• 沒有找到結果。

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS

5.1 Conclusion

In this work, the concept of dynamic tuning of operating CMP process is presented and one possible operation profile is proposed via sliding-mode theory.

This strategy is verified by numerical simulations. The simulation results show 14%

reduction in dishing during over-polish stage. Future experiment needs to be designed to confirm this improvement.

However, the simulation verification of step-height reduction needs to be reinforced in future work when there are better models which describes continuous transition from step-height from bulk-polish stage to dishing during over-polish stage.

Otherwise, experiments can be designed to compare directly step height reduction between conventional CMP operation and “dynamic tuning” CMP operation.

Dynamic tuning of operation profile provides a new aspect of CMP operation and it might be a candidate for within wafer control in CMP process. This concept provokes thought for the development of within-wafer control to improve CMP performance. It is the hope of this research that dynamic tuning may be considered for improving CMP planarization in the area of step height reduction and dishing reduction.

5.2 Future Works

The requirement of planarization in semiconductor fabrication is growing

rapidly with the feature size decreasing. This reveals the importance of process control in semiconductor fabrication process is greater and greater. Advanced process control (APC) becomes a hottest subject in fab production to date. To improve the performance substantially (not only in CMP process), within-wafer control may be a critical method. Once the control subject gets into within-wafer, the system must be treated as a dynamic system. It might be more complex than before but the more improvement can be expected.

Many difficulties in within-wafer control need to be solved, like in-situ sensor and the knowledge of process in the situation of dynamic operation. Except the in-situ sensor, to further research the behavior of process in dynamic state an appropriate dynamic model may be a key point. The tighter within-wafer control will be realized based on the proper dynamic model.

Although the preliminary verification/explanation of dynamic tuning is proposed in this work, more complete simulation and experiments must be done in the future. Some future works are listed below:

1. Further grasp the knowledge of CMP process including mechanical and chemical effects.

2. Establish an appropriate dynamic model for CMP process and performance indexes.

3. Examine the ability and stability of the operation strategy of dynamic-tuning by more theoretical analysis and simulations.

4. Try to overcome the limitation in the design of current CMP equipment and design experiments to verify the concept in real production.

5. To optimize the operation profiles based on more investigations on CMP process and more sophisticated control algorithm.

References

[1] F. W. Preston, “The Theory and Design of Plate Glass Polishing Machines,” J.

Soc. Glass Tech., Vol.11, pp.214-247, 1927.

[2] F. B. Kaufman, D. B. Thompson, R. E. Broadie, M. A. Jaso, W. L. Guthrie, D. J.

Pearson, and M. B. Small, “Chemical-Mechanical Polishing for Fabricating Patterned W Metal Features as Chip Interconnects,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.138, No.11, pp.3460-3464, 1991.

[3] G. Nanz and L. E. Camilletti, “Modeling of Chemical-Mechanical Polishing: A Review,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., Vol.8, No.4, pp.382-389, 1995.

[4] W.-T. Tseng and Y.-L. Wang, “Re-examination of Pressure and Speed Dependences of Removal Rate during Chemical-Mechanical Polishing Processes,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.144, No.2, pp.L15-L17, 1997.

[5] F. Zhang and A. Busnaina, “The Role of Particle Adhesion and Surface Deformation in Chemical Mechanical Polishing Processes,” Electrochem.

Solid-State Lett., Vol.1, No.4, pp.184-187, 1998.

[6] B. Zhao and F. G. Shi, “Chemical Mechanical Polishing: Threshold Pressure and Mechanism,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., Vol.2, No.3, pp.145-147, 1999.

[7] H. Hocheng, H. Y. Tsai, and Y. T. Su, “Modeling and Experimental Analysis of the Material Removal Rate in the Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Dielectric Films and Bare Silicon Wafers,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.148, No.10, pp.G581-G586, 2001.

[8] J. Luo and D. A. Dornfeld, “Material Removal Mechanism in Chemical Mechanical Polishing: Theory and Modeling,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., Vol.14, No.2, pp.112-133, 2001.

[9] D. Castillo-Mejia and S. Beaudoin, “A Locally Relevant Prestonian Model for Wafer Polishing,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.150, No.2, pp.G96-G102, 2003.

[10] R. K. Singh and R. Bajaj, “Advances in Chemical-Mechanical Planarization,”

MRS Bulletin/October 2002, pp.743-747.

[11] R. J. Gutmann, J. M. Steigerwald, L. You, D. T. Price, J. Neirynck, D. J.

Duquette, and S. P. Murarka, “Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Copper with Oxide and Polymer Interlevel Dielectrics,” Thin Solid Film, Vol.270, pp.596-600, 1995.

