BIBLIOGRAPHY/REFERENCES

A

/R

/S

Greenspan, Alan, Market Economies and Rule of Law, Keynote speech delivered at the Financial Markets Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Sea Island, Georgia, 4 April 2003

Julià-Barceló, Rosa, On-Line Intermediary Liability Issues: Comparing EU and U.S. Legal Frameworks, ESPRIT P^ROJECT 27018 ^{OF THE} E^LECTRONIC C^OMMERCE LEGAL ISSUES P^LATFORM (December 1999), available at http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/legal/en/lab/991216/liability.doc

Eisgrau, Adam, MGM v. Grokster: Balancing the Protection of Copyright and Technological Innovation: Hearing before the U.S. Senate Comm. On Commerce, Science and Transportation, 109^th Cong. ___ (28 July 2005)(Statement for Flanagan Consulting; also on behalf of P2P United and Electronic Frontier Foundation (EEF))

Liegl, Alexander, Andreas Leupold and Peter Bräutigam, Copyright Infringement in Germany, contained in Dennis Campbell and Susan Cotter, ed., C^OPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT – COMPARATIVE L^AW YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL B^USINESS, Special Issue 1997, at 162-164 (1997)

Litman, Jessica, Copyright Legislation and Technological Change, 68 O^REGON L. R. 275 (1989) Madden, Mary, Artists, Musicians and the Internet, P^EW I^NTERNET & A^MERICAN L^IFE P^ROJECT,

December 5, 2004

Madden, Mary and Rainie, Lee, Music and Video Downloading Moves beyond P2P, P^EW I^NTERNET

& A^MERICAN L^IFE P^ROJECT D^ATA M^EMO, 5 March 2005

Peters, Marybeth, Music Licensing Reform: Hearing before the Subcomm. on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, 109^th Cong., 1^st

102 Hilary B. Rosen, The Wisdom of the Court, Part II, THE HUFFINGTON POST, 27 June 2005, available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/hilary-rosen/the-wisdom-of-the-court-_3259.html.

Sess., ___ (21 June 2005), available at www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat062105.html

Rosen, Hilary B., The Wisdom of the Court, Part II, THE HUFFINGTON POST, 27 June 2005, available at:

www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/hilary-rosen/the- wisdom-of-the-court-_3259.html Soma, John T. and Norman, Natalie A., International Take-down Policy: A Proposal for the WTO

and WIPO to Establish International Copyright Procedural Guidelines for Internet Service Providers, 22 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 391, 398 (2000)

Stuller, Phillip, Note, How the RIAA Can Stop Worrying and Learn to Love the RICO Act:

Exploiting Civil RICO to Battle Peer-to-Peer Copyright Infringement, 24 LOY. L.A. ENT. L.

REV. 521 (2004)

B

/C

M

DURANT, WILL AND ARIEL,THE LESSONS OF HISTORY, at 19 (1968)

GOLDSTEIN,PAUL,COPYRIGHT’S HIGHWAY: FROM GUTENBERG TO CELESTIAL JUKEBOX (1994) SUN,ANDY Y., Reforming the Protection of Intellectual Property: The Case of China and Taiwan in

Light of WTO Accession, MARYLAND SERIES IN CONTEMPORARY ASIAN STUDIES, University of Maryland School of Law, No. 4 – 2001 (165)(2002)

WIPO SEMINAR ON COPYRIGHT AND INTERNET INTERMEDIARIES, WIPO/IIS/05, Geneva, Switzerland, available at http://www.wipo.int/meetings/2005/wipo_iis/

C

Universal Music v. Cooper, [2005] FCA 972 (14 July 2005)

Universal Music Australia Pty., Ltd. v. Sharman License Holdings, Ltd. (with corrigendum), [2005]

FCA 1242 (5 September 2005); [2005] FCA 1587 (17 November 2005) China (People’s Republic of)

Wang Meng, et al. v. Beijing Cenpok Intercom Technology Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Beijing Online case), [1999] First Intermediate Zhōng No. 185 Civil Judgment (17 December 1999)

Germany

RGSt 12/34 and RGZ 78,84 and 86; BGHZ 42, 118, 127 – Tonbandgerätehersteller Video Licensing Agreement Decision, [1987] GRUR 37

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China

Hong Kong SAR v. Chan Nai Min, [2005] TMCC 1268/2005 (conviction)(a/k/a the “BitTorrent” case) Hong Kong SAR v. Chan Nai Min, [2005] TMCC 1268/2005 (sentencing)

