secularization: Media coverage of health. In L.

Wilkins & P. Patterson (Eds.), Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy (pp. 43-59). New York: Greenwood.

Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., Doria, M. F., Haynes, K., & Vincent, K. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change.

Public Understanding of Science, 15, 435-457.

Matthews, B., & Davies, D. (1999). Changing children’s images of scientists: Can teachers make a difference? School Science Review, 80(293), 79-85.

McGinn, R. E. (1991). Science, technology, and society. London: Prentice-Hall.

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-178.

Millar, R. (1997). Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve? In R. Levinson & J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis?

(pp. 87-101). London: Routledge

Miller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. G. (2006). Adult science learning from local television newscasts. Science Communication, 28(2), 216-242.

Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Nelkin, D. (1987/1995). Science and technology in the media. In Selling science: How the press covers science and technology (pp. 1-13). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips. L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 947-967.

Nowotny, H. (1981). Expert and their expertise: On the changing relationship between experts and their public. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 1(3), 235-241.

Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Peters, H. P. (1995). The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: Co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society, 17, 31-48.

Peters, H. P. (1994). Mass media as an information channel and public arena. Risk:

Healthy, Safety & Environment, 5, 241-250.

Phillips D. P., Kanter E. J., Bednarczyk B., & Tastad P. L. (1991). Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. The New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 1180-1183.

Price, D. J. de S. (1963). Little science, big science. London: Columbia University Press.

Priest, S. H. (2006). Public discourse and scientific controversy: A spiral-of-silence analysis of biotechnology opinion in the United States. Science Communication, 28(2), 195-215.

Reis, P., & Galvao, C. (2004). Socio-scientific controversies and students’ conceptions about scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1621-1633.

Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science.

Science Education, 89, 803-821.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Scienec Education, 26(4), 387-409.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.

Shapin, S. (1990). Science and the public. In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie &

M. J. S. Hodge. (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 990-1007). London: Routledge.

Shinn, T., & Whitley, R. (Eds.). (1985). Expository science: Forms and functions of popularization. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

Steinke, J., Lapinski, M. K., Crocker, N., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Williams, Y., &

Kuchibhotla, S. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school- aged children’s perceptions of women in science using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST). Science Communication, 29(1), 35-64.

Stocklmayer, S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). New experiences and old knowledge: towards a model for the personal awareness of science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 835-858.

Tweney, R. D. (1991). Informal reasoning ins science. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & J.

W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum.

Webster, A. (1991). Science, technology and society. London: Macmillan.

Whitley, R. (1985). Knowledge producers and knowledge acquirers. In T. Shinn & R.

Whitley (Eds.), Expository science (pp. 3-28). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

Woodhouse, M. B. (1992). Philosophy and frontier science: Is there a new paradigm in the making? In D. Lamb (Ed.), New horizons in the philosophy of science (pp. 26-48).

Aldershot, Canada: Avebury.

Science Communication Studies between Science

相關文件