[12] J. Luo, “Review of Chemical-Mechanical Planarization Modeling for Integrated Circuit Fabrication,” Research Reports of LMA of UC. Berkley, USA, pp.107-135, 2002-2003.

[13] D. Zeidler, Z. Stavreva, M. Plotner, and K. Drescher, “Characterization of Cu

Chemical Mechanical Polishing by Electrochemical Investigations,”

Microelectronic Engineering, Vol.33, pp.259-265, 1997.

[14] V. Nguyen, H. VanKranenburg, and P. Woerlee, “Dependency of Dishing on Polishing Time and Slurry Chemistry in Cu CMP,” Microelectronic Engineering, Vol.50, pp.403-410, 2000.

[15] J. Hernandez, P. Wrschka, and G. S. Oehrlein, “Surface Chemistry Studies of Copper Chemical Mechanical Planarization,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.148, No.7, pp.G389-G397, 2001.

[16] V. S. Chathapuram, T. Du, K. B. Sundaram, and V. Desai, “Role of Oxidizer in the Chemical Mechanical Planarization of the Ti/TiN Barrier Layer,”

Microelectronic Engineering, Vol.65, pp.478-488, 2003.

[17] S. Ramarajan, Y. Li, M. Hariharaputhiran, Y.-S. Her, and S. V. Babu, “Effect of PH and Ionic Strength on Chemical Mechanical Polishing of Tantalum,”

Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., Vol.3, No.5, pp.232-234, 2000.

[18] V. H. Nguyen, A. J. Hof, H. van Kranenburg, P. H. Woerlee, and F. Weimar,

“Copper Chemical Mechanical Polishing using a Slurry-free Technique,”

Microelectronic Engineering, Vol.55, pp.305-312, 2001.

[19] S. Kondo, N. Sakuma, Y. Homma, Y. Goto, N. Ohashi, H. Yamaguchi, and N.

Owada, “Complete-Abrasive-Free Process for Copper Damascene Interconnection,” Interconnect Technology Conference, 2000. Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 International, pp.253-255, 2000.

[20] Y. Yamada, N. Konishi, N. Ohashi, and T. Kimura, “Improved Cu Abrasive-Free Polishing at 0.13um Manufacturing and Beyond,” Interconnect Technology Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 International, pp.108-110, 2002.

[21] A. Chen and R.-S. Guo, “Age-Based Double EWMA Controller and Its Application to CMP Processes,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., Vol.14, No.1, pp.11-19, 2001.

[22] L. Da, V. G. Kumar, A. Tay, A. A. Mamun, W. K. Ho, A. See, and L. Chan,

“Run-to-Run Process Control for Chemical Mechanical Polishing in Semiconductor Manufacturing,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, 27-30 Oct., pp.740-744, 2002.

[23] K. Wijekoon, S. Tsai, M. Chandrachood, B. Brown, F. Redeker, S. Nanjangud, and G. Amico, “Multi-Step Approach to Copper CMP Development,”

SEMI/Japan Technical Symposium, 1998.

[24] J.-B. Chiu, C.-C. Yu, and S.-H. Shen, “Application of Soft Landing to the Process Control of Chemical Mechanical Polishing,” Microelectronic Engineering, Vol.65, pp.345-356, 2003.

[25] A. Schiltz, “A Review of Planar Techniques for Multichip Modules,” IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrid, Manuf. Technol., Vol.15, No.2, pp.236-244, 1992.

[26] 王建榮、林必窕、林慶福,半導體平坦化 CMP 技術,全華,台北,1999。

[27] G. Wu and T. E. West, “Hard Porous Pads for Chemical Mechanical Polishing,”

SEMICON China, 2003.

[28] J. M. Steigerwald, S. P. Murarka, and R. J. Gutmann, Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997.

[29] K. Kasprzyk and J. Schlueter, “CMP In-Situ Multi-Zone Endpoint Using Optical Metrology,” Proceedings of 2001 CMP-MIC Conference.

[30] P. Wrschka, J. Hernandez, Y. Hsu, T. S. Kuan, G. S. Oehrlein, H. J. Sun, D.A.

Hansen, J. King, and M. A. Fury, “Polishing Parameter Dependencies and Surface Oxidation of Chemical Mechanical Polishing of Al Thin Films,” J.

Electrochem. Soc., Vol.146, No.7, pp.2689-2696, 1999.

[31] S. R. Runnels, I. Kim, J. Schleuter, C. Karlsrud, and M. Desai, “A Modeling Tool for Chemical-Mechanical Polishing Design and Evaluation,” IEEE Trans.

Semicond. Manuf., Vol.11, No.3, pp.501-510, 2001.

[32] V. H. Nguyen, P. van der Velden, R. Daamen, H. van Kranenburg, and P. H.