Japan

Case 1984 (o (オ)) No. 1204 on the infringement of copyright by the singing at a karaoke outlet, Supreme Court judgment of 15 March 1988, Minshu, vol. 42, No. 3, at 199 (a/k/a the Club Cat’s Eye Case)

Karaoke Equipment Leasing Case, Osaka District Court judgment of 17 May 1994, Hanrei Jiho,

No. 1516, at 116

Nippon Columbia, Co., Ltd., et al. v. Yugen Kaishia Nippon MMO, Case 2004 (Ne (ネ)) No. 446 on Copyright Infringement and Damages, Tokyo High Court judgment of 31 March 2005;

2002 (Wa (ワ)) Case No. 4249, Tokyo District Court, 29^th Civil Division, interlocutory judgment of 29 January 2003

“Sangokushi III” case, Tokyo District Court judgment of 14 July 1995, Hanrei Jiho, No. 1555, at 218 Korea (Republic of)

Asia Media, Inc. et al. v. Yang, No. (2002) KAHAP77 (Suwon District Court, Seongnam Branch, First Civil Department, 9 July 2002)(a/k/a the Soribada case)

Netherlands, The

Kazaa B.V. v. Buma-Stemra, Court of Appeal Amsterdam, 28 March 2002, no. 1370/01skg South Africa

Frank and Hirsch (Propriety) Ltd. v. A. Roopanand Brothers (Propriety) Ltd., 1993 (4) SA 279 (A) Taiwan, China (Republic of)

(2003) Su No. 728 Criminal Judgment, Shih-lin District Court, Taiwan (30 June 2005)(a/k/a the

“ezPeer” case)

(2003) Su No. 2146 Criminal Judgment, Taipei District Court (9 September 2005), opinion issued on 14 September 2005 (a/k/a the “Kuro” case)

United States

Aimster, In re, 334 F.3d 643, 646 (7^th Cir. 2003)

A&M Records v. Napster, 239 F.3d 1004 (9^th Cir. 2001), 284 F.3d 1091 (9^th Cir. 2002)

Cable/Home Communication Corporation v. Network Productions, Inc., 902 F.2d 829 (11^th Cir. 1990) Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., 443 F.2d 1159, 1162 (2^d Cir. 1971) Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 909 F.2d 1461 (Fed. Cir. 1990)

Kalem v. Harper Brothers, 222 U.S. 55 (1911)(the “Ben Hur” Case)

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 259 F.Supp.2d 1029 (C.D.Cal. 2003); affm’d, 380 F.3d 1154 (9^th Cir. 2004); vacated and remanded, 545 U.S. ___; 125 S.Ct. 2764, 162 L.Ed.2d 781 (2005)

Sega Enterprises, Ltd. v. MAPHIA, 948 F. Supp. 923 (N.D. Cal. 1996) Shiparo, Bernstein & Co. v. H. L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 354 (7^th Cir. 1929)

Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)

I

C

/T

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), as Annex 1C of the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (Marrakesh, 15 April 1994)(Final Act), MTN/FA-A1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1125 (1994)

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1971 Paris Text), 828 U.N.T.S.

223 (1972), as amended on Sept. 28, 1979, WIPO Document AB/X/32 (1979)

International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations (Rome Convention), done at Rome on October 26, 1961, entered into force on May 18, 1964, 496 U.N.T.S. 43 (1964)

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty (WCT), adopted in Geneva on December 20, 1996, 36 I.L.M. 65 (1997)

WIPO Copyright Treaty Notification No. 32 (6 December 2001)

WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), adopted in Geneva on 20 December 1996, 36 I.L.M. 76 (1997)

WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty Notification No. 32 (20 February 2002)

N

/P

R

______, Courting Disaster; The RIAA Hurts Its Cause Immeasurably by Targeting A 12-year-old, KANSAS CITY PITCH WEEKLY, vol. 22, Issue 62 (18 September 2003)

______, Soribada Shuts Down P2P Site After Court Verdict, CHOSUN ILBO (ENGLISH EDITION), 7 November 2005, available at

http://english.chosun.com/w21 data/html/news/200511/200511070017.html.