Woerlee, “Modeling of Dishing for Metal Chemical Mechanical Polishing,”

IEDM Technical Digest., 10-13 Dec., pp.499-502, 2000.

[33] G. Fu and A. Chandra, “An Analytical Dishing and Step Height Reduction Model for Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP),” IEEE Trans. Semicond.

Manuf., Vol.16, No.3, pp.477-485, 2003.

[34] Q. Luo, S. Ramarajan, and S. V. Babu, “Modification of the Preston Equation for the Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Copper,” Thin Solid Films, Vol.335, pp.160-167, 1998.

[35] K. D. Young, V. I. Utkin, andU .Ozguner, “A Control Engineer’s Guide to Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Trans. Cont. Sys. Tech., Vol.7, No.3, pp.328-342, 1999.

[36] J. Y. Hung, W. Gao, and J. C. Hung, “Variable Structure Control: A Survey,”

IEEE Trans. Ind. Elec., Vol.40, No.1, pp.2-22, 1993.

[37] 陳永平、張浚林,可變結構控制設計,全華,台北,2002。

[38] Y.-C. Kao, C.-C. Yu, and S.-H. Shen, “Robust Operation of Copper Chemical Mechanical Polishing,” Microelectronic Engineering, Vol.65, pp.61-75, 2003.

[39] S. Wang, “Chemical Mechanical Polish,” course lecture in NCTU, Jan.14, 2003.

[40] Y.-P. Chen and J.-L. Chang, “A New Method for Constructing Sliding Surfaces of Linear Time-Invariant Systems,” Intern. J. Sys. Sci., Vol.31, No.4,

pp.417-420, 2000.

[41] 方政煜,”ULSI 嵌入式銅導線之無研磨粒子平坦化技術”,國立交通大學材料科

學與工程研究所碩士論文,2001。

[42] Y. Lin, “Modeling CMP for Copper Dual Damascene Interconnects,” Solid State Technology, Vol. 43, Issue 6, pp.111-121, 2000.

[43] J. M. Steigerwald, S. P. Murarka, R. J. Gutmann, D. J. Duquette, “Mechanism of Copper Removal during Chemical Mechanical Polishing,” J. Vac. Sci.

Technol. B, Vol.13, No.6, pp.2215-2218, 1995.

[44] R. J. Contolini, A. F. Bernhardt, and S. T. Mayer, “Electrochemical Planarization for Multilevel Metallization,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.141, No.9, pp.2503-2510, 1994.

[45] R. Vidal and A. C. West, “Copper Electropolishing in Concentrated Phosphoric Acid,” J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.142, No.8, pp.2682-2694, 1995.

[46] S.-C. Chang, J.-M. Shieh, C.-C. Huang, B.-T. Dai, and M.-S. Feng, “Pattern Effect on Planarization Efficiency of Cu Electropolishing,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol.41, pp.7332-7337, 2002.

[47] S.-C. Chang, J.-M. Shieh, B.-T. Dai, M.-S. Feng, Y.-H. Li, C. H. Shih , M. H.

Tsai, S. L. Shue, and R. S. Liang, “Superpolishing for Planarizing Copper Damascene Interconnects,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Vol.6, No.5, pp.G72-G74, 2003.

[48] D. Padhi, J. Yahalom, S. Gandikota, and G. Dixit, “Planarization of Copper Thin Films by Electropolishing in Phosphoric Acid for ULSI Application,” J.

Electrochem. Soc., Vol.150, No.1, pp.G10-G14, 2003.

Fig.1.1 Various forms of planarization [26]

t2

Before Planarization

t1 Smoothing

(just planarize high density portion)

Local Planarization t1

t2

t1

t2

t1

t1 Global Planarization t1

t1

Fig.1.2 etchback process

Fig.1.3 Schematic of CMP benefit [40]

Wafer Metal

Oxide

Photoresist

Etch the PR and top of oxide

(Local Planarization)

Fig.1.4 Illustration of CMP fabrication process

Fig.1.5 Framework of integrated CMP model [12]

Wafer (substrate)

Growing

Oxide layer Oxide

Patterning

Depositing Metal (Cu)

Barrier layer (Ta) Planarization

Fig.2.1.1 Schematic of CMP polisher (CMP on Rotary Tool) [40]

Fig.2.1.2 Schematic of CMP polisher (CMP on Orbital Tool) [40]

Fig.2.1.3 Schematic of CMP polisher (CMP on Linear Tool) [40]

Fig.2.2 Effects of slurry flow rate on the CMP process [40]

Fig.2.3 Pad conditioning [40]

Fig.2.4 Dishing and Erosion

60μm

30μm

0.5μm

Not Conditioned Conditioned

Fig.2.5 Planarization efficiency

Fig.2.6 Copper CMP Defects [40]

ΔUP

ΔDOWN

相關文件