8.5m P2P File Sharers on Average at Any Time, ONLINE REPORTER (USA), Issue 450, 21 June 2005 Associate Press, Hollywood Sues File-sharing Servers: Action Aimed at Popular BitTorrent Site, 14

December 2004

Borland, John, Last Waltz for Grokster, CNET NEWS.COM, available at

http://news.com.com/Last+waltz+for+Grokster/2100-1027_3-5937832.html

Farzad, Ruben, File Swappers Get Creative as Wheels of Justice Turn, NEW YORK TIMES, June 18, 2005, at C13

Gain, Bruce, Europe Follows Grokster’s Lead, WIRED, 5 August 2005, available at http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,68418,00.html

Kahney, Leander, Inside Look at Birth of the iPod, WIRED, July 21, 2004, available at http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,64286,00.html

Levy, Steven, iPod Nation – In Just Three Years, Apple’s Adorable Mini Music Player Has Gone from Gizmo to Life-changing Cultural Icon, NEWSWEEK, July 26, 2005, available at

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5457432 /site/newsweek

McCullagh, Declan, Senator Wants to Ban P2P Networks, CNET NEWS, July 22, 2004

Charles Solomon, File Share and Share Alike,NEW YORK TIMES, 21 August 2005, Section 2, at 4 Nielsen Soundscan survey on music downloads, NEWSWEEK INTERNATIONAL, 16 January 2006, at 9 O’Brien, Kevin J., U.S. Ruling to Echo in Europe Despite Differences in National Laws, Case to

Have Chilling Effect, INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE, 28 June 2005, at 15

Spring, Tom, Napster Fans Find Lively Alternative – For Now As FastTrack's Popularity Grows, Napster's Old Foes Gear Up For A New Fight, PC WORLD, 12 July 2001, available at

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/ 0,aid,55006,00.asp

Waxman, Sharon, Web Site Agrees to Curb Access to Movie, NEW YORK TIMES, 23 November 2005, at C5

P

U.S. Patent No. 5,579,430 – “Digital encoding process” (the MP3 patent)

S

/R

/L

P

(B

)

H

Copyright Act of 1968, Act No. 63 (27 June 1968), as amended by the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act of 2000, §§100, 101(1)(A), and 112(E)

China (People’s Republic of)

Copyright Law/Amendments of 2001, Section 10, subsections (10), (12)(online publication and right of communications to the public)

Regulations on Internet Copyright Administrative Protection (互聯網著作權行政保護辦法), Order No. 5 jointly issued by the National Copyright Administration and Ministry of Information Industries of the People’s Republic of China (30 April 2005)

Supreme People’s Court Interpretation on Certain Questions Concerning Copyright Disputes Related to Computer Network (最高人民法院關於審理涉及計算機網絡著作權糾紛案件適用法律若 干問題的解釋), Supreme People’s Court, Fa Shi [2000] No. 48 (19 December 2002)

European Union

Council Directive 2001/29/EC, Harmonization of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 2001 O.J. (L 167) 10 (EC)(a/k/a the EU Copyright Directive (EUCD)) Council Directive 2004/48/EC, Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, 2004 O.J. (L 195) 16 (EC)

“Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights and a Council Framework Decision to Strengthen the Criminal Law Framework to Combat Intellectual Property Offenses,” COM (2005) 276 final (12 July 2005)

Germany

Copyright Act (Urheberrechtsgesetz, or UrhG), Sections 54-54d (equitable remuneration/

Vergütungspflicht) Hong Kong SAR, China

Copyright Ordinance, Cap 528, Section 118(1)(f) Korea, Republic of

Civil Code, Section 760, Paragraph 1

Copyright Law, Section 27 (personal fair use) Japan

Copyright Law, Article 113 (acts considered to be infringements)

Limited Liability Law of Internet Intermediary Services (責任制限法) South Africa

Copyright Act of 1978, Section 23 (secondary infringement) United States

17 U.S.C. §§107-122; 504 (c); 512 (a), (b)(2)(B); 1003-1007 (2000, Supp. II) 35 U.S.C. §271(b), (c) (2000, Supp. II)

Anti-counterfeiting Consumer Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-153, § 3, 110 Stat. 1386 (1996)

Copyright Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-553, Title I, 90 Stat. 2541 (1976), as codified in 17 U.S.C.

§§ 101 et seq.

House of Representative Report 94-1476 (on the legislative history of Copyright Act)

“Inducing infringement of Copyrights Act of 2004,” S. 2560, 108^th Cong., 2^d Sess. (2004) Register of Copyrights, Recommendations on Amendments to S. 2560, available at

http://www.copyright.gov/docs/S2560.pdf

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (2000, Supp. II) (a/k/a RICO)

Taiwan, China (Republic of)

Copyright Law, Articles 91-93 (amended as of 24 August 2004) Criminal Procedure Law, Article 376(1)